Dural arteriovenous fistula formation following bilateral middle meningeal artery embolization for the treatment of a chronic subdural hematoma: a case report

Simple coiling of middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: An inverse probability of treatment weighting matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has gained much attention in recent years. However, unintended embolization may occur when employing liquid embolic agents or particles. We present our clinical experience in simple coiling of MMAE to manage CSDH.

METHODS

Patients underwent either surgical evacuation or MMAE with simple coiling for CSDH were reviewed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed at admission, 1-month, and 6-month intervals. Two treatment groups were matched with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients were included, with 27 patients in MMAE group and 87 patients in surgery group. In MMAE group, significant reductions were observed in hematoma width (admission vs. 1-month, 2.04 [1.44-2.60] cm vs. 0.62 [0.37-0.95] cm, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of surgical rescue rate (0.77 95%CI 0.13-4.47, p = 0.77), hematoma reduction (>50%) (0.21 95%CI 0.04-1.07, p = 0.06), and midline shift improvement rate (3.22, 95%CI 0.84-12.4, p = 0.09) had no substantial disparities between two groups at 1-month follow-up. In addition, no significant difference was noted between two groups in terms of hematoma reduction (>50%) at 6-month follow-up (aOR 1.09 95%CI 0.32-3.70, p = 0.89). No procedure-related complications were found in MMA embolization group.

CONCLUSION

Simple coiling for MMA had comparable outcomes with surgical evacuation for CSDH. Our findings suggest that simple coiling can be an alternative choice for liquid agents or particles in MMA embolization for CSDH with acceptable safety.

A systematic review of middle meningeal artery embolization for minimally symptomatic chronic subdural haematomas that do not require immediate evacuation

Introduction

Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (EMMA) is an emerging treatment option for patients with Chronic Subdural Haematoma (CSDH).

Questions

(1) Can EMMA change the natural history of untreated minimally symptomatic CSDH which do not require immediate evacuation? (2) What is the role of EMMA in the prevention of recurrence following surgical treatment? (3) Can the procedure be performed under local anaesthetic?

Material and methods

Systematic literature review. No randomised clinical trials available on EMMA for meta-analysis.

Results

Six unique large cohorts with more than 50 embolisations were identified (evidence: 3b-4). EMMA can control the progression of surgically naïve CSDH in 91.1-100% of the patients, in which haematoma expansion is halted, or the lesion decreases and resolves. Treatment failure requiring surgery occurs in 0-4.1% of the patients having EMMA as the primary and only treatment. Treatment failure requiring surgery goes up slightly to 6.8% if post-surgical patients are included. When EMMA is used as postsurgical adjunctive the risk of recurrence is 1.4-8.9% compared to 10-20% in surgical series. EMMA has minimal morbidity and it is feasible under local anaesthesia or slight sedation in the majority of cases.

Conclusion

There is cumulative low-quality evidence in the literature that EMMA may be able to modify the natural course of the disease. It appears effective in controlling progression of CSDHs in patients having it as a primary standing alone treatment and it reduces the risk of recurrence and the need for surgical intervention in refractory postsurgical cases or as a postsurgical adjunctive treatment with minimal morbidity (recommendation: C).

Long-Term Middle Meningeal Artery Caliber Reduction Following Trisacryl Gelatine Microsphere Embolization for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

PURPOSE

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) particle embolization is a promising treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH). The main purpose of this study is to measure MMA proximal caliber and assess the visibility of the two main MMA branches as a surrogate for long-term distal arterial patency following MMA CSDH embolization with trisacryl gelatine microspheres (TAGM).

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study. All patients having undergone MMA TAGM only embolization for CSDH treatment between 15 March 2018 and 6 June 2020 with an interpretable follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination and no confounding factors were included. Patients were compared with controls matched for age, sex and MRI machine. Two independent readers analyzed the MRI images.

RESULTS

In this study, 30 patients having undergone embolization procedures using TAGM of 36 MMAs were included. The follow-up MRI scans were performed after a mean delay of 14.8 ± 7.1 months (range 4.9-29.4 months). The mean diameter of TAGM embolized MMAs (1 mm; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.9-1.1) was significantly smaller than the mean diameter of paired control MMAs (1.3 mm; 95% CI 1.3-1.4) (p < 0.001). The mean proximal diameter of the embolized MMAs (0.9 mm; 95% CI 0.7-1.1) was significantly smaller than the mean diameter of the contralateral MMAs in the same patients (1.4 mm; 95% CI 1.3-1.6)(p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up MRI demonstrated a significant impact of TAGM embolization on MMA proximal caliber as well as on the visibility of the two main MMA branches. All comparisons indicated that there was a probable lasting impact of embolization on the patency of distal branches.

Middle meningeal artery embolisation: The review of a new treatment for chronic subdural hematomas

Background

This is a literature review aiming to provide an update about the recent findings related to the efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs), comparison with conventional therapy and deduction of the current recommendations and indications.

Methods

The literature is reviewed using a search through the PubMed index using keywords. Studies are then screened, skimmed, and thoroughly read. 32 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and are included in the study.

Results

Five indications for the application of MMA embolization (MMAE) are deducted from the literature. The usage as a preventive measure after surgical treatment of symptomatic cSDHs in patients with a high risk of recurrence and the usage as a standalone procedure has been the most common reasons for indication of this procedure. Rates of failures for the aforementioned indications have been 6.8% and 3.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

The safety of MMAE as a procedure is regarded as a general theme in the literature and can be considered for future applications. Usage of this procedure in clinical trials with more patient segregation and timeframe assessment relative to surgical intervention are recommendations of this literature review.

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematomas. A systematic review of the literature focused on indications, technical aspects, and future possible perspectives

Background:

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases that affect elderly and fragile patients and as a consequence, management can be challenging. Surgery represents the standard treatment; however, alternative options are under investigation. Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is considered a minimally invasive treatment although with poor evidence. In this review, we tried to summarize the findings about MMA embolization as a treatment for a CSDH to provide a useful guidance for clinical practice and for future speculative aspects.

Methods:

Literature review on PubMed until March 2021 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. We conducted a research on PubMed with a various combinations of the keywords “CSDH” and “middle meningeal artery” and “embolization,” “refractory subdural hematoma,” and then we reviewed the references of the relevant studies as additional source of eligible articles.

Results:

Among the 35 studies eligible for this review, 22 were case series, 11 were case reports, one was a technical note, and 1 was a randomized trial. A total of 746 patients were found in the literature. Failure rate of MMA embolization was between 3.9 and 8.9% of the cases according the indication to treat CSDH (upfront vs. after surgery).

Conclusion:

The global impression deriving from the data available and the literature is that MMA embolization is a safe procedure with very low complications and with a low failure rate, both when associated with surgery or in case of a standalone treatment.