Pre-injury antithrombotic agents predict intracranial hemorrhagic progression, but not worse clinical outcome in severe traumatic brain injury

Effect of prior anticoagulation therapy on outcomes of traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Anticoagulants are commonly prescribed for multiple conditions. However, their influence on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes, especially mortality, is not clear. The present study aimed to explore the effect of prior anticoagulation treatment on the outcomes of TBI. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and CINAHL databases were systematically searched for studies on individuals diagnosed with TBI, with a subgroup on prior anticoagulation therapy. Outcomes of interest included overall mortality, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, need for neurosurgical intervention and discharge rate. Cohort and case-control studies, published up to September 2023, were examined. Analysis was performed using STATA version 14.2 software and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for bias assessment. A total of 22 studies (102,036 participants) were included in the analysis. Patients with TBI with prior anticoagulation treatment showed a statistically higher overall mortality risk [odds ratio (OR): 1.967, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.481-2.613]. Subgroup analyses revealed age-specific and TBI severity-specific variations. Prior anticoagulation treatment was associated with a 1.860-times higher rate of in-hospital mortality and a significantly increased likelihood of requiring neurosurgical intervention (OR: 1.351, 95%CI: 1.068-1.708). However, no significant difference was noted in lengths of hospital or ICU stays. Patients with TBI and prior anticoagulation therapy are at higher risk of overall and in-hospital mortality and have significantly higher likelihood of needing neurosurgical interventions. The results emphasized the need for tailored therapeutic approach and more comprehensive clinical guidelines. Future investigations on specific anticoagulant types and immediate post-TBI interventions could offer further insights.

Higher risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy compared to oral anticoagulation-a single-center experience

PURPOSE

Traumatic brain injury is the main reason for the emergency department visit of up to 3% of the patients and a major worldwide cause for morbidity and mortality. Current emergency management guidelines recommend close attention to patients taking oral anticoagulation but not patients on antiplatelet therapy. Recent studies have begun to challenge this. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation on traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

METHODS

Medical records of adult patients triaged with "head injury" as the main reason for emergency care were retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, and January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Patients ≥ 18 years with head trauma were included. Odds ratio was calculated, and multiple logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 4850 patients with a median age of 70 years were included. Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was found in 6.2% of the patients. The risk ratio for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet therapy was 2.25 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.73-2.94) and 1.38 (p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.84) in patients on oral anticoagulation compared to patients without mediations that affect coagulation. In binary multiple regression, antiplatelet therapy was associated with intracranial hemorrhage, but oral anticoagulation was not.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that antiplatelet therapy is associated with a higher risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to oral anticoagulation. Antiplatelet therapy should be given equal or greater consideration in the guidelines compared to anticoagulation therapy. Further studies on antiplatelet subtypes within the context of head trauma are recommended to improve the guidelines' diagnostic accuracy.

Intracranial lesion features in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: relation to neurointensive care variables and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to determine the association of intracranial hemorrhage lesion type, size, mass effect, and evolution with the clinical course during neurointensive care and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

In this observational, retrospective study, 385 TBI patients treated at the neurointensive care unit at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, were included. The lesion type, size, mass effect, and evolution (progression on the follow-up CT) were assessed and analyzed in relation to the percentage of secondary insults with intracranial pressure > 20 mmHg, cerebral perfusion pressure < 60 mmHg, and cerebral pressure autoregulatory status (PRx) and in relation to Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.

RESULTS

A larger epidural hematoma (p < 0.05) and acute subdural hematoma (p < 0.001) volume, greater midline shift (p < 0.001), and compressed basal cisterns (p < 0.001) correlated with craniotomy surgery. In multiple regressions, presence of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (p < 0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage progression on the follow-up CT (p < 0.01) were associated with more intracranial pressure-insults above 20 mmHg. In similar regressions, obliterated basal cisterns (p < 0.001) were independently associated with higher PRx. In a multiple regression, greater acute subdural hematoma (p < 0.05) and contusion (p < 0.05) volume, presence of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (p < 0.01), and obliterated basal cisterns (p < 0.01) were independently associated with a lower rate of favorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The intracranial lesion type, size, mass effect, and evolution were associated with the clinical course, cerebral pathophysiology, and outcome following TBI. Future efforts should integrate such granular data into more sophisticated machine learning models to aid the clinician to better anticipate emerging secondary insults and to predict clinical outcome.

Systematic review on traumatic intracranial haemorrhage in patients on anti-thrombotic medications; haemorrhage progression, thrombosis, and anti-thrombotic recommencement

A large number of patients who sustain a traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (tICH) are taking anti-thrombotic (AT) medications at the time of injury. These are stopped acutely, but there is uncertainty about safe timing for recommencement. This review aimed to understand the rate of new/progressive haemorrhage, thrombosis, and death in tICH patients on ATs and the rate and timing of AT recommencement. A systematic review of OVID Medline and EMBASE from 2000 to 2021 including adult patients with tICH on ATs with reported outcomes was performed. A total of 59 observational studies (20,421 patients) were included. Most patients were elderly (mean age 74), suffering falls (78%), and had a mild head injury. The mean new/progressive haemorrhage rate during admission was 26%, mostly diagnosed on routine imaging performed within 72 h of injury, with only 8% clinically significant. Thrombotic events were reported in 17 studies; mean rate of 3% during admission, 4-9% at 30 days and 3-11% at 6 months. AT recommencement rate and timing were only reported in six studies and varied widely, with some studies demonstrating reduced thrombotic events and mortality with earlier AT recommencement. Current data is observational and sparse in relation to haemorrhage, thrombosis, and AT recommencement. There is some suggestion that early recommencement, within 7-14 days, may be beneficial but higher quality studies with more consistent data are urgently required.

Antithrombotic agent usage before ictus in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: relation to hemorrhage severity, clinical course, and outcome

BACKGROUND

The number of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who are on antithrombotic agents before ictus is rising. However, their effect on early brain injury and disease development remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine if antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) were associated with a worse initial hemorrhage severity, rebleeding rate, clinical course, and functional recovery after aSAH.

METHODS

In this observational study, those 888 patients with aSAH, treated at the neurosurgical department, Uppsala University Hospital, between 2008 and 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, radiological (Fisher and Hijdra score), and outcome (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale one year post-ictus) variables were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 888 aSAH patients, 14% were treated with antithrombotic agents before ictus. Seventy-five percent of these were on single therapy of antiplatelets, 23% on single therapy of anticoagulants, and 3% on a combination of antithrombotic agents. Those with antithrombotic agents pre-ictus were significantly older and exhibited more co-morbidities and a worse coagulation status according to lab tests. Antithrombotic agents, both as one group and as subtypes (antiplatelets and anticoagulants), were not associated with hemorrhage severity (Hijdra score/Fisher) nor rebleeding rate. The clinical course did not differ in terms of delayed ischemic neurological deficits or last-tier treatment with thiopental and decompressive craniectomy. These patients experienced a higher mortality and lower rate of favorable outcome in univariate analyses, but this did not hold true in multiple logistic regression analyses after adjustment for age and co-morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for age and co-morbidities, antithrombotic agents before aSAH ictus were not associated with worse hemorrhage severity, rebleeding rate, clinical course, or long-term functional recovery.

Does pre-injury clopidogrel use increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage post head injury in adult patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several current guidelines do not include antiplatelet use as an explicit indication for CT scan of the head following head injury. The impact of individual antiplatelet agent use on rates of intracranial haemorrhage is unclear. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess if clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (tICH) on CT of the head within 24 hours of presentation following head trauma compared with no antithrombotic controls.

METHODS

Eligible studies were non-randomised studies with participants aged ≥18 years old with head injury. Studies had to have conducted CT of the head within 24 hours of presentation and contain a no antithrombotic control group and a clopidogrel monotherapy group.Eight databases were searched from inception to December 2020. Assessment of identified studies against inclusion criteria and data extraction were carried out independently and in duplicate by two authors.Quality assessment and risk of bias (ROB) were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and reported as an OR and 95% CI.

RESULTS

Seven studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 21 898 participants that were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Five studies were retrospective. Clopidogrel monotherapy was not significantly associated with an increase in risk of tICH compared with no antithrombotic controls (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.75). Heterogeneity was high with an I² of 75%. Sensitivity analysis produced an I² of 21% and did not show a significant association between clopidogrel monotherapy and risk of tICH (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.55). All studies scored for moderate to serious ROB on categories in the ROBINS-I tool.

CONCLUSION

Included studies were vulnerable to confounding and several were small-scale studies. The results should be interpreted with caution given the ROB identified. This study does not provide statistically significant evidence that clopidogrel monotherapy patients are at increased risk of tICH after head injury compared with no antithrombotic controls.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020223541.

The Impact of Preinjury Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Use on Elderly Patients with Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Following Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND

Although it is often assumed that preinjury anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) use is associated with poorer outcomes among those with acute subdural hematoma (aSDH), previous studies have had varied results. This study examines the impact of preinjury AC and AP therapy on aSDH thickness, 30-day mortality, and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months in elderly patients (aged ≥65).

METHODS

A level 1 trauma center registry was interrogated to identify consecutive elderly patients who presented with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and associated traumatic aSDH between the first of January 2013 and the first of January 2018. Relevant demographic, clinical, and radiological data were retrieved from institutional medical records. The 3 primary outcome measures were aSDH thickness on initial computed tomography scan, 30-day mortality, and unfavorable outcome at 6 months (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two elderly patients were admitted with moderate or severe TBI and traumatic aSDH. The mean (±SD) age was 78.39 (±7.87) years, and a majority of patients (59.8%, n = 79) were male. There was a statistically significant difference in mean aSDH thickness, but there were no significant differences in 30-day mortality (P = 0.732) and unfavorable outcome between the AP, AC, combined AP and AC, and no antithrombotic exposure groups (P = 0.342).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these observations, but our findings do not support the preconceived notion in clinical practice that antithrombotic use is associated with poor outcomes in elderly patients with moderate or severe TBI.

Pre-Injury Antiplatelet Therapy and Risk of Adverse Outcomes after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There is an increasing number of trauma patients presenting on pre-injury antiplatelet (AP) agents attributable to an aging population and expanding cardio- or cerebrovascular indications for antithrombotic therapy. The effects of different AP regimens on outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) have yet to be elucidated, despite the implications on patient/family counseling and the potential need for better reversal strategies. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of different pre-injury AP regimens on outcomes after TBI. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the OVID Medline, Embase, BIOSIS, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to February 2022 using a combination of terms pertaining to TBI and use of AP agents. Baseline demographics and study characteristics as well as outcome data pertaining to intracerebral hematoma (ICH) progression, need for neurosurgical intervention, hospital length of stay, mortality, and functional outcome were extracted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences comparing groups were calculated using random-effects models. Thirteen observational studies, totaling 1244 patients receiving single AP therapy with acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel, 413 patients on dual AP therapy, and 3027 non-AP users were included. No randomized controlled trials were identified. There were significant associations between dual AP use and ICH progression (OR, 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–6.61; I², 85%; p = 0.02) and need for neurosurgical intervention post-TBI (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15–2.28; I², 15%; p = 0.006) compared to non-users, but not between single AP therapy and non-users. There were no associations between AP use and hospital length of stay or mortality after trauma. Pre-injury dual AP use, but not single AP use, is associated with higher rates of ICH progression and neurosurgical intervention post-TBI. However, the overall quality of studies was low, and this association should be further investigated in larger studies.

The Impact of Preinjury Use of Antiplatelet Drugs on Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

The study aimed to compare outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients on pre-injury antiplatelet drugs vs. those, not on any antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to 15th May 2021. All cohort studies comparing outcomes of TBI between antiplatelet users vs. non-users were included.

Results

Twenty studies were included. On comparison of data of 2,447 patients on pre-injury antiplatelet drugs with 4,814 controls, our analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in early mortality between the two groups (OR: 1.30 95% CI: 0.85, 1.98 I² = 80% p = 0.23). Meta-analysis of adjusted data also revealed no statistically significant difference in early mortality between antiplatelet users vs. controls (OR: 1.24 95% CI: 0.93, 1.65 I² = 41% p = 0.14). Results were similar for subgroup analysis of aspirin users and clopidogrel users. Data on functional outcomes was scarce and only descriptive analysis could be carried out. For the need for surgical intervention, pooled analysis did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between the two groups (OR: 1.11 95% CI: 0.83, 1.48 I² = 55% p = 0.50). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was also not found to be significantly different between antiplatelet users vs. non-users (MD: −1.00 95% CI: −2.17, 0.17 I² = 97% p = 0.09).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that patients on pre-injury antiplatelet drugs do not have worse early mortality rates as compared to patients, not on any antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. The use of antiplatelets is not associated with an increased need for neurosurgical intervention and prolonged LOS.

Pre-injury chronic alcohol abuse predicts intracranial hemorrhagic progression, unfavorable clinical outcome, and mortality in severe traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the incidence of pre-injury alcohol abuse in TBI at our neurointensive care unit (NICU), the relation to intracranial hemorrhage evolution, and clinical outcome.

METHODS

Patients with TBI treated at our NICU at Uppsala university hospital, Sweden, 2008-2018, were included. Clinical, radiological, and outcome variables were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 844 patients with TBI, 147 (17%) had a history of pre-injury alcohol abuse and these patients were slightly older, but had a similar Charlson co-morbidity index as the other patients. They were more often injured by falls and more frequently developed acute subdural hematomas and cerebral contusions. Their platelets were lower and their IVY bleeding time slightly longer. Patients with pre-injury alcohol abuse more often exhibited an intracranial hemorrhage progression on the second computed tomography. Pre-injury alcohol abuse was an independent predictor of increased mortality (odds ratio = 2.96, p-value = 0.001) and decreased favorable outcome (odds ratio = 0.46, p-value = 0.001) in multiple regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-injury alcohol abuse was common in severe TBI, associated with coagulopathy, worse intracranial hemorrhage/injury evolution, and independently predicted poor clinical outcome. These patients deserve more attention in care and research to address specific challenges including disturbed hemostasis.