Advantages of 3-dimensional exoscope-assisted anterior cervical spine surgery: A meta-analysis

Exoscope Use in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications, Benefits, and Limitations

BACKGROUND

Exoscopes were recently developed as an alternative to the operative microscope (OM) and endoscope for intraoperative visualization during neurosurgery. Prior reviews studying mixed cranial and spinal surgical cohorts reported advantages with exoscope use, including improved ergonomics and teaching. In recent years, there has been an increase in exoscope research, with no updated systematic review focused exclusively on the benefits and limitations of exoscope use in spine surgery. Thus, we sought to systematically synthesize the literature related to exoscope-assisted spine surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies reported between 2010 and September 2023. Data, such as the exoscope model used, procedure types performed, and user observations, were then collected.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 481 patients with spine pathologies who underwent a surgical procedure using 1 of 9 exoscope models. The lumbar region was the most frequently operated area (n = 234; 48.6%), and discectomies comprised the most overall procedures (n = 273; 56.8%). All patients benefited clinically. The reported advantages of exoscopes compared with OMs or endoscopes were improved focal distance, surgeon posture, trainee education, compactness, and assistant participation. Other aspects such as stereopsis, illumination, and cost had various observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Exoscopes have advantages compared with OMs or endoscopes during spine surgery. The user learning curve is minimal, and no negative patient outcomes have been reported. However, some aspects of exoscope use necessitate longer term prospective research before exoscopes can be considered a standard tool in the armamentarium of intraoperative visualization strategies.

Exoscope Efficacy and Feasibility in Pediatric Spinal Neurosurgery: A Single-Institution Cohort Case Series

BACKGROUND

The exoscope has emerged as an efficacious microscope in adult spinal neurosurgery providing improved operative field visibility and surgeon ergonomics. However, outcome data and feasibility are underrepresented in the pediatric literature. We present the largest case series aimed at assessing operative and clinical outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing various exoscope-assisted spinal surgeries.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all consecutive pediatric (age <18 years) spinal surgeries performed with the use of an exoscope by 3 senior surgeons at a single institution from 2020-2023. Demographics and clinical and operative outcomes were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six exoscope-assisted pediatric spine surgeries were performed on 89 unique patients, 41 (42.7%) of which were male. The mean age at surgery was 12 (±5.3) years. Spinal cord detethering (55.8%) was the most common procedure performed. The overall mean operative time for all procedures was 155 (±86) minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 18 (±41) mL. The mean length of stay was 5.4 (±6.5) days. There were 14 (14.6%) patients with complications in this cohort. At final follow-up, 64 (83.1%) of symptomatic patients reported neurologic symptom improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the exoscope in a variety of pediatric spinal surgeries resulted in an acceptable average operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and rate of neurologic symptom improvement. The exoscope appears to be an efficacious option for pediatric neurosurgical spinal procedures.

The New Era of Spinal Surgery: Exploring the Use of Exoscopes as a Viable Alternative to Operative Microscopes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The growing interest in exoscopic (EX) technology has prompted a comprehensive evaluation of its clinical, functional, and financial outcomes in neurosurgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the utilization of EX in spine surgery and assess their safety, efficacy, and impact on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study focused on articles concerning the application of EXs in spinal surgical procedures. The inclusion criteria encompassed various study designs presenting clinical data and intraoperative experiences related to EX utilization in spine surgery.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included studies examining various aspects of EX utilization, such as intraoperative complications, video/image quality, surgical field visualization, ease of manipulation, ergonomic characteristics, educational utility, surgical duration, and team involvement. Findings indicated that EXs offered superior video quality and favorable ergonomic features. Comparable outcomes were observed in surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, time to discharge, and postoperative pain levels between EX and conventional microscope approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into the utilization of EXs in spine surgery, demonstrating their potential advantages and comparable outcomes with conventional microscopes.