Prevalence of neutralising antibodies in patients treated with botulinum toxin type A for spasticity

Intrasphincteric Botox injections in Hirschsprung's disease: indications and outcome in 64 procedures over a ten-year period

BACKGROUND

Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin (Botox) injection for symptomatic postoperative anal achalasia in Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) has found wide application in the last twenty years. The aim of this study was to describe effectiveness and functional outcome of a series of patients treated over a 10-year period.

METHODS

All consecutive HSCR patients who received intrasphincteric Botox injections between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Demographic data and clinical features were collected. A detailed questionnaire focusing on outcome in the medium and long-term was administered to all families.

RESULTS

In the study period 64 intrasphincteric Botox injections were performed in 31 patients. Completed questionnaires were returned by 27 out of 28 eligible patients (96%) reporting improvement or symptoms resolution in 16 (59%). The highest success rates were experienced by patients younger than 4, with long HSCR forms and with recurrent enterocolitis (75%, 100% and 100% of success rates, respectively). No major complications occurred. Minor complications were described by 7 patients (26%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrasphincteric Botox injection proved to be feasible, safe and reasonably effective in children with HSCR and postoperative anal achalasia. Infants and toddlers with long HSCR forms and recurrent bouts of enterocolitis are those who would benefit most from this treatment.

Functional Deimmunization of Botulinum Neurotoxin Protease Domain via Computationally Driven Library Design and Ultrahigh-Throughput Screening

Botulinum neurotoxin serotype A (BoNT/A) is a widely used cosmetic agent that also has diverse therapeutic applications; however, adverse antidrug immune responses and associated loss of efficacy have been reported in clinical uses. Here, we describe computational design and ultrahigh-throughput screening of a massive BoNT/A light-chain (BoNT/A-LC) library optimized for reduced T cell epitope content and thereby dampened immunogenicity. We developed a functional assay based on bacterial co-expression of BoNT/A-LC library members with a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) sensor for BoNT/A-LC enzymatic activity, and we employed high-speed fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to identify numerous computationally designed variants having wild-type-like enzyme kinetics. Many of these variants exhibited decreased immunogenicity in humanized HLA transgenic mice and manifested in vivo paralytic activity when incorporated into full-length toxin. One variant achieved near-wild-type paralytic potency and a 300% reduction in antidrug antibody response in vivo. Thus, we have achieved a striking level of BoNT/A-LC functional deimmunization by combining computational library design and ultrahigh-throughput screening. This strategy holds promise for deimmunizing other biologics with complex superstructures and mechanisms of action.

The Immunology of Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Brief Summary

Like all proteins foreign to the human body, also botulinum toxin (BT) is antigenic and may stimulate an immune response with formulation of antibodies (BT-AB). Affected patients may no longer respond to BT therapy and various degrees of BT-AB related therapy failure (ABF) may result. We want to review the immunological interactions between BT and BT-AB, the prevalence, the time course and the risk factors for BT-AB formation as they are related to the treatment algorithms, the patient's immune system and to exogenic factors. Special emphasis is placed on various features of the BT drugs including the specific biological activity (SBA) as a predictor of their antigenicity. Quantitative detection of BT-AB by the mouse diaphragm assay will be demonstrated. As ABF may have serious consequences for patients affected, careful risk factor analysis is warranted to reduce them wherever possible.

IncobotulinumtoxinA for Post-stroke Upper Limb Spasticity in Neutralizing Antibody-positive Patients after Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Report of Two Cases

Background:

Botulinum toxin type A is an effective treatment widely used to address post-stroke spasticity. Long-term repeated treatment with botulinum toxin type A may result in reduced efficacy due to the induction of neutralizing antibodies. Based on data from a phase 3 study of incobotulinumtoxinA for post-stroke upper limb spasticity, we describe the therapeutic response to botulinum toxin type A treatment in two neutralizing antibody-positive patients previously treated with other preparations of botulinum toxin type A.

Case:

Two patients (a 65-year-old woman and a 36-year-old woman) with post-stroke upper limb spasticity were previously treated with onabotulinumtoxinA, and neutralizing antibodies were detected in their sera at baseline using the mouse hemidiaphragm assay. After onabotulinumtoxinA had been discontinued for at least 16 weeks, incobotulinumtoxinA (400 U) was administered in three or four injection cycles. Good therapeutic responses, manifested by a reduction of 1–2 points on the modified Ashworth scale, were noted after each injection. The patients’ sera remained positive for neutralizing antibodies throughout the incobotulinumtoxinA treatment period.

Discussion:

These patients, who were previously treated with onabotulinumtoxinA and were neutralizing antibody positive throughout the clinical study period, showed stable therapeutic responses following incobotulinumtoxinA treatment. IncobotulinumtoxinA could be initiated for patients with neutralizing antibodies induced by onabotulinumtoxinA.

Immunogenicity to Botulinum Toxin Type A: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis Across Therapeutic Indications

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is commonly employed as a neuromodulator in several neurological diseases and aesthetic indications. Formation of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) after BTX-A injections may be responsible for treatment failure.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to quantify the prevalence of NAbs following treatment with Abobotulinumtoxin A, Incobotulinumtoxin A, and Onabotulinumtoxin A for therapeutic indications.

METHODS

An electronic systematic search (2000-2020) of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted. Original studies reporting prevalence of NAbs were included. Data analysis was carried out through open meta-analysis softwares.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies involving 8833 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of NAbs was 1.8% (summary estimate = 0.018, 95% CI [0.012, 0.023]); a meta-regression analysis revealed that BTX-A duration was significantly associated with increased incidence of NAbs (P = 0.007). Patients with dystonia had the highest incidence (7.4%) of NAbs against BTX-A (summary estimate = 0.074, 95% CI = [0.045, 0.103], I2 = 93.%, P < 0.00) followed by patients with spasticity (6.7%) and urological indications (6.2%). Abobotulinumtoxin A was associated with the highest incidence of NAbs (7.4%) (summary estimate = 0.074, 95% CI = [0.053, 0.096], I2 = 97.24%, P < 0.00) by the Incobotulinumtoxin A and Onabotulinumtoxin A 0.3% (summary estimate <0.003%, 95% CI = [-0.001, 0.007], P < 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall incidence of NAbs following BTX-A injections is relatively low, patients with secondary nonresponse to BTX-A with no apparent causes should be investigated for NAbs. A consensus needs to be developed for the optimal management of such patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Immunogenicity of Botulinum Toxin Formulations: Potential Therapeutic Implications

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are proteins produced by bacteria of the Clostridium family. Upon oral ingestion, BoNT causes the neuroparalytic syndrome botulism. There are seven serotypes of BoNT (serotypes A-G); BoNT-A and BoNT-B are the botulinum toxin serotypes utilized for therapeutic applications. Treatment with BoNT injections is used to manage chronic medical conditions across multiple indications. As with other biologic drugs, immunogenicity after long-term treatment with BoNT formulations may occur, and repeated use can elicit antibody formation leading to clinical nonresponsiveness. Thus, approaching BoNT treatment of chronic conditions with therapeutic formulations that minimize stimulating the host immune response while balancing patient responsiveness to therapy is ideal. Immunogenicity is a clinical limitation in many settings that use biologic drugs for treatment, and clinically relevant immunogenicity reduction has been achieved through engineering smaller protein constructs and reducing unnecessary formulation components. A similar approach has influenced the evolution of BoNT formulations. Three BoNT-A products and one BoNT-B product have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for therapeutic use: onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, incobotulinumtoxinA, and rimabotulinumtoxinB; a fourth BoNT-A product, daxibotulinumtoxinA, is currently under regulatory review. Additionally, prabotulinumtoxinA is a BoNT-A product that has been approved for aesthetic indications but not therapeutic use. Here, we discuss the preclinical and clinical immunogenicity data that exist within the scientific literature and provide a perspective for considering immunogenicity as a key factor in choice of BoNT formulation.

Antibody-induced botulinum toxin treatment failure: A review and novel management approach

BACKGROUND

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) has been used for cosmetic indications for many decades. Consumption of BoNT/A usage has been markedly increased for a few years. Even new formulations of BoNT/A to decrease immunogenicity have been released, repeated treatment to maintain efficacy outcome is inevitable and could finally provoke immune response. In the past, prevalence of botulinum treatment failure (BTF) in cosmetic indication was rare leading to less medical concern. Current decade, case reports on BTF, especially antibody-induced botulinum toxin treatment failure (ABTF), have been increasingly revealed and risk factors associated with ABTF have been intensively studied.

AIMS

In this article, we will review antibody-induced botulinum toxin treatment failure (ABTF), risk-associated ABTF, prevalence and recent case reports of ABTF, and new approach to deal with ABTF.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted using PubMed. The relevant literatures published between January 2000 and May 2020 concerning BTF and ABTF including investigation for ABTF were included and analyzed.

RESULTS

Possible causes of BTF were summarized. ABTF could be a tip of iceberg of BTF, its prevalence, and currently, 10-year case reports of ABTF were published evidence. Risk factors and investigation methods for ABTF were also summarized. Based on previous studies and our experience, novel approach to management of ABTF was described.

CONCLUSION

Effective management of BTF is to explore causes of treatment failure. Antibodies against BoNT/A complex could be one of many possibilities. Laboratory in vitro tests could be alternative tools to decrease adverse effect and rebooting immune responses in BTF patients.

Frequency and risk factors of antibody-induced secondary failure of botulinum neurotoxin therapy

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of neutralizing antibody (NAB)–induced complete secondary treatment failure (cSTF) during long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment in various neurologic indications.

Methods

This monocenter retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of 471 patients started on BoNT therapy between 1995 and 2015. Blood samples of 173 patients were investigated for NABs using the mouse hemidiaphragm test (93 with suspected therapy failure, 80 prospective study participants). The frequency of NAB-cSTF was assessed for various indications: hemifacial spasm, blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, other dystonia, and spasticity. A priori defined potential risk factors for NAB-cSTF were evaluated, and a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors.

Results

Treatment duration was 9.8 ± 6.2 years (range, 0.5–30 years; adherence, 70.6%) and number of treatment cycles 31.2 ± 22.5 (3–112). Twenty-eight of 471 patients (5.9%) had NAB-cSTF at earliest after 3 and at latest after 103 treatment cycles. None of the 49 patients treated exclusively with incobotulinumtoxinA over 8.4 ± 4.2 (1–14) years developed NAB-cSTF. Independent risk factors for NAB-cSTF were high BoNT dose per treatment, switching between onabotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT formulations (except for switching to incobotulinumtoxinA), and treatment of neck muscles.

Conclusions

We present a follow-up study with the longest duration to date on the incidence of NAB-cSTF in patients treated with various BoNT formulations, including incobotulinumtoxinA. Whereas the overall risk of NAB-cSTF is low across indications and BoNT formulations, our findings underpin the recommendations to use the lowest possible dose particularly in cervical dystonia, and to avoid unnecessary switching between different formulations.

Neurotoxin Impurities: A Review of Threats to Efficacy

Recently launched esthetic botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT/A) products include Nabota/Jeuveau, Meditoxin/Neuronox, and Botulax, which contain nontoxic accessory proteins and excipients. Clinical evidence supporting these formulations, including their purity and potential immunogenicity or their link to treatment failures, is limited. Any nonhuman protein, including nontoxin accessory proteins, can initiate immune reactions, especially if administered repeatedly, yet the issue of BoNT/A-induced immunogenicity is widely contested. However, there have been multiple reports of treatment failures and observations of BoNT/A-induced neutralizing antibodies. Compared with the purified formulation in Xeomin, these recently launched toxins contain higher total neurotoxin quantities, much of which is inactive and exposes patients to potentially immunogenic nontoxin proteins or inactive neurotoxins that increase their risk of developing treatment failure. Well-established products [especially abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and Xeomin] are accompanied by comprehensive and long-ranging clinical evidence on safety and efficacy in esthetic facial indications, which still remains undisclosed for many of the recently introduced toxins. Clinicians need this information as patients will require repeated BoNT treatments and may be unnecessarily but cumulatively exposed to potential immunogens. To underscore the need for caution and further evidence, we review some of the issues surrounding BoNT/A-induced immunogenicity and antibody-induced treatment failures and argue that using highly purified toxins that do not negatively impact patient outcomes is a prudent clinical decision.

Botulinum toxin: Pharmacology and injectable administration for the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatological condition defined by excessive sweating beyond thermoregulatory needs with significant effects on patients' quality of life. Hyperhidrosis is categorized as primary or secondary: primary hyperhidrosis is mostly focal and idiopathic, whereas secondary hyperhidrosis is commonly generalized and caused by an underlying medical condition or use of medications. Various surgical and nonsurgical therapies exist for primary hyperhidrosis. Although botulinum toxin is one of the deadliest toxins known, when used in small doses, it is one of the most effective therapies for primary hyperhidrosis. Botulinum toxin injections are widely used as a second-line primary hyperhidrosis treatment option once topical treatment strategies have failed. This article provides an overview of the commercially available botulinum toxin formulations and their applications in the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis.

Immunogenicity induced by botulinum toxin injections for limb spasticity: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The imputability of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) in secondary non-response (SnR) to botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections for limb spasticity is still debated.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic literature review aimed to determine the prevalence of NABs after BoNT injections for limb spasticity and analyze their determinants and their causal role in SnR.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases for articles published during 1990-2018. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of studies with a specific scale (according to PRISMA and STROBE guidelines). Because the techniques used to detect NABs did not influence the results, we calculated the global (all studies) sensitivity and specificity of NAB positivity to reveal SnR.

RESULTS

We included 14 articles published from 2002 to 2018 (including an epublication) describing 5 randomized controlled trials and 5 interventional and 4 observational studies. The quality was satisfactory (mean score 18/28 arbitrary units). NAB detection was the primary criterion in 5 studies and a secondary criterion in 9. In total, 1234 serum samples for 1234 participants (91% with stroke) were tested after injection. NAB prevalence was about 1%, with no significant difference among formulations. NAB positivity seemed favoured by long-duration therapy with high doses and a short interval between injections. The identification of non-response by NAB positivity had poor global sensitivity (56%) but very high specificity (99.6%). No consensual criteria were used to diagnose non-response to BoNT injection.

CONCLUSIONS

NAB prevalence is much lower after BoNT treatment for limb spasticity than cervical dystonia. Consensual criteria must be defined to diagnose non-response to BoNT injection. Because immunogenicity is not the most common cause of non-response to BoNT injection, NABs should be sought in individuals with SnR with no other cause explaining the treatment inefficacy. A test with 100% specificity is recommended. In cases for which immunogenicity is the most likely cause of non-response to BoNT injections, some biological arguments suggest trying another BoNT, but no clinical evidence supports this strategy.

High prevalence of neutralizing antibodies after long-term botulinum neurotoxin therapy

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) during long-term BoNT/A treatment in different neurologic indications.

Methods

In this monocentric, observational cross-sectional study, 596 outpatients treated with BoNT/A for different indications were tested for BoNT/A binding antibodies by ELISA. Positive samples were investigated for NAbs with the mouse hemidiaphragm test. The prevalence of NAbs was analyzed for different indications: facial hemispasm, blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, other dystonia, and spasticity. Besides the rate of NAb-positive patients overall and per patient subgroup, a Kaplan-Meier analysis of the probability of remaining NAb negative with duration of treatment is provided, and a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis is performed to identify factors significantly contributing to the induction of NAbs.

Results

Overall, 83 of 596 patients (13.9%) had measurable NAbs. The probability of developing NAbs increased with the single and cumulative dose of treatment and was influenced by the BoNT/A formulation, while all other factors analyzed, including disease entity and treatment duration, had no additional influence.

Conclusions

We present the largest study to date of the prevalence of BoNT/A NAbs in a large unbiased cohort of patients including the relevant neurologic indications. Repeated injections of BoNT/A inevitably bear the risk of developing NAbs. However, in addition to avoiding booster injections and providing short intervals between injections, reducing the individual injected doses may diminish the risk of NAb induction independently of the indication for which BoNT/A is used.

[Modern non-cosmetic treatment with botulinum toxins]

Botulinum toxin has been known in medical history for a long time. The first scientific investigations and thoughts on possible indications in the treatment of muscular disorders were published by the German physician and poet Justinus Kerner in 1822. The physiological effect of botulinum toxin was identified in the middle of the twentieth century and the first clinical use was reported in 1977. It was first used in ophthalmology for the correction of strabismus and some years later the therapy of blepharospasm and cervical dystonia was established. Further indications, all supported by randomized controlled studies, are spastic tone increase of the limbs after lesions of the central nervous system, idiopathic axillar hyperhidrosis, chronic migraine and neurogenic or idiopathic bladder hyperactivity. In addition to these indications, a large number of further possible options have been published in the literature. Beside its effect on transmission at the neuromuscular synapses, botulinum toxin has also been shown to affect the sensory transmission of nociceptive fibers.

Botulinum toxin type A versus botulinum toxin type B for cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003. Cervical dystonia is the most common form of focal dystonia and is a disabling disorder characterised by painful involuntary head posturing. There are two available formulations of botulinum toxin, with botulinum toxin type A (BtA) usually considered the first line therapy for this condition. Botulinum toxin type B (BtB) is an alternative option, with no compelling theoretical reason why it might not be as- or even more effective - than BtA.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of botulinum toxin type A (BtA) versus botulinum toxin type B (BtB) in people with cervical dystonia.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify studies for this review we searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, reference lists of articles and conference proceedings. All elements of the search, with no language restrictions, were last run in October 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BtA versus BtB in adults with cervical dystonia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors assessed records, selected included studies, extracted data using a paper pro forma, and evaluated the risk of bias. We resolved disagreements by consensus or by consulting a third author. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model, for the comparison BtA versus BtB to estimate pooled effects and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). No prespecified subgroup analyses were carried out. The primary efficacy outcome was improvement on any validated symptomatic rating scale, and the primary safety outcome was the proportion of participants with adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs, all new to this update, of very low to low methodological quality, with a total of 270 participants.Two studies exclusively enrolled participants with a known positive response to BtA treatment. This raises concerns of population enrichment, with a higher probability of benefit from BtA treatment. None of the trials were free of for-profit bias, nor did they provide information regarding registered study protocols. All trials evaluated the effect of a single Bt treatment session, and not repeated treatment sessions, using doses from 100 U to 250 U of BtA (all onabotulinumtoxinA, or Botox, formulations) and 5000 U to 10,000 U of BtB (rimabotulinumtoxinB, or Myobloc/Neurobloc).We found no difference between the two types of botulinum toxin in terms of overall efficacy, with a mean difference of -1.44 (95% CI -3.58 to 0.70) points lower on the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) for BtB-treated participants, measured at two to four weeks after injection. The proportion of participants with adverse events was also not different between BtA and BtB (BtB versus BtA risk ratio (RR) 1.40; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.96). However, when compared to BtA, treatment with BtB was associated with an increased risk of one adverse events of special interest, namely treatment-related sore throat/dry mouth (BtB versus BtA RR of 4.39; 95% CI 2.43 to 7.91). Treatment-related dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) was not different between BtA and BtB (RR 2.89; 95% CI 0.80 to 10.41). The two types of botulinum toxin were otherwise clinically non-distinguishable in all the remaining outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The previous version of this review did not include any trials, since these were still ongoing at the time. Therefore, with this update we are able to change the conclusions of this review. There is low quality evidence that a single treatment session of BtA (specifically onabotulinumtoxinA) and a single treatment session of BtB (rimabotulinumtoxinB) are equally effective and safe in the treatment of adults with certain types of cervical dystonia. Treatment with BtB appears to present an increased risk of sore throat/dry mouth, compared to BtA. Overall, there is no clinical evidence from these single-treatment trials to support or contest the preferential use of one form of botulinum toxin over the other.

Botulinum toxin type B for cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004, and previously updated in 2009 (no change in conclusions). Cervical dystonia is a frequent and disabling disorder characterised by painful involuntary head posturing. Botulinum toxin type A (BtA) is usually considered the first line therapy for this condition, although botulinum toxin type B (BtB) is an alternative option.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of botulinum toxin type B (BtB) versus placebo in people with cervical dystonia.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies for inclusion in the review using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles and conference proceedings, last run in October 2015. We ran the search from 1977 to 2015. The search was unrestricted by language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of BtB versus placebo in adults with cervical dystonia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors assessed records, selected included studies, extracted data using a paper pro forma and evaluated the risk of bias. We resolved disagreements by consensus or by consulting a third author. We performed one meta-analysis for the comparison BtB versus placebo. We used random-effects models when there was heterogeneity and fixed-effect models when there was no heterogeneity. In addition, we performed pre-specified subgroup analyses according to BtB doses and BtA previous clinical responsiveness. The primary efficacy outcome was overall improvement on any validated symptomatic rating scale. The primary safety outcome was the number of participants with any adverse event.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs of moderate overall methodological quality, including 441 participants with cervical dystonia. Three studies excluded participants known to have poorer response to Bt treatment, therefore including an enriched population with a higher probability of benefiting from Bt treatment. None of the trials were independently funded. All RCTs evaluated the effect of a single Bt treatment session using doses between 2500 U and 10,000 U. BtB was associated with an improvement of 14.7% (95% CI 9.8% to 19.5) in the patients' baseline clinical status as assessed by investigators, with reduction of 6.8 points in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS-total score) at week 4 after injection (95% CI 4.54 to 9.01). Mean difference (MD) in TWSTRS-pain score at week 4 was 2.20 (95% CI 1.25 to 3.15). Overall, both participants and clinicians reported an improvement of subjective clinical status. There were no differences between groups in the withdrawals rate due to adverse events or in the proportion of participants with adverse events. However, BtB-treated patients had a 7.65 (95% CI 2.75 to 21.32) and a 6.78 (95% CI 2.42 to 19.05) increased risk of treatment-related dry mouth and dysphagia, respectively. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was low to moderate for most outcomes. All tested dosages were efficacious against placebo without clear-cut evidence of a dose-response gradient. However, duration of effect (time until return to baseline TWSTRS-total score) and risk of dry mouth and dysphagia were greater in the subgroup of participants treated with higher BtB doses. Subgroup analysis showed a higher improvement with BtB among BtA-non-responsive participants, although there were no differences in the effect size between the BtA-responsive and non-responsive subgroups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A single BtB-treatment session is associated with a significant and clinically relevant reduction of cervical dystonia impairment including severity, disability and pain, and is well tolerated, when compared with placebo. However, BtB-treated patients are at an increased risk of dry mouth and dysphagia. There are no data from RCTs evaluating the effectiveness and safety of repeated BtB injection cycles. There are no RCT data to allow us to draw definitive conclusions on the optimal treatment intervals and doses, usefulness of guidance techniques for injection, and impact on quality of life.

Pharmaceutical, biological, and clinical properties of botulinum neurotoxin type A products

Botulinum neurotoxin injections are a valuable treatment modality for many therapeutic indications and have revolutionized the field of aesthetic medicine so that they are the leading cosmetic procedure performed worldwide. Studies show that onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, and incobotulinumtoxinA are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy. Differences between the products relate to the botulinum neurotoxin complexes, specific biological potency, and their immunogenicity. Protein complex size and molecular weight have no effect on biological activity, stability, distribution, or side effect profile. Complexing proteins and inactive toxin (toxoid) content increase the risk of neutralizing antibody formation, which can cause secondary treatment failure, particularly in chronic disorders that require frequent injections and long-term treatment. These attributes could lead to differences in therapeutic outcomes, and, given the widespread aesthetic use of these three neurotoxin products, physicians should be aware of how they differ to ensure their safe and effective use.

Clinical differences between botulinum neurotoxin type A and B

In humans, the therapeutic use of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) is well recognized and continuously expanding. Four BoNTs are widely available for clinical practice: three are serotype A and one is serotype B: onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona), abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo) and incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco), rimabotulinumtoxinB (B/Rima). A/Abo, A/Inco, A/Ona and B/Rima are all licensed worldwide for cervical dystonia. In addition, the three BoNT/A products are approved for blepharospasm and focal dystonias, spasticity, hemifacial spasm, hyperhidrosis and facial lines, with remarkable regional differences. These toxin brands differ for specific activity, packaging, constituents, excipient, and storage. Comparative literature assessing the relative safety and efficacy of different BoNT products is limited, most data come from reports on small samples, and only a few studies meet criteria of evidence-based medicine. One study compared the effects of BoNT/A and BoNT/B on muscle activity of healthy volunteers, showing similar neurophysiological effects with a dose ratio of 1:100. In cervical dystonia, when comparing the effects of BoNT/A and BoNT/B, results are more variable, some studies reporting roughly similar peak effect and overall duration (at a ratio of 1:66, others reporting substantially shorter duration of BoNT/B than BoNT/A (at a ratio 1/24). Although the results of clinical studies are difficult to compare for methodological differences (dose ratio, study design, outcome measures), it is widely accepted that: BoNT/B is clinically effective using appropriate doses as BoNT/A (1:40-50), injections are generally more painful, in most of the studies on muscular conditions, efficacy is shorter, and immunogenicity higher. Since the earliest clinical trials, it has been reported that autonomic side effects are more frequent after BoNT/B injections, and this observation encouraged the use of BoNT/B for sialorrhea, hyperhidrosis and other non-motor symptoms. In these indications the efficacy of toxins A and B are comparable and dose ratio is 1:25-30.

The influence of physical therapy and anti-botulinum toxin antibody on the efficacy of botulinum toxin-A injections in children with spastic cerebral palsy

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with the efficacy of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injections.

METHODS

Thirty-eight children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) received BoNT-A injections into the gastrocnemius. The baseline anti-botulinum antibodies were checked. The Static dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) and Physician Rating Scale (PRS) were assessed at pre-injection as well as 4- and 12-week post-injection.

RESULTS

No samples contained anti-botulinum antibodies. Greater baseline MTS dynamic range was associated with greater changes in MTS dynamic ranges at 4-week post-injection. More frequent physical therapy was associated with greater changes in static dorsiflexion ROM at 4-week post-injection and greater changes in PRS at 4- and 12-week post-injection.

CONCLUSION

The improvement in PRS at 12-week post-injection was associated with the frequency of physical therapy. Therefore, intensive physical therapy programs may be necessary to maintain the beneficial effects of BoNT-A injections in children with CP.

Neutralizing antibodies to botulinum neurotoxin type A in aesthetic medicine: five case reports

Botulinum neurotoxin injections are a valuable treatment modality for many therapeutic indications as well as in the aesthetic field for facial rejuvenation. As successful treatment requires repeated injections over a long period of time, secondary resistance to botulinum toxin preparations after repeated injections is an ongoing concern. We report five case studies in which neutralizing antibodies to botulinum toxin type A developed after injection for aesthetic use and resulted in secondary treatment failure. These results add to the growing number of reports in the literature for secondary treatment failure associated with high titers of neutralizing antibodies in the aesthetic field. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and implement injection protocols that minimize resistance development.

Progress in cell based assays for botulinum neurotoxin detection

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are the most potent human toxins known and the causative agent of botulism, and are widely used as valuable pharmaceuticals. The BoNTs are modular proteins consisting of a heavy chain and a light chain linked by a disulfide bond. Intoxication of neuronal cells by BoNTs is a multi-step process including specific cell binding, endocytosis, conformational change in the endosome, translocation of the enzymatic light chain into the cells cytosol, and SNARE target cleavage. The quantitative and reliable potency determination of fully functional BoNTs produced as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) requires an assay that considers all steps in the intoxication pathway. The in vivo mouse bioassay has for years been the 'gold standard' assay used for this purpose, but it requires the use of large numbers of mice and thus causes associated costs and ethical concerns. Cell-based assays are currently the only in vitro alternative that detect fully functional BoNTs in a single assay and have been utilized for years for research purposes. Within the last 5 years, several cell-based BoNT detection assays have been developed that are able to quantitatively determine BoNT potency with similar or greater sensitivity than the mouse bioassay. These assays now offer an alternative method for BoNT potency determination. Such quantitative and reliable BoNT potency determination is a crucial step in basic research, in the development of pharmaceutical BoNTs, and in the quantitative detection of neutralizing antibodies.

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin): background, mechanism of action, and manufacturing

IncobotulinumtoxinA is the third botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) to be approved for aesthetic use in the United States. This article introduces the new product with an overview of clinical applications and a discussion of the neurotoxin's molecular structure. The role and clinical relevance of complexing proteins in BoNTA products are discussed. Finally, incobotulinumtoxinA's mechanism of action is described.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxins

Botulinum neurotoxins are formulated biologic pharmaceuticals used therapeutically to treat a wide variety of chronic conditions, with varying governmental approvals by country. Some of these disorders include cervical dystonia, post-stroke spasticity, blepharospasm, migraine, and hyperhidrosis. Botulinum neurotoxins also have varying governmental approvals for cosmetic applications. As botulinum neurotoxin therapy is often continued over many years, some patients may develop detectable antibodies that may or may not affect their biological activity. Although botulinum neurotoxins are considered "lower risk" biologics since antibodies that may develop are not likely to cross react with endogenous proteins, it is possible that patients may lose their therapeutic response. Various factors impact the immunogenicity of botulinum neurotoxins, including product-related factors such as the manufacturing process, the antigenic protein load, and the presence of accessory proteins, as well as treatment-related factors such as the overall toxin dose, booster injections, and prior vaccination or exposure. Detection of antibodies by laboratory tests does not necessarily predict the clinical success or failure of treatment. Overall, botulinum neurotoxin type A products exhibit low clinically detectable levels of antibodies when compared with other approved biologic products. This review provides an overview of all current botulinum neurotoxin products available commercially, with respect to the development of neutralizing antibodies and clinical response.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxins

Botulinum neurotoxins are formulated biologic pharmaceuticals used therapeutically to treat a wide variety of chronic conditions, with varying governmental approvals by country. Some of these disorders include cervical dystonia, post-stroke spasticity, blepharospasm, migraine, and hyperhidrosis. Botulinum neurotoxins also have varying governmental approvals for cosmetic applications. As botulinum neurotoxin therapy is often continued over many years, some patients may develop detectable antibodies that may or may not affect their biological activity. Although botulinum neurotoxins are considered "lower risk" biologics since antibodies that may develop are not likely to cross react with endogenous proteins, it is possible that patients may lose their therapeutic response. Various factors impact the immunogenicity of botulinum neurotoxins, including product-related factors such as the manufacturing process, the antigenic protein load, and the presence of accessory proteins, as well as treatment-related factors such as the overall toxin dose, booster injections, and prior vaccination or exposure. Detection of antibodies by laboratory tests does not necessarily predict the clinical success or failure of treatment. Overall, botulinum neurotoxin type A products exhibit low clinically detectable levels of antibodies when compared with other approved biologic products. This review provides an overview of all current botulinum neurotoxin products available commercially, with respect to the development of neutralizing antibodies and clinical response.

Spasticity following spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

Up to 70% of patients with spinal cord injuries develop spasticity. The main aim of the paper is to provide an overview of spasticity management, primarily in patients with spinal cord injuries.

METHOD

The article is based on literature searches in PubMed using the keyphrases «spasticity» and «spasticity AND spinal cord injury», and own clinical experience and research.

RESULTS

Spasticity may be general, regional or localised. Factors such as an over-filled bladder, obstipation, acute infections, syringomyelia or bone fractures may substantially influence the degree of spasticity and must be determined. An assessment of the clinical and functional consequences for the patient is decisive before management. Active exercise, physiotherapy and peroral drugs are the simplest and cheapest options. Baclofen is the only centrally acting spasmolytic registered in Norway and is the first choice for peroral treatment. Benzodiazepines can also be used. The effect of the tablets is generally limited and there are often pronounced side effects. Local spasticity can be treated with botulinum toxin injections. The effect is time-limited and the treatment must be repeated. International guidelines recommend a combination of botulinum toxin injections and physiotherapy. In cases of regional spasticity, particularly in the lower limbs, intrathecal baclofen administered via a programmable pump may provide a continuous spasm-reducing effect. Orthopaedic surgery or neurosurgery may be an option for selected patients with intractable spasticity.

INTERPRETATION

Spasticity following a spinal cord injury must be assessed regularly. The treatment strategy depends on the degree of functional failure caused by the spasticity and its location.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxins

Botulinum neurotoxins are formulated biologic pharmaceuticals used therapeutically to treat a wide variety of chronic conditions, with varying governmental approvals by country. Some of these disorders include cervical dystonia, post-stroke spasticity, blepharospasm, migraine, and hyperhidrosis. Botulinum neurotoxins also have varying governmental approvals for cosmetic applications. As botulinum neurotoxin therapy is often continued over many years, some patients may develop detectable antibodies that may or may not affect their biological activity. Although botulinum neurotoxins are considered "lower risk" biologics since antibodies that may develop are not likely to cross react with endogenous proteins, it is possible that patients may lose their therapeutic response. Various factors impact the immunogenicity of botulinum neurotoxins, including product-related factors such as the manufacturing process, the antigenic protein load, and the presence of accessory proteins, as well as treatment-related factors such as the overall toxin dose, booster injections, and prior vaccination or exposure. Detection of antibodies by laboratory tests does not necessarily predict the clinical success or failure of treatment. Overall, botulinum neurotoxin type A products exhibit low clinically detectable levels of antibodies when compared with other approved biologic products. This review provides an overview of all current botulinum neurotoxin products available commercially, with respect to the development of neutralizing antibodies and clinical response.

Clinical relevance of botulinum toxin immunogenicity

Botulinum toxin type A is a 150 kD protein produced by Clostridium botulinum, which exists in a complex with up to six additional proteins. The ability of botulinum toxin to inhibit acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction has been exploited for use in medical conditions characterized by muscle hyperactivity. As such, botulinum toxin is widely recommended by international treatment guidelines for movement disorders and it has a plethora of other clinical and cosmetic indications. The chronic nature of these conditions requires repeated injections of botulinum toxin, usually every few months. Multiple injections can lead to secondary treatment failure in some patients that may be associated with the production of neutralizing antibodies directed specifically against the neurotoxin. However, the presence of such antibodies does not always render patients non-responsive. The reported prevalence of immunoresistance varies greatly, depending on factors such as study design and treated indication. This review presents what is currently known about the immunogenicity of botulinum toxin and how this impacts upon patient non-response to treatment. The complexing proteins may act as adjuvants and stimulate the immune response. Their role and that of neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies in the response to botulinum toxin is discussed, together with an assessment of current neutralizing antibody measurement techniques. Botulinum toxin preparations with different compositions and excipients have been developed. The major commercially available preparations of botulinum toxin are Botox® (onabotulinumtoxinA; Allergan, Inc., Ireland), Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA; Ipsen Ltd, UK), and Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA; botulinum toxin type A [150 kD], free from complexing proteins; NT 201; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Germany). The new preparations of botulinum toxin aim to minimize the risk of immunoresistance in patients being treated for chronic clinical conditions.

Antibody-induced secondary treatment failure in a patient treated with botulinum toxin type A for glabellar frown lines

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) preparations are widely used nonsurgical treatments for facial wrinkles. Higher doses of BTX-A are also used for therapeutic purposes in the treatment of conditions involving increased muscle tone, such as cervical dystonia. The phenomenon of antibody-induced treatment failure is well known in the therapeutic setting, but reports are also emerging following cosmetic use of BTX-A. We describe the case of a 41-year-old female nurse who developed secondary treatment failure during 6 years of BTX-A treatment for glabellar lines. After a good response to the first BTX-A injection, the intensity and duration of effect decreased after subsequent treatments. Antibody tests revealed a high titer of neutralizing anti-BTX-A antibodies. This case shows secondary treatment failure due to the production of neutralizing antibodies following administration of BTX-A formulations for cosmetic purposes and demonstrates that immunogenicity of BTX-A preparations is an important consideration, even in the cosmetic setting.

Antibodies after botulinum toxin A injection into musculus detrusor vesicae: incidence and clinical relevance

OBJECTIVES

Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection into the detrusor muscle has changed therapy options for patients with overactive bladder (OAB). However, in some patients, therapy fails or the effects of BTX-A decrease. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence of BTX-A antibodies (BTX-A Abs) after injection of BTX-A and its clinical relevance.

METHODS

31 patients (27 women, 4 men) were treated with BTX-A for OAB between January 2009 and August 2010. Eleven patients were treated once, 16 patients were treated twice and 4 patients were treated three times. Blood was collected before and 3 months after the BTX-A injection and BTX-A Abs were determined.

RESULTS

In 5 patients (16%) BTX-A Abs were detectable after the BTX-A injection. The BTX-A Ab titer was clearly positive in 1 patient (3.2%). This patient showed complete failure of BTX-A therapy. In 4 patients (13%) BTX-A Abs were slightly positive after the first BTX-A injection. The second BTX-A injection showed no positive effects in only 1 patient with borderline BTX-A Ab titers; the second BTX-A injection was successful in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of BTX-A Abs should be verified in nonresponders. More data are necessary to check the clinical relevance and risk of BTX-A Ab formation, especially in long-term follow-up, to optimize patient selection for this minimally invasive treatment option in OAB.

[Botulinum toxin in the treatment of adult spasticity. An interdisciplinary German 10-point consensus 2010]

Spasticity is one of the major causes of functional impairment in adults with lesions of the central nervous system. For instance, approximately 30% of post-stroke patients suffer from different degrees of spasticity with possible consecutive impairments. Numerous studies or meta-analyses showed that local injections of botulinum toxin in spastic muscles lead to dose-dependent reduction in muscle tone and improvement of passive movements (e. g. facilitated care), especially following repeated injections.However, country-specific regulations and patient-remote administration in German health care often do not allow adequate provision of this therapy. Thus, the present consensus statement based on the EBM analyses of the published international literature tries to highlight recent advances and the standard in the field of local spasticity treatment, aiming to facilitate communication between the decision makers and German reimbursement institutions in health care. Prior to initiation of BoNT-A injections, patient-oriented goals should be identified in a multiprofessional context to assure realistic goals for this specific treatment and patient expectations. In Germany for the treatment of focal spasticity following stroke three products have been approved: Botox® (Pharm Allergan, Ettlingen), Dysport® (Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen) and Xeomin® (Merz Pharma, Frankfurt/Main). For all preparations safety has been repeatedly shown. Functional improvements have also been illustrated for selected patients concerning hand/arm function and gait. The dose per muscle and the selection of muscles to be injected have to be individualized according to the patient's symptoms and should be accompanied by modern neurorehabilitative therapies such as redression or repetitive activation of the injected and antagonistic muscles.

Toxina botulínica e fisioterapia em crianças com paralisia cerebral espástica: revisão bibliográfica

INTRODUÇÃO: A paralisia cerebral (PC) é definida como uma condição neurológica não progressiva originada em razão de uma lesão no encéfalo imaturo que compromete os movimentos e a postura. A espasticidade está presente em 75% dos casos. Essa patologia tem incidência na população de aproximadamente 2 em cada 1.000 nascidos vivos e pode chegar a até 7 por 1.000 em países em desenvolvimento. O objetivo do estudo foi realizar uma revisão bibliográfica por meio da seleção e análise criteriosa de artigos científicos que relatem os efeitos da aplicação da toxina botulínica tipo A associada à fisioterapia em crianças com paralisia cerebral espástica. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma revisão bibliográfica nas bases de dados eletrônicas MEDLINE, LILACS e SciELO, no período de 1997 a 2009. Os descritores utilizados foram: "paralisia cerebral" e "espasticidade muscular", combinados com "toxina botulínica tipo A" e "fisioterapia". RESULTADOS: Somando-se todos os bancos de dados, um total de 50 artigos que continham os desfechos de interesse dessa revisão foram encontrados, no entanto, alguns artigos aparecem em mais de uma busca e em duplicidade de idioma. Então, 23 artigos foram utilizados neste estudo. DISCUSSÃO: Vários estudos demonstram que, para maior efetividade da toxina botulínica tipo A, esta deve ser associada a um programa fisioterapêutico que sempre deve considerar as etapas do desenvolvimento motor da criança. CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS: De acordo com a revisão bibliográfica apresentada, a TBA associada à fisioterapia para o controle da espasticidade se mostra bastante eficaz. Contudo, novas pesquisas acerca deste assunto são necessárias.

Clinical assessment and management of spasticity: a review

Spasticity is a sign of upper motor neurone lesion, which can be located in the cerebrum or the spinal cord, and be caused by stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, brain injury, cerebral paresis, or other neurological conditions. Management is dependent on clinical assessment. Positive and negative effects of spasticity should be considered. Ashworth score and the modified Ashworth score are the most used scales for assessment of spasticity. These and other spasticity scales are based on assessment of resistance during passive movement. The main goal of management is functional improvement. A novel 100-point score to assess disability, function related to spasticity (Rekand disability and spasticity score) is proposed. Management of spasticity should be multimodal and should always include physiotherapy or exercise. Oral medications such as baclofen and tizanidine have limited efficacy and considerable side effects, but are easiest to use. Botulinum toxin combined with physiotherapy and/or orthopaedic surgery is effective treatment of localized spasticity. Treatment with intrathecal baclofen via programmable implanted pump is effective in generalized spasticity, particularly in the lower extremities. Neurosurgical and orthopaedic procedures may be considered in intractable cases.

Modulation of botulinum toxin-induced changes in neuromuscular function with antibodies directed against recombinant polypeptides or fragments

Botulinum toxin is an agent that is typically encountered in two settings: as an agent that can cause disease (e.g. botulism), and as an agent that can be used to treat disease (i.e., a variety of neurologic disorders). In both cases it would be advantageous to develop a sound understanding of the mechanisms by which antibodies neutralize the toxin. In the present study, recombinant antigens were used to generate antibodies against the carboxyterminal half of the toxin heavy chain (HC50), the entire toxin light chain (LC), and the HA17, HA35 and HA70 components of the progenitor toxin complex. These antibodies were then evaluated for their respective abilities to alter botulinum toxin-induced changes in locomotor behavior in mice. The botulinum toxin type A complex was shown to produce dose-dependent depression of locomotor behavior within the dose range of 0.3-0.7 mouse LD50 units. At a dose of 0.5 LD50, the toxin typically reduced running behavior by 90% or more, and full recovery was not observed for approximately 4 weeks. Mice that were actively or passively vaccinated against the HC50 polypeptide were resistant to toxin action, presumably because the antibodies occluded the toxin binding domain. Interestingly, mice that were actively or passively vaccinated against LC were also resistant to toxin action. This effect may have been due to steric hindrance of the binding process. There was no scenario in which anti-HA antibodies altered the effects of toxin on locomotor behavior. This absence of effect was likely due to the fact that HAs and neurotoxin in the progenitor toxin complex spontaneously dissociate in physiologic media.

Complexing proteins in botulinum toxin type A drugs: a help or a hindrance?

Botulinum toxin type A is a high molecular weight protein complex containing active neurotoxin and complexing proteins, the latter of which, it is believed, protect the neurotoxin when in the gastrointestinal tract, and may facilitate its absorption. Comparisons of conventional botulinum toxin type A drugs that include complexing proteins with the complexing protein-free formulation of Xeomin^® strongly suggest that complexing proteins do not affect diffusion of the active neurotoxin. Studies of Xeomin have also shown that complexing proteins do not enhance product stability in storage. However, complexing proteins may stimulate antibody development against botulinum toxin type A. Numerous observational studies have been published showing that some patients receiving conventional botulinum toxin may develop neutralizing antibodies, leading to antibody-induced therapy failure. Studies have shown that Xeomin is not associated with the development of neutralizing antibodies in animal models or in patients. In conclusion, complexing proteins do not contribute to the stability of botulinum toxin type A drugs and do not contribute to their therapeutic effects, but may be associated with a secondary nonresponse due to the development of neutralizing antibodies.