Hemifacial spasm and reinnervation synkinesias: long-term treatment with either Botox or Dysport

Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm after Bell's palsy: a retrospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of hemifacial spasm (HFS) after Bell's palsy and to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of microvascular decompression (MVD).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 18 patients who underwent MVD for HFS after Bell's palsy at our institution between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Clinical presentations, intraoperative findings, postoperative outcomes, and complications were comprehensively assessed.

RESULTS

Neurovascular compression (NVC) was identified in all the 18 patients. The offending vessels included anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) in 6 patients (33.3%), posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) in 7 patients (38.9%), vertebral artery (VA) combined with AICA in 3 patients (16.7%), and VA alongside PICA in 2 patients (11.1%). Notably, marked arachnoid membrane adhesion was evident in 11 patients (61.1%). 15(83.3%) patients were cured immediately after MVD, delayed relief was found in 3 (16.7%) patients. During the follow-up period, recurrence was not documented. Surgical complications were limited to facial paralysis in 3 patients and auditory impairment in 1 patient. No additional surgical complications were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients manifesting HFS after Bell's palsy, NVC predominantly underlies the etiology. MVD is a reliably safe and efficacious therapeutic intervention.

Long-term follow-up of intravesical abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) injections in women with idiopathic detrusor overactivity

Objective

Only a few numbers of studies have been published on the use of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO). This study reported the long-term follow-up of women with IDO who were treated with intravesical Dysport® injections.

Methods

Two hundred and thirty-six patients with IDO who had failed first-line conservative and antimuscarinic therapy received 500-900 units of Dysport® between April 2014 and July 2015. All patients were followed up for 5 years after their initial injection and interviewed on the phone.

Results

A total of 236 women with IDO aged from 18 years to 84 years (mean±standard deviation: 49.6±15.9 years) were included in our study. The median follow-up time for patients was 36.5 (range: 10-70) months, and the median recovery time after injection was 18.5 (range: 0-70) months. A total of 83 (35.2%) patients stated that they had subjective improvement of their symptoms whereas 84 (35.6%) patients did not report any improvement in symptoms. The initial International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder mean score was 6.9 (standard deviation 3.4). There was a positive association between the median recovery time and the components of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder questionnaire.

Conclusion

In a sub-population of overactive bladder patients with IDO who have failed first-line therapy, a single intravesical Dysport® injection can resolve patient symptoms completely or reduce the symptoms to an acceptable level that can be controlled with antimuscarinics or re-injection on demands.

Botulinum toxin A treatment in facial palsy synkinesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Synkinesis is defined as involuntary movements accompanying by voluntary movements and can occur during the aftermath of peripheral facial palsy, causing functional, aesthetic and psychological problems in the patient. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is frequently used as a safe and effective treatment; however, there is no standardized guideline for the use of BTX-A in synkinesis. The purpose of this article is to review and summarize studies about the BTX-A treatment of synkinesis in patients with a history of peripheral facial palsy; including given dosages, injection sites and time intervals between injections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-database systematic literature search was performed in October 2020 using the following databases: Pubmed, Embase, Medline, and The Cochrane Library. Two authors rated the methodological quality of the included studies independently using the 'Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale' for non-randomised studies' (NOS).

RESULTS

Four-thousand-five-hundred-and-nineteen articles were found of which 34 studies met the inclusion criteria, in total comprising 1314 patients. Most studies were assessed to be of 'fair' to 'good' methodological quality. The Cohen's kappa (between author FJ and AS) was 0.78. Thirty-one studies investigated the reported dosage injected, 17 studies reported injection location and 17 studies investigated time intervals. A meta-analysis was performed for three studies comprising 106 patients, on the effects of BTX-A treatment on the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) scores. The mean difference was 11.599 (range 9.422-13.766), p < 0.01. However, due to inconsistent reporting of data of the included studies, no relationship with the dosage and location could be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Many treatment strategies for synkinesis exist, consisting of varying BTX-A brands, dosages, time intervals and different injection locations. Moreover, the individual complaints are very specific, which complicates creating a standardized chemodenervation treatment protocol. The BTX-A treatment of long-term synkinesis is very individual and further studies should focus on a patient-tailored treatment instead of trying to standardize treatment.

Preseptal and Pretarsal Botulinum Toxin Injection in Hemifacial Spasm and Blepharospasm: A 10-Year Comparative Study

Purpose

Preseptal and pretarsal botulinum toxin injections are approved for treatment of hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. However, the long-term data is limited. We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs between preseptal and pretarsal injection in hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm.

Patients and Methods

The data were retrieved between 2011 and 2021. Consecutive hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm botulinum toxin patients were categorized as preseptal or pretarsal. Study outcomes were the difference in pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale, self-reporting scales, time-related treatment, safety, and cost.

Results

Of 152 botulinum toxin-injected patients, 117 (77.0%) patients had hemifacial spasm and 35 (33.0%) patients had blepharospasm. Analysis included data pertinent to 1665 injections in hemifacial spasm (920 preseptal and 745 pretarsal) and 527 injections in blepharospasm (210 preseptal and 317 pretarsal). The difference between pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale was lower in the preseptal group than in the pretarsal group in both hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm (1.5±0.8 vs 1.8±0.6, P-value <0.001 and 1.8±0.8 vs 3.1±0.9, P-value <0.001). There was no difference in duration of maximum response in hemifacial spasm between groups, while the blepharospasm with preseptal had a longer duration than blepharospasm with pretarsal. The preseptal injection was associated with more adverse events overall than the pretarsal (9.4% vs 5.2%, P-value <0.001). The total dose and cost per session in the preseptal group is lower for onabotulinum toxin but higher for abobotulinum toxin.

Conclusion

Pretarsal injections reduced symptom severity with fewer side effects. Further studies on the pharmacoeconomics of both techniques are required.

Antinociceptive Actions of Botulinum Toxin A1 on Immunogenic Hypersensitivity in Temporomandibular Joint of Rats

Botulinum neurotoxin type A1 (BoNT-A) reduces the peripheral peptide and cytokine upregulation in rats with antigen-evoked persistent immunogenic hypersensitivity (PIH) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Herein, we examined the effects of two preparations of BoNT-A, abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A; Dysport) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A; Botox), on spontaneous and evoked nociceptive behaviors, as well as on central neuronal and astroglial activation. The antigen-evoked PIH was induced in rats via repeated systemic and unilateral intra-articular (i.a.) injections of methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA). Rats were subsequently injected with unilateral i.a. aboBoNT-A (14 U/kg), onaBoNT-A (7 U/kg), or the vehicle (saline). After i.a. treatments, spontaneous and mechanically evoked nocifensive behaviors were assessed before and after the low-dose i.a. formalin (0.5%) challenge. The central effects of BoNT-A were assessed by an immunohistochemical analysis of cleaved synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (cSNAP-25) presence, c-Fos, GFAP, and CGRP expression in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). Both BoNT-A preparations similarly reduced the formalin-induced spontaneous pain-related behaviors and mechanical allodynia of the hypernociceptive rats. Likewise, their effects were associated with the central occurrence of cSNAP-25 and reduction of c-Fos and GFAP upregulation in the TNC. BoNT-A antinociceptive activity on the PIH is associated with the toxin axonal transport to trigeminal sensory areas and reduction of neuronal and glial activation in central nociceptive regions.

[Therapy of Hemifacial Spasm with Botulinum Toxin: an Update]

Injections of botulinum toxin can be viewed by now as the therapy of choice in treating hemifacial spasm (HFS). Each of the three botulinum toxin-A preparations have been approved for this indication in Germany. HFS is a frequent disease characterized by involuntary contractions of the muscles of one half of the face innervated by the facial nerve. The symptoms can be either tonic or clonic, intermittant or permanent. Diagnosis is based purely on clinical observation. A magnetic resonance imagingof the skull is appropriate to demonstrate nerve-vessel contact as most frequent cause and to exclude other pathologies.

Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Hemifacial Spasm: An Update on Clinical Studies

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a movement disorder characterized by involuntary contractions of the facial muscles innervated by the seventh cranial nerve. Generally, it is associated with a poor quality of life due to social embarrassment and can lead to functional blindness. Moreover, it is a chronic condition, and spontaneous recovery is rare. Intramuscular injections of Botulinum Toxin (BoNT) are routinely used as HFS treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed published articles between 1991 and 2021 regarding the effectiveness and safety of BoNT in HFS as well as any reported differences among BoNT formulations.

RESULTS

The efficacy of BoNT for HFS treatment ranged from 73% to 98.4%. The mean duration of the effect was around 12 weeks. Effectiveness did not decrease over time. Adverse effects were usually mild and transient. The efficacy and tolerability of the different preparations appeared to be similar. Among the studies, dosage, injected muscles, intervals of treatment, and rating scales were variable, thus leading to challenges in comparing the results.

CONCLUSIONS

BoNT was the treatment of choice for HFS due to its efficacy and safety profile. Further studies are needed to investigate the factors that influence the outcome, including the optimal timing of treatment, injection techniques, dosage, and the best selection criteria for formulations.

Real-world experience with botulinum toxin A for the treatment of hemifacial spasm: A study of 1138 injections

BACKGROUND

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a chronic, potentially disabling disorder that often requires long-term management with botulinum toxin (BoNT). In a country where healthcare costs limit compliance to medical follow-up and treatment, the study aims to provide a real-world experience on the use of BoNT for HFS among Filipinos.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 162 HFS patients who received 1138 botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections from 2006 to 2019 in our movement disorders center in the Philippines. We described their clinical profile and treatment response.

RESULTS

The mean age at onset of disease was 47.7 ± 10.72 years. Majority of the patients reported a baseline moderate disease severity and disease frequency of >75% of waking time (59.8% and 46.9%, respectively). Most patients (61.73%) received 5 or less injections during the follow-up period. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.96 ± 4.28 years. The overall duration of treatment effect per injection was 3.6 ± 1.3 months while the mean interval between injections was 6 ± 5 months. There was no difference in the symptom improvement and duration between onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA. Side effects were infrequent.

CONCLUSION

This study supports existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of BoNT for the symptomatic relief of HFS. In the Philippines, long-term treatment with BoNT may be limited by the cost of the procedure as majority of our patients had a few injections with long treatment intervals.

Long-term therapy with botulinum toxin in facial synkinesis: Retrospective data analysis of data from 1998 to 2018

OBJECTIVES

Treatment with botulinum toxin A (BoNT) is the therapy of choice for many patients with facial synkinesis. Repeated injections relieve hypertonicity and hyperkinesis of reinnervated mimic muscles. Aim of the study was to prove if the injection regime and dosage of BoNT change during long-time therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patients´ data, who were treated for synkinesis with BoNT from 1998 to 2018.

SETTING

Tertiary referral facial nerve centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Injection pattern of BoNT was based on clinical symptoms, observations of the specialist and on previous treatment pattern. Onabotulinumtoxin (OnaBoNT), Incobotulinumtoxin (IncoBoNT) and Abobotulinumtoxin (AboBoNT) were available for treatment. Patients consulted our department for following treatment as soon as the symptoms re-occurred.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in dosage and injection pattern, the time intervals between treatments over the entire therapy period.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were repeatedly injected. The median number of treatments was 18, the median treatment interval was 3.0 months. During the initial treatment, orbicularis oculi and the mentalis muscles were the most frequently injected muscles (94%). During repeated treatment, the number of injected muscles increased significantly (P < .0001), whereas the dose per muscle remained stable. The initial dose was 24 U (95%-CI 22-27 U) for OnaBoNT and IncoBoNT; 69 U for AboBoNT(95%-CI 44-94 U). We observed a significant increase in dosage for OnaBoNT and IncoBoNT (P < .0001) during the long-term therapy. The time intervals between treatments were stable for all three BoNT preparations (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed significant change in treatment dose and injection pattern of BoNT in patients with facial synkinesis. These results provide an orientation in dose finding and injection regimen of BoNT in the long-term course of therapy.

Experiences on The Administration of Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders

Background and objectives

Botulinum toxin injection has been used for many years for various indications such as cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, hemifacial spasm in neurology. Botulinum toxin injections have been made in our clinic for about ten years. We want to report our experiences about botulinum toxin treatment in neurologic disease.

Methods

In this study, the data of the patients receiving BoNT injection between January 2018 and December 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Age, gender, botulinum toxin indications, and mean dose, duration of efficacy, side effects noted for each injection were recorded.

Results

There were 122 patients who received botulinum toxin injections between January 2018 and December 2019. Of the 122 patients identified, 28 had cervical dystonia, 61 had HFS, 21 had blepharospasm, 4 had generalized dystonia, 1 had hemidystonia following thalamic bleeding, 1 had tardive dystonia, 4 had migraine, 1 had bruxism and 1 had both migraine and bruxism.

Conclusion

BoNT injection is a treatment that has been used for various indications in neurology for almost 40 years. Side effects are limited and temporary with appropriate injections. We also had a wide range of indication profiles and high numbers of patients to whom we administered the BoNT treatment.

Buccinator synkinesis treated by botulinum toxin in facial palsy and hemifacial spasms

OBJECTIVE

To assess botulinum toxin treatment for buccinator muscle synkinesis including: how often the synkinesis was troublesome; who benefitted and how from the treatment; and what were the adverse effects, ideal dosage, and injection site.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Facial palsy (FP) patients and patients with hemifacial spasms who were attending for multiple site botulinum-toxin treatment for facial sequelae were assessed for buccinator synkinesis. The study group comprises those experiencing buccinator synkinesis with associated bothering symptoms who were willing to try injection also to the buccinator muscle.

RESULTS

During 9/2017-12/2019, 126 different patients with facial sequelae were treated with multiple-site botulin-toxin injections by the author. Of them, 83 (66%) received injection also for buccinator synkinesis and 66/82 (80%) wanted to continue with the buccinator injections. The most remarkable results were seen with FP patients biting the mucus membrane of their cheek: usually the biting ceased totally. Patients with powerful hemifacial cheek spasms also experienced cessation of the spasms, contrasting any previous treatments. Adverse effects were mostly mild: slight weakness of the corner of the mouth or additional leakage of saliva or liquids. Only a few patients experienced more pronounced adverse effects. The most posterior contracting part of the buccinator muscle proved to be the best site for the injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Buccinator synkinesis was very common and its treatment gave many patients additional relief from facial sequelae symptoms. Professionals treating patients with synkinesis and hemifacial spasms should add well-tolerated buccinator injections to their repertoire of injection sites.

[Hemifacial spasm]

Hemifacial spasm (HFS), or facial hemispasm, is a paroxysmal hyperkinetic disorder involving muscles innervated by the facial nerve, mainly on the one hand. The development of HFS is based on neurovascular conflict. However, it is impossible to explain the clinical manifestations of HFS only by nerve compression. Both peripheral and central mechanisms are involved in the generation of HFS, with the formation of ephaptic transmission, antidromic excitation, primary or secondary hyper-excitability of the nuclear and supranuclear level of innervation. Two treatment methods are pathogenetically justified: microvascular decompression (MVD) and botulinum toxin (BTX) injections. The effectiveness of MVD is 95.37% with full or partial recovery. The recurrence rate does not exceed 2.4%. Facial nerve paralysis (2.7-22.5%) and hearing loss (1.9-20%) are the most common complications of treatment with the use of the MVD for HFS with partial or complete cure in most cases. Botulinum toxin injection chemo-denervation is a first-line treatment of primary and secondary HFS. HFS is an officially registered indication for the drug dysport (abobotulotoxin) (ABO) in the Russian Federation. Total doses of ABO ranged from 25 to 150 units for one side depending on the severity of the clinical manifestations. Studies demonstrate the statistically significant benefits of HFC treatment with ABO. ABO is generally well-tolerated. Adverse events (up to 3.6%) are transient and include ptosis, lacrimation, blurred vision, double vision, dry eyes and weak facial muscles.

Synkinesis in primary and postparalytic hemifacial spasm: Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes of botulinum toxin A treatment

Facial synkinesis can be present in both primary and postparalytic hemifacial spasm (HFS). The present retrospective study aimed to summarize the clinical features of synkinesis and explore an appropriate botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection strategy to manage the synkinesis accompanying HFS. Video recordings of 234 patients with primary and postparalytic HFSs were analyzed. Improvements in the severity of spasm and synkinesis owing to BoNT-A treatment were monitored and compared among 36 primary and 12 postparalytic HFS patients with synkinesis and completed follow-up records. BoNT-A was injected into the voluntary facial region (VFR), the synkinetic facial region (SFR), or both VFR and SFR, and the efficacy of these strategies was evaluated and analyzed. Oral-ocular synkinesis in the primary group (32.8%) and ocular-oral synkinesis in the postparalytic group (81.0%) showed the highest incidence. Patients in both the primary and postparalytic groups exhibited a tremendous alleviation of spasm (97.2% vs. 91.7%, P > 0.05) following BoNT-A treatment. In both groups, coinjection and SFR injection were commonly used and effective in treatment of ocular and oral synkinesis, while VFR was frequently used but ineffective for frontal synkinesis. In addition, the improper muscle selection surrounding the mouth corner resulted in pattern change and treatment failure of oral synkinesis. Synkinesis mostly affected the ocular and oral regions. BoNT-A, via treatment of SFR, is effective against synkinesis accompanying HFS.

Endoscopic assisted microvascular decompression versus new antiepileptics and BOTOX in treatment of hemifacial spasm: a clinical trial

Introduction

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a chronic movement disorder characterized by twitching of muscles of facial expression which is innervated by the facial nerve. The condition is unilaterally, beginning in the orbicularis occuli, and later on progress to involve the perioral, platysma, and other muscles of facial expression. Endoscopic assisted microvascular decompression is considered the state of the art in hemi-facial spasm surgery. New antiepileptic have emerged with a new hope for good control with few side effects. Botulinum toxin is still a good option for some patients.

Methods

This study is a prospective study that was conducted on 30 patients with primary hemifacial spasm. Bilateral and secondary cases where excluded. All patients were subjected to proper pre-treatment assessment including; proper history taking, clinical examination, and proper radiological investigations (MRI, FISTA) when needed. They were divided into three groups according to treatment modality: group A where patient's general condition was unfit for surgical intervention, received oral medications (gabapentin or levetiracetam); group B included those patients unfit for surgical intervention and did not respond to oral therapy, received Botox injection; and group C underwent endoscopic assisted microvascular decompression. Follow-up period ranged from 6 to 24 months. Outcome of different treatment modalities were compared among different groups.

Results

Among group A patients, one patient showed excellent response to treatment (Gabapentin 1200 mg), three patients had good response, four patients had fair response, and three patients had poor response to treatment (one used levetiracetam, two used gabapentin). Overall success rate is 72.7%. Among group B patients, four patients enjoyed excellent response. Another four patients had good response, while three patients had fair response. Only one patient had poor response. Overall success rate was 83.3%. Among group C patients, five cases had excellent outcome and two cases had good outcome. Overall success rate is 100%.

Conclusion

Endoscopic assisted microvascular decompression offers the best chance to permanent cure with low complication rate. New antiepileptics (levetiracetam, gabapentin) provide a safe therapy for patients refusing surgical intervention. Botox is an attractive local therapy with reversible complications but with non-sustainable effect. From our results, we conclude that endoscopic assisted microvascular decompression is superior to either BOTOX or antiepiletics for the permanent cure of hemifacial spasm.

Evaluation of botulinum toxin effects in hemifacial spasm patients: correlation between clinical rating scales and high-speed video system measurements

The purpose of this study was to compare the scores of two clinical rating scales and high-speed video system measurements obtained during spontaneous eyelid movements in hemifacial spasm (HFS) patients before and after treatment. Patients were evaluated before and 30 days after receiving treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA injections. Using a high-speed video system, the eyelid movements were recorded bilaterally for 3 min and the energy power generated by the upper eyelid during spontaneous eyelid movements was assessed before and after treatment. The scores of the Jankovic rating scale (JRS) and Hemifacial Spasm Grading System (HSGS) were also assessed before and after treatment. The authors studied 22 patients. Significant reduction in JRS and HSGS scores and in the energy generated by the upper eyelid was observed after treatment. A power spectrum of less than 23,000 was associated with JRS and HSGS scores less than 4 and 6.25, respectively and a power spectrum greater than or equal to 23,000 was associated with JRS and HSGS scores greater than or equal to 4 and 6.25, respectively (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0025). Rating systems are easy to use, but they may exhibit limitations in sensitivity to assess differences between distinct disease patterns and between subtle differences in treatment responses. The high-speed video system permits a greater degree of accuracy, which allows for the assessment of differences in eyelid movement patterns and would permit better tailoring of treatment to patients. However, simpler devices employing this system would need to be developed, so that it could be used in clinical practice.

AbobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION

Overactive bladder is a common condition that can have a negative impact on quality of life. Botulinum Toxin A is a third line treatment for overactive bladder following conservative measures and anticholinergic medication. At present, OnabotulinumtoxinA is the only preparation licensed for this indication. More recently, trials have been undertaken to compare the efficacy of this to AbobotulinumtoxinA. Areas covered: This article aims to provide an overview of AbobotulinumtoxinA, which is currently not yet licensed for overactive bladder or neurogenic detrusor overactivity. It will detail the pharmacokinetics and dynamics, assess the available clinical trial data and make comparisons with current clinical practice. A systematic literature search was completed, using ovid Medline and Embase, with the aim to review all data concerning the administration of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of overactive bladder. Expert opinion: Currently, there are a lack of data on the use of AbobotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder or neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Current evidence concentrates on its use in neurogenic detrusor overactivity, and there are data to show it may be as efficacious as OnabotulinumtoxinA. However, there is a lack of homogenous data to compare the two products and therefore we are unable to recommend this currently.

Treatment of Blepharospasm/Hemifacial Spasm

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of both hemifacial spasm (HFS) and blepharospasm (BEB) requires making the appropriate clinical diagnosis. Advance imaging and electrophysiologic studies are useful; however, one's clinical suspicion is paramount. The purpose of this review is to summarize current and emerging therapies for both entities. Botulinum toxin (BTX) remains the first-line therapy to treat both conditions. If chemodenervation has failed, surgery may be considered. Due to the risks associated with surgery, the benefits of this option must be carefully weighed. Better surgical outcomes are possible when procedures are performed at tertiary centers with experienced surgeons and advanced imaging techniques. Microvascular decompression is an efficacious method to treat HFS, and myectomy is an option for medication-refractory BEB; the risks of the latter may outweigh any meaningful clinical benefits. Oral agents only provide short-term relief and can cause several unwanted effects; they are reserved for patients who cannot receive BTX and/or surgery. Transcranial magnetic stimulation has gained some traction in the treatment of BEB and may provide safer non-invasive options for refractory patients in the future.

Botulinum toxin in the management of facial paralysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Complete flaccid facial paralysis, as well as the synkinetic and hyperkinetic sequelae of partial recovery, has significant impact on quality of life. Patients suffer from functional deficiencies, cosmetic deformity, discomfort and social consequences leading to emotional distress. Despite an extensive and sophisticated array of available interventions for facial reanimation, most patients have persistent issues that require consistent follow-up. In long-term management, botulinum toxin (BT) injection remains a critical tool in the treatment of the facial paralysis patient, particularly in the case of synkinesis, hyperkinesis and imbalance. We review the recent scientific literature and highlight key principles and developments in the use of BT in the management of facial paralysis, including less common applications for acute facial paralysis, hyperlacrimation and pseudoptosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

We reviewed the literature for the latest advances in the use of BT in facial paralysis, including applications and technique, as well as measurement tools and adjunct exercises. We also share our experience in treating our own patient population.

SUMMARY

BT continues to be a well tolerated and effective tool in the long-term management of facial paralysis, specifically in treating synkinesis, imbalance and hyperkinesis, as well as hyperlacrimation and pseudoptosis. Consistent measurement tools and adjunct neuromuscular retraining are crucial in the successful deployment of BT. Controversy exists as to whether BT should be used to manage facial paralysis during the acute phase, and whether BT application to the nonparalyzed face can improve long-term recovery in the paralyzed side.

Long-term treatment of chronic migraine with OnabotulinumtoxinA: efficacy, quality of life and tolerability in a real-life setting

Botulinum toxin was shown to be effective in treatment of chronic migraine. We wanted to explore its efficacy and tolerability in chronic application under real-life conditions. For this, 27 consecutive patients (age 45.6 ± 10.8 years, 25 females, 2 males) received altogether 176 injection series (IS) with 189.7 ± 45.8MU onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox(®)) according to the PREEMPT scheme. During the study period altogether 6.5 ± 2.9 (min 4, max 13) IS were applied per patient (total treatment time of 73.1 ± 36.9 weeks). 96 % of the patients reported benefit. Monthly headache days were reduced from 18.9 ± 3.9 to 8.7 ± 4.5 (p < 0.001, -53.7 %), migraine days from 16.8 ± 4.9 to 7.4 ± 4.6 (p < 0.001, -55.1 %), autonomic days from 8.6 ± 7.5 to 2.7 ± 4.2 (p < 0.001, -71.9 %) and medication days from 14.2 ± 4.6 to 8.3 ± 4.2 (p < 0.001, -71.1 %). Health-related quality of life improved by 0.6-1.5 standard deviations (SD) (Short Form Health Survey), migraine-related quality of life by 1.4-2.0 SD (Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire) and by 1.9 SD (Headache Impact Test), depression by 1.1 SD (Beck Depression Inventory). Subjective global clinical improvement was 2.6 ± 0.6 (Global Clinical Improvement Scale). All improvements were stable throughout the entire study period. Adverse effects were infrequent, mild and transient. Botulinum toxin provides highly effective and safe long-term treatment of chronic migraine.

Conversion Ratio between Botox®, Dysport®, and Xeomin® in Clinical Practice

Botulinum neurotoxin has revolutionized the treatment of spasticity and is now administered worldwide. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A products available in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinum toxin-A (ONA) Botox(®), abobotulinum toxin-A (ABO), Dysport(®), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO, Xeomin(®)). Although the efficacies are similar, there is an intense debate regarding the comparability of various preparations. Here we will address the clinical issues of potency and conversion ratios, as well as safety issues such as toxin spread and immunogenicity, to provide guidance for BoNT-A use in clinical practice. INCO was shown to be as effective as ONA with a comparable adverse event profile when a clinical conversion ratio of 1:1 was used. The available clinical and preclinical data suggest that a conversion ratio ABO:ONA of 3:1-or even lower-could be appropriate for treating spasticity, cervical dystonia, and blepharospasm or hemifacial spasm. A higher conversion ratio may lead to an overdosing of ABO. While uncommon, distant spread may occur; however, several factors other than the pharmaceutical preparation are thought to affect spread. Finally, whereas the three products have similar efficacy when properly dosed, ABO has a better cost-efficacy profile.

Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Blepharospasm and Hemifacial Spasm

Background

The aim was to elucidate clinical trial efficacy, safety, and dosing practices of abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment in adult patients with blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. To date, most literature reviews for blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm have examined the effectiveness of all botulinum neurotoxin type A products as a class. However, differences in dosing units and recommended schemes provide a clear rationale for reviewing each product separately.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and other comparative clinical studies of ABO in the treatment of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm published in English between January 1991 and March 2015. Medical literature databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE) were searched. A total of five primary publications that evaluated ABO for the management of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm were identified and summarized.

Results

Data included 374 subjects with blepharospasm and 172 subjects with hemifacial spasm treated with ABO. Total ABO doses ranged between 80 and 340 U for blepharospasm and 25 and 85 U for hemifacial spasm, depending on the severity of the clinical condition. All studies showed statistically significant benefits for the treatment of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. ABO was generally well tolerated across the individual studies. Adverse events considered to be associated with ABO treatment included: ptosis, tearing, blurred vision, double vision, dry eyes, and facial weakness.

Discussion

These data from 5 randomized clinical studies represents the available evidence base of ABO in blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. Future studies in this area will add to this evidence base.

Botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of hemifacial spasm over 16 years

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and side effects of botulinum toxin (BTX) in the treatment of hemifacial spasm (HFS). We also focused on the divergence between different injection techniques and commercial forms. We retrospectively evaluated 470 sessions of BTX injections administered to 68 patients with HFS. The initial time of improvement, duration and degree of improvement, and frequency and duration of adverse effects were analysed. Pretarsal and preseptal injections and Botox (Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) and Dysport (Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Paris, France) brands were compared in terms of efficacy and side effects, accompanied by a review of papers which reported BTX treatment of HFS. An average of 34.5 units was used per patient. The first improvement was felt after 8 days and lasted for 14.8 weeks. Patients experienced a 73.7% improvement. In 79.7% of injections, no adverse effect was reported, in 4.9% erythema, ecchymosis, and swelling in the injection area, in 3.6% facial asymmetry, in 3.4% ptosis, in 3.2% diplopia, and in 2.3% difficulty of eye closure was detected. Patients reported 75% improvement on average after 314 sessions of pretarsal injections and 72.7% improvement after 156 sessions of preseptal injections (p=0.001). The efficacy and side effects of Botox and Dysport were similar. BTX is an effective and safe treatment option for HFS. No difference was determined between Botox and Dysport, and pretarsal injection is better than preseptal injection regarding the reported degree of improvement.

Comparison of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA at the 1: 3 conversion ratio for the treatment of asymmetry after long-term facial paralysis

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A injection into the nonparalyzed side is used to treat asymmetry resulting from facial palsy. OnabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA units are not equivalent. The authors compared the conversion ratio of 1:3 in patients with facial palsy.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients (age, 16 to 67 years; 43 women) with longstanding facial palsy were randomly treated with either onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 25) or abobotulinumtoxinA (n = 30) injections into the nonparalyzed side. Adverse effects, facial symmetry, subjective satisfaction, and Facial Disability Index were assessed after 1 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The incidence of adverse effects was higher with abobotulinumtoxinA (93.3 percent versus 64.0 percent; p = 0.007). Clinical scores of the nonparalyzed side decreased after 1 month and increased again at 6 months, with no between-group differences. Scores of the paralyzed side were lower in the onabotulinumtoxinA group before treatment, but similar in both groups thereafter. The paralyzed side scores increased after 1 month, and at 6 months were still higher than the pretreatment scores in both groups. Subjective assessment improved at all time points compared with pretreatment scores and differed between the two groups only at 1 month, when the abobotulinumtoxinA group was a bit too paralyzed. The physical function and social/well-being function subscales of the Facial Disability Index did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both toxins efficiently reduced asymmetry in patients with facial palsy. Adverse effects were higher with abobotulinumtoxinA at an equivalence ratio of 1:3.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Dysport and Botox at a ratio of 2.5:1 units in cervical dystonia: a double-blind, randomized study

We aimed to compare Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA, Ipsen Biopharm, Slough, UK) and Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) at a 2.5:1 ratio in the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD). A Dysport/Botox ratio of lower than 3:1 was suggested as a more appropriate conversion ratio, considering its higher efficacy and more frequent incidence of adverse effects not only in the treatment of CD but also in other focal movement disorders. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, non-inferiority, two-period crossover study was done in CD, with a duration of at least 18 months. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment for the first period with Dysport or Botox, and they were followed up for 16 weeks after the injection. After a 4-week washout period, they were switched to the other formulation and then followed up for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the changes in the Tsui scale between the baseline value and that at 1 month after each injection. A total of 103 patients were enrolled, and 94 completed the study. Mean changes in the Tsui scale between baseline and 4 weeks after each injection tended to favor Botox; however, this was not statistically significant (4.0 ± 3.9 points for the Dysport treatment vs. 4.8 ± 4.1 points for Botox; 95% confidence interval, −0.1-1.7; P = 0.091). The mean change of the Toronto western spasmodic torticollis rating scale score, the proportion of improvement in clinical global impression and patient global impression, and the incidences of adverse events were not significantly different between the two treatments. With regard to safety and efficacy, Dysport was not inferior to Botox in patients with CD at a conversion factor of 2.5:1. [http//clinicaltrial.gov: NCT00950664] © The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Blepharospasm: long-term treatment with either Botox®, Xeomin® or Dysport®

Botulinum toxin (BT) therapy is the treatment of choice for blepharospasm (BPS). Currently available BT type A drugs include Botox(®), Dysport(®) and Xeomin(®). Until now, there are few long-term studies on BT therapy for BPS. This is the first long-term study comparing all three major BT drugs. We collected treatment, efficacy and adverse effect data on BPS patients treated with either Botox(®), Dysport(®) or Xeomin(®) for at least eight consecutive treatments. Two hundred and eighty-eight patients (208 females, 80 males, age 62 ± 12 years) were included in this study. The treatment time was 11.2 ± 4.1 years covering 10,701 injection series. Doses were 47 ± 10 MU for Botox(®), 120 ± 35 MU for Dysport(®) and 62 ± 11 MU for Xeomin(®) (Botox(®) dose vs Xeomin(®) dose: p < 0.001, unpaired t test). 85 % of all patients had stable doses. The onset of the therapeutic effect was after 6.1 ± 3.3 days and its duration lasted 10.2 ± 3.5 weeks. The Global Clinical Improvement (GCI, 0 = no, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = marked improvement in severity and function) as estimated by the patient was 2.5 ± 0.6. It was stable in 90% of the patients. Adverse effect frequency was 3.0% (ptosis 2.3%, dry eye 0.5%, diplopia 0.2%). None of these findings was significantly different between Botox(®), Dysport(®) and Xeomin(®). Our study, one of the largest studies on BT therapy of BPS and the study with the longest follow-up, confirms that BT therapy produces robust clinical improvement which is stable throughout the treatment time. Therapeutic effects start after 6.1 days and last for about 10 weeks before they start to vanish. With this, they are approximately 2 weeks shorter than the recommended inter-injection interval. Adverse effects were rare, mild and always transient. BT therapy is a safe and effective treatment for BSP. Shorter inter-injection intervals may improve therapeutic results.

Misdiagnosis of hemifacial spasm is a frequent event in the primary care setting

Primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterized by irregular and involuntary contraction of the muscles innervated by the ipsilateral facial nerve. Treatment controls symptoms and improves quality of life (QoL). Objective : Evaluate the initial diagnosis and treatment of HFS prior to referral to a tertiary center. Method : We interviewed through a standard questionnaire 66 patients currently followed in our center. Results : Mean age: 64.19±11.6 years, mean age of symptoms onset: 51.9±12.5 years, male/female ratio of 1:3. None of the patients had a correct diagnosis in their primary care evaluation. Medication was prescribed to 56.8%. Mean time from symptom onset to botulinum toxin treatment: 4.34 ±7.1 years, with a 95% satisfaction. Thirty percent presented social embarrassment due to HFS. Conclusion : Despite its relatively straightforward diagnosis, all patients had an incorrect diagnosis and treatment on their first evaluation. HFS brings social impairment and the delay in adequate treatment negatively impacts QoL.

Blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm: long-term treatment with botulinum toxin

INTRODUCTION

Our purpose is to describe the demographic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics of patients with blepharospasm (BS) and hemifacial spasm (HFS) in treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BtA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with BS or HFS and treated with BtA in the Neurology Department at Complejo Asistencial de Segovia between March 1991 and December 2009.

RESULTS

Different variables were collected from 34 patients with BS and 55 with HFS, of whom 44.1% and 32.7% respectively had been undergoing treatment with BtA for more than 10 years. Elapsed time from symptom onset to the first visit was 24 months in the BS group and 59.7 months in the HFS group. Diagnosis was given on the first visit for 76.5% of the BS patients and 90.7% of the HFS patients. Patients were referred by their primary care centres in 34.6% of the cases with BS and in 77.6% of the cases with HFS. The most commonly used BtA preparation was BOTOX(®) in both groups, and there were no cases of primary or secondary resistance. The median dose of BtA was raised gradually in both groups, and the increase was statistically significant during the early years of treatment. The most common side effect was ptosis (47.1% in BS, 32.5% in HFS).

CONCLUSIONS

BS and HFS are the most common facial movement disorders. The demographic and clinical characteristics and therapeutic findings from this study show that treatment with BtA is both effective and safe over the long term.

Botulinum toxin in hemifacial spasm: the challenge to assess the effect of treatment

Hemifacial spasm is characterized by intermittent tonic or clonic contractions of the muscles supplied by the facial nerve. Although vision is less impaired than in patients with blepharospasm, the disease can impose significant psychosocial burden on patient's life. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is the well-established pharmacotherapy of choice, but evidence from controlled clinical trials is sparse. There is a broad variety of rating scales used in clinical studies with BoNT and obviously no consensus has been reached how to assess treatment outcome in hemifacial spasm. Clinical rating scales focusing on objective function were used in a couple of controlled studies with BoNT and were appropriate to discriminate between BoNTA and placebo. But it has not been shown that they would be sensitive enough to detect minor differences between several BoNT formulations. Although most of the clinical scales consist of a five-point rating, the descriptors for the ordinal numbers are not necessarily the same so that the results of different clinical studies are not comparable to each other. The main disadvantage of clinical scales is that they do not take into account patient's perspective of disability and impact on daily life. For this reason some clinical studies applied health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires to assess efficacy, and one research group worked on the development of disease-specific tools. Although these HRQoL questionnaires have been validated and a good correlation to disease severity could be demonstrated, they are far from having become an established variable for efficacy assessment in hemifacial spasm trials. The challenge remains to establish tools which are appropriate to rate BoNT treatment effects in hemifacial spasm. Currently, it is virtually impossible to identify one rating scale which can cover all relevant aspects of the disorder. In consequence we recommend the implementation of a combination of different rating scales which address functional impairment as well as those issues which are most important to patients. Further research is needed to standardize and validate rating scales for hemifacial spasm in clinical studies.

Is it always necessary to apply botulinum toxin into the lower facial muscles in hemifacial spasm?: a randomized, single-blind, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin (BTX) injections are accepted as safe and efficacious in the treatment of hemifacial spasm (HFS), but it is still debated whether BTX treatment of lower facial muscles should be performed or not.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate the necessity of BTX administration into lower facial muscles in patients with HFS.

METHODS

A randomized, single-blind, crossover, clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-three HFS patients were randomly allocated to two different application methods. The patients were administered BTX type A into both the orbicularis oculi and perioral muscles in the first method and BTX type A into the orbicularis oculi but placebo into the perioral muscles in the second method. Subjects were crossed over to the alternate method when they needed BTX injection with a minimum of 3 months' duration. All the patients underwent both methods with no change in the total dose of BTX.

RESULTS

All the patients benefited from BTX treatment regardless of the methods. However, in the patients with severe lower facial muscle involvement, the application of BTX into both orbicularis oculi and lower facial muscles led to better results.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that BTX application to lower facial muscles might not be necessary in patients with mild lower facial involvement.