Development and validation of a solid-phase competition ELISA based on virus-like particles of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A for antibody detection

Development and Validation of Serotype-Specific Blocking ELISA for the Detection of Anti-FMDV O/A/Asia1/SAT2 Antibodies

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is one of the most infectious viral transboundary diseases of livestock, which causes devastating global economic losses. Different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are used for sero-surveillance of the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). However, more sensitive, accurate, and convenient ELISAs are still required to detect antibodies against FMDV serotypes. The primary goal of this study was to establish serotype-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based blocking ELISAs (mAb-bELISAs) that would provide better performance characteristics or be equivalent in performance characteristics compared with a conventional polyclonal antibody (pAb)-based competitive ELISA (pAb-cELISA). Four mAb-bELISAs were developed using FMDV serotype-specific mAbs for the detection of anti-FMDV/O/A/Asia1/SAT2 antibodies. Using a 50% cut-off, all four mAb-bELISAs exhibited species-independent 99.74%, 98.01%, 96.59%, and 98.55% diagnostic specificity (DSp) and 98.93%, 98.25%, 100%, and 87.50% diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) for FMDV serotypes O, A, Asia1, and SAT2, respectively. In addition, a 100% DSe of serotypes O- and SAT2-specific mAb-bELISAs was observed for porcine sera when the cut-off was 30%. All mAb-bELISAs developed in this study displayed high repeatability/reproducibility without cross-reactivity. Finally, the diagnostic performance of mAb-bELISAs was found to be better than or equivalent to compared with pAb-cELISAs, suggesting that mAb-bELISAs can be used to replace existing pAb-ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against these four FMDV serotypes.

Monoclonal antibody based solid phase competition ELISA to detect FMDV serotype A specific antibodies

In Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) enzootic countries, periodic vaccination is the key tool in controlling the disease incidence. Active seromonitoring of the vaccinated population is critical to assess the impact of vaccination. Virus neutralization test (VNT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are commonly used for antibody detection. Assays like liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) or solid phase competition ELISA (SPCE) are preferred as they do not require handling of live FMDV and are routinely used for seromonitoring or for vaccine potency testing; however, false positives are high in LPBE. Here we report, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) based SPCE as a potential alternate assay for antibody titration. From a panel of 12 mAbs against FMDV serotype A, two mAbs were chosen for the development of SPCE. Based on a set of 453 sera, it was demonstrated that mAb 2C4G11, mAb 6E8D11and polyclonal antibody (pAb) based SPCE had a relative sensitivity of 86.1, 86.1 and 80.3 %; and specificity of 99.6, 99.1 and 99.1 %, respectively. The correlation, repeatability, and level of agreement of the assays were high demonstrating the potential use of mAb in large scale surveillance studies and regular vaccine potency testing.

A poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based solid-phase microchip platform for dual detection of Pseudorabies virus gD and gE antibodies

Pseudorabies caused by pseudorabies virus (PRV) infection is still a major disease affecting the pig industry; its eradication depends on effective vaccination and antibody (Ab) detection. For a more rapid and accurate PRV detection method that is suitable for clinical application, here, we established a poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based (efficient removal of non-specific binding) solid-phase protein chip platform (blocking ELISA) for dual detection of PRV gD and gE Abs. The purified gD and gE proteins expressed in baculovirus were coated into the highly hydrophobic nanomembrane by an automatic spotter, and the gray values measured by a scanner were used for the S/N (sample/negative) value calculation (gD and gE Abs standard, positive: S/N value ≤0.6; negative: S/N value >0.7; suspicious: 0.6 < S/N ≤ 0.7). The method showed an equal sensitivity in the gD Ab test of immunized pig serum samples compared to the neutralization test and higher sensitivity in the gE Ab test compared to the commercial gE Ab detection kit. In the clinical evaluation, we found an agreement of 100% (122/122) in the gD Ab detection compared to the neutralization test and an agreement of 97.5% (119/122) in the gE Ab detection compared to the commercial PRV gE Ab detection kit. In summary, the protein chip platform for dual detection of PRV gD and gE Abs showed high sensitivity and specificity, which is suitable for PRV immune efficacy evaluation and epidemic monitoring.