Genetic diversity in the capsid protein gene of porcine circovirus type 3 in Vietnam from 2018 to 2019

Co-circulation and genetic characteristics of porcine circoviruses in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome cases in commercial swine farms

This study aimed to investigate the co-infection and genetic characteristics of Porcine circoviruses in PMWS-affected pigs in five commercial farrow-to-finish swine farms in Vietnam. By the end of 2022, the percentage of PMWS-affected pigs in these farms has increased significantly compared to previous years. The lymph node samples from ten PMWS typical cases were randomly collected to test for the presence of PRRSV, PCV2, PCV3 and PCV4. While PRRSV and PCV4 were not found in these cases, 10 and 3 out of 10 samples were positive for PCV2 and PCV3, respectively. Three farms in the study showed the co-infection of PCV2 and PCV3 in affected pigs. Besides, all PCV-positive samples were sequenced to evaluate genetic characterization of PCVs in PMWS-affected cases. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all PCV3 strains in the study were clustered into PCV3b genotype. 8 out of 10 PCV2 strains belonged to PCV2d genotype while the remaining two strains belonged to PCV2b genotypes. Two farms had co-circulation of PCV2b and PCV2d genotypes in two different age groups of pigs, which is reported for the first time in Vietnam. Several amino acid substitutions were identified in important antigenic regions in the capsid protein of the PCV2 field strains compared to vaccine strains. Taken together, the results showed the high co-prevalence of PCV3 and PCV2, and the wide genetic diversity of PCV2 field and vaccine strains may be the cause of the increased PMWS situation in these pig farms.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13337-023-00849-4.

A Retrospective Analysis of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 in Samples Collected from 2008 to 2021 in Mexico

Porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) is a nonenveloped virus of the Circoviridae family. This virus has been identified in pigs of different ages and pigs with several clinical manifestations of the disease or even in apparently healthy pigs. While PCV3 was first reported in 2015, several retrospective studies have reported the virus before that year. The earliest report indicates that PCV3 has been circulated in swine farms since 1996. In this study, we evaluated the presence of PCV3 in samples collected in Mexico in 2008, 2015, 2020, and 2021. This study assessed PCV3 DNA by qPCR and antibodies against CAP protein by indirect ELISA. The results showed that PCV3 (DNA and anti-CAP antibodies) was detected in the samples collected from 2008 to 2021. The highest prevalence was in 2008 (100%), and the lowest was in 2015 (negative). Genetic analysis of ORF2 showed that the virus identified belonged to genotype a, as most of the viruses identified thus far. PCV3 was detected in samples from piglets with respiratory signs and growth retardation, sows with reproductive failure, or asymptomatic piglets and sows. Pigs with respiratory signs, growth retardation, or reproductive failure had a higher prevalence of antibodies and qPCR-positive samples. In conclusion, this study showed that PCV3 has been circulating in Mexico since 2008 and that PCV3 DNA and antibodies were more prevalent in samples from pigs with clinical manifestations of diseases.

Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV-3) variability: Is it in the virus or in the classification criteria?

The continuous discovery of new viruses during the last decades has increased the need for new classification approaches and rules. Currently, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses classifies viruses up to the species level. However, because of the higher variability of most of these infectious agents, a below-species categorization is often required for proper epidemiological investigations. Unfortunately, variable criteria are typically proposed by different research groups, leading to misleading and poorly reproducible results. This scenario occurred for the recently identified Porcine circovirus 3. Although genotype definition standards had been defined by a group of experts in the field, recent articles have been published introducing new genotypes, whose classification rules are not reported. We therefore would like to stress the usefulness of defining and maintaining a common language to allow proper results comparison among groups. We consider the consensus opinion of a heterogeneous expert team as the most valuable approach. Nevertheless, if other approaches are proposed, the disclosure of the criteria and the comparison with previous literature should be deemed mandatory to allow effective results reproducibility, interpretation and sharing.