Review: mapping epidermal beta-protein distribution in the lizard Anolis carolinensis shows a specific localization for the formation of scales, pads, and claws

Microscopic structure and immunolabeling of extremely overlapped scales in some scincid, anguid, and pygopod lizards

Skink, anguid, and pygopod lizards possess an extremely flat skin, imparting a compact and solid body and shining surface that facilitates their slider and/or fossorial movements. The present morphological study, conducted using immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, has analyzed the microscopical morphology of extremely overlapped scales in different lizards, including species with limb reduction (scincids such as Lerista bougainvilli, Scincella lateralis, Lampropholis delicata) or legless (pygopods such as Lialis burtonis and Delma molleri and the anguid Anguis fragilis). The outer surface of the epidermis shows different micro-structures of the Oberhautchen layer containing corneous beta-proteins (CBPs) with variable immunoreactivity for these proteins. The beta-layer is relatively thick in most of these species, probably in relation to the resistance against strong mechanical forces acting on scales during the movements on harsh substrates. The scincid and anguid lizards also possess and regenerate osteoderms that reinforce scales flatness and mechanical resistance during the serpentiform or fossorial movements of these reptiles. Osteoderms are absent in pygopods. Roundish cells with a granular content are detected in the deep hinge region of scales in Lerista and Lampropholis skinks. Whether these cells may secrete substances that facilitate scale anti-friction and also determine shining of the skin surface remains to be shown.

Spatio-temporal expression patterns of glycine-rich beta proteins and cysteine-rich beta proteins in setae development of Gekko japonicus

BACKGROUND

Setae on the pad lamellae of the Japanese gecko Gekko japonicus (Schlegel, 1836), a vital epidermal derivative, are primarily composed of cornified beta-proteins (CBPs) and play a pivotal role in adhesion and climbing. The amino acid composition of CBPs might be a determining factor influencing their functional properties. However, the molecular mechanisms governed by CBP genes with diverse amino acid compositions in setae development remain unexplored.

RESULTS

Based on RNA-seq analyses, this study confirmed that all G. japonicus CBPs (GjCBPs) are involved in setae formation. Cysteine-rich CBPs encoding genes (ge-cprp-17 to ge-cprp-26) and glycine-rich CBPs encoding genes (ge-gprp-17 to ge-gprp-22) were haphazardly selected, with quantitative real-time PCR revealing their expression patterns in embryonic pad lamellae and dorsal epidermis. It is inferred that glycine-rich CBPs are integral to the formation of both dorsal scales and lamellar setae, cysteine-rich CBPs are primarily associated with setae development. Additionally, fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed spatiotemporal differences in the expression of a glycine-rich CBP encoding gene (ge-gprp-19) and a cysteine-rich CBP encoding gene (ge-cprp-17) during dorsal scales and/or lamellar development.

CONCLUSIONS

All 66 CBPs are involved in the formation of setae. Glycine-rich CBPs hold a significant role in the development of dorsal scales and lamellar setae, whereas most cysteine-rich CBPs appear to be essential components of G. japonicus setae. Even GjCBPs with similar amino acid compositions may play diverse functions. The clear spatio-temporal expression differences between the glycine-rich and cysteine-rich CBP encoding genes during epidermal scale and/or setae formation were observed. Embryonic developmental stages 39 to 42 emerged as crucial phases for setae development. These findings lay the groundwork for deeper investigation into the function of GjCBPs in the development of G. japonicus setae.

Scales of non-avian reptiles and their derivatives contain corneous beta proteins coded from genes localized in the Epidermal Differentiation Complex

The evolution of modern reptiles from basic reptilian ancestors gave rise to scaled vertebrates. Scales are of different types, and their corneous layer can shed frequently during the year in lepidosaurians (lizards, snakes), 1-2 times per year in the tuatara and in some freshwater turtle, irregularly in different parts of the body in crocodilians, or simply wore superficially in marine and terrestrial turtles. Lepidosaurians possess tuberculate, non-overlapped or variably overlapped scales with inter-scale (hinge) regions. The latter are hidden underneath the outer scale surface or may be more exposed in specific body areas. Hinge regions allow stretching during growth and movement so that the skin remains mechanically functional. Crocodilian and turtles feature flat and shield scales (scutes) with narrow inter-scale regions for stretching and growth. The epidermis of non-avian reptilian hinge regions is much thinner than the exposed outer surface of scales and is less cornified. Despite the thickness of the epidermis, scales are mainly composed of variably amount of Corneous Beta Proteins (CBPs) that are coded in a gene cluster known as EDC (Epidermal Differentiation Complex). These are small proteins, 100-200 amino acid long of 8-25 kDa, rich in glycine and cysteine but also in serine, proline and valine that participate to the formation of beta-sheets in the internal part of the protein, the beta-region. This region determines the further polymerization of CBPs in filamentous proteins that, together a network of Intermediate Filament Keratins (IFKs) and other minor epidermal proteins from the EDC make the variable pliable or inflexible corneous material of reptilian scales, claws and of turtle beak. The acquisition of scales and skin derivatives with different mechanical and material properties, mainly due to the evolution of reptile CBPs, is essential for the life and different adaptations of these vertebrates.

Duplications in Corneous Beta Protein Genes and the Evolution of Gecko Adhesion

Corneous proteins are an important component of the tetrapod integument. Duplication and diversification of keratins and associated proteins are linked with the origin of most novel integumentary structures like mammalian hair, avian feathers, and scutes covering turtle shells. Accordingly, the loss of integumentary structures often coincides with the loss of genes encoding keratin and associated proteins. For example, many hair keratins in dolphins and whales have become pseudogenes. The adhesive setae of geckos and anoles are composed of both intermediate filament keratins (IF-keratins, formerly known as alpha-keratins) and corneous beta-proteins (CBPs, formerly known as beta-keratins) and recent whole genome assemblies of two gecko species and an anole uncovered duplications in seta-specific CBPs in each of these lineages. While anoles evolved adhesive toepads just once, there are two competing hypotheses about the origin(s) of digital adhesion in geckos involving either a single origin or multiple origins. Using data from three published gecko genomes, I examine CBP gene evolution in geckos and find support for a hypothesis where CBP gene duplications are associated with the repeated evolution of digital adhesion. Although these results are preliminary, I discuss how additional gecko genome assemblies, combined with phylogenies of keratin and associated protein genes and gene duplication models, can provide rigorous tests of several hypotheses related to gecko CBP evolution. This includes a taxon sampling strategy for sequencing and assembly of gecko genomes that could help resolve competing hypotheses surrounding the origin(s) of digital adhesion.

Review: mapping proteins localized in adhesive setae of the tokay gecko and their possible influence on the mechanism of adhesion

The digital adhesive pads that allow gecko lizards to climb vertical surfaces result from the modification of the oberhautchen layer of the epidermis in normal scales. This produces sticky filaments of 10-100 μm in length, called setae that are composed of various proteins. The prevalent types, termed corneous beta proteins (CBPs), have a low molecular weight (12-20 kDa) and contain a conserved central region of 34 amino acids with a beta-conformation. This determines their polymerization into long beta-filaments that aggregate into corneous beta-bundles that form the framework of setae. Previous studies showed that the prevalent CBPs in the setae of Gekko gecko are cysteine-rich and are distributed from the base to the tip of adhesive setae, called spatulae. The molecular analysis of these proteins, although the three-dimensional structure remains undetermined, indicates that most of them are charged positively and some contain aromatic amino acids. These characteristics may impede adhesion by causing the setae to stick together but may also potentiate the van der Waals interactions responsible for most of the adhesion process on hydrophobic or hydrophilic substrates. The review stresses that not only the nanostructural shape and the high number of setae present in adhesive pads but also the protein composition of setae influence the strength of adhesion to almost any type of substrate. Therefore, formulation of dry materials mimicking gecko adhesiveness should also consider the chemical nature of the polymers utilized to fabricate the future dry adhesives in order to obtain the highest performance.

Disulfide-bond-mediated cross-linking of corneous beta-proteins in lepidosaurian epidermis

Corneous beta-proteins (CBPs), formerly referred to as beta-keratins, are major protein components of the epidermis in lepidosaurian reptiles and are largely responsible for their material properties. These proteins have been suggested to form filaments of 3.4nm in thickness and to interact with themselves or with other proteins, including intermediate filament (IF) keratins. Here, we performed immunocytochemical labeling of CBPs in the epidermis of different lizards and snakes and investigated by immunoblotting analysis whether the reduction of disulfide bonds or protein oxidation affects the solubility and mobility of these CBPs. Immunogold labeling suggested that CBPs are partly co-localized with IF-keratins in differentiating and mature beta-cells. The chemical reduction of epidermal proteins from lizard and snake epidermis increased the abundance of CBP-immunoreactive bands in the size range of CBP monomers on Western blots. Conversely, in vitro oxidation of epidermal proteins reduced the abundance of putative CBP monomers. Some modifications in the IF-keratin range were also noted. These results strongly indicate that CBPs associate with IF-keratins and other proteins via disulfide bonds in the epidermis of lizards and snakes, which likely contributes to the resilience of the cornified beta- and alpha-layers of the lepidosaurian epidermis in live animals and after shedding.

Identification and comparative analysis of the epidermal differentiation complex in snakes

The epidermis of snakes efficiently protects against dehydration and mechanical stress. However, only few proteins of the epidermal barrier to the environment have so far been identified in snakes. Here, we determined the organization of the Epidermal Differentiation Complex (EDC), a cluster of genes encoding protein constituents of cornified epidermal structures, in snakes and compared it to the EDCs of other squamates and non-squamate reptiles. The EDC of snakes displays shared synteny with that of the green anole lizard, including the presence of a cluster of corneous beta-protein (CBP)/beta-keratin genes. We found that a unique CBP comprising 4 putative beta-sheets and multiple cysteine-rich EDC proteins are conserved in all snakes and other squamates investigated. Comparative genomics of squamates suggests that the evolution of snakes was associated with a gene duplication generating two isoforms of the S100 fused-type protein, scaffoldin, the origin of distinct snake-specific EDC genes, and the loss of other genes that were present in the EDC of the last common ancestor of snakes and lizards. Taken together, our results provide new insights into the evolution of the skin in squamates and a basis for the characterization of the molecular composition of the epidermis in snakes.

Low-cysteine alpha-keratins and corneous beta-proteins are initially formed in the regenerating tail epidermis of lizard

During tail regeneration in lizards, the stratified regenerating epidermis progressively gives rise to neogenic scales that form a new epidermal generation. Initially, a soft, un-scaled, pliable, and extensible epidermis is formed that is progressively replaced by a resistant but non-extensible scaled epidermis. This suggests that the initial corneous proteins are later replaced with harder corneous proteins. Using PCR and immunocytochemistry, the present study shows an upregulation in the synthesis of low-cysteine type I and II alpha-keratins and of corneous beta-proteins with a medium cysteine content and a low content in glycine (formerly termed beta-keratins) produced at the beginning of epidermal regeneration. Quantitative PCR indicates upregulation in the production of alpha-keratin mRNAs, particularly of type I, between normal and the thicker regenerating epidermis. PCR-data also indicate a higher upregulation for cysteine-rich corneous beta-proteins and a high but less intense upregulation of low glycine corneous protein mRNAs at the beginning of scale regeneration. Immunolabeling confirms the localization of these proteins, and in particular of beta-proteins with a medium content in cysteine initially formed in the wound epidermis and later in the differentiating corneous layers of regenerating scales. It is concluded that the wound epidermis initially contains alpha-keratins and corneous beta-proteins with a lower cysteine content than more specialized beta-proteins later formed in the mature scales. These initial corneous proteins are likely related to the pliability of the wound epidermis while more specialized alpha-keratins and beta-proteins richer in glycine and cysteine are synthesized later in the mature and inflexible scales. J. Morphol. 278:119-130, 2017. ©© 2016 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.