EPR UNIFORM FIELD SIGNAL ENHANCEMENT BY DIELECTRIC TUBES IN CAVITIES

Towards high performance dielectric microwave resonators for X-band EPR spectroscopy

Microwave (MW) resonators in Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy concentrate the MW magnetic field (B1) at the sample and separate the MW electric field from the sample. There are numerous experimental methods in EPR spectroscopy which all impose different requirements on MW resonators (e.g. high or low quality factor, MW conversion, and B1-field homogeneity). Although commercial spectrometers offer standardized MW resonators for a broad application range, newly emerging and highly-specialized research fields push these spectrometers to or beyond their sensitivity limits. Optimizing the MW resonator offers one direct approach to improve the sensitivity. Here we present three low-cost optimization approaches for a commercially available X-band (9-10 GHz) MW resonator for three experimental purposes (continuous-wave (CW), transient and pulse EPR). We obtain enhanced MW conversion factors for all three optimized resonators and higher quality factors for two optimized resonators. The latter is important for CW and transient EPR. Furthermore, we fabricated a resonator which features an extended area of homogeneous B1-field and, hence, improved pulse EPR performance. Our results demonstrate that small changes to a commercial MW resonator can enhance its performance in general or for specific applications.

Recent advances in microresonators and supporting instrumentation for electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy characterizes the magnetic properties of paramagnetic materials at the atomic and molecular levels. Resonators are an enabling technology of EPR spectroscopy. Microresonators, which are miniaturized versions of resonators, have advanced inductive-detection EPR spectroscopy of mass-limited samples. Here, we provide our perspective of the benefits and challenges associated with microresonator use for EPR spectroscopy. To begin, we classify the application space for microresonators and present the conceptual foundation for analysis of resonator sensitivity. We summarize previous work and provide insight into the design and fabrication of microresonators as well as detail the requirements and challenges that arise in incorporating microresonators into EPR spectrometer systems. Finally, we provide our perspective on current challenges and prospective fruitful directions.

Improving B1 field homogeneity in dielectric tube resonators for EPR spectroscopy via controlled shaping of the dielectric insert

We propose an approach for improving the homogeneity of microwave magnetic field amplitude in a dielectric tube resonator for electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy at X-band. The improvement is achieved by "shaping" (controllable variation of the outer diameter of a dielectric insert along its axial direction). Various shaping scenarios based on the principle of discrete solenoids and electromagnetic calculations have been considered. The dielectric insert having the most promising shape was manufactured from a bismuth germanate single crystal. The shaped insert increases the area at B₁ > 0.9 B_1max from 5.06 to 7.36 mm. Higher sensitivity and lower likelihood of quantitative errors have been achieved in pulse EPR experiments for "long" samples (whose length was comparable to that of the dielectric insert) in a shaped dielectric insert.

Rutile dielectric loop-gap resonator for X-band EPR spectroscopy of small aqueous samples

The performance of a metallic microwave resonator that contains a dielectric depends on the separation between metallic and dielectric surfaces, which affects radio frequency currents, evanescent waves, and polarization charges. The problem has previously been discussed for an X-band TE₀₁₁ cylindrical cavity resonator that contains an axial dielectric tube (Hyde and Mett, 2017). Here, a short rutile dielectric tube inserted into a loop-gap resonator (LGR) at X-band, which is called a dielectric LGR (dLGR), is considered. The theory is developed and experimental results are presented. It was found that a central sample loop surrounded by four "flux-return" loops (i.e., 5-loop-4-gap) is preferable to a 3-loop-2-gap configuration. For sufficiently small samples (less than 1 µL), a rutile dLGR is preferred relative to an LGR both at constant Λ (B₁/P_l) and at constant incident power. Introduction of LGR technology to X-band EPR was a significant advance for site-directed spin labeling because of small sample size and high Λ. The rutile dLGR introduced in this work offers further extension to samples that can be as small as 50  nL when using typical EPR acquisition times.

Uniform Field Resonators for EPR Spectroscopy: A Review

Cavity resonators are often used for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Rectangular TE102 and cylindrical TE011 are common modes at X-band even though the field varies cosinusoidally along the Z-axis. The authors found a way to create a uniform field (UF) in these modes. A length of waveguide at cut-off was introduced for the sample region, and tailored end sections were developed that supported the microwave resonant mode. This work is reviewed here. The radio frequency (RF) magnetic field in loop-gap resonators (LGR) at X-band is uniform along the Z-axis of the sample, which is a benefit of LGR technology. The LGR is a preferred structure for EPR of small samples. At Q-band and W-band, the LGR often exhibits nonuniformity along the Z-axis. Methods to trim out this nonuniformity, which are closely related to the methods used for UF cavity resonators, are reviewed. In addition, two transmission lines that are new to EPR, dielectric tube waveguide and circular ridge waveguide, were recently used in UF cavity designs that are reviewed. A further benefit of UF resonators is that cuvettes for aqueous samples can be optimum in cross section along the full sample axis, which improves quantification in EPR spectroscopy of biological samples.