Clinical effect of bisphosphonate and vitamin D on osteoporosis: reappraisal of a multicenter double-blind clinical trial comparing etidronate and alfacalcidol

Spinal Compression Fracture Management: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies and Possible Future Avenues

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

Despite the numerous treatment options for vertebral compression fractures, a consensus opinion for the management of patients with these factures has not been established. This review is meant to provide an up-to-date overview of the most common treatment strategies for compression fractures and to suggest possible routes for the development of clearer treatment guidelines.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search of PubMed was performed. All results from the past 30 years were obtained and evaluated based on title and abstract. The full length of relevant studies was analyzed for level of evidence, and the strongest studies were used in this review.

RESULTS

The major treatment strategies for patients with compression fractures are conservative pain management and vertebral augmentation. Despite potential adverse effects, medical management, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, calcitonin, teriparatide, and bisphosphonates, remains the first-line therapy for patients. Evidence suggests that vertebral augmentation, especially some of the newer procedures, have the potential to dramatically reduce pain and improve quality of life. At this time, balloon-assisted kyphoplasty is the procedure with the most evidence of support.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current literature, it is evident that there is a lack of standard of care for patients with vertebral compression fractures, which is either due to lack of evidence that a procedure is successful or due to serious adverse effects encountered with prolonged treatment. For a consensus to be reached, prospective clinical trials need to be formulated with potential new biomarkers to assess efficacy of treatment strategies.

Comparison of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar Spine and Fracture Rate among Eight Drugs in Treatments of Osteoporosis in Men: A Network Meta-Analysis

Context

The preferred treatment for osteoporosis in men is debated, and pairwise meta-analysis cannot obtain hierarchies of these treatments.

Objective

The objective of this study was to integrate the evidence and provide hierarchies of eight drugs based on their effect on the bone mineral density in the lumbar spine (BMD in LS) and the fracture rate.

Data Sources

Eligible studies were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK), and the Current Controlled Trials databases.

Study Selection

RCTs or quasi-RCTs reporting at least two drugs (two active drugs or one active drug and a placebo) used to treat osteoporosis in men were selected by two authors.

Data Extraction

Two authors independently extracted the data.

Data Synthesis

Thirteen studies involving 3647 patients were included. Compared with placebo therapy, zoledronate (SMDs 13.48, 95% credible intervals 11.88-15.08) yielded the most significant effect on increasing the BMD in LS, followed by alendronate (11.04, 9.68-12.41), teriparatide (20mcg) + risedronate (10.98, 8.55-13.48), risedronate (10.33, 8.68-12.01), teriparatide (20mcg) (9.33, 6.87-11.76), strontium ranelate (8.88, 7.51-10.24), ibandronate (5.49, 3.82-7.16), parathyroid hormone (1-84) (4.89, 3.12-6.62) and alfacalcidol (3.42, 1.7-5.2). Placebo therapy had a significantly higher fracture rate in contrast to risedronate (OR 2.51, 95% CrI 1.23-4.24) or zoledronate (2.92, 1.29-5.62) or teriparatide (20mcg) (4.04, 1.36-8.49) or teriparatide (40mcg) (3.5, 1.14-8.34). Zoledronate ranked first for increasing the BMD in LS, and teriparatide (20mg) was ranked first for decreasing the fracture rate.

Conclusions

Zoledronate might be the best choice to increase the BMD in LS and teriparatide (20mg) might lead to the lowest fracture rate.

Vertebral fractures affect functional status in postmenopausal rheumatoid arthritis patients

Functional disability is a major concern in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This retrospective study investigated the risk factors for vertebral fractures (VFs) in postmenopausal RA patients and determined the impact of VFs on functional status. Data from a cohort of 200 postmenopausal RA patients in a single hospital registry were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data, imaging data from spine radiographs, and bone mineral density (BMD) data were collected from the patients at baseline and at the final visit (a mean of 2.9 years after the first visit). Risk factors for incident VFs and their impact on the modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ) were analyzed. Twenty-eight patients (14%) developed new VFs (NVFs). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, and disease duration revealed that daily dose of prednisolone, femoral neck BMD, use of active vitamin D3, and use of a bisphosphonate at baseline were factors associated with NVF, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 1.27 (1.05-1.54), 0.94 (0.91-0.97), 0.34 (0.13-0.89), and 0.31 (0.12-0.82), respectively. Patients with NVF exhibited worse mHAQ scores and a greater increase in mHAQ scores from baseline compared with those without NVF. In conclusion, incident VFs were associated with reduced functional status in postmenopausal patients with RA. It is important to prevent VFs to maintain the functional status of RA patients.

Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis

We completed a network meta-analysis of published papers to compare bisphosphonate gastrointestinal safety. We found that zoledronic acid had the highest chance of causing gastrointestinal adverse events. Etidronate had the highest chance of discontinuation due to an adverse event. No difference was found for serious adverse events.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates are first-line treatment for osteoporosis. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AE) are the primary reason for non-adherence. Little is known about the comparative GI safety of bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

Leverage published clinical trial data to examine the comparative GI safety of bisphosphonates.

METHODS

We completed a systematic review of all English-language clinical trials that assessed bisphosphonate safety and/or efficacy in primary osteoporosis through to 2012. Randomized, blinded, and controlled studies were eligible. The primary outcome was any GI-related AE. Subanalyses were completed for upper GI symptoms, serious GI, nausea, esophageal-related events, and discontinuation due to AE. A Bayesian-based network meta-analysis was completed to allow for indirect comparisons. Results were reported as the probability that a specific drug had the highest number of events.

RESULTS

We identified 50 studies: 32 alendronate, 12 risedronate, 5 etidronate, and 7 zoledronic acid. Zoledronic acid had the highest probability of having the highest number of any GI AE (91%) and nausea (70%). Etidronate (70%) and zoledronic acid (28%) had the highest probability of having the greatest attrition due to AE. Etidronate had the highest probability (56%) of having the greatest number of upper GI symptoms among oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid had the highest probability of causing the greatest number of GI AE, possibly related to nausea. These results question the assumption that annual zoledronic acid will translate into better adherence. Little difference was found between alendronate and risedronate for serious AE. More research into real-world implications of the comparative safety of bisphosphonates is needed.

Efficacy of antiresorptive agents for preventing fractures in Japanese patients with an increased fracture risk: review of the literature

The aim of the present review was to clarify the efficacy of currently available potent antiresorptive agents for preventing fractures in Japanese patients with an increased fracture risk. PubMed was used to search the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with the following search terms: fracture, etidronate, alendronate, risedronate, minodronate, raloxifene, bazedoxifene and Japan. The inclusion criteria were papers written in English, ≥50 subjects per group and a study period of ≥1 year. Fourteen RCTs met these criteria. The efficacy of antiresorptive agents for preventing vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures was investigated. There was evidence that raloxifene reduced the incidence of clinical vertebral fractures, while etidronate, alendronate and minodronate (but not bazedoxifene) reduced the incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal or involutional osteoporosis. Head-to-head trials showed that alendronate and raloxifene had similar efficacy for preventing vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, while risedronate was not inferior to etidronate for reducing the incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures in patients with involutional osteoporosis. Alendronate reduced the incidence of hip fractures in patients with Parkinson's disease, and risedronate reduced the incidence of nonvertebral fractures and hip fractures in patients with Alzheimer's disease or stroke. In conclusion, the present review confirmed the efficacy of etidronate, minodronate and raloxifene for the prevention of vertebral fractures, the efficacy of alendronate for vertebral and hip fractures, and the efficacy of risedronate for vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures in Japanese patients with an increased fracture risk.

Seven years' experience with etidronate in a woman with anorexia nervosa and vertebral fractures

We report the case of a 30-year-old Japanese woman with anorexia nervosa and vertebral fractures who was treated with etidronate. She had a history of anorexia nervosa, chronic back pain, osteoporosis, and multiple vertebral fractures (morphometric fractures) that responded poorly to treatment with alfacalcidol (1 μg daily) for 1 year and was treated with cyclical etidronate (200 mg for 2 weeks every 3 months) for 7 years. The lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) increased, and the serum alkaline phosphatase and urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen levels and back pain decreased. During the 7-year period of treatment with etidronate, no osteoporotic fractures occurred. The patient experienced neither renal dysfunction nor hyperparathyroidism caused by osteomalacia. No gastrointestinal tract symptoms were observed. Thus, etidronate was effective for increasing the lumbar spine BMD and reducing back pain over a 7-year period without causing either osteoporotic fractures or adverse events.

Efficacy of oral bisphosphonates for preventing hip fracture in disabled patients with neurological diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials among the Japanese population

OBJECTIVE

Neurological diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), stroke, and Parkinson's disease cause disability and immobilization that increases the risk of hip fracture. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of oral bisphosphonates for preventing hip fracture in disabled patients with such neurological diseases.

METHODS

A literature search (PubMed) was done from 1995 to the present for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and a meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs met the criteria, including two of etidronate (ALS and stroke), two of alendronate (stroke and Parkinson's disease), and three of risedronate (stroke and Parkinson's disease). All of the RCTs were performed on Japanese patients. According to the results of pooled data analysis, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) of hip fracture in patients receiving etidronate, alendronate, and risedronate treatment compared with placebo or active control treatment was 0.16 (0.03-0.87), 0.29 (0.10-0.80), and 0.24 (0.10-0.58), respectively, suggesting a reduction of risk by more than 70% with oral bisphosphonates. There was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity among RCTs, and publication bias was not identified by the funnel plot and Begg's rank correlation test. No severe adverse events due to oral bisphosphonate treatment were reported.

LIMITATION

It remains uncertain whether the findings are relevant for Western patients with an increased risk of hip fracture due to neurological diseases.

CONCLUSION

A meta-analysis of RCTs suggested that oral bisphosphonate treatment prevents hip fracture in disabled Japanese patients with neurological diseases, including ALS, stroke, and Parkinson's disease. Oral bisphosphonate treatment was well tolerated by such patients.

[Austrian guidance for the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women--update 2009]

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by diminished bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased fragility and subsequent increased fracture risk. Therapeutic measures therefore aim at reducing individual fracture risk. In Austria, the following drugs, all of which have been proven to reduce fracture risk, are currently registered for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: alendronate, risedronate, etidronate, ibandronate, raloxifene, teriparatide (1-34 PTH), 1-84 PTH, strontium ranelate and salmon calcitonin. Fluorides are still available, but their role in daily practice has become negligible. Currently, there is no evidence that a combination of two or more of these drugs could improve anti-fracture potency. However, treatment with PTH should be followed by the treatment with an anticatabolic drug such as bisphosphonates. Calcium and vitamin D constitute an important adjunct to any osteoporosis treatment.

Effects of risedronate or alfacalcidol on bone mineral density, bone turnover, back pain, and fractures in Japanese men with primary osteoporosis: results of a two-year strict observational study

Although osteoporosis in men is already a major public health problem, there is still a dearth of data about the effects of risedronate in male osteoporosis, especially in Japanese with primary osteoporosis. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate the effects of risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, back pain, and fractures in these patients prospectively for two years (at baseline, three months, six months, twelve months, and twenty-four months) both longitudinally and compared with those of alfacalcidol. The subjects enrolled for this study were 66 Japanese male patients with untreated primary osteoporosis (mean age 63.52 +/- 8.7 years), who were divided into two groups (44 with risedronate and 22 with alfacalcidol). We measured BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at three sites-the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal radius. Risedronate treatment significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine and at the femoral neck, reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), and reduced back pain, both longitudinally and compared with alfacalcidol treatment. We observed a lower rate of incident fracture in risedronate users. However, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that this trend was not statistically significant, possibly because of the small number of patients enrolled. These potentially beneficial effects of risedronate on bone in male patients with primary osteoporosis suggest the possibility that osteoporosis should be treated with risedronate regardless of gender in order to effectively prevent subsequent osteoporotic fractures.

Prolonged-efficacy of bisphosphonate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and chronic liver disease

Osteoporosis is present often in postmenopausal women. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to assess the cumulative appearance incidence and predictive factors for bone fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and chronic liver disease. The patients were 80 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and chronic liver disease due to hepatitis virus B or C. These patients were given cyclic etidronate therapy within 3 months after diagnosis of osteoporosis (etidronate-group). Another 400 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and chronic liver disease were selected as controls (control group). Patients in control group were matched 1:5 with etidronate-group for age. Patients in control group were not given any drugs after diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The mean observation period was 8.1 years. Four patients in the etidronate-group and 46 in control group developed bone fracture. The 10th year cumulative appearance rates of bone fracture were 4.9% in etidronate-group and 13.8% in control group. Cox regression model showed that the appearance rate of bone fracture decreased with statistical significance in the following cases: (1) patients <65 years (P<0.001), (2) patients with serum albumin level of >or=3.5 g/dl (P=0.003), and (3) patients treated with etidronate (P=0.020). The cumulative survival rate after bone fracture was 82.2% at the second year, and 57.6% at the fifth year. The present study suggests that a serum albumin level of >or=3.5 g/dl and cyclic etidronate treatment reduce the appearance of bone fracture.

Characteristics of males over 50 years who present with a fracture: epidemiology and underlying risk factors

Osteoporosis and fragility fractures in men constitute a considerable burden in healthcare. We have reviewed 2035 men aged over 50 years with 2142 fractures to clarify the epidemiology of these injuries and their underlying risk factors. The prevalence of osteoporosis ranged between 17.5% in fractures of the ankle and 57.8% in those of the hip. The main risk factors associated with osteoporosis were smoking (47.4%), alcohol excess (36.2%), body mass index < 21 (12.8%) and a family history of osteoporosis (8.4%). Immobility, smoking, self-reported alcohol excess, a low body mass index, age >/=72 and loss in height were significantly more common among men with fractures of the hip than in those with fractures elsewhere.

Efficacy of risedronate against hip fracture in patients with neurological diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Neurological diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and Parkinson's disease have been reported to increase the risk for fractures. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of risedronate against hip fracture in patients with neurological diseases.

METHODS

The literature was searched with PubMed from 1995 to the present, with respect to strictly conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with narrow confidence intervals (CIs), and a meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Four RCTs met the criteria; one RCT for Alzheimer's disease (n = 461, mean age = 78 years), two RCTs for stroke (n = 267, mean age = 76 years for men; n = 345, mean age = 71 years for women), and one RCT for Parkinson's disease (n = 223, mean age = 71 years). According to the results of RCTs, the relative risks (95% CI) for hip fracture with risedronate treatment compared with placebo treatment were 0.26 (0.10, 0.69) for Alzheimer's disease, 0.20 (0.04, 0.89) for stroke in men, 0.14 (0.02, 1.16) for stroke in women, and 0.34 (0.09, 1.21) for Parkinson's disease. Overall, the relative risk (95% CI) for hip fracture with risedronate treatment was 0.25 (0.13, 0.48), suggesting 75% of risk reduction rate with risedronate treatment in patients with one of the three neurological diseases (heterogeneity: 0.58, p = 0.9016 and overall effect: 17.36, p < 0.0001). No severe adverse events were reported in the risedronate and placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of a meta-analysis of strictly conducted RCTs suggest that there is efficacy against hip fracture and safety with risedronate treatment in patients with neurological diseases including Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and Parkinson's disease.

Three-month changes in bone turnover markers and bone mineral density response to raloxifene in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

It has been well established that raloxifene (RLX) improves bone turnover, increases bone mineral density (BMD), and reduces the risk of fractures. However, it remains obscure how to monitor the therapeutic effects of RLX, while numerous clinical trials for other antiresorptive agents have suggested that greater short-term reductions of bone turnover markers (BTMs) can predict greater increases in BMD and greater reduction in risk of future fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between short-term reductions of BTMs and subsequent changes of BMD after 1-year treatment with RLX. Seventy-three Japanese postmenopausal women with untreated osteoporosis were selected for this study. Reductions in BTMs [bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) or serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx)] after 3 months did not correlate with increases of BMD at any major sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, total neck, and distal 1/3 radius) either after 6 months or after 12 months. Our results suggest that short-term reductions or 3-month reductions of BTMs with RLX treatment cannot be used to predict increases of BMD. However, this does not directly mean that short-term reductions or 3-month reductions of BTMs with RLX treatment cannot be used to predict risk reduction of future fractures or the ultimate effects of RLX on bone. Further studies with fracture endpoints in longer observation and larger number of patients are warranted to establish how to monitor the therapeutic effects of RLX or early identification of responders or nonresponders to RLX treatment.

Etidronate: what is its place in treatment of primary osteoporosis and other demineralizing diseases today?

Bisphosphonate drugs are the major treatment options for primary and secondary osteoporosis and other demineralizing bone diseases. This class of drugs was presaged over a decade ago when etidronate disodium, the "mother compound" for modern-day bisphosphonates, was first used in the treatment of osteoporosis. The cyclic use of etidronate in therapy, which is known mainly to specialists in the field, is not approved in the United States. The drug does, however, have a worldwide reputation as a relatively inexpensive, efficacious, and highly tolerable treatment for osteoporosis. Many studies still describe its use for primary osteoporosis and some have described use in immobilization bone loss, periprosthetic bone loss, and even glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. This review highlights some of these uses.