Disease-specific complications and multidisciplinary interventions in achondroplasia

Surgery for Spinal Stenosis in Achondroplasia: Causes of Reoperation and Reduction of Risks

BACKGROUND

Individuals with achondroplasia are prone to symptomatic spinal stenosis requiring surgery. Revision rates are thought to be high; however, the precise causes and rates of reoperation are unknown. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the causes of reoperation after initial surgical intervention in individuals with achondroplasia and spinal stenosis. In addition, we report on surgical techniques aimed at reducing the risks of these reoperations.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted over an 8-year period of all patients with achondroplasia at a single institution that serves as a large referral center for patients with skeletal dysplasias. Patients with achondroplasia who underwent spinal surgery for stenosis were identified and the need for revision surgery was studied. Data collected included demographic, surgical, and revision details. Fisher exact test was used to determine if an association existed between construct type and the need for revisions.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of the 130 (22%) patients with achondroplasia required spinal stenosis surgery. Twenty-four individuals who met the criteria were selected for analysis. The initial spine surgery was at an average age of 18.7 years (SD: 10.1 y). Nine patients (38%) required revision surgeries, and 3 required multiple revisions. Five of 9 (56%) of the revisions had primary surgery at an outside institution. Revision surgeries were due to caudal pseudarthrosis (the distal instrumented segment) (8), proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (7), and new neurological symptoms (7). There was a significant association found between construct type and the need for revision ( P =0.0111). The pairwise comparison found that short fusions were significantly associated with the need for revision compared with the interbody group ( P =0.0180). PJK was associated with short fusions when compared with the long fusion group ( P =0.0294) and the interbody group ( P =0.0300). Caudal pseudarthrosis was associated with short fusions when compared with the interbody group ( P =0.0015). Multivariate logistic regression found long fusion with an interbody was predictive of and protective against the need for revision surgery ( P =0.0246). To date, none of the initial cases that had long fusions with caudal interbody required a revision for distal pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with achondroplasia, the rate of surgery for spinal stenosis is 22% and the risk of revision is 38% and is primarily due to pseudarthrosis, PJK, and recurrent neurological symptoms. Surgeons should consider discussing spinal surgery as part of the patient's life plan and should consider wide decompression of the stenotic levels and long fusion with the use of an interbody cage at the caudal level in all patients to reduce risks of revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Retrospective case series.

Midline-Sparing Interapophysealaminar Decompression Technique for Management of Lumbar Stenosis in Pediatric Achondroplasia

INTRODUCTION

Achondroplasia is the most common form of short-limb dwarfism in humans, with an incidence of 1 in 25,000-40,000 live births. About one-third of achondroplasia patients will require operative intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis, generally presenting with progressive neurogenic claudication. The anatomy of the achondroplastic lumbar spine, with shortened pedicles, hypertrophic zygapophyseal joints, and thickened laminae frequently results in the development of multilevel interapophyseolaminar stenosis, while stenosis is usually absent at the mid-laminar levels secondary to pseudo-scalloping of the vertebral bodies. Treatment remains controversial, as disrupting the posterior tension band with complete laminectomies in the pediatric population puts patients at risk of developing post-laminectomy kyphosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 15-year-old girl with achondroplasia presented to clinic with debilitating neurogenic claudication in the setting of multilevel lumbar interapophyseolaminar stenosis. We present a technical case report of her successful surgical treatment using a midline posterior tension band sparing modification to the interapophyseolaminar decompression technique proposed by Thomeer et al. [J Neurosurg. 2002;96(3 Suppl l):292-7].

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that an adequate interapophyseolaminar decompression can be achieved through the performance of bilateral laminotomies, bilateral medial facetectomies, and undercutting of the ventral spinous process while preserving supraspinous and interspinous ligament attachments. Given the generally multilevel nature of lumbar stenosis and longer life expectancies of pediatric achondroplasia patients, decompressive surgical interventions must aspire to minimize disruption of spine biomechanics if fusion surgery is to be avoided.