Antegrade interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures

Comparison of Expandable and Locked Intramedullary Nailing for Humeral Shaft Fractures

Introduction In this study, we clinically and radiologically investigated whether the application of expandable nails for surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures has an advantage over locked intramedullary nails. Methods Patients treated with intramedullary fixation due to humeral shaft fractures in our clinic were investigated retrospectively. Patients with fractures of type 12A and 12B according to the AO classification in the middle 1/3 shaft region of the humerus were divided into two groups as those receiving fixation with expandable nails and with locked intramedullary nails. The union rate, union time, Q-DASH scores, duration of surgery, and complication rates were statistically compared between the two groups. Results The study included 38 patients with clinical follow-up from among 47 patients; 20 patients received fixation with locked intramedullary nails and 18 with expandable nails. The mean age of the patients was 56.92 (19-91) years and 53% (n=20) were men while 47% (n=18) were women. During statistical evaluation, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups for union (100% and 72.2%) and complication rates (6% and 13%). More union and lower complication rates were found in patients treated with locked intramedullary nails. In comparing the mean of surgical times (71.1 and 30.2 min), expandable nails had a shorter surgical time. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the union time and Q-DASH scores between the two groups. Conclusion Locked intramedullary nails are a better fixation method than expandable nails due to the low complication rate and high rate of union. However, due to shorter surgery time, expandable nailing is an alternative method in limited cases.

Results of the keyhole interlocked nailing for humeral diaphyseal fractures in adults

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of interlocked humerus nail through a keyhole incision for the management of humeral diaphyseal fractures in terms of radiological union, shoulder function, and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study of sixty-two patients with humeral diaphyseal fractures in our institute (51 men, 11 women; mean age 42 years; range 20 to 73 years), fifty-nine fractures were closed and three were grade I open fractures. Three patients had a preoperative radial nerve palsy. Key hole surgery was performed by closed technique (n = 56) and limited open technique (n = 6) with reamed humerus interlocked nail through an antegrade nailing procedure. The cases were followed up prospectively for union and function. The mean follow-up was 12.3 months (range 12 months to 18 months). The outcome of the procedure was assessed according to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, radiological union, complications, and secondary procedures required.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight (93.33%) fractures united with an average consolidation time of 12.75 weeks. Two patients had delayed union. Two patients had nonunion which required plating and bone grafting. No cases of infection were encountered. Neuropraxia which was detected preoperatively recovered fully in all three cases between three and six weeks. The ASES scores were excellent-to-good in fifty-six (90.32%) patients, fairly functional outcome was noted in four patients(6.5%), and two patients (3.2%) continued to have poor function at the time of final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The results of keyhole interlocked humerus nail with proximal multi-locking options were excellent-to-good for humeral diaphyseal fractures in terms of union, shoulder function, and complications. It is a safe, easy, and reliable method for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures.

Orange city tapping nail: An innovative implant for humeral diaphyseal fractures

BACKGROUND

We have conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of Orange City tapping nail in humeral diaphyseal fractures in terms of radiological union, shoulder function and complications. It's a pilot study with the new implant "Orange City tapping nail" developed at our institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with humeral diaphyseal fractures were treated with Orange City tapping nail through antegrade nailing procedure. The cases were followed up prospectively for a period of minimum six months. Outcome of the procedure were assessed according to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, radiological union, complications and secondary procedures required.

RESULTS

Twenty eight (93.33%) fractures united with an average consolidation time of 15.75 weeks. Two patients had nonunion. Functional outcome was excellent to good in 24 (80%) patients. One (3.33%) case had infection with Orange City tapping nail.

CONCLUSION

Results of Orange City tapping nail were excellent to good for humeral diaphyseal fractures in terms of union, shoulder function and complications. It is a safe, easy and reliable method for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures. Postoperative shoulder stiffness and impingement depends on operative technique and postoperative rehabilitation. We need a larger comparative study with conventional antegrade nail to evaluate the effectiveness of the implant.

Management of AO type 12C humerus proximal metadiaphyseal fractures with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in geriatric patients

Background

To evaluate the treatment efficacy and complications of the lateral minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) method in geriatric patients with a humerus diaphyseal fracture with proximal extension.

Patients and methods

The study included a total of 21 patients (18 females, 3 males; mean age 74±6.3 years, range 65–89 years) who underwent surgery with the lateral MIPO technique for a humerus diaphyseal fracture with proximal extension during the period January 2011 to December 2016. None of the patients had additional injuries and all completed regular follow-up. According to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation classification system, the fractures were evaluated as 12C1 in 17 cases and 12C3 in 4 cases. All patients were evaluated radiologically and functionally at 6 months and 1 year. In the follow-up evaluations, the Constant–Murley score and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) score were used.

Results

No non-union, avascular necrosis or infection was seen in any patient. The mean time to union was 15.7 weeks. Impingement syndrome was seen in 2 patients and radial nerve palsy in 2 patients. The mean Constant–Murley score was 70.6±10.2 at 6 months and 84±7.6 at the end of 1 year. The mean Q-DASH score was 38.6±15.1 at 6 months and 21.9±13.1 at the end of 1 year. The increase in the Constant–Murley scores from 6 months to 1 year was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The decrease in the Q-DASH scores between 6 months and 1 year was determined to be statistically significant. In the 2 patients with radial nerve palsy, the functions were seen to completely recover during follow-up. No axillary nerve palsy was seen in any patient.

Conclusion

Metadiaphyseal humerus fractures with proximal extension in the elderly can be successfully treated with the lateral MIPO technique. When applied correctly, it is a method with high rates of union and low rates of complications.

Arthroscopy-assisted versus standard intramedullary nail fixation in diaphyseal fractures of the humerus

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess applicability of arthroscopic technique in intramedullary nail fixation of humerus shaft fractures and to compare with conventional nailing in terms of its effects on perioperative and postoperative intra-articular complication rates as well as on clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included 40 patients (12 females and 28 males) indicated for surgery between either undergo arthroscopy-assisted (Arthroscopy-assisted intramedullary nailing [AIMN]; n = 20) or conventional (Intramedullary nailing [IMN]; n = 20) anterograde intramedullary nailing. Two groups were compared in terms of mean number of fluoroscopic shootings until the guide wire was inserted, time for union, length of hospital stay, and complication rates. Shoulder functions were assessed by Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.

RESULTS

Groups did not significantly differ in terms of age, gender, and mechanism of injury, length of hospital stay, union rate, and mean union time ( p > 0.05). Mean ASES and Constant scores were found to be statistically significantly higher in AIMN group than that in IMN group ( p = 0.000 and p = 0.002, respectively). Mean number of fluoroscopic shootings until the guide wire was inserted was 2.15 in AIMN group, which was significantly lower compared to 4.2 of IMN group ( p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopy-assisted technique may be an applicable and safe method owing to its cosmetic advantages and more satisfactory postoperative shoulder functions subsequent to less injury to deltoid, rotator cuff, and other soft tissue, as compared to conventional anterograde approach.

Clinic research on the treatment for humeral shaft fracture with minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis: a retrospective study of 128 cases

INTRODUCTION

Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) is one of the most important techniques in the treatment for humeral shaft fractures. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of MIPO technique for the treatment for humeral shaft fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 128 cases with humeral shaft fractures that were treated with MIPO technique from March 2005 to August 2008. All the patients were followed up by routine radiological imaging and clinical examinations. Constant-Murley score and HSS elbow joint score were used to evaluate the treatment outcome.

RESULTS

The average duration of the surgery was 60 min (range 40-95 min) without blood transfusion. All fractures healed without infection. All cases recovered carrying angle except four cases with 10°-15° cubitus varus. After the average follow-up of 23 (13-38) months, satisfactory function was achieved according to Constant-Murley score and HSS elbow joint score. Constant-Murley score was 80 on average (range 68-91). According to HSS elbow joint score, there were 123 cases of excellent clinical outcome and five cases of effective outcome.

CONCLUSION

It seems to be a safe and effective method for managing humeral shaft fractures with MIPO technique.

Locking plate fixation versus antegrade nailing of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in patients without osteoporosis. Comparative retrospective study of 63 cases

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus on the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The goal of the present retrospective observational study was to compare functional and radiological results and complications of internal fixation using locking plates versus antegrade nailing in the treatment of non-osteoporotic Neer classification 3- and 4-part fractures after a least 1 year of follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Internal fixation was performed in 67 fractures (1 bilateral): 35 by locking plate (1 lost to follow-up, 1 deceased) and 32 by intramedullary nailing (2 lost to follow-up) between January 1st, 2004 and December 31st, 2010. Thus, the study included 33 plates (21 3-part and 12 4-part fractures) and 30 nails (21 3-part and nine 4-part fractures). Final functional assessment was based on the Oxford, Constant, Relative Constant and QuickDASH scores and percentage of handicap. Radiological follow-up included immediate postoperative, 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year AP and Lamy lateral views. All complications were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Mean Oxford, Constant, Relative Constant and QuickDASH scores and percentage of disability for the plate and nail groups respectively were: 23.8 vs. 23.3, 59.7 vs. 60 6, 73.5 vs 79.3, 20.9 vs 21.0, 22.6 vs 22.6. Multivariate analysis did not show any significant difference in functional scores or quality of reduction: final unsatisfactory reduction on AP view, 30.3 vs. 36.7%; lateral view, 3.2 vs. 10.0%; greater tuberosity, 9.1 vs. 16.7%. Four-part fracture (P<0.05), frontal reduction defect at follow-up (P<0.05) or greater tuberosity defect (P>0.05) had negative impacts on functional scores. The complication rates corresponded to those in the literature and did not differ between the techniques (P=0.1901) except for three infections in the plate group.

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

Internal fixation is the treatment of choice for 3- and 4-part fractures in non-osteoporotic patients. Although no difference was found in the present study between locking plate and intramedullary nailing, the former seems to be less well adapted and more aggressive.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective observational study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Complications after interlocking intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures

INTRODUCTION

IM nails have gained popularity for stabilization of humeral shaft fractures (HSF). The initial enthusiasm was tempered by a number of specific complications and thus indications need to be re-evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes 111 patients with HSF subjected to a treatment protocol of IM fixation with first and second generation of humeral nails. Antegrade approach was used in 105 (94.5%) and retrograde in 6 (5.5%) patients. Reaming was performed in 51 (45.9%) fractures. The study covers a period of 10 years. Mean follow-up time was 3.5 (1-6) years. This investigation is directed at technical errors and complications, especially those corrected by secondary surgery.

RESULTS

We registered 52 (46.85%) intra-operative complications in 40 (36.04%) patients, on average 1.3 per patient. The most common were: distraction n=5 (4.5%), long proximal locking screws n=9 (8.1%), additional diaphyseal fracture n=7 (6.3%) and countersinking of the nail in the humeral head n=8 (7.2%). The number of postoperative complications was 40 (36.0%) related to 19 (17.1%) patients. Technical errors, such as distraction, longer nail and additional fractures have affected time to union and resulted in chronic shoulder pain. 36 (32.5%) secondary surgeries were needed to address these problems. When first generation nails are used, the intra-operative complication related risk increases 1.58 times, and the postoperative complication related risk is 1.67 times higher compared to second generation nails. According to Constant-Murley score excellent and very good functional results were achieved in 93 (83.78%) patients. While reaming did not influence the clinical results for both nail generations, overall better results were achieved with second generation nails. Postoperative shoulder pain has been registered in 18 (16.2%) patients.

CONCLUSION

We registered a number of technical errors and complications, which we consider technique specific. The analysis and avoidance of these complications, related only to IM nailing of the humerus, will allow IM nails to successfully bridge the gap between functional bracing and plating.

Proximal third humeral shaft fractures -- a fracture entity not fully characterized by conventional AO classification

INTRODUCTION

The retrospective study was made to evaluate the fracture patterns at the proximal humeral shaft for which the long version of a standard proximal humeral nail (PHNLV) has been used. The indication has been decided by the individual surgeons.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a five year period 72 consecutive PHNLV cases of an acute fracture were identified and were included in the study. Mean patient age was 68.9 years. Gender ratio was m/f=22/50. 86.1% of the patients fractured their humerus by a fall, the rest by a high velocity accident. We analysed patient comorbidity, ASA score, osteoporosis, social status before accident, additional injuries affecting local soft tissues or other anatomic regions. We analysed the expansion of the fractures, dividing the humerus into five zones. Fracture morphology was categorized according to the standard AO/ASIF classification (if applicable).

RESULTS

Comorbidities were found in 76.4% of the patients. Almost all patients (93.1%) had been living independently at home before the accident. 47.2% of patients had osteoporosis in their medical history. Five patients (6.9%) had a primary palsy of the radial nerve. Six fractures chosen for PHNLV fixation were clearly restricted to the humeral head. The remaining 66 fractures were located in the humeral shaft (AO region 12). There were 5 segmental fractures. Of the remaining 67 fractures affecting the proximal third of the humeral shaft 49.3 percent extended into the humeral head. 98 percent of these fractures displayed spiral morphology.

DISCUSSION

Proximal humeral shaft fractures are amazingly similar to subtrochanteric and distal tibial shaft fractures: Spiral fracture types with different grades of comminution are absolutely dominant; a great proportion of the fractures extend into the humeral head with growing tendency of displacement if located closer to the humeral head. Diverging traction of deltoid and pectoralis muscle causes typical displacement if the fracture line runs in between their attachments substantiating the term 'intermuscular fracture'. A distinct classification system for proximal humeral shaft fractures seems meaningful and is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is clear evidence of specific characteristics which differentiate proximal third humeral shaft fractures from those of midshaft and distal third. They explain the specific problems of reduction and fixation. If disrespected they will lead to higher rates of therapeutic failure.

Posterior percutaneous plating of the humerus

OBJECTIVE

This is a prospective case series study, which was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of posterior percutaneous plating of the humerus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From the year 2010 to 2011, 37 patients with middle and distal third humeral fractures who met the inclusion criteria were surgically treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis through posterior approach. Their age ranged from 19 to 43 with an average of 27.8 years. Type of fractures varied from B to C, and all of them were traumatic.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for a period varied from 12 to 24 months with an average of 18. There were no cases of intraoperative complications, infection or metal failure. Union was achieved in all of them within 16-21 weeks with an average of 18. Iatrogenic postoperative temporary neuropraxia of the radial nerve palsy was observed in two patients. All patients achieved normal range of shoulder and elbow motion within 3 months after surgery. The average Quick DASH score at 12-month follow-up was 30. According to patient's satisfaction, all of them returned to the usual pre-injury activity level within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the principles of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis can be applied safely through posterior approach of the humerus to treat middle and distal third humeral fractures. This approach has the advantage of preserving the triceps anatomy and function facilitating rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis for mid-distal third humeral shaft fractures

Mid-distal third humeral shaft fractures can be effectively treated with minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing (IMN). However, these 2 treatments have not been adequately compared. Forty-seven patients (47 fractures) with mid-distal third humeral shaft fractures were randomly allocated to undergo either minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (n=24) or IMN (n=23). The 2 groups were similar in terms of fracture patterns, fracture location, age, and associated injuries. Intraoperative measurements included blood loss and operative time. Clinical outcome measurements included fracture healing, radial nerve recovery, and elbow and shoulder discomfort. Radiographic measurements included fracture alignment, time to healing, delayed union, and nonunion. Functional outcome was satisfactory in both groups. Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Mayo score were both better for the minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis group than for the IMN group (98.2 vs 97.6, respectively, and 93.5 vs 94.1, respectively; P<.001). Operative time was shorter and less intraoperative blood loss occurred in the minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis group than in the IMN group. Average time to union was similar in both groups. Primary union was achieved in 23 of 24 patients in the minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis group and in 22 of 23 in the IMN group. Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis may have outcomes comparable with IMN for the management of mid-distal third humeral shaft fractures. Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis is more suitable for complex fractures, especially for radial protection and motion recovery of adjacent joints, compared with IMN for simple fractures.

Outcomes of nails versus plates for humeral shaft fractures: a Medicare cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to determine (1) the incidence of humeral shaft fractures within the Medicare noncancer population, (2) the trends in utilization of humeral shaft fixation techniques by plate-and-screw devices and intramedullary nails, (3) differences in procedure times, and (4) the outcomes of individuals as measured by rate of secondary operations and 1-year mortality.

DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective comparative cohort analysis. A cancer-free Medicare part B claims sample derived from a 5% sample from the years 1993 to 2007 was analyzed.

PATIENTS/INTERVENTION

Our cohorts were generated by diagnostic and procedural codes for humeral shaft fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The incidence of humeral shaft fracture and trend in operative fixation were evaluated for all years of data. Surgical times were assessed by anesthesia Current Procedural Terminology codes. Outcomes and complications were assessed by Current Procedural Terminology codes. The proportion of individuals experiencing complications and 1-year mortality were compared by proportion hazards.

RESULTS

We identified 1385 claims for humeral shaft fractures over 15 years, with an adjusted rate of between 12.0 and 23.4 fractures per 100,000 beneficiaries. We identified 511 individuals who received surgical treatment for humeral shaft fractures, 451 of whom had complete 1-year follow-up data. Nail fixation was more prevalent than plate fixation most years and had shorter anesthesia time by 27.1 minutes (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the complication rates between the 2 groups as measured by incidence of secondary operations and 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nails are used for the majority of operative humeral shaft fractures among Medicare beneficiaries. Nailing has a shorter mean operative time. The 2 surgical techniques had no significant differences in terms of risk of secondary procedures and 1-year mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mismatch analysis of humeral nailing: antegrade versus retrograde insertion

BACKGROUND

Closed humeral nailing is now considered an alternative treatment for humeral-shaft fracture. The nail can be inserted with either the antegrade or retrograde method. We investigated and compared the problem of geometric mismatch of the humeral nail to the humerus between the two methods of insertion.

METHODS

The study was performed using virtual simulation based on computed tomography (CT) data of 76 Thai cadaveric humeri and the commonly used Russell-Taylor humeral nail 8 mm in diameter and 220 mm long. Mismatch of the nail to the intact humerus was analyzed and compared between the antegrade and retrograde nailing approaches.

RESULTS

The results showed: (1) the diameter of the medullary canal averaged 7.9-13.8 mm; (2) the minimal reaming diameter to accommodate virtual nail insertion averaged 8.8-14.8 mm for the antegrade and 8.8-29.3 mm for the retrograde approach; (3) the minimal reaming thickness of the inner cortex averaged 0.1-1.5 mm for the antegrade and 0.1-9.9 mm for the retrograde approach; (4) the percentages of cortical bone removed prior to nail insertion were 3.8-107.1% and 3.8-1,287.6% for the antegrade and retrograde approaches, respectively; (5) the eccentricity of the nail-medullary canal center were 0.4-3.4 and 0.4-10.6 mm for the antegrade and retrograde approaches, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Less mismatching occurred with antegrade nailing than with the retrograde approach. Retrograde nailing requires excessive reaming at the distal part of the humerus to accommodate nail insertion. This may create bone weakness and the risk of supracondylar fracture.

New trends in fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a review

Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures continues to be a challenge especially in osteoporotic patients. Locking plates and intramedullary nails have been used with satisfactory results but the previous reported complications have not been substantially reduced. Most of the existing studies involve a small number of patients followed up for a rather short period of time. Since proximal humeral fractures constitute a heterogenous group of complex fractures in an even more heterogenous population, no single fixation method is a panacea. Choice of implant and method of fixation should be selected according to individual patient and fracture pattern characteristics based on clearly defined indications and contraindications. Based on the findings of the existing clinical studies the authors propose a treatment algorithm.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humerus diaphyseal fractures

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique is reported as a satisfactory procedure for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures by the anterior approach by several authors. However, none of the published reports had a significant follow-up nor have they reported patient outcomes. We evaluated the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome over a minimum follow-up of 2 years using the same MIPO technique to humeral shaft fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

32 adult patients with diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with MIPO between June 2007 and October 2008 were included in the study. Patients with metabolic bone disease, polytrauma, and Gustilo and Anderson type 3 open fractures with injury severity score >16 were excluded from the study. All cases were treated with closed indirect reduction and locking plate fixation using the MIPO technique. The surgery time, radiation exposure, and time for union was noted. The shoulder and elbow function was assessed using the UCLA shoulder and Mayo elbow performance scores, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 32 patients in the study, 19 were males and 13 were females. The mean age was 39 years (range: 22-70 years). Twenty-seven of the thirty-two patients (84.3%) had the dominant side fractured. We had eight cases of C2 type; five cases of C1 and A2 type; four cases of B2 type; three cases each of B3, B1, and A1 type; and one case of A3 type of fracture. The mean surgical time was 91.5 minutes (range: 70-120 minutes) and mean radiation exposure was 160.3 seconds (range: 100-220 seconds). The mean radiological fracture union time was 12.9 weeks (range: 10-20 weeks). Shoulder function was excellent in 27 cases (84.3%) and good in remaining 5 cases (15.6%) on the UCLA score. Elbow function was excellent in 26 cases (81.2%), good in 5 cases (15.6%), and fair in 1 case (3.1%) who had an associated olecranon fracture that was fixed by tension band wire in the same sitting.

CONCLUSION

MIPO of the humerus gives good functional and cosmetic results and should be considered one of the management options in the treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures.

Minimal invasive long PHILOS®-plate osteosynthesis in metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus

Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) not only meets the criteria of a "biological" osteosynthesis by minimising invasivity as well as iatrogenic soft tissue damage, but can also provide adequate stability for fracture healing and early functional aftertreatment. Up to date, only few publications report on MIPO of humeral shaft fractures mainly using the anterolateral deltopectoral approach for proximal plate insertion. Objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility and clinical outcome of MIPO for metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus through a lateral approach using angular stable long PHILOS(®)-plates. We retrospectively evaluated 29 patients (mean age 77 years, range 48-95 years) with displaced metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus treated with MIPO technique. For the first time, an angular stable long PHILOS(®)-plate through a lateral deltoid-split approach proximally and a brachialis/brachioradialis intermuscular approach with exposure of the radial nerve distally, were used. There were no infections and no iatrogenic injuries to the axillary and radial nerve. One patient showed subacromial impingement and one patient had to be reoperated for redislocation of the distal fragment with screw breakage, which was most likely due to incorrect screw placement. This patient was successfully operated using the same method and implant. Besides one patient who refused further follow-up, 28 patients could be followed up to a mean of 8 months (range 3-12 months) each with an entirely healed fracture. Furthermore, patient's quality of life was documented using the SF-36 questionnaire. Comparison with published United States normative data showed no significant deficits in the physical as well as in the mental domains 8 months after MIPO. Minimal invasive long PHILOS(®)-plate osteosynthesis using a combined lateral deltoid-split and brachialis/brachioradialis intermuscular approach proved to be a safe procedure for the treatment of metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus with low morbidity and full restoration of quality of life in these elderly patients.

Plating osteosynthesis of mid-distal humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive versus conventional open reduction technique

Results of two methods, conventional open reduction-internal plating and minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO), in the treatment of mid-distal humeral shaft fractures were compared. Thirty-three patients were retrospectively analysed and divided into two groups. Group A (n = 17) patients were treated by MIPO and group B (n = 16) by conventional plating. The mean operation time in group A was 92.35 +/- 57.68 minutes and 103.12 +/- 31.08 minutes in group B (P = 0.513). Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in group A was 0% (0/17) and 31.3% in group B (5/16 (P = 0.012). The mean fracture union time in group A was 15.29 +/- 4.01 weeks (range 8-24 weeks), and 21.25 +/- 13.67 weeks (range 10-58 weeks) in group B (P = 0.095). The mean UCLA end-result score in group A was 34.76 +/- 0.56 points (range 33-35), and 34.38 +/- 1.41 points (range 30-35) in group B (P = 0.299). The mean MEPI in group A was 99.41 +/- 2.43 points (range 90-100) and 99.69 +/- 1.25 points (range 95-100) in group B ( P = 0.687). When compared to the conventional plating techniques, MIPO offers advantages in terms of reduced incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsies and accelerated fracture union and a similar functional outcome with respect to shoulder and elbow function.

Avoidance of malreduction of proximal femoral shaft fractures with the use of a minimally invasive nail insertion technique (MINIT)

OBJECTIVES

To determine our rate of malalignment in proximal femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nails, with and without the use of a minimally invasive nail insertion technique (MINIT).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

Between July 1, 2003, and June 31, 2005, 100 consecutive proximal femoral shaft fractures (97 patients) were treated with IM nails. The average age of the 56 men and 41 women was 43.5 years (range, 17 to 96 years). There were 92 closed fractures and 8 open fractures. Fractures were classified according to the Russell-Taylor classification (69 type 1A, 11 type 1B, 3 type 2A, 17 type 2B). All patients underwent antegrade IM nailing using a fracture table in the supine (83) or lateral (17) position. A total of 72 entry portals were trochanteric, and 28 were piriformis. Seventy-seven percent of the femurs were opened with MINIT, a technique that uses a percutaneous cannulated channel reamer over a guide pin as opposed to the standard method of Kuntscher, which employs a femoral awl. Nails were locked proximally using standard locking in 37 fractures, and recon mode in 63. Fracture reduction was examined on immediate postoperative films to determine angulation in the coronal and sagittal planes. Criteria for acceptable reduction were less than 5 degrees angulation in any plane. In addition, surgical position, entry portal, mechanism of injury, Russell-Taylor classification, OTA classification, open or closed fracture, open or closed reduction, and type of implant used were analyzed for significance.

RESULTS

The frequency of malalignment was 10% for the entire group of patients. Malalignment occurred in 26% of fractures treated without the use of the MINIT and in 5.2% when the MINIT was used (P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between the different Russell-Taylor fracture types, although there was a trend towards more malalignment in type 2A and 2B fractures (P = 0.06). None of the other factors studied had a statistically significant effect on malalignment. A whole-model test of the factors that were surgeon-controlled (use of the MINIT, surgical position, open or closed reduction, type of implant used, and entry portal) found that only use of the MINIT had a statistically significant effect on malalignment (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that use of the minimally invasive nail insertion technique (MINIT) significantly decreases the occurrence of malalignment in proximal femoral shaft fractures.

Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures treated with the minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO).

DESIGN

Prospective, single-center, nonconsecutive clinical series study.

SETTING

: Skeletal trauma center of a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirteen patients who were seen from May 2004 to October 2005 with an average age of 38.1 years (range, 25 to 60 years) form the basis of this study. Patients were obtained from a surgical database of 1 surgeon.

INTERVENTION

The middle and the distal third humeral shaft fractures were reduced by closed means and fixed with long narrow 4.5-mm dynamic compression plates introduced through 2 small incisions away from the fracture sites and placed on the anterior aspect of the humerus.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Time to fracture healing and functional assessments were assessed at an average follow-up of 12.5 months (range, 7 to 19 months) for the affected shoulders and elbows using the UCLA and Mayo elbow performance scoring systems, respectively.

RESULTS

All fractures united with a mean healing time of 16.2 weeks (range, 12 to 32 years). There were no nonunions, radial nerve palsies, or implant failures. The UCLA scoring system showed excellent results in 7 cases (53.8%) and good results in 6 cases (46.2%). Thirteen patients had excellent results of their elbow function when assessed with the Mayo elbow performance scoring system.

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction and internal fixation of middle or distal third humeral shaft fractures using MIPO is a safe and effective surgical treatment method and an alternative option to open techniques.

Humeral fractures in the elderly: treatment with a reamed intramedullary locking nail

In the elderly person, comorbidities combined with lower functional demands tend to indicate non-operative treatment; however, fast functional recovery is mandatory to prevent loss of independency and social ability. This retrospective follow-up study included 40 people with a mean age of 75 (range 60-87) years. They had all received treatment with a reamed intramedullary nail for humeral fracture; 21 were operated after a mean of 6 (range 0-16) days, and 19 after a mean of 28 (range 9-63) days after a primary decision for non-operative treatment. In all, 5 cases (12.5%) were lost to follow-up. The primary healing rate was 94% (33/35) after a mean of 17 (range 6-61) weeks; 14% (5/35) needed re-operation, in 2 cases because of healing problems. Functional results could be assessed in 18 cases: the median Neer score was 90 (range 45-97) points and the median Morrey score 98 (range 74-100) points. The relative functional scores were 94 (range 89-101) and 100 (range 97-100) points, respectively. All functional scores were independent of introduction site and time to treatment. On the basis of these results we conclude that treatment of humeral fractures in the elderly with an intramedullary nail leads to good healing and functional results, and an acceptable re-operation rate.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture

The management of fractures of the proximal shaft of the humerus has been evolving since the development of new techniques and new implants in recent years. It seems that this kind of fracture has an increasing incidence in the older, osteoporotic population. In the last 2 years, we have operated on 17 patients, with an average age of 65, who had proximal humeral shaft fractures treated by minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique using the metaphyseal locking compression plate. Our study evaluated the surgical technique used and the outcome for these patients with regards to their range of movement and shoulder function. Our results showed that all the patients could achieve at least 140 masculine of shoulder abduction in the first 6 months after the operation, except for three patients who had shoulder impingement. These patients had an average Constant score of 76.8. All fractures had bony union at 6 months, except one, which was probably due to poor reduction in the initial operation. Another complication that we encountered was radial nerve neuropraxia. The ways to prevent these complications are discussed. In conclusion, MIPO fixation using the metaphyseal locking compression plate is a good option for the management of proximal humeral shaft fractures. It provides early functional recovery, but we had to pay special attention to some of the surgical details in order to minimise complications.

Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study

The aim of this study was to compare the results of the humerus intramedullary nail (IMN) and dynamic compression plate (DCP) for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Forty-seven patients with diaphyseal fracture of the shaft of the humerus were randomised prospectively and treated by open reduction and internal fixation with IMN or DCP. The criteria for inclusion were grade 1 or 2a compound fractures, polytrauma, early failure of conservative treatment and unstable fractures. The patients with pathological fractures, grade 3 open fractures, refractures and old neglected fractures of the humerus were excluded from the study. Twenty-three patients underwent internal fixation by IMN and 24 by DCP. Reamed antegrade nailing was done in all cases. DCP was done through an anterolateral or posterior approach. The outcome was assessed in terms of the union time, union rate, functional outcome and the incidence of complications. Functional outcome was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' Score (ASES). On comparing the results by independent samples t test, there was no significant difference in ASES scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The average union time was found to be significantly lower for IMN as compared to DCP (P<0.05). The union rate was found to be similar in both groups. Complications such as infection were found to be higher with DCP as compared to IMN, while shortening of the arm (1.5-4 cm) and restriction of shoulder movements due to impingement by the nail were found to be higher with IMN as compared to DCP. However, this improved in all patients following the removal of the nail once the fracture had healed. This study proves that IMN can be considered a better surgical option for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus as it offers a short union time and lower incidence of serious complications like infection. However, there appears to be no difference between the two groups in terms of the rate of union and functional outcome.