Long-term results of posterior-cruciate-retaining Genesis I total knee arthroplasty

Radiological measurement of posterior tibial subluxation as a preoperative factor in choosing the type of implant in primary total knee arthroplasty

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most effective treatment of late osteoarthritis (OA) and is considered among the most successful surgical procedures in general. However, about 20% of patients remain dissatisfied. An important aspect of TKA is the proper choice of implant type - posterior stabilized (PS) or cruciate retaining (CR). Both have their indications for use based on intraoperative functional examination, but no objective radiological criteria have yet been developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the posterior subluxation of the tibia on preoperative radiograms and implant type used.

Material and methods

A series of 52 patients undergoing TKA were included in the study. All patients were over 50 years old, had clinically and radiologically confirmed primary OA of grade IV on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale and were undergoing a primary total knee replacement (TKR) with a PS or CR design. Preoperative lateral radiographs were analysed retrospectively. The tibial translation ratio was calculated as a percentage of subluxation in the length of the tibial plateau.

Results

There were no significant differences between implant types in regard to investigated parameters. However, there was a significant difference between the groups CR and PS in regard to age (68.5 [60.0-72.0] vs. 72.5 [68.0-75.0], p = 0.006).

Conclusions

This study revealed that preoperative tibial translation does not significantly correlate with the choice of implant type and so probably not with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and efficiency either. Additionally, this study showed that PCL insufficiency is related to the age of the patients, because of the more frequent choice of the PS implant type for the surgery in older patients than in the case of the CR implant type.

Comparison of the in-vivo kinematics of three different knee prosthesis designs during a step-up movement

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the importance of the kinematics of the prosthetic joint for the clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. A 3-armed randomized controlled trial was done to determine and compare the in vivo kinematics of a posterior cruciate-retaining and two posterior cruciate-sacrificing (Anterior-Stabilized and Posterior-Stabilized) prosthetic designs from the same total knee arthroplasty system. Since the anterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized designs are posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing designs, we hypothesized they would have similar contact-point kinematics. Further, we hypothesized that the cruciate-retaining design would have contact-point kinematics different from the anterior-stabilized and the posterior-stabilized designs, but comparable to a native knee.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with a well-functioning total knee arthroplasty one year postoperatively underwent kinematic analysis of a weight-bearing step-up movement under fluoroscopic recording. Model-based radiostereometric analysis was used to determine anteroposterior contact-point translations and rotations through the movement path to assess knee kinematics.

FINDINGS

The cruciate-retaining and anterior-stabilized groups' medial and lateral contact-points displayed similar paradoxical posterior translations during step-up in the magnitude of 7 and 2 mm, respectively. In contrast, the posterior-stabilized group's contact-points translated anteriorly by 4 and 10 mm throughout the movement and were significantly more posterior than the cruciate-retaining and the anterior-stabilized groups from >100° to 40° of flexion. The femur rotated internally with all designs.

INTERPRETATION

The cruciate-retaining and anterior-stabilized designs displayed similar contact-point translation patterns during a step-up movement. Only the posterior-stabilized design showed a pattern comparable to native knees. Conversion from a cruciate-retaining to an anterior-stabilized design because of posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency will not change knee kinematics.

Comparison of long-term kinematics and wear of total knee arthroplasty implant designs

We sought to evaluate wear and kinematics in well-established implants of posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) designs. Ninety-one knees implanted for at least five years were examined. The implants were Genesis II PS (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN), Sigma PS (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN), or Sigma CR. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) images were acquired at multiple flexion angles and the 3D positions of the implant components were determined using model-based RSA software. The location of the center of the contact area between the femoral and polyethylene components was used to obtain contact kinematics, and the magnitude of the virtual intersection between the components indicated linear wear. All three groups had paradoxical anterior motion on both condyles, experienced similar net external rotation, and exhibited instances of internal rotation during flexion. The maximum observed wear rate was significantly greater for the Sigma PS than the Genesis II PS on the medial condyle (mean difference = 0.032 mm/year, p = 0.044), but not the lateral condyle, while there was no difference between the Sigma PS and Sigma CR for either condyle. Knees with lateral condylar separation had greater maximum wear rates on the medial condyle (mean difference = 0.033 mm/year, p = 0.001), while those with medial condylar separation had greater maximum wear rates on the lateral condyle (mean difference = 0.044 mm/year, p = 0.014). At long term follow-up in patients with well-functioning implants, there were differences in kinematics and wear resistance between implants. These results suggest that implant design affects long-term kinematics and wear in well-functioning implants and that condylar separation should be avoided to minimize wear.

Return to Play and Performance in Golfers After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Component Type Matter?

BACKGROUND

Golf is a popular sport among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The golf swing requires significant knee rotation, which may lead to changes in golfing ability postoperatively. The type of implant used may alter the swing mechanics or place different stresses on the knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate golf performance and subjective stability after TKA and compare outcomes between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) implants.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with CR implants will experience better stability during the golf swing compared to patients with PS implants.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary TKA were identified from the medical record and sent an electronic questionnaire focusing on return to play (RTP), performance, pain, and stability during the golf swing. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were collected before and at multiple time points after surgery. Patients were surveyed postoperatively and asked to evaluate overall performance, pain, and stability before and after surgery. Outcomes were compared based on implant type.

RESULTS

Most patients (81.5%) were able to return to golf at an average of 5.3 ± 3.1 months from surgery. The average postoperative KOOS was 74.6 ± 12.5 in patients able to RTP compared with 64.4 ± 9.5 in those who were not (P < 0.05). Knee pain during golf significantly improved from 6.4 ± 2.1 to 1.8 ± 2.2 (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in pain, performance, or stability between the CR and PS patients.

CONCLUSION

Most patients can successfully return to golfing after TKA. Knee replacement offers patients reliable pain relief during the golf swing and fewer physical limitations during golf, with no detriment to performance. There is no difference in performance or subjective knee stability based on component type.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding associated outcomes of different TKA knee systems allows for unbiased and confident recommendations of either component to golfers receiving total knee replacement.

A surgical reduction technique for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison study

Background

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture of the tibia is an uncommon but serious complication during primary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The first objective of this report was to conduct a retrospective cohort study to investigate the incidence and potential risk factors of PCL avulsion fracture in primary cruciate-retaining TKA. The second objective was to assess the functional outcomes of the knee after reduction of PCL avulsion fracture.

Methods

From January 2014 to January 2016, 56 patients who experienced PCL avulsion fracture of the tibia in primary cruciate-retaining TKA were included in the study group. Patients in this group underwent reduction of avulsion fracture. In this period, we selected 224 patients (control group) for comparison. Patients in this group also underwent the same TKA, but no PCL avulsion fracture occurred. The range of motion of the knee and Knee Society Scores were assessed. The Forgotten Joint Score was used to analyze the ability to forget the joint. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

In our series, the incidence of PCL avulsion fracture was 4.6%. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) with regard to the preoperative or postoperative range of motion of the knee, final 4-year mean clinical score in the study and control groups 92.4 ± 2.7 and 93.6 ± 1.9, respectively, and mean functional scores of 85.1 ± 1.8 and 87.1 ± 1.2, respectively.

Conclusions

The incidence of PCL avulsion fracture of the tibia is relatively high. Older age and female gender were the two risk factors of fracture in primary cruciate-retaining TKA. Reduction of PCL avulsion fracture with a high-strength line can achieve good stability and function of the knee.

Comparison of Contact Kinematics in Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty at Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the superiority of posterior-stabilizing (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. Substantial work has made comparisons between PS and CR TKA at follow-ups of less than 5 years. It was the goal of the present study to compare the kinematics at greater than 5 years postoperatively between CR and PS TKA, with a secondary goal of comparing patient function.

METHODS

A total of 42 knees were investigated, with equal representation in the PS and CR TKA groups. Patients underwent radiostereometric analysis imaging at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60° 80°, and 100° of flexion. Contact position, magnitude of excursion, and condylar separation on each condyle were measured. A Timed-Up-and-Go functional test was also performed by patients, with the total test time being measured. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome scores were also collected.

RESULTS

There were differences in contact position on both the medial and lateral condyles at multiple angles of flexion (P < .05). There was no difference (P = .89) in medial excursion; however, PS TKA had greater lateral excursion than CR TKA (P < .01). No difference (P > .99) was found in frequency of condylar separation. PS TKA was associated with faster (P = .03) total Timed-Up-and-Go test times. There were no differences in clinical outcome scores between the groups preoperatively or postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

We found kinematic and functional differences that favor PS TKA. Our results suggest posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency in CR TKA, indicating that perhaps the cam/post systems in PS TKA better maintain knee kinematics and function long term.

Genesis 1 posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with asymmetric tibial tray: An 18-to-26-year long-term clinical outcome study

BACKGROUND

To present the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of the Genesis I posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics, Memphis, TN, USA) (one of the first designed with an asymmetric tibial tray).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 117 cemented TKAs performed on 95 patients were evaluated using this design, with a mean follow-up of 21.5 years (range, 18-26). Failures, complication rates, and clinical (both subjective and objective) and radiological outcomes were assessed for all patients.

RESULTS

Seven failures occurred (wear and structural failure of the polyethylene insert) and six revision surgeries were performed at a mean of 10 years (range, three to 14) from the index operation. No revision of either the femoral or tibial components for aseptic loosening was performed. Survivorship analysis showed a cumulative success rate of 93.53% (95% CI, 92.75-94.32%) at 20 and 25 years, with revision for any reason as an end point. All patients showed a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.001) in the Knee Society and Oxford knee rating scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes for this TKA design, with revisions being related to polyethylene wear structural failure.

Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Stiffness is a common reason for suboptimal clinical outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA). There is a lack of consensus regarding its definition, which is often conflated with its histopathologic subcategory-i.e., arthrofibrosis. There is value in refining the definition of acquired idiopathic stiffness in an effort to select for patients with arthrofibrosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish a consensus definition of acquired idiopathic stiffness, determine its prevalence after pTKA, and identify potential risk factors for its development.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Scopus databases were searched from 2002 to 2017. Studies that included patients with stiffness after pTKA were screened with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to isolate the subset of patients with acquired idiopathic stiffness unrelated to known extrinsic or surgical causes. Three authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias and collected data. Outcomes of interest were then analyzed according to age, sex, and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

In the 35 included studies (48,873 pTKAs), the mean patient age was 66 years. In 63% of the studies, stiffness was defined as a range of motion of <90° or a flexion contracture of >5° at 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively. The prevalence of acquired idiopathic stiffness after pTKA was 4%, and this did not differ according to age (4%, I = 95%, among patients <65 years old and 5%, I = 96%, among those ≥65 years old; p = 0.238). The prevalence of acquired idiopathic stiffness was significantly lower in males (1%, I = 85%) than females (3%, I = 95%) (p < 0.0001) as well as in patients with a BMI of <30 kg/m (2%, I = 94%) compared with those with a BMI of ≥30 kg/m (5%, I = 97%) (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary literature supports the following definition for acquired idiopathic stiffness: a range of motion of <90° persisting for >12 weeks after pTKA in patients in the absence of complicating factors including preexisting stiffness. The mean prevalence of acquired idiopathic stiffness after pTKA was 4%; females and obese patients were at increased risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What to Know for Selecting Cruciate-Retaining or Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

There has been continuing debate about the superiority of cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA for obtaining knee joint stability with functional improvement. Many surgeons tend to select the type of prosthesis on the basis of their own training and experience. However, the selection must be based on a great store of knowledge rather than on the surgeon's preconceptions or preferences. CR TKA may not be feasible in certain settings: posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, severe deformity, and history of trauma or surgery. The risk of conversion from a CR type prosthesis to a PS type prosthesis might be high in patients with severe flexion contracture, steep posterior slope, and small femoral component size. The above factors should be carefully considered for an appropriate selection of the type of prosthesis. The surgeon should have a clear understanding on the technical differences between CR and PS TKAs. The amount of distal femoral resection, femoral component size, and tibial slope are particularly crucial for successful TKA. Unless they are meticulously determined, stiffness or instability will ensue, which can be difficult to resolve afterwards. There was no notable difference in functional outcome, range of motion, kinematics, and survival rate between CR and PS TKAs in most previous studies. Strict adherence to surgical indications and solid understanding of differences in surgical principles might be more important than the selection of either a CR or PS prosthesis.

Annual revision rates of partial versus total knee arthroplasty: A comparative meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) as alternatives to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) has increased. However, no single resource consolidates survivorship data between TKA and partial resurfacing options for each variant of unicompartmental OA. This meta-analysis compared survivorship between TKA and medial UKA (MUKA), lateral UKA (LUKA) and PFA using annual revision rate as a standardized metric.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for studies quantifying TKA, MUKA, LUKA and/or PFA implant survivorship. Studies were classified by evidence level and assessed for bias using the MINORS and PEDro instruments. Annual revision rates were calculated for each arthroplasty procedure as percentages/observed component-year, based on a Poisson-normal model with random effects using the R-statistical software package.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four studies (113 cohort and 11 registry-based studies) met inclusion/exclusion criteria, providing data for 374,934 arthroplasties and 14,991 revisions. The overall evidence level was low, with 96.7% of studies classified as level III-IV. Annual revision rates were lowest for TKA (0.49%, CI 0.41 to 0.58), followed by MUKA (1.07%, CI 0.87 to 1.31), LUKA (1.13%, CI 0.69 to 1.83) and PFA (1.75%, CI 1.19 to 2.57). No difference was detected between revision rates for MUKA and LUKA (p=0.222).

CONCLUSIONS

Revisions of MUKA, LUKA and PFA occur at an annual rate of 2.18, 2.31 and 3.57-fold that of TKA, respectively. These estimates may be used to inform clinical decision-making, guide patient expectations and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in the setting of unicompartmental OA.

Cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting ultra-congruent insert

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) conservation and the polyethylene insert constraint in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are still debated. The PCL is one of the primary stabilizers of the joint, but cruciate retaining (CR) implants have the disadvantage of a difficult balancing of the PCL. Postero-stabilized (PS) implants were introduced to reduce this problem. However, also the PS implants have some disadvantages, due to the cam-mechanism, such as high risk of cam-mechanism polyethylene wear. To minimize the polyethylene wear of the cam-mechanism and the bone sacrifice due to the intercondylar box, different types of inserts were developed, trying to increase the implant conformity and to reduce stresses on the bone-implant interface. In this scenario ultra-congruent (UC) inserts were developed. Those inserts are characterized by a high anterior wall and a deep-dished plate. This conformation should guarantee a good stability without the posterior cam. Few studies on both kinematic and clinical outcomes of UC inserts are available. Clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as kinematic data are similar between UC mobile bearing (MB) and standard PS MB inserts at short to mid-term follow-up. In this manuscript biomechanics and clinical outcomes of UC inserts will be described, and they will be compared to standard PS or CR inserts.

Does cruciate retention primary total knee arthroplasty affect proprioception, strength and clinical outcome?

PURPOSE

It remains unclear what the contribution of the PCL is in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of the PCL in TKA in relationship to clinical outcome, strength and proprioception.

METHODS

Two arthroplasty designs were compared: a posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) and a posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. A retrospective analysis was performed of 27 CR and 18 PS implants with a minimum of 1 year in vivo. Both groups were compared in terms of clinical outcome (range of motion, visual analogue scale for pain, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scoring system, Lysholm score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), strength (Biodex System 3 Dynamometer(®)) and proprioception (balance and postural control using the Balance Master system(®)). Each design was also compared to the non-operated contralateral side in terms of strength and proprioception.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between both designs in terms of clinical outcome and strength. In terms of proprioception, only the rhythmic weight test at slow and moderate speed shifting from left to right was significant in favour of the CR design. None of the unilateral stance tests showed any significant difference between both designs. There was no difference in terms of strength and proprioception between the operated side and the non-operated side.

CONCLUSION

Retaining the PCL in TKA does not result in an improved performance in terms of clinical outcome and proprioception and does not show any difference in muscle strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes between posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to evaluate which approach is superior.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing posterior cruciate-retaining with posterior stabilized TKA were reviewed which were published up to August 2011. Methodological quality of each included RCT was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The relevant data were analysed using Review Manager 5.1. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 888 patients with 963 knee joints met predetermined inclusion criteria. The postoperative range of motion (ROM) and flexion angle were 11.07° and 2.88° higher for patients with a posterior stabilized TKA than those with a posterior cruciate-retaining TKA, respectively [weighted mean difference (WMD), -11.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), -18.06 to -4.08; p < 0.01 and WMD, -2.88; 95% CI, -5.63 to -0.12; p = 0.04]. No statistical differences were observed between the two designs for knee society pain score, extension angle, 2- and 5-year knee society score, 2- and 5-year knee society function score and complications after primary TKA.

CONCLUSION

Posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA have similar clinical outcomes with regard to knee function, postoperative knee pain and the other complications. Prosthesis survivorship for both posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA is satisfactory, and there are no differences between them at short- and middle-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Long-term follow-up of cemented fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in a Chinese population: a survival analysis of more than 10 years

The aims of this study were to evaluate the long term clinical outcomes and survival rate of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Chinese population and the risk factors for failure. Between 1985 to 2001, 297 patients underwent primary TKAs with cemented fixed bearing platform in our center. Survival rate was 92.7% at 10 years, with reoperation of the implant as the endpoint, and 90.4% at 15 years. Main reasons for failure were infection and aseptic loosening. Clinical evaluation of 96 knees with HSS knee score showed the mean scores increased from 56.58 ± 11.05 preoperatively to 92.29 ± 10.95 postoperatively. RA patients had lower long-term survivorship compared with OA patients. Younger patients had better HSS scores. Patella strategy and posterior-cruciate-ligament (PCL) strategy had no effect on implant survivorship and clinical outcome. In conclusion, this was one of first studies showing valid long-term outcomes of primary TKA in Chinese.

Intraoperative joint gaps affect postoperative range of motion in TKAs with posterior-stabilized prostheses

BACKGROUND

Joint gaps and mediolateral (ML) soft tissue balance have long been known to affect clinical scores and patient function after TKA, but the relationship between gaps and soft tissue balance remain poorly defined. If specific relationships exist between soft tissue tension and patient function, then objective targets could be established to assist surgeons in achieving more consistent postoperative knee function.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

By performing instrumented gap measurements during TKA, we sought to quantify the relationships between intraoperative soft tissue tension and clinical scores and patient function.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 57 patients with 63 primary TKAs with posterior-stabilized prostheses. Joint gaps and ML soft tissue balance were measured intraoperatively from 0° to 135° with the patella reduced after independent bone cuts and soft tissue releases. We determined the relationships between these intraoperative measurements and postoperative ROM and Knee Society scores at minimum 2-year followup.

RESULTS

Larger joint gaps at 120° and 135° flexion predicted larger postoperative knee flexion (r=0.296 and r=0.393, respectively), whereas larger gaps at 10° flexion predicted greater postoperative knee extension (r=0.285). Knees with rectangular joint gaps did not show better ROM or Knee Society scores compared with knees with trapezoidal joint gaps. In the range of normal surgical variation, neither joint gaps nor gap asymmetry affected the incidence of postoperative instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding small joint gaps in extension and in deep flexion should allow patients who undergo TKAs to obtain maximum ROM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Knee kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament-substituting arthroplasty with or without the posterior cruciate ligament

Few studies have compared functional kinematics in knees using identical prostheses with or without the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). This study contrasted in vivo knee kinematics with an anterior cruciate ligament-substituting arthroplasty with and without PCL retention. We hypothesized that knees without PCLs would exhibit less femoral posterior translation, and consequently less maximum knee flexion. Fifty-six knees were studied using dynamic radiography at least one year post-surgery, with twenty-seven knees retaining the PCL and twenty-nine knees having the PCL sacrificed. Consistent with our hypothesis, PCL-sacrificing knees showed more anterior femoral condylar positions. Contrary to our hypothesis, PCL-sacrificing knees demonstrated greater knee flexion during kneeling (122° versus 115°). Contracted PCLs in severely deformed knees likely were the cause of limited flexion in some retaining knees.

Influence of patellofemoral articular geometry and material on mechanics of the unresurfaced patella

Patellar resurfacing during knee replacement is still under debate, with several studies reporting higher incidence of anterior knee pain in unresurfaced patellae. Congruency between patella and femur impacts the mechanics of the patellar cartilage and strain in the underlying bone, with higher stresses and strains potentially contributing to cartilage wear and anterior knee pain. The material properties of the articulating surfaces will also affect load transfer between femur and patella. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanics of the unresurfaced patella and compare with natural and resurfaced conditions in a series of finite element models of the patellofemoral joint. In the unresurfaced analyses, three commercially available implants were compared, in addition to an 'ideal' femoral component which replicated the geometry, but not the material properties, of the natural femur. Hence, the contribution of femoral component material properties could be assessed independently from geometry changes. The ideal component tracked the kinematics and patellar bone strain of the natural knee, but had consistently inferior contact mechanics. In later flexion, compressive patellar bone strain in unresurfaced conditions was substantially higher than in resurfaced conditions. Understanding how femoral component geometry and material properties in unresurfaced knee replacement alters cartilage contact mechanics and bone strain may aid in explaining why the incidence of anterior knee pain is higher in the unresurfaced population, and ultimately contribute to identifying criteria to pre-operatively predict which patients are suited to an unresurfaced procedure and reducing the incidence of anterior knee pain in the unresurfaced patient population.