Comparison of mucosal and mucoperiosteal wound cover for the treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw lesions: a retrospective cohort study

Analysis of Factors Associated with the Postoperative Healing of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is considered the best approach by many researchers for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). While postoperative outcomes are mainly favorable, wound healing still fails in some cases. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting the postoperative healing of MRONJ.

METHODS

This study involved 400 osteoporosis patients who received surgical treatment from January 2009 to January 2018 in Kyungpook National University Hospital. The patient, drug, and clinical factors were collected as investigation variables. The obtained data were statistically analyzed to identify relationships between the factors and healing aspect.

RESULTS

Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the route of drug administration, bone exposure, types of surgical management, and wound management had a significant influence (p < 0.05) on the healing outcome. Sequestrectomy with primary closure had a more positive effect on favorable healing. In the multivariate logistic regression test, the effect of wound management alone was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with osteoporosis, the factors such as intravenously administered drugs, fistulas that were probed to the bone, and surgical management with curettage were associated with a lower rate of postoperative complete healing of MRONJ, whereas primary closure of wounds led, possibly, to good healing outcomes. The strengths of the study include its relatively large sample size and that its results can hopefully aid in the clinical decisions for practitioners and future research studies for researchers.

Clinical outcomes of open and closed management after surgical treatments in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

CONTEXT AND PURPOSE

To achieve success following surgical treatment of MRONJ, complete wound closure has been considered necessary; open wound management has not been generally recommended. Therefore, various closure techniques using local flaps have been reported. However, these techniques often increase surgical invasiveness, and there is minimal evidence regarding whether complete wound closure is preferable to open wound management following surgical treatment of MRONJ. The aim of this study was to clarify whether complete wound closure is necessary for successful healing following surgical treatment of MRONJ.

PROCEDURES

This retrospective study included 52 patients with stage 2 and 3 MRONJ who underwent surgical treatment. Twenty-seven of the 52 patients received open wound management, while the remaining 25 received complete wound closure management. The outcomes of both groups were evaluated at the 6-month follow-up visit; 'success' was defined as complete mucosal covering without symptoms and 'failure' was defined as the presence of residual bone exposure or progression of disease.

MAIN FINDINGS

In the open wound group, 23 patients (85.1%) exhibited 'success' and four patients (14.8%) exhibited 'failure'; in the closed wound group, 21 patients (84.0%) exhibited 'success' and four patients (16.0%) exhibited 'failure'. These outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Although complete wound closure has many advantages with respect to the healing process, open wound management is also acceptable for patients with difficulty achieving complete wound closure, as well as for surgeons who wish to reduce surgical invasiveness.

The Type of Antiresorptive Treatment Influences the Time to Onset and the Surgical Outcome of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

PURPOSE

Few data exist focusing on differences in the time to disease onset and the success rates in patients suffering from medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) dependent on their different antiresorptive treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare these variables for patients treated with bisphosphonate (BP) or denosumab (DNO) and for patients who switched the antiresorptive drug (BP/DNO).

PATIENTS AND METHODSS

A retrospective single-center cohort study with patients suffering from MRONJ was conducted. The predictor variable was the antiresorptive treatment, the outcome variables were 1) time to onset of MRONJ (time of antiresorptive treatment to MRONJ diagnosis) and 2) treatment success (mucosal integrity 12 months postoperatively). The other variables include data on demographic, underlying disease, MRONJ stage, and trigger events. Cox and logistic regression, Phi-coefficient, Cramer's V, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two patients were included and divided into 3 groups: group I (BP) n = 45 patients, n = 59 lesions; group II (BP/DNO) n = 42 patients, n = 71 lesions; and group III (DNO) n = 45 patients, n = 62 MRONJ lesions. Treatment success and time to onset differed significantly between the groups: success rates in group I BP (84.7%) were significantly lower (P = .04) than in group II BP/DNO (91.5%, P = .12) and group III DNO (90.3%, P = .35). The onset was significantly earlier in group III DNO (median 2.0 years, Q_0.25: 1.49, Q_0.75: 2.98; confidence interval 95%: 1.93 to 2.83) than in group II BP/DNO (median 4.07 years, Q_0.25: 1.64, Q_0.75: 6.70; confidence interval 95%: 3.55 to 5.68) and group I BP (median 3.86 years, Q_0.25: 1.69, Q_0.75: 6.46; confidence interval 95%: 3.43 to 5.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The different antiresorptive drugs show distinctive characteristics of time to onset and treatment success with the lowest success rates in the BP group and the earliest onset in the DNO group. The switch of the antiresorptive therapy (BP to DNO) did not influence the outcome variables negatively.

The role of M1 and M2 macrophage polarization in progression of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between M1 and M2 macrophage polarization and clinical stage in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) who underwent treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

M1 and M2 macrophage density and expression of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 were assessed on biopsies of mucosal tissues surrounding necrotic bone in 30 MRONJ patients with stages 1-3 and controls. For identification of M1 and M2 macrophages, double CD68/iNOS and CD68/CD206 immunofluorescence staining was conducted, respectively. Computer-assisted immunofluorescence quantification of markers was performed.

RESULTS

Early stage 1 MRONJ patients showed a switch toward the M2 phenotype, as indicated by the higher density of M2 macrophages, the decreased M1/M2 ratio, and the upregulation of IL-10. MRONJ patients with advanced stages 2 and 3 showed a shift toward M1-polarized macrophages, as suggested by the higher density of M1 macrophages, the increased M1/M2 ratio, and the overexpression of IL-6. The macrophage density of both M1 and M2 subsets was significantly enhanced in patients receiving bisphosphonates compared with those receiving denosumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The M1-M2 macrophage polarization status in mucosal tissues bordering necrotic bone correlates with clinical stage of MRONJ. Patients with early-stage MRONJ show a switch toward M2-polarized macrophages, while MRONJ patients with advanced stage demonstrate a shift toward the M1 phenotype.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Therapeutic molecules targeting the inflammatory microenvironment via the regulation of either M1 or M2 macrophage polarization may represent a novel strategy for treatment of MRONJ.

Adipose-derived stem cells prevent the onset of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw through transforming growth factor β-1-mediated gingival wound healing

Background

Due to its complex pathogenesis and low clinical cure rate, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) poses a substantial challenge for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Therefore, the treatment of BRONJ should focus on prevention. In clinical studies, primary wound closure can significantly reduce the incidence of BRONJ. Whether local stem cell transplantation can promote primary gingival healing in patients with a medication history and prevent BRONJ has not been reported.

Methods

In this study, animals were divided into a healthy group (non-drug treatment), a BP group, a hydroxyapatite (HA) group, and an adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) group. All groups except the healthy group were treated with BPs and immunosuppressive drugs once per week for 8 weeks, simulating clinical use for the treatment of cancer patients with bone metastasis, to induce BRONJ-like animals. After the sixth drug treatment, the bilateral premolars were extracted in all groups. In contrast to the healthy and BP groups, the extraction sockets in the HA and ADSC groups were filled with HA or HA + ADSCs simultaneously post extraction to observe the preventive effect of ADSCs on the occurrence of BRONJ. At 2 and 8 weeks post extraction, animals from all groups were sacrificed.

Results

At 8 weeks post transplantation, ADSCs prevented the occurrence of BRONJ, mainly through accelerating healing of the gingival epithelium at 2 weeks post extraction. We also found that ADSCs could upregulate the expression of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) and fibronectin in tissue from animals with a medication history by accelerating gingival healing of the extraction socket. A rescue assay further demonstrated that TGF-β1 and fibronectin expression decreased in TGF-β1-deficient ADSC-treated animals, which partially abolished the preventive effect of ADSCs on the onset of BRONJ.

Conclusion

ADSCs prevent the onset of BRONJ, mainly by upregulating the expression of TGF-β1 and fibronectin to promote primary gingival healing, ultimately leading to bone regeneration in the tooth extraction socket. Our new findings provide a novel stem cell treatment for the prevention of BRONJ.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-019-1277-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.