Binary and WHO dysplasia grading systems for the prediction of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Machine learning methods in predicting the risk of malignant transformation of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) refer to a heterogenous group of clinical presentations with heightened rate of malignant transformation. Identification of risk levels in OPMDs is crucial to determine the need for active intervention in high-risk patients and routine follow-up in low-risk ones. Machine learning models has shown tremendous potential in several areas of dentistry that strongly suggest its application to estimate rate of malignant transformation of precancerous lesions.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed on Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library database to identify articles including machine learning models and algorithms to predict malignant transformation in OPMDs. Relevant bibliographic data, study characteristics, and outcomes were extracted for eligible studies. Quality of the included studies was assessed through the IJMEDI checklist.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were found suitable for the review as per the PECOS criteria. Amongst all studies, highest sensitivity (100%) was recorded for U-net architecture, Peaks Random forest model, and Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA). Highest specificity (100%) was noted for PLSDA. Range of overall accuracy in risk prediction was between 95.4% and 74%.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning proved to be a viable tool in risk prediction, demonstrating heightened sensitivity, automation, and improved accuracy for predicting transformation of OPMDs. It presents an effective approach for incorporating multiple variables to monitor the progression of OPMDs and predict their malignant potential. However, its sensitivity to dataset characteristics necessitates the optimization of input parameters to maximize the efficiency of the classifiers.

The Significance of Modified Histone H3 in Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Cancer

BACKGROUND

Oral carcinogenesis is complex and influenced by both genetic and epigenetic changes. Altered histone modification is the epigenetic event that plays a role in cancer development and progression. Distinct modification patterns of histones have been shown to affect patient prognosis in selected cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the profiles of histone H3 modification in oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in association with the clinical-pathologic characteristics.

METHODS

One hundred patients were divided into 4 groups: low-grade OED, high-grade OED, OSCC, and normal oral mucosa (NOM). The levels of 3 types of histone modification-the H3K18ac, H3K9me3, and H3K9ac-were analysed immunohistochemically. Their expression profiles were compared and correlated with prognostically relevant clinical and pathologic features.

RESULTS

The H3K18ac and H3K9me3 were upregulated in OSCC, compared with OED and NOM. In contrast, the H3K9ac was downregulated in low-grade OED but increased in high-grade OED and OSCC. The hyperacetylations of H3K18 and H3K9 significantly correlated with advanced cancer depth of invasion and high T stage, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Histone H3 acetylation and methylation at lysine residues are differentially involved in the multistep oral carcinogenesis and impact aggressive cancer phenotypes. The effect of H3K9ac appears early in OED development, whilst the increased H3K18ac and H3K9me3 may be vital in the emergence of OSCC.

Demystifying oral epithelial dysplasia: a histological guide

Oral epithelial dysplasia is a histologically diagnosed potentially premalignant disorder of the oral mucosa, which carries a risk of malignant transformation to squamous cell carcinoma. The diagnosis and grading of oral epithelial dysplasia is challenging, with cases often referred to specialist oral and maxillofacial pathology centres for second opinion. Even still there is poor inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement in a diagnosis. There are a total of 28 features of oral epithelial dysplasia listed in the 5th edition of World Health Organization classification of tumours of the head and neck. Each of these features is poorly defined and subjective in its interpretation. Moreover, how these features contribute to dysplasia grading and risk stratification is even less well defined. This article discusses each of the features of oral epithelial dysplasia with examples and provides an overview of the common mimics, including the normal histological features of the oral mucosa which may mimic atypia. This article also highlights the paucity of evidence defining these features while offering suggested definitions. Ideally, these definitions will be refined, and the most important features identified to simplify the diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia. Digital whole slide images of the figures in this paper can be found at: https://www.pathogenesis.co.uk/r/demystifying-dysplasia-histology-dataset.

Calibration improves the agreement in grading oral epithelial dysplasia-Findings from a National Workshop in Malaysia

INTRODUCTION

A major pitfall of many of the established oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) grading criteria is their lack of reproducibility and accuracy to predict malignant transformation. The main objective of this study was to determine whether calibration of practicing oral pathologists on OED grading could improve the reproducibility of the WHO 2017 and the binary OED grading systems.

METHODS

A nationwide online exercise was carried out to determine the influence of calibration on the reproducibility of the WHO 2017 and the binary OED grading systems.

RESULTS

A significant improvement was observed in the inter-observer agreement for the WHO 2017 OED grading system (K 0.196 vs. 0.448; Kw 0.357 vs. 0.562) after the calibration exercise. The significant difference (p = 0.027) in the level of agreement between those with five or more years and less than 5 years of experience was no more observed (p = 0.426) after the calibration exercise. The percent agreement for binary grading was significantly higher (91.8%) for buccal mucosal lesions as compared to lesions on the tongue after the calibration exercise.

CONCLUSION

This study validates the significance of calibration in improving the reproducibility of OED grading. The nationwide exercise resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the inter-observer agreement for the WHO 2017 OED grading system among a large number of oral pathologists. It is highly recommended that similar exercises should be organized periodically by professional bodies responsible for continuing education among oral pathologists to improve the reliability of OED grading for optimal treatment of oral potentially malignant disorders.

Histopathological findings of oral epithelial dysplasias and their relation to malignant transformation

OBJECTIVES

Oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) are often diagnosed late. This study aimed to determine how frequently oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) transforms to OSCC and to identify histological features that could influence the rate of malignant transformation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of OED over 29 years at the Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Finland. OEDs with co-existing carcinomas were excluded from the data (5.8%). OED patients who developed carcinoma were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry database.

RESULTS

Altogether 681 OED patients had a mean age of 59.0 years, and the male:female ratio was 0.67. Of all OED samples, 21.8% were on the tongue, followed by lining mucosa (21.3%), lip (5.3%), and masticatory mucosa (4.85%). In addition, 46.7% had no location cited. The prevalence of mild dysplasia was 62.4%, moderate dysplasia 29.1%, and severe dysplasia 3.2%. Of the patients, 94.7% had an additional histological diagnosis alongside OED. Candidiasis, lichenoid inflammation, and ulcer were found in 18.2%, 0.0%, and 22.7% of severe dysplasias, in 12.1%, 12.2%, and 22.7% of moderate dysplasias, and in 6.6%, 12.2%, and 15.8% of mild dysplasias, respectively. An additional histopathological diagnosis did not increase the risk for OED to transform to OSCC. In a mean time of 5.2 (range 0.7-29.0) years, 7.5% of OED patients developed OSCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Location on the tongue and the more severe OED grades increased the risk of malignant transformation of OED. These patients may benefit from an intensified follow-up schedule to ensure early diagnosis of OSCC.

Prediction of malignant transformation in oral epithelial dysplasia using infrared absorbance spectra

Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is a histopathologically-defined, potentially premalignant condition of the oral cavity. The rate of transformation to frank carcinoma is relatively low (12% within 2 years) and prediction based on histopathological grade is unreliable, leading to both over- and under-treatment. Alternative approaches include infrared (IR) spectroscopy, which is able to classify cancerous and non-cancerous tissue in a number of cancers, including oral. The aim of this study was to explore the capability of FTIR (Fourier-transform IR) microscopy and machine learning as a means of predicting malignant transformation of OED. Supervised, retrospective analysis of longitudinally-collected OED biopsy samples from 17 patients with high risk OED lesions: 10 lesions transformed and 7 did not over a follow-up period of more than 3 years. FTIR spectra were collected from routine, unstained histopathological sections and machine learning used to predict malignant transformation, irrespective of OED classification. PCA-LDA (principal component analysis followed by linear discriminant analysis) provided evidence that the subsequent transforming status of these 17 lesions could be predicted from FTIR data with a sensitivity of 79 ± 5% and a specificity of 76 ± 5%. Six key wavenumbers were identified as most important in this classification. Although this pilot study used a small cohort, the strict inclusion criteria and classification based on known outcome, rather than OED grade, make this a novel study in the field of FTIR in oral cancer and support the clinical potential of this technology in the surveillance of OED.

What is the malignant transformation potential of oral lichen planus?

Data sources In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to identify studies assessing the risk of malignant transformation in oral lichen planus (OLP).Study selection Observational studies published in English between 2003-2020 were independently assessed for inclusion by two blinded investigators.Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted independently by two investigators followed by discussion to reach consensus. This included: study design and patient characteristics; length of follow-up; risk of bias; method of OLP diagnosis; oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) risk factors; rate of malignant transformation; and individual characteristics of malignant transformation cases. Cases of malignant transformation in the included studies were only included in meta-analysis if: 1) OLP diagnosis met current diagnostic criteria; 2) OSCC developed in the same site as previously diagnosed OLP after at least six months' follow-up; 3) the patient had no history of systemic immunosuppressive therapy, head and neck malignancy, or organ transplantation. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and meta-analysis was conducted to estimate overall risk of OLP malignant transformation using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Pooled univariate odds ratios (OR) for malignant transformation were calculated based on gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, hepatitis C infection and OLP subtype.Results In total, 593 studies were identified after removal of duplicates and 33 studies were included for data extraction. The included sample comprised 12,838 patients with OLP, and 151 malignant transformation cases were reported in the included studies. The authors excluded 56 malignant transformation cases from the meta-analysis, most commonly because of the absence of pathological OLP diagnosis. Among included malignant transformation cases, the mean (SD) age was 58.1 (12.4) years, and 64% of the sample was female. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated an OLP malignant transformation rate of 0.2% (95%CI: 0.1-0.3%). Heterogeneity was low (I2 = 28.74%, p = 0.065). Malignant transformation was significantly higher among smokers (OR = 4.62, p = 0.001), alcohol consumers (OR = 3.22, p = 0.05), those with hepatitis C (OR = 3.77, p = 0.03) and atrophic or erosive OLP subtypes (OR = 2.70, p = 0.03). Gender was not associated with increased risk of malignant transformation.Conclusions The malignant transformation rate of OLP is likely to be lower than previously reported, possibly as a result of variable diagnostic criteria. Whilst encouraging, clinical vigilance remains necessary, as OLP does carry a small risk of malignant transformation. Smoking, alcohol use, hepatitis C infection and erosive or atrophic subtypes appear to have a greater rate of malignant transformation.

Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Tumours of the Oral Cavity and Mobile Tongue

The fifth chapter of the upcoming fifth edition of the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Head and Neck titled Tumours of the oral cavity and mobile tongue, has had some modifications from the 2017 fourth edition. A new section "Non-neoplastic Lesions", introduces two new entries: necrotizing sialometaplasia and melanoacanthoma. The combined Oral potentially malignant disorders and Oral epithelial dysplasia section in the 2015 WHO has now been separated and submucous fibrosis and HPV-associated dysplasia are also discussed in separate sections. Carcinoma cuniculatum and verrucous carcinoma are described in dedicated sections, reflecting that the oral cavity is the most common location in the head and neck for both these entities which have distinct clinical and histologic features from conventional squamous cell carcinoma. This review summarizes the changes in Chapter 5 with special reference to new additions, deletions, and sections that reflect current clinical, histological, and molecular advances.

The clinical utility of contemporary oral epithelial dysplasia grading systems

INTRODUCTION

Clinical management of oral potentially malignant disorders relies on accurate histopathological assessment of the presence and grade of oral epithelial dysplasia. Whilst adjunctive laboratory tests have provided useful prognostic information, none are in widespread clinical use. This study was performed to assess the clinical utility of two contemporary oral epithelial dysplasia grading systems.

METHODS

Patients were identified from a clinical database. Oral epithelial dysplasia grading was performed by three oral and maxillofacial pathologists blinded to clinical outcome using the WHO 2017 system and a binary classification. The primary outcome measure was the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma, termed 'malignant transformation'.

RESULTS

131 cases satisfied the inclusion criteria, of which 23 underwent malignant transformation. There was substantial inter-rater agreement between the study pathologists for both grading systems, measured using kappa statistics (κ = 0.753-0.784). However, there was only moderate agreement between the consensus WHO 2017 dysplasia grade for the study against the original grade assigned by a pool of six pathologists in the context of the clinical service (κ = 0.491). Higher grade categories correlated with an increased risk of developing cancer using both grading systems.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the WHO 2017 and binary grading systems are reproducible between calibrated pathologists and that consensus reporting is likely to improve the consistency of grading. The WHO and binary systems were prognostically comparable. We recommend that institutions implement consensus oral epithelial dysplasia grading and prospectively audit the effectiveness of risk stratifying their patients with oral potentially malignant disorders. (249 words).