Long-term dentoskeletal side effects of mandibular advancement therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: data from the Pays de la Loire sleep cohort

Long-term efficacy of mandibular advancement devices in the treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aims to review the long-term subjective and objective efficacy of mandibular advancement devices (MAD) in the treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized self-controlled trials with a treatment duration of at least 1 year with MAD were included. The quality assessment and data extraction of the included studies were conducted in the meta-analysis. A total of 22 studies were included in this study, of which 20 (546 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. All the studies had some shortcomings, such as small sample sizes, unbalanced sex, and high dropout rates. The results suggested that long-term treatment of MAD can significantly reduce the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) by -3.99 (95%CI -5.93 to -2.04, p<0.0001, I2 = 84%), and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) -16.77 (95%CI -20.80 to -12.74) events/h (p<0.00001, I2 = 97%). The efficacy remained statistically different in the severity (AHI<30 or >30 events/h) and treatment duration (duration <5y or >5y) subgroups. Long-term use of MAD could also significantly decrease blood pressure and improve the score of functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ). Moderate evidence suggested that the subjective and objective effect of MAD on adult OSA has long-term stability. Limited evidence suggests long-term use of MAD might improve comorbidities and healthcare. In clinical practice, regular follow-up is recommended.

Mandibular advancement devices used with morning occlusal guides for treating obstructive sleep apnea-changed incisor inclination and its associated factors

PURPOSE

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) effectively treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although the use of morning occlusal guides (MOGs) along with MADs is recommended to prevent dental side effects, there is no evidence to support this. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in incisor inclination in patients with OSA treated with MADs and MOGs, and to identify its predictive factors.

METHODS

Patients with OSA who received MAD and MOG therapy and had a reduction in their apnea-hypopnea index greater than 50% were analyzed. Cephalometric measurements were performed at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up or longer to assess the dentoskeletal side effects of MAD/MOG treatment. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between the change in incisor inclination and the independent variables that may cause the observed side effects.

RESULTS

Among 23 patients enrolled in the study, there was significant upper incisor retroclination (U1-SN: 2.83° ± 2.68°, U1-PP: 2.86° ± 2.46°; P < 0.05) and significant lower incisor proclination (L1-SN: 3.04° ± 3.29°, L1-MP: 1.74° ± 3.13°; P < 0.05). However, no significant skeletal changes were observed. Multivariable linear regression revealed that advancement ≥ 95% of the patients' maximal mandibular protrusion was associated with greater upper incisor retroclination. Increased treatment duration was also associated with increased upper incisor retroclination. No \measured variables were associated with the change in lower incisor inclination.

CONCLUSIONS

Dental side effects occurred in patients who used MADs with MOGs. The amount of mandibular protrusion by MADs and treatment duration were predictive factors associated with upper incisor retroclination.

Mandibular Torus as a New Index of Success for Mandibular Advancement Devices

BACKGROUND

In obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), treatment with mandibular advancement devices (MADs) reduces patients' Apnoea-Hypopnoea index (AHI) scores and improves their sleepiness and quality of life. MADs are non-invasive alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate traditional continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The variability of responses to these devices makes it necessary to search for predictors of success. The aim of our study was to evaluate the presence of mandibular torus as a predictor of MAD efficacy in OSA and to identify other potential cephalometric factors that could influence the response to treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. The study included 103 patients diagnosed of OSA who met the criteria for initiation of treatment with MAD. Structural variables were collected (cephalometric and the presence or absence of mandibular torus). Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the existence of predictive factors for the efficacy of MADs.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients who were consecutively referred for treatment with MAD were included (89.3% men); the mean age of the participants was 46.3 years, and the mean AHI before MAD was 31.4 (SD 16.2) and post- MAD 11.3 (SD 9.2). Thirty-three percent of patients had mandibular torus. Torus was associated with a better response (odds ratio (OR) = 2.854 (p = 0.035)) after adjustment for sex, age, body mass index (BMI; kg/m²), the angle formed by the occlusal plane to the sella-nasion plane (OCC plane to SN), overinjection, and smoking. No cephalometric predictors of efficacy were found that were predictive of MAD treatment success.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a mandibular torus practically triples the probability of MAD success. This is the simplest examination with the greatest benefits in terms of the efficacy of MAD treatment for OSA.