Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE): three-dimensional superimposition on cranial base

Three-dimensional assessment of the maxilla after modified surgically assisted rapid expansion: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aims to assess the three-dimensional dentoskeletal effects and median palatal suture opening pattern in patients undergoing modified surgically assisted maxillary rapid expansion (SARME) without pterygoid plate detachment.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients submitted to modified SARME between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Dental and skeletal measurements were taken at three different operative periods (before the expansion - T0; at the end of the activation of the Hyrax device - T1; and six months after the immobilization of the device - T2). Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and Pearson's correlation coefficient, were performed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

SARME demonstrated significant transverse maxillary expansion (with an average of 6.05 mm) with a greater impact in the anterior region. Dental measurements, including canine and molar distances, exhibited significant changes over the operative periods. Bone measurements (ANS and PNS) presented small but significant alterations, including a slight inferior displacement of ANS during device activation. The nasal floor width increased, followed by a width reduction after immobilization. The median palatal suture predominantly exhibited a Type II (V-shaped) opening.

CONCLUSION

The modified SARME presented a transversal direction increase and a super-lower skeletal displacement, with the anterior region being more affected than the posterior region. There was no change in the anteroposterior direction of the maxilla. Additionally, there was an increase in the linear dental measurements and a decrease in the angular measurement, with a positive correlation between the amount of posterior bone expansion and molar expansion as a result of the treatment in the analyzed period.

Can different osteotomies have an influence on surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion? A systematic review

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the randomized and non-randomized clinical trials (RCT; nRCT) concerning the different available osteotomies for surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME): pterygomaxillary disjunction (SARME + PD vs SARME-PD) and segmental Le Fort I osteotomy (2-piece vs 3-piece). Outcomes focused on skeletal, dental, upper airway changes, complications, and relapse. Two authors investigated five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science) until August 2023. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used for the quality assessment of the included RCTs and nRCTs, respectively. A total of 554 articles were retrieved and after duplicates removing and full-text reading, 40 studies were included. Two RCTs showed a low risk of bias, one an unclear risk and one a high risk. Among the non-RCTs, 15 studies showed a good quality, while 21 exhibited a fair quality score. SARME + PD resulted in more homogeneous posterior bone expansion, with minimal dental effects. No difference between 2-piece and 3-piece in asymmetric expansion was observed, although 3SO showed 1-2 mm of more transverse increase. The oropharynx minimum cross-sectional area, the nasopharynx and the oropharynx volume were greater in SARME + PD. Both dental and bone relapse can occur but no differences between the groups were observed. All osteotomies guaranteed a correction of transverse maxillary deficiency. Lower side effects were described in SARME + PD. Two-piece and 3-piece segmental Le Fort I osteotomies did not show any differences in the symmetry and amount of expansion.

Effect of different palatal expanders with miniscrews in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A non-linear finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) has been the treatment of choice in subjects presenting skeletally mature sutures.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze stress distribution and displacement of the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures resulting from three types of palatal expanders with surgical assistance using a non-linear finite element analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three different palatal expanders were designed: Model-I (tooth-bone-borne type containing four miniscrews), Model-II (tooth-bone-borne type containing two miniscrews), and Model-III (bone-borne type containing four miniscrews). A Le Fort I osteotomy was performed, and a total of 5.0 mm palatal expansion was simulated. Nonlinear analysis (three theory) method (geometric nonlinear theory, nonlinear contact theory, and nonlinear material methods) was used to evaluate stress and displacement of several craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures.

RESULTS

Regardless of the maxillary expander device type, surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion produces greater anterior maxillary expansion than posterior (ANS ranged from 2.675 mm to 3.444 mm, and PNS ranged from 0.522 mm to 1.721 mm); Model-I showed more parallel midpalatal suture opening pattern - PNS/ANS equal to 54%. In regards to ANS, Model-II (1.159 mm) and Model-III (1.000 mm) presented larger downward displacement than Model-I (0.343 mm). PNS displaced anteriorly more than ANS for all devices; Model-III presented the largest amount of forward displacement for PNS (1.147 mm) and ANS (1.064 mm). All three type of expanders showed similar dental displacement, and minimal craniofacial sutures separation. As expected, different maxillary expander designs produce different primary areas and levels of stresses (the bone-borne expander presented minimal stress at the teeth and the tooth-bone-borne expander with two miniscrews presented the highest).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this finite element method/finite element analysis, the results showed that different maxillary expander designs produce different primary areas and levels of stresses, minimal displacement of the craniofacial sutures, and different skeletal V-shape expansion.

Asymmetric Maxillary Expansion Introduced by Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

A commonly reported complication of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) that has not been explored extensively is uneven expansion between left and right sides, which requires secondary surgery for correction. This systematic review aims to analyze the prevalence and potential causes of asymmetric expansion in the transverse dimension after SARPE to guide the clinical practice.

METHODS

Electronic databases and manual search were used to search for original articles published on SARPE on March 11, 2022. Original human studies that recorded the number and percentage of asymmetric expansion after two-piece SARPE were included. The 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was implemented for the quality assessment and data analysis of the included articles. The study was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under the number CRD42022300782.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 articles were included in the final review. The risk of bias was high in 8 studies and medium in the other 5 studies. Overall, the prevalence of asymmetric expansion in the transverse dimension (different amount of expansion between left and right sides) was 7.52%, with 12.90% of patients involved receiving a second surgery for correction. Expander design did not significantly affect the rate of asymmetry expansion. Pterygomaxillary fissure release significantly increased the rate of asymmetry expansion (11.02% vs 5.08%, P < .001). In comparison, lateral nasal wall osteotomy (4.26% vs 14.77%, P < .001) and release of the nasal septum (5.22% vs 17.15%, P < .001) significantly lowered the rate of asymmetry expansion, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymmetric dentoskeletal expansion between left and right sides is a common complication of SARPE procedures, mostly caused by variations in surgical cuts. However, the risk of bias in currently available publications is high. Further studies are warranted to fully understand the causes of asymmetric expansion.