Horizontal ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla with in situ onlay bone grafting: a retrospective cohort study

Bone alteration and esthetics associated with implant-supported prostheses in the anterior maxilla under different implant placement timing: A retrospective clinical study of 1 to 3 years

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Different factors influence alterations in facial bone thickness and esthetic outcomes after implant placement. Whether the timing of implant placement influences alterations in the bone dimensional and esthetic outcomes is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the influence of the timing of implant placement on alveolar bone alterations and esthetic outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected from 40 patients who had received guided bone regeneration (GBR) performed simultaneously with immediate, early, or delayed single-tooth implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Facial and palatal horizontal bone thicknesses (FHBT, PHBT) and vertical bone level (FVBL, PVBL) immediately after surgery (T0), at 6 months after implant placement (T1), and at 1 to 3 years follow-up (T2) were measured, and the changes calculated. The pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES) were evaluated at the 1- to 3-year follow-up. The Kruskal-Wallis followed by the Dunn t test was applied to evaluate bone alteration among groups, and the Bonferroni method was used for adjusting multiple comparisons. The 1-way ANOVA test was used to determine any significance in the esthetic outcome in the 3 groups (α=.05).

RESULTS

The reduction in the FHBT0 of the immediate, early, and delayed implant placement group (T2-T0) was -1.17 (-1.70, -0.61) mm, -1.53 (-1.69, -0.49) mm, and -1.47 (-2.30, -0.20) mm, respectively. The FHBT around the implant apices remained basically stable. No obvious changes in the PHBT around the implants of the immediate and delayed implant placement group were noted. The FVBL significantly decreased in each group during the follow-up period (-1.34 (01.88, -0.56) mm, immediate; -2.88 (-3.79, -1.07) mm, early; -1.26 (-2.52, -0.48) mm, delayed). The PVBL change in the early implant placement group (-2.18 (-3.26, -0.86) mm) was more significant than that in the immediate (-0.55 (-2.10, -0.17) mm) and delayed (-0.51 (-1.29, 0.02) mm) implantation groups (P =.013). The mean ±standard deviation PES/WES score of the immediate (15.6 ±1.84) and early (15.00 ±1.13) implant placement groups was higher than that of the delayed implant placement group (13.92 ±2.10) without significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar bone changes and esthetic outcomes were found around implants of the immediate, early, and delayed implant placement groups.

Accuracy and Technical Predictability of Computer Guided Bone Harvesting from the Mandible: A Cone-Beam CT Analysis in 22 Consecutive Patients

This study assesses the accuracy and technical predictability of a computer-guided procedure for harvesting bone from the external oblique ridge using a patient-specific cutting guide. Twenty-two patients needing bone augmentation for implant placement were subjected to mandibular osteotomy employing a case-specific stereolithographic surgical guide generated through computer aided design. Differences between planned and real cut planes were measured comparing pre- and post-operative Cone Beam Computed Tomography images of the donor site according to six validated angular and displacement indexes. Accuracy and technical predictability were assessed for 119 osteotomy planes over the study population. Three different guide fitting approaches were compared. An average root-mean-square discrepancy of 0.52 (0.30-0.97) mm was detected. The accuracy of apical and medial planes was higher than the mesial and distal planes due to occasional antero-posterior guide shift. Fitting the guide with an extra reference point on the closest tooth performed better than using only the bone surface, with two indexes significantly lower and less disperse. The study showed that the surgical plan was actualized with a 1 mm safety margin, allowing effective nerve preservation and reducing technical variability. When possible, surgical guide design should allow fitting on the closest tooth based on both radiological and/or intra-oral scan data.