Micro-CT evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on hard-tissue debris removal from mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus

Postoperative pain after endodontic treatment using 8.25% vs 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in necrotic mandibular molars with apical periodontitis: A randomized double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of 8.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), compared with the use of 2.5% NaOCl, leads to higher postoperative pain after endodontic treatment.

METHODS

A total of 154 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: 8.25% and 2.5% NaOCl. A single-visit endodontic treatment was performed using a standard protocol, varying only the NaOCl concentration. Postoperative pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale at multiple times over 30 days. Overall pain scores over time were explored via multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression. The need for pain medication was recorded and compared between groups via the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The use of 8.25% NaOCl increased postoperative pain scores over time by 3.48 times compared with the use of 2.5% NaOCl (incident rate ratio [IRR], 3.48; 95% CI, 1.57 to 7.67). Furthermore, the 8.25% NaOCl group exhibited higher pain incidence than the 2.5% NaOCl group during the 12-hour through 3-day period, with scores at these times ranging from 2.21 (IRR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.62) through 10.74 (IRR, 10.74; 95% CI, 3.74 to 30.87) higher. No difference was detected in the number of analgesic capsules administered between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 8.25% NaOCl resulted in higher postoperative pain than the use of 2.5% NaOCl, with pain scores increasing by 3.48 times when this solution was used. Furthermore, the 8.25% NaOCl group exhibited higher pain incidence than the 2.5% NaOCl group during the 12-hour through 3-day period.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The use of 8.25% NaOCl during endodontic treatment can increase postoperative pain significantly. This clinical trial was registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials database (RBR-6vq3hc4).

Cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system provided by four active supplementary irrigation methods

This in vitro study evaluated the bacterial reduction provided by the EndoActivator (EA), Easy Clean (EC), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and XP-Endo Finisher. Eight-four mesial roots of mandibular first molars were instrumented, inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis, and divided into four groups (n. 20). Bacterial reduction in the main canals and dentinal tubules were respectively determined by MTT assays and Live/Dead BackLight technique through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at 50, 100, and 150 µm in-depth (n. 10 per group). Statistical analyses were conducted following a significance level of 95% (P < 0.05). A significant statistical difference was just identified between XPF and EC in the main canals. In the dentinal tubules from the main root canals, at 100 and 150 µm in-depths, significant statistical differences were only observed between XPF and EC (P = 0.027) for the former and between XPF and EC (P = 0.011) and XPF and PUI (P = 0.021) for the latter. In the dentinal tubules from the isthmus, at 100 µm in-depth, statistically relevant differences did occur between XPF and EC (P = 0.038) and EC and EA (P = 0.029). At 150 µm in-depth, these differences were only significant by comparing XPF and PUI (P = 0.025) and XPF and EC (P = 0.036). Although no irrigation method could thoroughly disinfect the RCS, bacterial reduction indexes were generally better after using XPF.

Can the addition of surfactants to NaOCl irrigation impact on the percentage of voids of root canal filling?

This study evaluated the impact of canal irrigation using surfactants associated to NaOCl on the percentage of voids of root canal filling through micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) analysis. 27 mandibular mesial roots with Vertucci type II canal configuration with isthmus were selected and scanned in a micro-CT device. The specimens were assigned to three groups (n = 9), according to the irrigation solution during instrumentation: 2.5% NaOCl without additives (control), 2.5% NaOCl with 0.1% Benzalkonium Chloride and 2.5% NaOCl with 0.1% Tween 80. After obturation, the specimens were rescanned, and the percentage of voids were calculated. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA with a significance level of 5%. The percentage of voids were similar among the groups (p > 0.05). None of the specimens showed completely voids-free areas. The addition of surfactants to NaOCl irrigation did not improve the quality of root canal filling of mandibular mesial root canals.

Enhancing debris removal in curved canals: a comparative evaluation of XP-endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to compare the efficacy of XP-endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) in removing hard tissue debris from curved canals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four mandibular molars with Vertucci's type II mesial canals were scanned in microcomputed tomography before and after preparation with HyFlex EDM, and accumulated hard tissue debris was quantified. Subsequently, the teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to the supplementary procedure: PUI with the Ultra-X insert or XP-endo Finisher. After the intervention, the specimens underwent another scanning. Two separate analyses were conducted, one for the total canal and another for the isthmus area. Unpaired and paired T-tests were used for inter- and intergroup comparisons, with a significance level set at 5%.

RESULTS

Both supplementary methods reduced the amount of debris compared to the initial volume. Remarkably, the XP-endo Finisher achieved a significantly higher percentage of debris removal (71% for the total canal and 74% for the isthmus areas) compared to PUI (41% for the total canal and 52% for the isthmus area) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both supplementary approaches reduced the amount of hard tissue debris from canal preparation, still XP-endo Finisher showed a higher reduction compared to PUI (p < 0.05).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

None of the supplementary methods rendered canals completely free of hard tissue debris. However, the supplementary approach with XP-endo Finisher resulted in lower levels of hard tissue debris than PUI in curved canals with isthmuses.