1
|
Alhabshi MO, Taweel DM, Alahmary HM, Al-Suhaymi OH, Al-Bander MR, Al-Suroor TA, Al-Shahrani AM, Alshallaa BH, Bakhamis BA. The Role of Orthodontics in the Management of Maxillofacial Fractures in Children: A Review on Contemporary Approaches. Cureus 2024; 16:e63128. [PMID: 39055419 PMCID: PMC11271819 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Maxillofacial fractures present complex challenges requiring effective orthodontic management to restore function and aesthetics. This review explores various orthodontic techniques, including fixed braces, maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), functional orthodontic therapy (FOT), and acrylic splints, emphasizing their roles in stabilizing fractures and promoting healing. The management of condylar fractures is discussed, highlighting the benefits of early intervention with functional appliances to facilitate condylar remodeling in children and adolescents. Additionally, the review covers splinting methods for dental and dentoalveolar fractures and the use of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for maxillary fractures. It addresses the complications and challenges of fracture management, the need for a multidisciplinary approach, and the limitations of current studies. Future directions include the use of advanced technologies such as virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D printing to enhance treatment precision and outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of orthodontic strategies for maxillofacial fractures, offering insights into clinical applications and future advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manaf O Alhabshi
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King Abdullah Medical City, Jeddah, SAU
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bushra A Bakhamis
- General Dentistry, Armed Forces Hospitals Administration in Taif Region, Taif, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schopper H, Krane NA, Sykes KJ, Yu K, Kriet JD, Humphrey CD. Trends in Maxillomandibular Fixation Technique at a Single Academic Institution. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2024; 17:119-123. [PMID: 38779397 PMCID: PMC11107819 DOI: 10.1177/19433875231176339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective chart review. Objective Restoration of premorbid occlusion is a key goal in the treatment of mandibular fractures. Placement of the patient in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) is performed during mandibular fracture repair to help establish occlusion. A number of techniques are available to achieve MMF. We sought to examine trends in MMF technique at our institution. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patients who underwent surgical treatment of mandibular fractures between January 1, 2011 and March 31, 2021. Data including fracture characteristics, mechanism of injury, patient demographics, complication rates, and MMF technique utilized were collected. Results One hundred sixty-three patients underwent MMF (132 males). The most common etiology of fracture was assault (34%). There was an increasing preference for rapid MMF techniques over time, as opposed to standard Erich arch bars. No significant difference in obtaining adequate fracture reduction as determined by postoperative imaging or complications were noted between those who underwent MMF with newer rapid techniques vs traditional MMF techniques. Conclusions Our institution has demonstrated changing trends in the technique utilized for establishing occlusion intraoperatively, more recently favoring rapid MMF techniques, with similar rates of complications and ability to adequately reduce fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Schopper
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Natalie A. Krane
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kevin J. Sykes
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Katherine Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - J. David Kriet
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Clinton D. Humphrey
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalluri MH, Edalatpour A, Thadikonda KM, Blum JD, Garland CB, Cho DY. Patient outcomes and complications following various maxillomandibular fixation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 92:151-176. [PMID: 38520780 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Currently, there are several methods of achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), each with its unique operative considerations and subsequent patient outcomes and complications. In this study, we reviewed the literature to evaluate and compare all MMF methods. METHODS A systematic review of all MMF types was conducted and post-operative outcome data were analyzed and compared among the different types. Conventional Erich arch bars were compared to hybrid arch bars, MMF screws, and eyelet interdental wiring. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine the mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a statistical significance of P < 0.05. RESULTS Among the 4234 articles identified, 24 were included, and 17 were meta-analyzed. Time to achieve MMF (-43.38 min; 95% CI, -58.20 to -28.56; P < 0.001), total operative time (-30.33 min; 95% CI, -61.05 to 0.39; P = 0.05), incidence of wire puncture injuries and glove perforations (0.11; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.30; P < 0.001), and incidence of poor oral hygiene (0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28; P < 0.001) were lower for alternative MMF interventions compared to those of the conventional Erich arch bars. CONCLUSIONS Alternative MMF methods required shorter operative time to achieve MMF and demonstrated other increased efficiencies of practice such as shorter total operative time and decreased glove perforations, when compared to conventional Erich arch bars. If a patient is a candidate for MMF, the presented alternative MMF techniques should be considered depending on the clinical context and availability of institutional resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasa H Kalluri
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Armin Edalatpour
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kishan M Thadikonda
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jessica D Blum
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Catharine B Garland
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel Y Cho
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grippaudo C, Lo Giudice A, Saponaro G, Todaro M, Moro A, D’Addona A. The Use of a CAD/CAM Thermoformed Splints System in Closed Reduction of Condylar Fractures. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:1023. [PMID: 37760125 PMCID: PMC10525750 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10091023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Mandibular fractures are very common. Common indications of closed treatment for mandibular fractures are non-displaced or minimally displaced simple fractures in adult compliant patients with good dentition, the absence of occlusal disruption, and fractures in growing children. In closed treatment, the mandible is maintained in centric occlusion with a maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) with orthodontic elastics. Many methods of MMF have been described, often using orthodontic appliances. In recent years, CAD-CAM technology has improved many procedures used in maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics. The device we present is manufactured following a digital workflow, and was designed specifically for MMF. (2) Materials: Two patients with mandibular fractures were treated with an MMF method whose procedure comprised scanning of the dental arches, followed by construction of thermoformed splints on which buttons for the elastics and retention holes are made. The splints were fixed on the dental arches with composite resin at the level of the holes, and were kept in place for the period of healing of the fracture, with the intermaxillary elastics hooked to the buttons. (3) Results: The application time of the splints was very quick. The splints remained stable for the necessary time, without causing particular discomfort to the patients. (4) Conclusions: From our experience, this technique has proved to be reliable and reproducible and could represent a valid tool in the closed treatment of mandibular fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Grippaudo
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, UOC di Chirurgia Odontostomatologica e Implantologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
- Odontoiatria e Protesi Dentaria, Dipartimento Universitario Testa Collo ed Organi di Senso, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.T.); (A.M.)
| | - Antonino Lo Giudice
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Gianmarco Saponaro
- Odontoiatria e Protesi Dentaria, Dipartimento Universitario Testa Collo ed Organi di Senso, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.T.); (A.M.)
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, UOC di Chirurgia Maxillo Facciale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Todaro
- Odontoiatria e Protesi Dentaria, Dipartimento Universitario Testa Collo ed Organi di Senso, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.T.); (A.M.)
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, UOC di Chirurgia Maxillo Facciale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Moro
- Odontoiatria e Protesi Dentaria, Dipartimento Universitario Testa Collo ed Organi di Senso, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.T.); (A.M.)
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, UOC di Chirurgia Maxillo Facciale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio D’Addona
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, UOC di Chirurgia Odontostomatologica e Implantologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
- Odontoiatria e Protesi Dentaria, Dipartimento Universitario Testa Collo ed Organi di Senso, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.T.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Polizzi A, Ronsivalle V, Lo Giudice A, Isola G, Bianchi A, Santonocito S, Leonardi R, Mummolo S. Orthodontic Approaches in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: A Scoping Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:children10030605. [PMID: 36980163 PMCID: PMC10047072 DOI: 10.3390/children10030605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Non-surgical approaches have been proposed in the management of mandibular fractures, especially in children, but there is a lack of clear guidelines on the clinical indications of conservative approaches. The aim of this scoping review is to provide the available evidence of the role of the orthodontist in the management of mandibular fractures. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed to select eligible articles from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases according to precise inclusion criteria. The research questions were formulated as follows: "what is the scientific evidence concerning the rule of orthodontists in the management of mandibular fractures" and "the preferential use of the direct bonding technique with orthodontic brackets rather than rigid arch bars"? Seventeen articles were included. Five articles presented the use of removable acrylic splints or functional appliances, six articles concerned the employment of cemented acrylic or rigid splints, and six articles described the management of mandibular fractures in adults and children using orthodontic brackets or mini-screws. Most of these techniques have been employed in children and growing subjects, while fewer data were available regarding conservative treatments in adults. Preliminary evidence suggests that condylar and some minor parasymphyseal fractures in children may be managed with conservative approaches. In adults, minor condylar and stable body mandibular fractures with minimal displacement have been reduced similarly. However, there are no sufficient elements that could suggest the preferential use of orthodontic brackets over rigid arch bars in adults. Further randomized and non-randomized clinical trials with long follow-ups will be needed to better define the clinical indications of the orthodontic approaches in the management of mandibular fractures based on severity, location, and age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Polizzi
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
- Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ronsivalle
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Antonino Lo Giudice
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Gaetano Isola
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgery Specialties, Section of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Santonocito
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Rosalia Leonardi
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Mummolo
- Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhushan K, Unakalkar S, Sahu R, Sharma ML. Compare the Efficacy of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures With and Without Use of Intra-Operative Inter-Maxillary Fixation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 74:4096-4099. [PMID: 36742617 PMCID: PMC9895336 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02830-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mandible fractures are regularly encountered by maxillofacial surgeons and various treatment protocols are available for the management of these fractures. The aim of study compares the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures with and without use of intra-operative inter-maxillary fixation. Twenty patients between age group ranging l8-65 years who reported with single mandibular fracture in Dental college in India, during Oct 2012-March 2015 were the study subjects. These patients were divided into two groups. In one group fracture reduction was done by using inter-maxillary fixation and miniplate fixation was done. In other group fracture reduction was done manually and then fractured fragments were held in position by the assistant and miniplate fixation was done. Post-operatively patients were evaluated for occlusion, bone alignment and soft tissue/hard tissue infection at 1st, 4th, 8th, 12th weeks in both the groups. Statistics done by using Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test. It was observed thatthere was no statistically significant difference seen in both the groups in terms of post-operative occlusion, radiological alignment and soft/hard tissue infection. Statistically significant difference was seen when the mean operating time was compared. The Group A showed mean difference of 35.50 min more time than Group B. The results of our study suggested that, use of intra-operative IMF does not show any advantages in terms of post-operative occlusion, bone alignment and soft/hard tissue infection. We have concluded from the study that the increased intra-operative time for the placement of IMF increases the cost of the surgery in regard to equipment and theatre time. There is no benefit in terms of radiographic and clinical outcome. Hence use of intra-operative IMF can be avoided for ORIF of single mandibular fracture.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaur T, Dhawan A, Bhullar RS, Kapila S, Gupta S, Resham R. Are Embrasure Wires Effective and Reliable Method for Intraoperative Maxillomandibular Fixation in Mandibular Fractures? J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2022; 21:433-441. [DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01528-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
8
|
Singh AK, Dahal S, Singh S, Krishna KC, Chaulagain R. Is manual reduction adequate for intraoperative control of occlusion during fixation of mandibular fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 60:271-278. [PMID: 35248408 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to find out if manual intraoperative control of occlusion is adequate for the reduction of mandibular fractures in comparison with intermaxillary fixation (IMF). We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials Registry, and the references of included trials. Our primary outcomes of interest were the reduction of fracture anatomically and radiographically, occlusal disturbances, and the incidence of revision procedures due to poor occlusion or reduction. Our secondary outcomes of interest were operating time and infective complications. Of the 257 studies retrieved (manual reduction = 136, IMF = 121), four were included. The studies had an unclear risk of bias. Nevertheless, the overall effect was statistically significant and in favour of manual reduction, with a lower number of adverse events in the manual reduction group (n = 43) than in the IMF group (n = 78), odds ratio 0.42 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.64). An absolute reduction in adverse events was seen in occlusion disturbances (120 fewer/1000), revision procedures (164 fewer/1000), and infective complications (178 fewer/1000). The evidence to support manual reduction over IMF for the intraoperative control of fracture fragments and occlusion was derived from few studies with an unclear risk of bias, and the quality was low. The results were not different when condylar fractures were present. The overall certainty of evidence was moderate. Clinicians should select the appropriate technique based on the injury pattern, and the treating surgeon's experience and available resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashutosh Kumar Singh
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TU dental Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - Samarika Dahal
- Department of Oral Pathology, TU dental Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sumit Singh
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kantipur Dental College, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - K C Krishna
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, TU dental Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
What is a better modality of maxillomandibular fixation: bone-supported arch bars or Erich arch bars? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59:858-866. [PMID: 34315565 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Any procedure that aims to manage maxillofacial fracture is incomplete without meticulous maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). For decades, Erich arch bars (EABs) have been used for this purpose, but with the advent of bone-supported arch bars (BSABs), more surgeons now prefer them to conventional EABs. The present study was designed to identify which of the two methods is best. An exhaustive literature search was conducted in June 2020 on various electronic databases to select studies that compared EABs and BSABs. Outcomes such as duration of placement, stability, oral hygiene, and complications such as damage to the roots of teeth and needle-stick injury, were analysed. A total of 716 studies were identified, of which seven were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis showed that the use of BSABs is significantly faster with no needle penetration and better oral hygiene. Both arch bars are equally stable, but root damage is an associated complication. The available literature to date shows that BSABs are a better option than EABs. However, further research is recommended, as these studies are associated with various confounding factors.
Collapse
|