Orthognathic surgery in patients with systemic diseases

Postoperative complications following orthognathic surgery in patients with rheumatic diseases: A 2-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the complications following orthognathic surgery in patients with rheumatic diseases and to evaluate rheumatic disease as a possible risk factor.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted during a 6-year period. The sample consisted of rheumatic and healthy patients who underwent orthognathic surgery. The outcome variables included infection, relapse, respiratory complications, hemorrhage, neurosensory disturbances, temporomandibular joint complications, and removal of osteosynthesis material. Bivariate analysis and logistic regression were applied to identify rheumatic disease as an independent risk factor for complications after orthognathic surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified as having rheumatic diseases (male: 2; female: 18; mean age: 37.8 ± 13.6 years), and 278 patients were systemically healthy (male: 105; female: 173; mean age: 25.8 ± 11.8 years). The most frequent complications in rheumatic and healthy patients were delayed recovery from neurosensory disturbance (55% and 33%), removal of osteosynthesis material (45% and 26%), and infection (35% and 7%). Following adjustment for possible confounders, rheumatic disease showed a significant association with infection (OR = 4.191, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Patients with rheumatic diseases are at a higher risk of postoperative infection following orthognathic surgery compared to healthy patients.

Complications and Associated Risk Factors for Bimaxillary Osteotomies: A 15-Year Single-center Retrospective Study

AIM

The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the risk factors and their association on bimaxillary osteotomies to be able to improve patient selection and bimaxillary osteotomy planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients treated with a bimaxillary osteotomy were included in the study. The complications were collected retrospectively from the patient data records. The effects of certain predictor variables on complication rates were also studied.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (48.0%) suffered from peri- or postoperative complications, or both. Twenty-five various perioperative complications were reported on 25 patients (19.6%) and 63 postoperative complications on 46 patients (36.2%). Ten patients (7.8%) suffered from both perioperative and postoperative complications. The effect of various predictor variables (sex, age, general health, type of malocclusion, surgery planning, use of bone grafts, and type of maxillary or mandibular movement) on complications was investigated, but we could not find any single factor to affect significantly on complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Both perioperative and postoperative complications are common in bimaxillary surgery, which must be noted in patient preoperative information. However, life-threatening complications are rare. Patient profile, bone grafting, type of osteosynthesis, or segmentation of the maxilla do not seem to affect the complication risk.

Influence of systemic comorbidities on the complications of orthognathic surgery: A scoping review

The potential impact of systemic comorbidities has not yet been thoroughly explored in orthognathic surgery. Therefore, the following scoping review was conducted to accumulate evidence on the possible impact of systemic comorbidities on the orthognathic surgery complications. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched up to April 2022 to identify studies about patients with systemic comorbidities who underwent orthognathic surgery. A total of 12,938 articles were screened, and seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Only one study had control group, other six articles had a non-comparative study design. The current evidence suggests a high impact of rheumatic diseases and neuromuscular disorders on the surgery- and patient-related postoperative complications following orthognathic surgery. At the same instance, the findings of the review should be interpreted with caution due to a lack of substantial evidence for extrapolating the findings to a contemporary surgical practice.