Coronary and carotid artery disease in patients with degenerative aneurysm of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta: prevalence and impact on operative mortality

Comparative analysis of long-term outcomes in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between Marfan syndrome patients and non-Marfan syndrome patients

BACKGROUND

A consensus on the management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes after open TAAA repair in patients with and without MFS.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 230 consecutive patients who underwent TAAA repair between 2012 and 2022, including of 69 MFS patients and 161 non-MFS patients. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality. The secondary endpoint was a composite of early adverse events, including early mortality, permanent stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent renal failure, and reoperation. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of MFS on early composite adverse events, and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate the association between MFS and overall mortality.

RESULTS

Compared with non-MFS patients, MFS patients were younger (mean, 31.9 ± 8.5 years vs 44.8 ± 12.3 years; P < .001), had less comorbid coronary artery disease (0 vs 8.1%; P = .034), more frequently underwent Crawford extent III repair (56.5% vs 34.8%; P = .002) and applied normothermic iliac perfusion (91.3% vs 81.4%; P = .057). There was no significant difference in the rate of early composite adverse events between the MFS and non-MFS groups (23.2% vs 14.3%; P = .099), which was verified by multivariable logistic regression analyses with multiple models. Overall mortality was significantly lower in the MFS group compared to the non-MFS group (P = .026, log-rank test), with 1-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative mortality of 4.4% versus 8.7%, 8.1% versus 17.2%, and 20.9% versus 36.4%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analyses across different models further confirmed MFS as a significant protective factor for overall mortality (model 1: hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.73; P = .007; model 2: HR, 0.32, 95% CI, 0.13-0.75; P = .009; model 3: HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.95; P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite varying risk profiles, MFS patients undergoing open TAAA repair can achieve comparable or even superior outcomes to non-MFS patients with tailored surgical strategies, meticulous perioperative care, and close follow-up surveillance, especially in the long term.

Outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with a previous myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

Many patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair have had a previous myocardial infarction (MI). To address the paucity of data regarding outcomes in such patients, we aimed to compare outcomes after open TAAA repair in patients with and without previous MI.

METHODS

From 1986 to 2022, we performed 3737 consecutive open TAAA repairs. Of these, 706 (18.9%) were in patients with previous MI. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of operative death. Propensity score matching analyzed preoperative and select operative variables to create matched groups of patients with or without a previous MI (n = 704 pairs). Late survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared by log rank test.

RESULTS

Overall, operative mortality was 8.5% and the adverse event rate was 15.2%; these were elevated in patients with MI (11.0% vs 7.9% [P = .01] and 18.0% vs 14.6% [P = .02], respectively). In the propensity score-matching cohort, the MI group had a greater rate of cardiac complications (32.4% vs 25.4%; P = .005) and delayed paraparesis (5.1% vs 2.4%; P = .1); however, there was no difference in operative mortality (11.1% vs 10.9%; P = 1) or adverse event rate (18.0% vs 16.8%; P = .6). Overall, previous MI was not independently associated with operative mortality in multivariable analysis (P = .1). The matched MI group trended toward poorer 10-year survival (29.8% ± 1.9% non-MI vs 25.0% ± 1.8% MI; P = .051).

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous MI was not associated with early mortality after TAAA repair, patients with a previous MI had greater rates of cardiac complications and delayed paraparesis. Patients with a previous MI also trended toward poorer survival.

Coronary artery disease in aortic aneurysm and dissection

Coexisting coronary artery disease is a significant risk factor of untoward outcomes after surgical and endovascular aortic repair. This article reviewed the data, consensus, and remaining controversy about the diagnosis and management of coexisting coronary artery disease in the patients who require intervention for aortic aneurysm and dissection. It can be summarized as follows: (1) the current guidelines generally recommend the same diagnostic algorithm, including indications of coronary artery angiography, as one for non-surgical patients; (2) they also recommend the same indications of coronary revascularization; and (3) there are minor, but important, remaining issues regarding the details of management and surgical techniques most of which are still at the discretion of individual surgeons and institutions. Because it is not likely to get large-scale investigational data about these issues, the collection of individual experiences should be promoted in future scientific meetings to build up the consensus.

Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients With Ascending Aorta Aneurysm Detected at Transthoracic Echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in patients with ascending aorta aneurysm detected at transthoracic echocardiography.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with an aneurysm 45 mm or greater at transthoracic echocardiography who underwent CCT from 2012 to 2014 in our hospital. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CCT for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis (<50% or ≥50% stenosis) in patients who underwent conventional coronary angiography.

RESULTS

We included 104 patients (73 men, aged 64 [SD, 10.8] years) in our study. Obstructive coronary artery disease was found in 22.1% of patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CCT for detecting significant stenoses were 100%, 98%, and 82% and 100% on a segment-by-segment analysis and 100%, 83%, and 65% and 100% on a per-patient analysis, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac computed tomography provides a comprehensive evaluation of ascending aorta aneurysms and coronary artery tree.

Should patients undergo ascending aortic replacement with concomitant cardiac surgery?

Aim

To determine whether concomitant surgery is a predictor of mortality in patients undergoing surgery for ascending aortic aneursym.

Methods

Ninety-nine patients who underwent ascending aortic aneursym surgery between January 2010 and January 2015 were included in this study. Nineteen patients underwent ascending aortic replacement (RAA) only, 36 underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and RAA, 25 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and RAA, 11 underwent the Bentall procedure, and eight underwent AVR, CABG and RAA.

Results

Depending on the concomitant surgery performed with RAA, the mortality risk increased 2.25-fold for AVR, 4.5-fold for CABG, 10.8-fold for AVR + CABG and four-fold for the Bentall procedure, compared with RAA alone.

Conclusion

Concomitant cardiac surgery increased the mortality risk in patients undergoing RAA, but the difference was not statisticaly significant. Based on these study results, patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with a pre-operative ascending aortic diameter of over 45 mm, should undergo concomitant RAA.

Ascending aortic dilatation is rarely associated with coronary artery disease regardless of aortic valve morphology

OBJECTIVE

Differences in clinical presentation between patients with tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs) or bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) and aortic valve disease are evident. Whether these differences can be attributed to differences in cardiovascular risks remains uncertain.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, echocardiographic findings, medical history, medication, and laboratory findings were evaluated in 702 patients with aortic valve and/or ascending aortic pathology; 202 also had concomitant coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

A BAV was commonly found in patients with isolated valve disease (BAV 47%, TAV 53%) and frequently associated with ascending aortic dilatation (BAV 80%, TAV 20%). In patients with coronary artery disease, a TAV was commonly found (TAV 84%, BAV 16%). The combination of ascending aortic dilatation and coronary artery disease was markedly rare regardless of valve morphology (TAV, 7 out of 38; BAV, 6 out of 127). The distribution of valve pathology and clinical parameters was similar in patients with TAV and BAV with coronary artery disease (P ≥ .12). Without coronary artery disease, parameters associated with cardiovascular risks were more often seen in patients with TAV than in patients with BAV (P ≤ .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery disease is uncommon in surgical patients with BAV, but it is associated with TAV, advanced age, and male gender. Coronary artery disease and ascending aortic dilatation rarely coexist, regardless of valve phenotype. Differences in the prevalence of coronary artery disease or ascending aortic dilatation between patients with TAV and BAV are not explained by differences in cardiovascular risks or the distribution of valve pathology.

Video-atlas of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has evolved significantly over the last decades thanks to technical improvements, especially in the area of organ protection. However, despite adjunctive strategies, morbidity and mortality rates are still not negligible. Repair of the thoracoabdominal aorta represents a formidable challenge for surgeons, anesthesiologists and patients alike. While operative repair is generally carried out in specialized institutions, knowledge of the state-of-the-art diagnostic, anesthesiologic, surgical and endovascular aspects will certainly be of great value to all physicians involved in the care of these patients at any level. This "How to" video will explain all of these diagnostic, anesthesiologic and surgical aspects in our daily practice.

Frequency of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing peripheral artery disease surgery

The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) varies widely in published reports. This is likely due at least in part to significant differences in how PAD and CAD were both defined and diagnosed. In this report, the investigators describe 78 patients with PAD who underwent preoperative coronary angiography before elective peripheral revascularization and provide a review of published case series. Among the patients included, the number with concomitant CAD varied from 55% in those with lower-extremity stenoses to as high as 80% in those with carotid artery disease. The number of coronary arteries narrowed by ≥ 50% was 1 in 28%, 2 in 24%, and 3 in 19%; 28% did not have any angiographic evidence of CAD. The review of published research resulted in the identification of 19 case series in which a total of 3,969 patients underwent preoperative coronary angiography before elective PAD surgery; in the 2,687 who were described according to the location of the PAD, 55% had ≥ 1 epicardial coronary artery with ≥ 70% diameter narrowing. The highest prevalence of concomitant CAD was in patients with severe carotid artery disease (64%). In conclusion, despite sharing similar risk factors, the prevalence of obstructive CAD in patients with PAD ranges widely and appears to differ across PAD locations. Thus, the decision to perform coronary angiography should be based on indications independent of the planned PAD surgery.

Access for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Despite advancement in stent-graft technology, access-related problems continue to occur during endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. Various techniques have been adopted to overcome difficult access situations, however. To survey these developments in arterial access, we performed a systematic literature review from 1994 through 2005 to identify relevant articles pertaining to endovascular access techniques and complications. Excessive iliac tortuosity, circumferential vessel wall calcification, significant occlusive disease, and small caliber vessels account for the majority of access problems, most of which are readily apparent with adequate baseline imaging. Even with careful preoperative assessment, however, some access problems may not be foreseen; nonetheless, the majority can be overcome using today's array of ancillary procedures, such as an iliac conduit, a brachiofemoral wire, or arterial reconstruction. Alternatively, other approach routes, such as the common carotid artery or direct aortic access, may be used to facilitate endovascular aneurysm repair.

Vascular profile of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

PURPOSE

Early and accurate diagnosis of peripheral atherosclerosis is of paramount importance for global management of patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to retrospectively evaluate the clinical relevance of significant subclavian artery stenosis (SAS) and abdominal vessel stenosis or aneurysm (AVA) in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Medical records of consecutive patients underwent coronary angiography at two public institutions over a 12-month period were evaluated. Angiographic results of patients underwent coincident diagnostic abdominal aorta angiography to evaluate abdominal vessels or subclavian angiography on the basis of clinical and angiographic criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 724 consecutive patients (535 males, mean age 68.1+/-11 years) were enrolled (Table 2): a significant atherosclerotic disease of at least one arterial segments were observed in 198 patients (27.3%). Angiographically significant SAS was observed in 18/220 patients (8.1%) undergoing concomitant subclavian artery angiography and candidates to coronary surgery using the internal mammary artery. Ten patients with subclavian artery stenosis and upper limb ischemia underwent subclavian artery angioplasty and stenting and bypass surgery using LIMA. AVA were reported in 180 (35.7%) of 504 consecutive patients: renal artery stenosis was found in 13.1% of cases (66 patients), aortoiliac artery disease in 13.7 % (69 patients), and aortic aneurismal disease in 8.9% (45 patients). Logistic regression analyses revealed > or =3-vessel CAD (odds ratio [OR] 9.917, p=0.002), age>60 years old (OR 3.817, p=0.036), > or =3 risk factors (OR 2.8, p=0.048) as independent predictors of SAS and AVA.

CONCLUSION

Patients with multivessel CAD are frequently aged, have an high risk profile and multiple vascular atherosclerotic distributions, suggesting the usefulness of a more global and comprehensive cardiovascular approach.

Malpractice in Invasive Cardiology: Is Angiography of Abdominal Aorta or Subclavian Artery Appropriate in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography?

BACKGROUND

Identification of peripheral vascular disease by angiography in patients undergoing coronary angiography may be considered as malpractice but sometimes seems to be justified under clear entry criteria. The present mata-analysis is aimed to analyze the appropriateness and results of screening angiography of subclavian or abdominal aorta performed at the time of coronary angiography.

METHODS

A search of published literature for peripheral angiography in patients undergoing coronary angiography over the last 10 years was performed using the MEDLINE database. No language restriction was employed. Only studies enrolling more than 100 patients for abdominal aortography and 50 patients for subclavian/internal mammary artery angiography were considered. Reference lists from identified studies were also reviewed to identify other potentially relevant references.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were retrieved: 8 articles about subclavian artery (SA) and internal mammary (IMA) angiography and 21 about renal (RA) and aortoiliac (AOI) angiography. The total number of patients enrolled was 27,936. Nine studies out of 29 were prospective. Defined entry criteria were reported in 24 out of 29 studies. Significant SA and IMA stenosis were reported in 5.5 and 9% of patients, respectively. RA stenosis >50% was present in 12.7% of patients with CAD. Finally, undetected AOI disease was reported in 35.5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Mean complication rate was 0.8 +/- 0.6%. Predictors of SA and IMA stenosis were unclear. Age, multi-risk profile, multi-vessel CAD, history of PVD or carotid disease, severe hypertension, unexplained renal dysfunction or decreased creatinine clearance have been reported most frequently as predictors of RA and AOI disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent evidence of appropriateness of renal angiography in selected patients undergoing coronary angiography have been produced in literature. IMA and AOI angiography seem to be not justified unless they are part of SA in patients scheduled for arterial conduit with brachial differential pressure, thoracic irradiation or surgery, or of abdominal angiography to detect RA stenosis in laboratories with radiological digital peripheral equipment.

Concomitant peripheral vascular and coronary artery disease: a new dimension for the global endovascular specialist?

BACKGROUND

Early and accurate diagnosis of peripheral atherosclerosis is of paramount importance for global ma agement of patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD).

HYPOTHESIS

We sought to evaluate retrospectively the prevalence and clinical relevance of significant abdominal vessel stenosis or aneurysm (AVA) in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

METHODS

Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography at two public institutions over a 12-month period were evaluated. Angiographic results of patients who underwent diagnostic abdominal aorta angiography, based on clinical criteria, to evaluate abdominal vessels the same time as coronary angiography were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, AVA was reported in 180 (35.7%) of 504 consecutive patients (335 men, mean age 68 +/- 13.8 years): renal artery stenosis was found in 13.1% of cases (66 patients), aortoiliac artery disease in 13.7% (69 patients and aortic aneurysmal disease in 8.9% (45 patients). Logistic regression analyses revealed > or = 3-vessel CAD (odds ratio [OR] 9.917, p = 0.002), age >65 years (OR 3.817, p = 0.036), > or =3 risk factors (OR 2.8, p = 0.048) as independent predictors of AVA.

CONCLUSION

Multiple vascular atherosclerotic distributions are frequent in elderly patients who have multivessel CAD and a high-risk profile, suggesting the usefulness of a more global and comprehensive cardiovascular approach.

Evidence against the widespread use of angiography of noncoronary arteries during coronary artery angiography and cardiac catheterization

PURPOSE

Although the most widely used screening techniques for extracardiac atherosclerotic distributions are noninvasive, in patients undergoing coronary arteriography, the question as to whether angiography of extracardiac arteries at the time of cardiac catheterization is really effective or if it should be considered malpractice is still open. We sought to determine the safety and real usefulness of angiography of extracardiac arteries performed by trained invasive cardiologists during cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients undergoing combined coronary and noncoronary angiography between May 1998 and December 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Moderate to severe arterial stenosis (>50% stenosis), vessel occlusion, aneurysmal, or severe ectasia were noted as significant angiographic findings.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy patients (165 males, mean age = 67.7+/-9.2 years, mean serum creatinine = 1.1+/-0.8 mg/dl) underwent combined cardiac catheterization and angiography of extracardiac arteries following specific indications. Significant findings were reported in 66 (24.4%) patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed three-vessel coronary artery disease [CAD; odds ratio (OR)=9.917; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.2 to 43.8; P = .002) and hypercholesterolemia (OR = 2.851; 95% CI=1.03 to 7.9; P = .044) to be independent predictors of extracardiac atherosclerotic involvement. Complications rate was negligible. The detection of significant angiographic findings led to endovascular treatment in 37.8% and surgical vascular repair in 33.3% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography of extracardiac arteries at the time of coronary angiography appears justified only in patients with specific indications, multivessel CAD, and hypercholesterolemia.

Physical activity and atherosclerosis: which animal model?

Atherosclerosis is a progressive disease that is the most important single contributor to human cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Epidemiologic studies show that physical activity, or routine exercise, reduces the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The mechanisms through which exercise may function in primary or secondary prevention of atherosclerosis remain largely to be established. Most studies in humans are performed after the onset of clinical signs when disease is well advanced and the prescription of exercise is based on empirical evidence of benefit in secondary prevention. Animal models per-mit the study of the initiation and progression of preclinical stages of atherosclerosis. In order to provide information relevant to treatment and prevention, these models should mimic human disease and interactions of physical activity with disease processes as closely as possible. The purpose of this review is to compare animal models of atherosclerosis and to summarize the available data in those models in regard to the effects of exercise.

Management of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Type IV

BACKGROUND

Thoracoabdominal aneurysm type IV (TAA IV) represents only a minority of aortic aneurysms, but as it is an entirely abdominally located aneurysm, vascular surgeons are likely to see such aneurysms in their practice. The current surgical management of TAA IV is reviewed.

METHODS

A PubMed/Medline-literature search for TAA IV.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A detailed preoperative evaluation to determine the rupture and operative risk is required. A threshold size of 5.5-6 cm is recommended for elective repair of TAA IV, which then is adjusted for age and other risk factors. Operative simplicity with the clamp and sew approach to obtain a short aortic cross-clamp time seems to have most support in the literature. The necessity of adjunct treatment to prevent visceral and spinal cord ischemia seems to be needed rarely. Uncomplicated repair has a minimal risk of neurological injury and a low risk of renal failure requiring dialysis in patients without preoperative renal dysfunction or renal artery stenosis. The role of endovascular repair of these aneurysms remains to be established.

Staged Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms Using the Common Carotid Artery

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of staged open and endoluminal repair of complex thoracoabdominal aneurysms. We report the management of two patients with a staged, open abdominal and endoluminal thoracic repair of Crawford extent II aneurysms, where iliofemoral access was impossible and thoracic repair effected by endograft deployment via a common carotid artery. From this experience we conclude that staged open and endovascular repair for both ruptured and elective Crawford extent II thoracoabdominal aneurysms can be performed using the common carotid artery, when anatomy is favorable.