Infectious and ischemic complications from percutaneous closure devices used after vascular access

Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge with Manual Compression and 5F Sheath Compatible Devices for Lower Extremity Arterial Endovascular Treatment

BACKGROUND

For same-day discharge lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) endovascular procedures, femoral manual compression could be an alternative to arterial closure devices. The aim of this study was to assess the security and efficacy of same-day discharge after manual compression in patients treated for LEAD endovascular revascularization with 5F sheath.

METHODS

FREEDOM OP was a national multicenter, prospective, single arm study. Patients with symptomatic LEAD (Rutherford 2-5) and eligible for same-day discharge were included. The primary endpoint was the total in-hospital admission rate, which includes overnight surveillance and rehospitalization rate at 1 month.

RESULTS

Between September 2017 and August 2019, 114 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 66 ± 10 years and most of them were claudicant (103; 94%). Mainly femoropopliteal lesions were treated (178; 70%) and the technical success was 97%. One hundred forty-two 5F stents and fifty one 5F drug coated balloon were delivered. The mean manual compression duration was 13 ± 4 min. Major access-related complications rate was 4.5%. Total in-hospital admission rate was 11%. Seven patients had overnight surveillance and 5 were rehospitalized (2 for the target lesion). No rehospitalisation was carried out within 24 hr after discharge. No major cardiovascular event, including death, was observed. The patients were significantly improved in term of clinical status (P < 0.0001) and hemodynamic (P < 0.0001) in comparison to baseline.

CONCLUSION

FREEDOM OP showed that manual compression is feasible and safe for same-day discharge after LEAD revascularization with 5F sheath femoral approach.

FemoSeal® Device Use for Femoral Artery Closure by Different Techniques

BACKGROUND

Common femoral artery is still the most frequently used site for vascular access, mostly for peripheral arterial interventions, and its puncture remains a significant source of patient's morbidity. Manual compression (MC) has been the gold standard for hemostasis after femoral catheterization until recently, but only in the last few years, vascular closure devices (VCDs) are replacing MC due to their rapid development. Nowadays, vascular surgeons (VSs) are also becoming familiar with VCDs. The purpose of this study was to investigate FemoSeal^® arterial closure system use in terms of safety and efficacy in patients undergoing transfemoral peripheral procedure and evaluate the complication risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis to compare 2 different specialists and technique with systematic implantation of FemoSeal^® VCD was performed in a cohort of vascular patients treated by endovascular procedure with femoral artery access site over a 2-year period and sheaths ranged from 6F to 8F. All the patients were on antiplatelet therapy and received heparin during the procedure. The FemoSeal^® was deployed in common femoral arteries. All patients were examined for access site complication by VS in both groups 20-24 hrs after VCD deployment and 1 and 6 weeks after the procedure with clinical visit and ultrasound duplex scan. Complications, as minor and major hematomas, pseudoaneurysm formation, vessel occlusion or dissection, and infection were recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 130 FemoSeal^® were deployed in 114 patients, 102 FemoSeal^® in VS group, and 28 in interventionalist group. Mean age was 57 ± 24 years. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of comorbidities. Patient follow-up ranged from 1 to 15 months. All but 3 of the FemoSeal^® devices were successfully deployed (all 3 cases in group 2). Mobilization time was 6 ± 4 hrs following interventions, and the discharge time ranged from 6 hrs to 7 days after procedure. Early discharge (within 6 hrs) was obtained in 23% of group 1 and in 0 cases of group 2 (P = 0.008). Delayed discharge was obtained in 74% of group 1 (67 pts) and in 70% of group 2 (18 pts) on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.47). Technical success was achieved in 99% of group 1 and in 93% of group 2 (P = 0.87). There were no perioperative deaths. There were no significant differences in terms of minor bleeding complications (P = 0.21) or infections or transfusion needing (P 0.06) in both groups. FemoSeal^®-related complications occurred in 6 patients (1 in group 1 and 5 in group 2; P = 0.0017). All complications occurred following therapeutic intervention with 6F sheath introducer. Complication rate resulted significatively higher in group 2 in terms of pseudoaneurysm development (P < 0.0001) and transfusion needing (P = 0.03) in a subgroup analysis on peripheral arterial disease (Rutherford 3-5). Only chronic limb ischemia was found to be independent predictor of complications due to VCD use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that when simple guidelines are observed, the device is safe, effective, and easy to deploy and allows for early ambulation and discharge. However, appropriate randomized clinical trials could clarify the correct guideline to minimize the complication rates.

The FREEDOM Study: A Pilot Study Examining the Feasibility and Safety of Early Walking following Femoral Manual Compression after Endovascular Interventions Using 5F Sheath-Compatible Devices

BACKGROUND

Increasing prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) burning and pressure to reduce costs and promote patient empowerment make outpatient endovascular procedures an attractive alternative to conventional hospitalization. For outpatient peripheral endovascular procedures, femoral manual compression could replace the use of arterial closure devices for small-bore punctures. Presently, safety and feasibility evidence for femoral manual compression is still lacking. FREEDOM is a pilot study designed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of early walking after femoral manual puncture point compression following a therapeutic endovascular procedure for PAD.

METHODS

From May to August 2015, all patients requiring endovascular treatment for PAD were prospectively screened. Those patients that received therapeutic endovascular procedures involving retrograde femoral punctures with a 5F sheath were included. Manual compression and pressure dressing of the femoral puncture points was applied. The primary end point was defined as the walking ability 5 hr after index procedure (H5), which was assessed by a walk test.

RESULTS

In total, 129 consecutive patients were screened, and 30 patients met the study criteria. The mean age was 66 ± 11 years. The mean duration of the procedure and of the manual compression was 63 ± 24 min and 12.8 ± 4 min, respectively. At 5 hr following the procedure, 97% of the patients were able to walk 100 m. Two patients failed to walk due to cardiac arrhythmia and to a false aneurysm at the femoral puncture site. No further complications were observed at 1 month, and quality of life assessed by EQ-5D test was significantly increased compare to baseline (72.3 vs. 60.4; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrated the benefits of manual compression to close arterial punctures over procedures using 5F shealth-compatible endovascular devices. A sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial is needed to further characterize the potential benefits of manual compression following use of low-profile devices.

Percutaneous Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Techniques and Outcomes

Endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) has become a widely accepted treatment modality. The conventional approach of an EVAR involves bilateral groin incisions to expose the femoral arteries followed by introducer sheath placement, which is typically performed with the use of general or epidural anesthesia. As technology trends toward less invasive methods and sheath sizes become smaller, the use of a total percutaneous approach to endovascular repair of aortic pathology is becoming more common. In this review, we present a brief history of percutaneous closure devices for common femoral artery access, factors important in patient selection, the technique of performing a percutaneous EVAR procedure, early and late complications, and overall outcomes of percutaneous approaches for the endovascular treatment of aortic pathology.

Risk Factors for Groin Wound Infection After Femoral Artery Catheterization A Case-Control Study

Objective.

Groin wound infection (GWI) after femoral artery catheterization is unusual. However, several reports of GWI associated with the use of a Perclose device appear in the surgical literature.

Design.

A case-control study.

Setting.

We pooled 23 cases and 83 controls from a university hospital and a community medical center.

Patients.

A case was defined as a patient who developed a GWI after a femoral artery catheterization. At the university hospital, 3 controls were randomly selected from the at-risk population and matched to each case by time of procedure only (within 2 weeks). At the community medical center, 4 controls were selected and matched to each case by time of procedure (within 2 weeks), sex, and age (within 5 years).

Results.

We considered several covariates, including age, sex, body mass index, medical conditions, Perclose use, hematoma formation, and antithrombotic therapy. In a multivariate model, only hematoma formation (odds ratio, 68.8; 95% confidence interval, 12.1-391.4) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet inhibitor therapy (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-33.6) were statistically significant predictors of GWI; Perclose use (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-3.7) was not a statistically significant predictor of GWI. However, most of the hematomas (15/17) formed after procedures during which a Perclose device was used.

Conclusion.

Perclose use did not have any additional effect on GWI risk beyond the effect that hematoma formation had.

Vascular access complications: diagnosis and management

OPINION STATEMENT

The incidence of vascular access site related complications ranges between 0.8 % to 1.8 % of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and up to 9 % of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) [1]. The femoral vessels at the groin are used as the access site for the majority of percutaneous coronary, peripheral arterial and venous, and electrophysiologic interventions. With emergence of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR), and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), larger access sheaths (up to 18Fr-24Fr) are required, which further increases the potential for access site complications. The true incidence of access site complications arising from non-coronary interventions is unknown; hence it is likely that the total incidence of vascular access site complications is greatly underestimated. Vascular closure devices (VCDs), radial artery access, fluoroscopic guidance, and ultrasound guidance have all been used with a hope to minimize these complications. Despite these attempts, vascular access complications have not been eliminated. Cardiovascular specialists must promptly identify these complications and manage them appropriately.

Treatment of infected pseudoaneurysm of femoral artery after vascular closure device deployment: a practical solution

Like other invasive procedures, percutaneous coronary interventions are associated with complications. Most common access site for these procedures is common femoral artery. Complications such as groin and retroperitoneal hematoma can be encountered as well as pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, acute arterial occlusion, and infection. When infected pseudoaneurysm occurs, surgical treatment can be extremely difficult. We present a case of the patient in whom infected pseudoaneurysm of common femoral artery developed after percutaneous coronary intervention and was successfully treated by surgical excision and autoarterial graft insertion.

Arterial thrombosis after using Angio-Seal

Percutaneous closure systems of arterial puncture sites are being used more and more in modern endovascular practice. In this article, we report five cases of thrombotic complications following Angio-Seal deployment which required to be treated in our department between June 2004 and January 2006. We carried out a computerized literature review using "vascular closure" as a keyword and elected 106 articles published between 1992 and 2007. The analysis of this literature review showed that the rate of percutaneous closure complications was similar to the rate of manual compression complications, which is still the reference method. The complications associated with the use of these systems were more complex and more often required surgical repair. The severity and frequency of these complications differ based on the type of closure systems. The vascular surgeon in charge must have a good knowledge of these systems and of the complications each of them entails to be able to treat them in the most appropriate way.

The use of the StarClose device for obtaining femoral artery hemostasis

BACKGROUND

Following percutaneous intervention, obtaining femoral artery hemostasis quickly and reliably with few complications is of considerable importance. While the StarClose device has been studied in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, its use in patients undergoing treatment for peripheral vascular disease has rarely been reported. It is the purpose of this report to determine whether the Starclose is able to deliver safe and effective femoral artery closure in this group of patients.

METHODS

The records of all patients undergoing StarClose closure of the femoral artery by or under the supervision of a single vascular surgeon were reviewed. Indication, type of intervention, and size of the vascular sheath employed were noted. Times to mobilization and discharge were tabulated. Complications including hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, infection, and vessel occlusion were recorded.

RESULTS

Between February 2006 and September 2009, 603 StarClose nitinol clip closure devices were deployed in 478 patients. In all, 97 procedures were diagnostic and 506 included therapeutic interventions. A total of 97 5F sheaths, 465 6F sheaths, and 41 7F sheaths were employed. Time to ambulation and discharge was 44.2 ± 13.2 minutes and 119.3 ± 22.6 minutes in patients in whom a 5F sheath was used, 112.5 ± 13.5 minutes and 157.5 ± 20.6 minutes when a 6F sheath was used, and 121.9+/-38.8 minutes and 160.2+/-43.2 minutes when a 7F sheath was employed. The clip could not be successfully deployed in 21 arteries (3.5%) and manual compression was successful in achieving hemostasis in 17 patients without complication. Three patients (0.5%) developed major hematomas requiring transfusion; 1 patient developed a pseudoaneurysm (0.17%) requiring thrombin injection. A single patient (0.17%) occluded his common femoral artery following StarClose deployment and 1 patient (0.17%) developed a femoral artery stenosis requiring balloon dilatation. No patient developed a groin infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The StarClose provides a safe and reliable method of achieving femoral artery closure following percutaneous intervention for peripheral arterial disease. When successfully deployed, it allows for early ambulation and discharge. Since it remains entirely extraluminal, it offers advantages over other closure devices and can be safely used in the vast majority of patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate secular trends and factors associated with major femoral bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in routine clinical practice during the past decade and to assess the impact of these complications on outcomes including mortality.

BACKGROUND

Significant changes in patient demographic data, adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and access site management have occurred during the coronary stent era. Trends in major vascular complications after PCI during this time have not been well characterized.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral PCI from 1994 to 2005 at the Mayo Clinic (n = 17,901) were studied. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (1994 to 1995, n = 2,441); Group 2 (1996 to 1999, n = 6,207); and Group 3 (2000 to 2005, n = 9,253).

RESULTS

The incidence of major femoral bleeding complications decreased (from 8.4% to 5.3% to 3.5%; p < 0.001). Reductions in sheath size, intensity and duration of anticoagulation with heparin, and procedure time were observed (p < 0.001), and multivariate analysis confirmed each as an independent predictor of complications (p < 0.001). Adverse outcomes of major femoral bleeding included prolonged hospital stay (mean 4.5 vs. 2.7 days; p < 0.0001) and increased requirement for blood transfusion (39% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.0001). Major femoral bleeding and blood transfusion were both associated with decreased long-term survival, driven by a significant increase in 30-day mortality (p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

We noted a marked decline in the incidence of major femoral bleeding after PCI over the past decade. Mortality associated with these bleeding complications and with blood transfusion remains a significant issue.

Ischemic complications of percutaneous femoral artery catheterization

Ischemic injuries following percutaneous femoral artery catheterization are uncommon but have been associated with vascular closure devices (VCDs). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare ischemic and hemorrhagic complications of femoral artery catheterization and to identify factors associated with ischemic injuries. The operative registries of the attending vascular surgeons at one academic and two community hospitals were retrospectively reviewed to identify all complications of femoral artery catheterization requiring operative intervention. Demographic, clinical, procedural, operative, and outcome data were compared between patients who sustained ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. From January 2001 to December 2006, 95 patients required operative management of complications related to femoral artery catheterization including 40 patients who experienced ischemic (group 1) and 55 patients who experienced hemorrhagic (group 2) complications. Compared to those sustaining hemorrhagic complications, ischemic complications were more frequently associated with younger age, smoking, VCD deployment, and, when controlling for VCD use, female gender. Time to presentation was also significantly longer in patients experiencing ischemic complications. Ischemic complications are increasingly recognized following femoral artery catheterization. Vascular surgeons should anticipate a new pattern of injury following femoral artery catheterization, one that often requires complex arterial reconstruction.

Day-case peripheral angioplasty using nurse-led admission, discharge, and follow-up procedures: arterial closure devices are not necessary

AIM

To audit the safety of day-case peripheral arterial intervention without the use of arterial-closure devices using nurse-led admission, discharge, and follow-up procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred for elective, peripheral vascular intervention were selected for day-case care according to pre-determined criteria using telephone triage. Post-procedure haemostasis was achieved using manual compression. After 3h bed-rest, patients were mobilized and discharged at 5h. Patients were contacted by telephone next working day to audit complications.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-three elective day-case peripheral interventions were performed over 2 years, predominantly using 6 F sheaths. No closure devices were used. Five patients (2%) returned to the department because of persistent groin symptoms the next day. One of these had a false aneurysm. Four required no further treatment. A single patient returned at day 6 with a delayed false aneurysm.

CONCLUSION

Day-case peripheral vascular intervention can be safely performed in appropriately selected patients without the use of arterial closure devices. Specialist radiology nurses have a major role in the counselling, care, and follow-up of these patients.

Ambulation 1 hour after diagnostic cardiac catheterization: a prospective study of 1009 procedures

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety of a protocol that allows ambulation 1 hour after diagnostic cardiac catheterization with a transfemoral approach using a 5F catheter system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1005 consecutive patients (1009 procedures) undergoing outpatient diagnostic cardiac catheterization with a transfemoral approach using a 5F catheter system at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, were included in this study from January 1, 2004, to August 31, 2005. All patients underwent standard manual compression to achieve hemostasis and were ambulated after 1 hour of bed rest.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64.5 years, and 62% were male. Minor vascular complications occurred in 33 procedures (3.3%), Including 14 hematomas (1.4%) less than 4 cm and 19 cases of rebleeding (1.9%) that required repeated manual compression. Only 1 patient (0.1%) had a hematoma greater than 4 cm. No patient had a major complication, such as surgical repair, red blood cell transfusion, retroperitoneal bleeding, formation of an arteriovenous fistula or pseudoaneurysm, arterial occlusion, or an infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulation 1 hour after diagnostic cardiac catheterization with a transfemoral approach using a 5F catheter system is safe and associated with low rates of vascular complications. This strategy may improve patient comfort, reduce resource utilization, and be preferable to use of vascular closure devices.

Infectious complications of percutaneous vascular closure devices

OBJECTIVE

To describe the infectious complications of percutaneous vascular closure devices (PVCDs) on the basis of our institutional experience with PVCDs and the published medical literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of PVCD-related Infection seen at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2003, and searched the English language medical literature for all previously published reports.

RESULTS

We identified 46 cases in the medical literature and 6 cases from our Institutional database. The median age of patients was 63 years (range, 40-79 years). Diabetes mellitus and obesity were the most common comorbidities. The median Incubation period from device Insertion to presentation with access-site infection was 8 days (range, 2-29 days). The most common presenting symptoms were pain, erythema, fever, swelling, and purulent drainage at the access site. Mycotic pseudoaneurysm (22 cases) was the most common complication. Staphylococcus aureus was responsible for most (75%) of the Infections. All patients underwent surgical debridement, and 54% required reconstructive procedures. The median duration of antibiotic treatment was 28 days (range, 7-42 days). The mortality rate was 6% (3 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection associated with PVCD placement is uncommon but is an extremely serious complication. Morbidity is high, and aggressive medical and surgical interventions are required to achieve cure.

The Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Closure Device in Patients Undergoing Uterine Artery Embolization

PURPOSE

The use of suture-mediated closure devices (SMCDs) in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization (UAE) for symptomatic leiomyomata is controversial. With recent literature suggesting a higher complication rate with the use of SMCDs, their use in this specific population has been questioned. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of SMCDs specifically for those patients undergoing UAE for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective database was established in a single high-volume medical center for patients undergoing UAE for symptomatic leiomyomata. Data were tracked prospectively, with technical outcome and complication rates serving as endpoints.

RESULTS

UAE was performed in 342 consecutive patients from January 2001 to September 2003. The SMCD was used in 328 of these patients (96%). Successful primary hemostasis was achieved in 320 of 328 patients (97%), with additional manual compression required in the remaining eight patients (3%). No major complications were observed. Minor complications consisted of minor hematomas in four women (1%) and anteriomedial thigh pain in 68 women (21%) within 1 month of follow-up, resulting in an overall complication rate of 22%. All symptoms related to anteromedial thigh pain ipsilateral to the arterial puncture site were managed conservatively with 1 week of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication.

CONCLUSION

The SMCD provided safe and effective hemostasis in patients undergoing UAE. Transient thigh discomfort, which may result from irritation of the anterior femoral cutaneous nerves (femoral neuralgia syndrome), was uniformly relieved with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory therapy.

Percutaneous AAA Repair:Is It Safe?

PURPOSE

To assess if percutaneous insertion of large-bore sheaths is safe during endovascular repair (EVR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

Ninety-five AAA patients undergoing EVR had the endografts implanted percutaneously via 14-F to 20-F sheaths in a prospective nonrandomized study. Vascular sutures were applied bilaterally to the common femoral arteries using a vascular closure device; the sutures were tied after sheath withdrawal. Blood loss, operative time, and length of stay (LOS) were compared to 26 AAA patients undergoing EVR with bilateral femoral cutdowns before the percutaneous technique was available. Follow-up included duplex ultrasonography and clinical examination.

RESULTS

Bilateral percutaneous closure of the femoral arteries was successful in 78 (82%) patients. Fifteen patients required arteriorrhaphy intraoperatively and 2 others within 24 hours. The failure rate was 20%, 0%, 3%, and 7% for the 20-F, 18-F, 16-F, and 14-F introducers, respectively. Blood loss was 400 mL (range 0-1800) in successful cases, 900 mL (range 0-3000) in failures (p<0.0001). One deep infection at the puncture site required thrombectomy and patchplasty; no other late complication occurred. There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss, and LOS between patients treated with percutaneous EVR and those with primary femoral exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous transfemoral EVR of AAA using large-bore introducer sheaths is safe. More than three quarters of the patients avoid femoral cutdown. Late complications are rare.

The use of closure devices

The use of arterial closure devices offers significant benefits over manual compression in achieving groin hemostasis following catheter-based procedures. Several currently available devices provide rapid puncture site closure with complication rates similar to that of manual compression. Closure devices allow for early times to ambulation and hospital discharge, and have a high degree of patient satisfaction. Their use may be of particular benefit inpatients that are anticoagulated. We believe that their use should be strongly considered in all patients following femoral artery catheterization.

The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure

BACKGROUND

As vascular surgeons perform increasing numbers of percutaneous catheter-based procedures, they will need to become familiar with varying methods of femoral artery closure. Few studies on closure devices have included significant numbers of patients with peripheral arterial disease. It is the purpose of this study to determine whether the Angioseal device (St. Jude Medical) is a satisfactory method of achieving femoral artery puncture site hemostasis in these patients.

METHODS

The records of all patients undergoing Angioseal closure of femoral artery puncture by a single vascular surgeon were reviewed. Indication, type of intervention, and size of the vascular sheath employed were recorded. Times to mobilization and discharge were determined. Patients were seen before discharge and 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure, and at 3- month intervals thereafter. Complications including hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, infection, and vessel occlusion were noted.

RESULTS

Between February 1, 2002, and August 31, 2003, 220 Angioseal collagen plugs were deployed in 188 patients. Attempts were made to deploy Angioseal devices in 92% of patients undergoing percutaneous procedures during this time period. One hundred forty-four procedures were diagnostic and 74 procedures included 76 therapeutic interventions. One hundred forty-four 5F sheaths, 47 6F sheaths, and 29 7F sheaths were employed during the procedures. Time to mobilization and discharge was 58 +/- 19 minutes and 102 +/- 31 minutes in patients undergoing diagnostic studies, 68 +/- 22 minutes and 146 +/- 42 minutes following interventions using 6F sheaths, and 127 +/- 18 minutes and 219 +/- 37 minutes when interventions were performed using 7F sheaths. No patient developed a major hematoma or infection following the use of an Angioseal. There were 2 complications related to device deployment. One patient developed a 1.4-cm false aneurysm at the femoral artery puncture site that resolved spontaneously. A second patient required operation for vessel occlusion when an Angioseal was deployed in a markedly diseased femoral artery. These adverse events occurred early in our experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The Angioseal provides a secure method of achieving hemostasis following femoral artery puncture. It is easy to deploy, has a high level of patient satisfaction, and allows for early ambulation and hospital discharge. When simple guidelines are observed, the device can be safely used in the great majority of patients with peripheral vascular disease. It offers considerable advantages over the traditional method of manual compression.

Granuloma Formation around a Retained Perclose S Suture Presenting 12 Months after Implantation

Suture-mediated closure devices have become commonplace in interventional and diagnostic femoral catheterization procedures. Although they reduce the time to hemostasis, ambulation, and hospital discharge, they are associated with a greater potential for serious infection compared with manual compression, often with delayed presentation. Scrupulous aseptic procedure and careful technique are vital in reducing complications. Herein a case of sterile granuloma formation around an untrimmed Perclose S suture is reported, which presented 12 months after use of a suture-mediated closure device.

Percutaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is feasible, but is associated with a unique set of risks. A comparison of Excluder endograft deployment with femoral artery cutdown (FAC) versus percutaneous femoral access (PFA) for treatment of infrarenal AAA was undertaken.

METHODS

A single-institution, controlled, retrospective review was carried out in patients who underwent either bilateral FAC or bilateral PFA for endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA with the Gore bifurcated Excluder endograft between March 1999 and November 2003. To November 2000, 35 patients underwent bilateral FAC; since then, 47 patients have undergone bilateral PFA. All have been followed up for at least 30 days.

RESULTS

Mean AAA size was 5.7 cm in the FAC group and 6.0 cm in the PFA group. During hospitalization there were six access-related complications in the FAC group; three required early surgical intervention. In the PFA group nine perioperative access-related complications occurred, all consisting of either hemorrhage or arterial occlusion; seven required additional intervention, and were recognized and ameliorated while the patient was still in the operating room. At 30-day follow-up there were no additional access-related complications in the PFA group. There were eight other access-related complications in eight additional patients who underwent FAC. In patients undergoing bilateral PFA total operative time was shorter (PFA 139 minutes vs FAC 169 minutes; P =.002), total in-room anesthesia time was less (PFA 201 minutes vs FAC 225 minutes; P <.008), and use of general anesthesia was reduced (P <.001). No significant differences were observed between groups with respect to estimated blood loss (PFA 459 mL vs FAC 389 mL; P =.851).

CONCLUSION

Complete percutaneous treatment of AAA may have some advantages over open femoral artery access, but it is not free from risk. Percutaneous treatment of AAA can be completed successfully in most patients, but should be performed at an institution where conversion to an open procedure can be completed expeditiously if necessary.

Iatrogenic operative injuries of abdominal and pelvic veins: a potentially lethal complication

PURPOSE

Epidemiologic studies of vascular injuries are usually limited to those caused by trauma. The purpose of this study was to review the management and clinical outcome in patients with operative injuries to abdominal and pelvic veins.

METHODS

Clinical data and outcome in all patients with iatrogenic venous injuries during abdominal and pelvic operations between 1985 and 2002 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty patients (21 men, 19 women; mean age, 51 years [range, 27-87 years]) sustained 44 venous injuries. Injuries occurred during general (30%), colorectal (23%), orthopedic (20%), gynecologic (15%), and other (12%) operations. Factors leading to injury included oncologic resection (65%), difficult anatomic exposure (63%), previous operation (48%), recurrent tumor (28%), and radiation therapy (20%). All patients had substantial bleeding (mean, 3985 mL; range, 500-20,000 mL). Injuries were located in the inferior vena cava (n = 6), portal vein (n = 7), renal vein (n = 1), and iliac vein (n = 30). Repair was performed with venorrhaphy (64%), end-to-end anastomosis (14%), interposition graft (20%), and vessel ligation (2%). Seven patients (18%) died of injury-related causes, including multisystem organ failure (n = 4), uncontrollable bleeding (n = 2), and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). Thirteen patients (32.5%) had major injury-related complications, including repeat exploration because of bleeding (n = 6), multisystem organ failure (n = 6), and venous thrombosis (n = 4). In two patients (5%) unilateral lower extremity edema developed, with no evidence of thrombosis. There was no late graft or venous thrombosis. Variables associated with increased risk for death were massive bleeding, acidosis, hypotension, and hypothermia (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

Operative injuries of abdominal and pelvic veins occur in patients undergoing oncologic resection and those with difficult anatomic exposure, owing to previous operation, recurrent tumor, or radiation therapy. Massive blood loss, acidosis, hypotension, and hypothermia are associated with increased risk for death. Repair of venous injuries offers durable results with low incidence of graft or venous thrombosis.