Cardiac Medical Therapy among Patients Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Effects of cardiac function alterations on the risk of postoperative thrombotic complications in patients receiving endovascular aortic repair

Introduction: Chronic heart disease (CHD) is a common comorbidity of patients receiving endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The explicit relationship between ventricular systolic function and EVAR complication of thrombotic events is unknown. Methods: In this study, we proposed a three-dimensional numerical model coupled with the lumped-elements heart model, which is capable of simulating thrombus formation in diverse systolic functions. The relation of cardiac functions and the predicted risk of thrombus formation in the aorta and/or endograft of 4 patients who underwent EVAR was investigated. Relative risks for thrombus formation were identified using machine-learning algorithms. Results: The computational results demonstrate that thrombus tended to form on the interior side of the aorta arch and iliac branches, and cardiac function can affect blood flow field and affect thrombus formation, which is consistent with the four patients' post-operative imaging follow-up. We also found that RRT, OSI, TAWSS in thrombosis area are lower than whole average. In addition, we found that the thrombus formation has negative correlations with the maximum ventricular contractile force (r = -.281 ± .101) and positive correlations with the minimum ventricular contractile force (r = .238 ± .074), whereas the effect of heart rate (r = -.015 ± .121) on thrombus formation is not significant. Conclusion: In conclusion, changes in ventricular systolic function may alter the risk of thrombotic events after EVAR repair, which could provide insight into the selection of adjuvant therapy strategies for AAA patients with CHD.

Statins Reduce Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth, Rupture, and Perioperative Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

There are no recognized pharmacological treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), although statins are suggested to be beneficial. We sought to summarize the literature regarding the effects of statins on human AAA growth, rupture, and 30‐day mortality.

Methods and Results

We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized and observational studies using the Cochrane CENTRAL database, MEDLINE, and EMBASE up to June 15, 2018. Review, abstraction, and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Pooled mean differences and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Our search yielded 911 articles. One case‐control and 21 cohort studies involving 80 428 patients were included. The risk of bias was low to moderate. Statin use was associated with a mean AAA growth rate reduction of 0.82 mm/y (95% confidence interval 0.33, 1.32, P=0.001, I²=86%). Statins were also associated with a lower rupture risk (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51, 0.78, P<0.0001, I²=27%), and preoperative statin use was associated with a lower 30‐day mortality following elective AAA repair (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.36, 0.83, P=0.005, I²=57%).

Conclusions

Statin therapy may be associated with reduction in AAA progression, rupture, and lower rates of perioperative mortality following elective AAA repair. These data argue for widespread statin use in AAA patients.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk. Unique identifier: CRD42017056480.

Current status of medical management for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Previous trials indicate that surgical management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) does not reduce mortality. The medical management of AAA, however, has to a large degree been ignored until recently. Medical management is not only needed to limit the expansion of small AAAs but also to reduce the high incidence of other cardiovascular events in these patients. In this review current evidence regarding medical therapy for patients with small AAAs is discussed. Four current randomised controlled trials are examining the efficacy of exercise, doxycycline and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in limiting AAA progression. A further trial using a mast cell stabilisation agent is expected to start soon. It is anticipated that a range of novel therapies for small AAAs will be identified within the next decade.

The management of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abdominal aortic aneurysms cause about 6000 deaths per year in England and Wales, predominantly from rupture. Significant progress has been made in recent years in developing minimally invasive, endovascular methods of treatment. This review evaluates the current management options for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Myocardial and renal injury commonly contribute to perioperative morbidity and mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a phenomenon whereby brief periods of ischemia followed by reperfusion in one organ provide systemic protection from prolonged ischemia. To investigate whether remote preconditioning reduces the incidence of myocardial and renal injury in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, we performed a randomized trial. METHOD AND RESULTS; Eighty-two patients were randomized to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with RIPC or conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (control). Two cycles of intermittent crossclamping of the common iliac artery with 10 minutes ischemia followed by 10 minutes reperfusion served as the RIPC stimulus. Myocardial injury was assessed by cardiac troponin I (>0.40 ng/mL), myocardial infarction by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association definition and renal injury by serum creatinine (>177 micromol/L) according to American Heart Association guidelines for risk stratification in major vascular surgery. The groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. RIPC reduced the incidence of myocardial injury by 27% (39% versus 12% [95% CI: 8.8% to 45%]; P=0.005), myocardial infarction by 22% (27% versus 5% [95% CI: 7.3% to 38%]; P=0.006), and renal impairment by 23% (30% versus 7%; [95% CI: 6.4 to 39]; P=0.009). Multivariable analysis revealed the protective effect of RIPC on myocardial injury (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.67; P=0.008), myocardial infarction (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.75; P=0.006) and renal impairment were independent of other covariables.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, RIPC reduces the incidence of postoperative myocardial injury, myocardial infarction, and renal impairment.

Acute effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade on arterial function in hypertensive patients

The acute effects of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers may be important in some clinical settings. To assess the acute impact of such drugs on arterial function, we studied the effects of captopril 25 mg, quinapril 20 mg and telmisartan 80 mg on 100 hypertensive patients, according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Central (aortic) blood pressure (BP) and augmentation index (AIx, a measure of wave reflections), as well as flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery and forearm blood flow (FBF) (measures of conduit and resistance artery endothelial function, respectively), were evaluated before and 2 h after oral drug administration. Compared to placebo, captopril and quinapril decreased central systolic (by 7.5 mm Hg, P<0.05 and by 12.3 mm Hg, P<0.001) and diastolic BP (by 4.9 mm Hg, P<0.01 and by 8.4 mm Hg, P<0.001), whereas telmisartan had no significant effect (P=NS). Additionally, AIx was reduced after quinapril (absolute decrease of 7.2%, P<0.01) and marginally after captopril (decrease of 4.7%, P=0.07). Only quinapril led to a beneficial change of FMD (absolute increase of 2.7%, P<0.001). No treatment was related to significant changes of peak hyperaemic or 3-min hyperaemic FBF. In adjusted analyses, all the favourable alterations induced by quinapril were independent of potential confounding haemodynamic factors. Our data show that acute RAS inhibition with quinapril (20 mg) may be more beneficial in terms of arterial function and central haemodynamics compared to captopril (25 mg) or telmisartan (80 mg). Further studies are needed to investigate whether these acute arterial effects of quinapril are clinically significant.