|
1
|
Pribék IK, Kovács I, Kádár BK, Kovács CS, Richman MJ, Janka Z, Andó B, Lázár BA. Evaluation of the course and treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome with the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol - Revised: A systematic review-based meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 220:108536. [PMID: 33503582 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol - Revised (CIWA-Ar) is a gold standard tool for the clinical evaluation of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), a systematic analysis using the total scores of the CIWA-Ar as a means of an objective follow-up of the course and treatment of AWS is missing. The aims of the present study were to systematically evaluate scientific data using the CIWA-Ar, to reveal whether the aggregated CIWA-Ar total scores follow the course of AWS and to compare benzodiazepine (BZD) and non-benzodiazepine (nBZD) therapies in AWS. METHODS 1054 findings were identified with the keyword "ciwa" from four databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cochrane Registry). Articles using CIWA-Ar in patients treated with AWS were incorporated and two measurement intervals (cumulative mean data of day 1-3 and day 4-9) of the CIWA-Ar total scores were compared. Subgroup analysis based on pharmacotherapy regimen was conducted to compare the effectiveness of BZD and nBZD treatments. RESULTS The random effects analysis of 423 patients showed decreased CIWA-Ar scores between the two measurement intervals (BZD: d = -1.361; CI: -1.829 < δ < -0.893; nBZD: d = -0.858; CI: -1.073 < δ < -0.643). Sampling variances were calculated for the BZD (v1 = 0.215) and the nBZD (v2 = 0.106) groups, which indicated no significant group difference (z = -1.532). CONCLUSIONS Our findings support that the CIWA-Ar follows the course of AWS. Furthermore, nBZD therapy has a similar effectiveness compared to BZD treatment based on the CIWA-Ar total scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ildikó Katalin Pribék
- Addiction Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, 8-10 Korányi fasor, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
| | - Ildikó Kovács
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, 8-10 Korányi fasor, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Bettina Kata Kádár
- Addiction Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, 8-10 Korányi fasor, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Csenge Sára Kovács
- Addiction Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, 8-10 Korányi fasor, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Mara J Richman
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa Street 8, H-1085, Budapest, Hungary; Endeavor Psychology, 10 Newbury Street, Boston, MA, 02116, USA
| | - Zoltán Janka
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, 8-10 Korányi fasor, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Bálint Andó
- Addiction Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, 8-10 Korányi fasor, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary
| | - Bence András Lázár
- Addiction Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, 8-10 Korányi fasor, Szeged, H-6720, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|