Criteria for selective utilization of the intensive care unit following carotid endarterectomy

To drain or not to drain following carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

A postoperative neck hematoma can be a life-threatening complication after carotid endarterectomy necessitating urgent surgical decompression to avoid airway compromise. The practice of routine incisional drain placement is variable with few published studies evaluating the "to drain versus not to drain" approach. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of neck drain placement for prevention of neck hematoma requiring re-exploration for decompression.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcome of surgical re-exploration for neck decompression among patients receiving or not receiving wound drainage.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 5 studies for inclusion, comprising 48,297 patients with 19,832 (41.1%) patients receiving a drain after carotid endarterectomy. Patients in the drain group had a significantly higher re-exploration rate after carotid endarterectomy compared to those who did not receive a drainage (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.49; P=0.02) with no heterogeneity (I²=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine drain placement does not offer complete protection against neck hematoma development and may give the surgeon a false sense of security in wound drainage. Thus, we conclude that drain placement following carotid endarterectomy should be selective, not routine.

Associated Risk Factors and Complications in Vascular Surgery Patients Requiring Unplanned Postoperative Reintubation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of reintubation within 30 days in vascular surgery patients and the associated risk factors and complications.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors and outcomes from data collected by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

SETTING

All institutions participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients older than 18 undergoing vascular surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A reintubation rate of 2.2% among vascular surgery patients within the first 30 days was demonstrated. Reintubation was associated positively with increased age, low body mass index, poor functional status, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and increased anesthesia and surgical times. In addition, specific procedures were found to have significantly increased rates of reintubation, including bypass surgery, thrombectomy, and open thoracic and abdominal aorta surgery. Reintubation was associated positively with all measured complications, including a quadrupled length of average hospital stay (19.8 v 5.5 days), a 10-fold risk of mortality (33.9% v 2.6%), and a 40-fold risk of cardiac arrest (22.4% v 0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing major vascular surgery represent a high-risk population for unplanned postoperative reintubation. Preoperative evaluation should include the consideration of the positively associated risk factors found in this study. Due to the significant morbidity associated with unplanned reintubation, additional work is needed to identify risk factors amenable to optimization in the preoperative period.

Carotid Endarterectomy: A Review

Background:

Since the validation of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as an effective means of stroke prevention, there has been renewed interest in its best indications and methods, as well as in how it compares to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). This review examines these topics, as well as the investigation of carotid stenosis and the role of auditing and reporting CEAresults.

Investigation:

Brain imaging with CTor MRI should be obtained in patients considered for CEA, in order to document infarction and rule out mass lesions. Carotid investigation begins with ultrasound and, if results agree with subsequent, good-quality MRAor CTangiography, treatment can be planned and catheter angiography avoided. An equally acceptable approach is to proceed directly from ultrasound to catheter angiography, which is still the gold-standard in carotid artery assessment.

Indications:

Appropriate patients for CEA are those symptomatic with transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling stroke due to 70-99% carotid stenosis; the maximum allowable stroke and death rate being 6%. Uncertain candidates for CEA are those with 50 - 69% symptomatic stenosis, and those with asymptomatic stenosis ≥ 60% but, if selected carefully on the basis of additional risk factors (related to both the carotid plaque and certain patient characteristics), some will benefit from surgery. Asymptomatic patients will only benefit if surgery can be provided with exceptionally low major complication rates (3% or less). Inappropriate patients are those with less than 50% symptomatic or 60% asymptomatic stenosis, and those with unstable medical or neurological conditions.

Techniques:

Carotid endarterectomy can be performed with either regional or general anaesthesia and, for the latter, there are a number of monitoring techniques available to assess cerebral perfusion during carotid cross-clamping. While monitoring cannot be considered mandatory and no single monitoring technique has emerged as being clearly superior, EEG is most commonly used. “Eversion” endarterectomy is a variation in surgical technique, and there is some evidence that more widely practiced patch closure may reduce the acute risk of operative stroke and the longer-term risk of recurrent stenosis.

Carotid angioplasty and stenting:

Experience with this endovascular and less invasive procedure grows, and its technology continues to evolve. Some experienced therapists have reported excellent results in case series and a number of randomized trials are now underway comparing CAS to CEA. However, at this time it is premature to incorporate CAS into routine practice replacing CEA.

Auditing:

It has been shown that auditing of CEA indications and results with regular feed-back to the operating surgeons can significantly improve the performance of this operation. Carotid endarterectomy auditing is recommended on both local and regional levels.

Association between age and use of intensive care among surgical Medicare beneficiaries

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the role age plays in use of intensive care for patients who have major surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study examining the association between age and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for all Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older who had a hospitalization for 1 of 5 surgical procedures: esophagectomy, cystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (open AAA), and elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (endo AAA) from 2004 to 2008. The primary outcome was admission to an ICU. Secondary outcomes were complications and hospital mortality. We used multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression to adjust for other patient and hospital-level factors associated with each outcome.

RESULTS

The percentage of hospitalized patients admitted to ICU ranged from 41.3% for endo AAA to 81.5% for open AAA. In-hospital mortality also varied, from 1.1% for endo AAA to 6.8% for esophagectomy. After adjusting for other factors, age was associated with admission to ICU for cystectomy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.56 [95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.78] for age 80-84+ years; 2.25 [1.85-2.75] for age 85+ years compared with age 65-69 years), pancreaticoduodenectomy (AOR, 1.26 [1.06-1.50] for age 80-84 years; 1.49 [1.11-1.99] for age 85+ years), and esophagectomy (AOR, 1.26 [1.02-1.55] for age 80-84 years; 1.28 [0.91-1.80] age 85+ years). Age was not associated with use of intensive care for open AAA or endo AAA. Older age was associated with increases in complication rates and in-hospital mortality for all 5 surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between age and use of intensive care was procedure specific. Complication rates and in-hospital mortality increased with age for all 5 surgical procedures.

Who receives postoperative intensive and intermediate care?

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of preoperative and intraoperative factors that determine whether to provide postoperative intensive or intermediate care.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care university hospital.

PATIENTS

3,066 ASA physical status I, II, III, and IV adult patients, 1,233 of whom were transferred to floor or the ambulatory surgery unit after a short postoperative recovery room stay (group 1), whereas the other 1,883 were admitted to intermediate and intensive care areas (group 2).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic and clinical information including preoperative medical history, extent of intraoperative care, and postoperative course were collected. Intraoperative activities were examined with the Operative Complexity Score and the Intraoperative Therapeutic Intensity Score.

RESULTS

Almost all patients undergoing complex surgery (cardiac surgery and neurosurgery) received postoperative intermediate or intensive care, even if they had no significant underlying systemic diseases (ASA physical status I and II). Patients with severe underlying diseases (ASA physical status III and IV), but who underwent less extensive surgery, tended to receive intensive and intermediate care. Postoperative mechanical ventilation was associated with receipt of intensive rather than intermediate care. Interestingly, 10% of the elective surgery patients in group 2 unexpectedly received intensive or intermediate care because of intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of postoperative intermediate and intensive care is associated with distinct patterns of preoperative and intraoperative factors.

Demographic and clinical variation of adult intensive care unit utilization from a geographically defined population

OBJECTIVE

To determine population-based rates of adult intensive care unit (ICU) use and evaluate the effects that demographic variables and chronic illness have on ICU utilization.

DESIGN

Retrospective, population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Olmsted County, Minnesota.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult residents admitted to an ICU in 1998.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Measurements included demographics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, ICU admission diagnosis, ICU interventions, Charlson comorbidity index and conditions, ICU length of stay (LOS), and ICU, hospital, 1-month, and 1-yr mortalities. Risk of ICU admission and rates of ICU utilization increased substantially with increasing age, peaking in the very elderly. The rates of ICU admission and utilization in those > or =85 yrs old were 58.2 admissions/1,000 residents and 195.8 days/1,000 residents compared with 3.8 admissions/1,000 residents and 11.5 days/1,000 residents in those 18 to 44 yrs old. Residents > or =85 yrs old were 3.75 times as likely (p < .001) to be admitted to the ICU compared with those 18-44 yrs old after controlling for the presence of comorbid illness. ICU admission rates increased with an increasing number of comorbid illnesses. Residents with cardiovascular conditions and renal disease had high rates of ICU admission. Repeat users of the ICU were more likely to have a chronic condition and higher degree of comorbid illness compared with nonrepeat users. ICU mortality was similar across all age groups, except in those > or =85 yrs old, for whom mortality was greater. One-year mortality after ICU admission increased with increasing age.

CONCLUSIONS

Population-based rates of ICU admission and utilization in Olmsted County, Minnesota, increased with age and are highest in the very elderly. The presence of chronic illness, particularly cardiovascular conditions, significantly increases ICU utilization and risk of ICU admission.

Predictors of intensive care unit admission and related outcome for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy

High-volume centers have low morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Less is known about treatment pathways and their influence on intensive care unit (ICU) utilization. Patients who underwent PD at a tertiary cancer center during the five-year period between January 1998 and December 2003 were identified from a prospective database. Preoperative and intraoperative factors relating to ICU admission and outcome were analyzed. Five hundred ninety-one pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed during the study period. Of these, 536 patients had complete records for analysis. Of the 536 patients, 51 (10%) were admitted to the ICU after surgery. Admission to the ICU was associated with decreased overall survival (P < .0001). Of the preoperative predictors of ICU admission, serum creatinine, albumin, and increased body mass index (BMI) were associated with ICU admission (P = .02, .05, and .002, respectively). Age, blood glucose, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were not predictive of ICU admission on univariate analysis. Of the intraoperative factors, longer operative time and estimated blood loss (EBL) correlated with ICU admission (P = .003 and .0001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, only preoperative BMI and intraoperative EBL were independent predictors of ICU admission (P = .03 and .003, respectively). Patients with a preoperative BMI greater than 30 had a substantially higher risk of ICU admission (relative risk 2.4). The majority of patients who undergo PD do not require admission to the ICU. Factors most associated with ICU admission after PD are increased preoperative BMI and intraoperative blood loss.

The use of benchmarking to identify top performing critical care units: a preliminary assessment of their policies and practices

PURPOSE

To describe the policies and practices of intensive care units (ICUs) with good patient survival and highly efficient resource use and to identify relevant variables for future investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used clinical data for 359,715 patients from 108 ICUs to compare the ratios of actual with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III predicted hospital mortality, ICU and hospital stay, and the proportion of low-risk monitor patients. The best performing ICUs (top 10%) were defined by a mortality ratio of 1.0 or less, and either the lowest ratio for ICU stay, hospital stay, or percentage of low-risk monitor patients. The medical and nursing directors of top performing ICUs completed a questionnaire to describe their unit's structure policies and practices.

RESULTS

Among the 108 ICUs, 61 (56%) had a ratio of actual to predicted hospital mortality of 1.0 or less and the best performing units had ICU stay ratios of 0.62 to 0.79, hospital stay ratios of 0.73 to 0.77, and admitted 10% to 38% low-risk monitor patients. ICU structure varied among the best performing ICUs. Units with the shortest ICU and hospital stay had alternatives to intensive care, methods to facilitate patient throughput, used multiple protocols for high-volume diagnoses and care processes, and continuously monitored resource use. Units with the fewest low-risk monitor patients screened potential admissions, had intermediate care areas, extended-stay recovery rooms, and care pathways for high-volume diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Benchmarking can be used to identify ICUs with good patient survival and highly efficient resource use. The combination of policies and practices used by these units might improve resource use in other ICUs.

Timing of postcarotid complications: a guide to safe discharge planning

OBJECTIVES

Currently, our standard of practice is that patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be safely discharged on the first postoperative day. Because many patients do not appear to require overnight observation, we wanted to determine the safety and feasibility of same-evening discharge by establishing the timing of postoperative complications, which may potentially require operative intervention.

METHODS

A total of 835 consecutive patients undergoing CEA were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-two patients had a postoperative wound hematoma or neurologic deficit (ND) (transient ischemic attack or stroke) within 24 hours of their operation, complications potentially requiring a second operation. Excluded were 64 patients not eligible for same-day discharge because of other reasons (eg, heparinization, CEA with coronary artery bypass grafting).

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (8.0%) had ND (26 [3.4%]) or neck hematoma (NH) (36 [4.7%]) within 24 hours of their CEA. Nineteen (73%) of the NDs were diagnosed in the operating room or recovery room, 5 (19%) within 8 hours of the operation, and 2 (7.7%) after 8 hours but in less than 24 hours. Of the NHs, 23 (66%) were diagnosed in the recovery room, 11 (31%) within 8 hours, and 1 (2.7%) after 8 hours. Of the outliers, one patient experienced a blowout of the vein graft occurring on postoperative day 1, one patient had a delayed ipsilateral stroke, and one had a vertebrobasilar stroke. Overall, only three of 773 (0.4%) patients undergoing CEA had a complication occurring more than 8 hours after operation.

CONCLUSION

NDs and NHs in post-CEA patients occurred within 8 hours of operation in 95% of those patients experiencing these complications or 99.6% of all CEA patients. These data indicate that same-evening discharge may be safely performed without increasing the adverse effects of stroke or hematoma. This plan has cautiously been initiated at this institution.

Reconstructive surgery of the extracranial arteries

The first carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is usually accredited to Eastcott who reported in 1954 the successful incision of a diseased carotid bulb with end-to-end anastomosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to the common carotid artery (CCA). During the following years surgeons were quick to adopt and improve the intuitively attractive procedure. But by the early to mid 1980s several leading neurologists began to question the growing number of CEAs performed at that time. Six major CEA trials were then designed which are now completed or nearing completion. Most conclusive data are available from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) for symptomatic carotid disease, and from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) for asymptomatic carotid disease. The key result of these studies is that CEA is beneficial to high grade symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. While the benefit in symptomatic disease is clear, it may be negligible in asymptomatic patients suffering from other medical conditions, the most important being coronary artery disease. Since the conclusions from the different studies vary significantly, guidelines and recommendations with regard to CEA have been issued by a number of interest groups, so-called consensus conferences. The best known guidelines are published by the American Heart Association (AHA). However, the practice of interest groups to issue guidelines is currently being criticized, the main reason being that interest groups have different ideas and all claim the right to issue guidelines. At present we recommend CEA for symptomatic high-grade stenosis in patients without significant coincident disease. With regard to asymptomatic stenosis we suggest surgery to otherwise healthy patients if the stenosis is very narrow or progressive. Preoperative evaluation has changed over the years. Currently we recommend duplex sonography in combination with intra- and extracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Concurrent coronary artery disease is a major consideration in the perioperative management, and the use of a specific algorithm is recommended. Surgery is performed under general anaesthesia with intraoperative monitoring such as electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial Doppler (TCD). A temporary intraluminal shunt is used selectively if after cross-clamping the flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline. For years we employed routine barbiturate neuroprotection during cross-clamping. At the present time we use barbiturate selectively, if the flow velocity in the MCA falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline and if the use of a temporary intraluminal shunt is not possible due to difficult anatomic conditions. The reason to abandon systematic barbiturate protection was to accelerate recovery from anaesthesia. Our patients are monitored overnight on the ICU or a surveillance unit. Routine hospitalization after surgery is 5 to 7 days with a control duplex sonography being performed prior to discharge. A number of details with regard to surgical technique and perioperative management are a matter of discussion. Our surgical routine is described here step by step. Such management resulted in 6 major complications among the 402 cases with 4 of cardiopulmonary and 2 of cerebrovascular origin. For the future we can expect the development of percutaneous transluminal techniques competing with standard carotid endarterectomy. At the present time several comparative studies are under way. Irrespective of the technical approach to treat carotid stenosis, several other issues have to be clarified before long. One of the major unresolved items is the timing of treatment after completed stroke. In this regard prospective trials need to be performed. Although numerically not as important as carotid stenosis, vertebral artery (VA) and subclavian artery (SA) stenoses are more and more accepted as indication for surgical

Short stay carotid surgery for veterans: an emerging standard

We have taken the short stay approach to carotid artery surgery to our VA setting over the past 5 to 6 years. Retrospectively, we reviewed the efficacy and safety of that approach in 201 consecutive carotid operations over the recent 4-year period (January 1, 1996-December 31, 1999). In 1996 we had already begun the transition to an algorithm to (1) utilize carotid color flow Doppler duplex exams for diagnosis, (2) same-day admission (SDA), (3) intensive care unit (ICU) only when deemed medically necessary, and (4) next-day discharge. Results of this approach have been a decrease in the utilization of diagnostic arteriograms and utilization of the ICU from 100% previous to the onset of this approach to 17 and 22%, respectively. SDA increased from 24 to 89%. Mean LOS decreased from 5.13+/-0.9 to 1.97+/-0.4 days. The percentage of patients completing the algorithm went from 15 to 72%. Stroke and/or death varied from 0 to 3.7% each year and was only 2.4% over the 4-year period. In conclusion, this approach to short stay carotid surgery in the veteran population has proven both efficacious and safe with results similar to those in university and community practices.

Is routine use of the intensive care unit after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair necessary?

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative care after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has traditionally involved admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). With the advent of endovascular AAA repair, the management of open procedures has received increased scrutiny. We recently modified our AAA clinical pathway to include selective use of the ICU.

METHODS

Consecutive elective infrarenal AAA repairs performed by members of the vascular surgery division at a university medical center from 1994 to 1999 were analyzed retrospectively with a computerized database, the Medical Archival Retrieval System. Group I consisted of 245 patients who were treated in the ICU for 1 or more days, and Group II included 69 patients admitted directly to the floor. Ruptured, symptomatic, suprarenal, endovascular, and reoperative repairs were excluded. Outcome variables were compared over the 6-year period.

RESULTS

Floor admissions increased over the study period with 0%, 0%, 3.3%, 16.3%, 48.6%, and 43.6% of patients admitted directly to the surgery ward from 1994 to 1999. The average ICU length of stay declined from 4.6 to 1.2 days, whereas the hospital length of stay decreased from 12.5 to 6.8 days from 1994 to 1999. The change in ICU use had no effect on death (2.4% in Group I vs 0% in Group II). Major and minor morbidity was comparable. Hospital charges were significantly lower for patients in Group II.

CONCLUSION

A policy of selective utilization of the ICU after elective infrarenal AAA repair is safe. It can reduce resource use without a negative impact on the quality of care.