1
|
Grünzweig JM, De Boeck HJ, Rey A, Santos MJ, Adam O, Bahn M, Belnap J, Deckmyn G, Dekker SC, Flores O, Gliksman D, Helman D, Hultine KR, Liu L, Meron E, Michael Y, Sheffer E, Throop HL, Tzuk O, Yakir D. Dryland mechanisms could widely control ecosystem functioning in a drier and warmer world. Nat Ecol Evol 2022; 6:1064-1076. [PMID: 35879539 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01779-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change have been explored in many regions worldwide. While continued drying and warming may alter process rates and deteriorate the state and performance of ecosystems, it could also lead to more fundamental changes in the mechanisms governing ecosystem functioning. Here we argue that climate change will induce unprecedented shifts in these mechanisms in historically wetter climatic zones, towards mechanisms currently prevalent in dry regions, which we refer to as 'dryland mechanisms'. We discuss 12 dryland mechanisms affecting multiple processes of ecosystem functioning, including vegetation development, water flow, energy budget, carbon and nutrient cycling, plant production and organic matter decomposition. We then examine mostly rare examples of the operation of these mechanisms in non-dryland regions where they have been considered irrelevant at present. Current and future climate trends could force microclimatic conditions across thresholds and lead to the emergence of dryland mechanisms and their increasing control over ecosystem functioning in many biomes on Earth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Grünzweig
- Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, the Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
| | - Hans J De Boeck
- Plants and Ecosystems, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Ana Rey
- Department of Biogeography and Global Change, National Museum of Natural History, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria J Santos
- Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ori Adam
- The Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michael Bahn
- Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jayne Belnap
- US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Moab, UT, USA
| | - Gaby Deckmyn
- Plants and Ecosystems, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Stefan C Dekker
- Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Omar Flores
- Plants and Ecosystems, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen, Wilrijk, Belgium.,Department of Biogeography and Global Change, National Museum of Natural History, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Gliksman
- Institute for Hydrology and Meteorology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Tharandt, Germany.,Institute of Geography, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - David Helman
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, the Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.,Advanced School for Environmental Studies, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kevin R Hultine
- Department of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Lingli Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, China
| | - Ehud Meron
- Department of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.,Department of Solar Energy and Environmental Physics, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, Israel
| | - Yaron Michael
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, the Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Efrat Sheffer
- Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, the Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Heather L Throop
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Omer Tzuk
- Department of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.,Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Dan Yakir
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smettem KRJ, Rye C, Henry DJ, Sochacki SJ, Harper RJ. Soil water repellency and the five spheres of influence: A review of mechanisms, measurement and ecological implications. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 787:147429. [PMID: 33992948 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Soil water repellency (SWR) is a widespread phenomenon that influences patterns of soil wetting, runoff, evapotranspiration and availability of water for plants. In natural ecosystems there is emerging evidence that some plants can take advantage of non-uniform wetting patterns, leading to the emergence of co-evolutionary behaviour. In this review, SWR is considered in terms of five spheres of influence. Given the presence of hydrophobic organic material in the biosphere, the strength, severity and persistence of SWR is influenced by properties at the surface of the lithosphere and prevailing conditions in the atmosphere and hydrosphere. These in turn, can be modified by activities in the anthroposphere. This review thus examines the strength, severity and persistence of non-wetting behaviour with reference to these five spheres of influence and also the interactions between the spheres. It is focused on (i) how SWR is characterised to provide insight into how different measurement techniques have specific operational ranges, (ii) how SWR has developed as an indirect consequence of evolution in natural ecosystems and (iii) how feedbacks across the different spheres have emerged. It demonstrates that management and restoration of natural ecosystems with water repellent soils is very different from management of productive crops in monocultural agricultural systems, controlled in the anthroposphere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R J Smettem
- Agricultural Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia; Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - C Rye
- Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - D J Henry
- Chemistry, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
| | - S J Sochacki
- Agricultural Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
| | - R J Harper
- Agricultural Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feedbacks between Biotic and Abiotic Processes Governing the Development of Foredune Blowouts: A Review. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/jmse7010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This paper reviews the initiation, development, and closure of foredune blowouts with focus on biotic-abiotic interactions. There is a rich body of literature describing field measurements and model simulations in and around foredune blowouts. Despite this abundance of data there is no conceptual framework available linking biotic and abiotic observations to pathways of blowout development (e.g., erosional blowout growth or vegetation induced blowout closure). This review identifies morphological and ecological processes facilitating the transition between blowout development stages and sets them in the context of existing conceptual frameworks describing biotic-abiotic systems. By doing so we are able to develop a new conceptual model linking blowout development to the dominance of its governing processes. More specifically we link blowout initiation to the dominance of abiotic (physical) processes, blowout development to the dominance of biotic-abiotic (bio-geomorphological) processes and blowout closure to the dominance of biotic (ecological) processes. Subsequently we identify further steps to test the proposed conceptual model against existing observations and show possibilities to include it in numerical models able to predict blowout development for various abiotic and biotic conditions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tinoco P, Almendros G, Sanz J. Soil Perturbation in Mediterranean Ecosystems Reflected by Differences in Free-Lipid Biomarker Assemblages. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2018; 66:9895-9906. [PMID: 30179002 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Environmental information provided by free lipids in soil samples collected from control and disturbed plots (Madrid, Spain) was assessed by comparing molecular assemblages of terpenoids and distribution patterns of alkanes and fatty acids (FAs) analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Wildfires in pine forests led to increased proportions of retene, dehydroabietin, and simonellite. Friedo-oleananes were characteristic in soils under angiosperms, and norambreinolide-type diterpenes were characteristic in soils encroached by Cistus bushes. Steroids were major compounds in pastured sites. Enhanced Shannon's lipid biodiversity index in disturbed soils compared with in control soils suggested patterns of recent lipids overlapping a preserved original lipid signature. The extent of the environmental impacts was illustrated as Euclidean distances between paired control and disturbed sites calculated using the compounds in alkyl homologous series as descriptors. As expected, reforestation, bush encroachment, wildfires, and cultivation were reflected by changes in the molecular record of lipids in soils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Tinoco
- Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Campus de Villanueva de la Cañada , Avenida Universidad 1 , E-28691 Madrid , Spain
| | | | - Jesús Sanz
- Instituto de Química Orgánica General , CSIC , Juan de la Cierva 3 , E-28006 Madrid , Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siteur K, Eppinga MB, Doelman A, Siero E, Rietkerk M. Ecosystems off track: rate-induced critical transitions in ecological models. OIKOS 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/oik.03112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Siteur
- Dept of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute, Faculty of Geosciences; Utrecht Univ.; Heidelberglaan 2 PO Box 80115 NL-3508 TC Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Maarten B. Eppinga
- Dept of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute, Faculty of Geosciences; Utrecht Univ.; Heidelberglaan 2 PO Box 80115 NL-3508 TC Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Arjen Doelman
- Mathematical Inst.; Leiden Univ.; Leiden the Netherlands
| | - Eric Siero
- Mathematical Inst.; Leiden Univ.; Leiden the Netherlands
| | - Max Rietkerk
- Dept of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute, Faculty of Geosciences; Utrecht Univ.; Heidelberglaan 2 PO Box 80115 NL-3508 TC Utrecht the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|