Recurrences after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results and critical review

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of methods of mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia repairs are common and have high recurrence rates. They are usually repaired laparoscopically with an intraperitoneal mesh, which can be fixed in various ways. The aim was to evaluate the recurrence rates for the different fixation techniques.

METHODS

This systematic review included studies with human adults with a ventral hernia repaired with an intraperitoneal onlay mesh. The outcome was recurrence at least 6 months after operation. Cohort studies with 50 or more participants and all RCTs were included. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched on 22 September 2016. RCTs were assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and cohort studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Studies comparing fixation techniques were included in a network meta-analysis, which allowed comparison of more than two fixation techniques.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies with a total of 6553 participants were included. The overall crude recurrence rates with the various fixation techniques were: absorbable tacks, 17·5 per cent (2 treatment groups); absorbable tacks with sutures, 0·7 per cent (3); permanent tacks, 7·7 per cent (20); permanent tacks with sutures, 6·0 per cent (25); and sutures, 1·5 per cent (6). Six studies were included in a network meta-analysis, which favoured fixation with sutures. Although statistical significance was not achieved, there was a 93 per cent chance of sutures being better than one of the other methods.

CONCLUSION

Both crude recurrence rates and the network meta-analysis favoured fixation with sutures during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Laparoscopic-assisted Ventral Hernia Repair: Primary Fascial Repair with Polyester Mesh versus Polyester Mesh Alone

Laparoscopic-assisted ventral hernia repair (LAVHR) with mesh is well established as the preferred technique for hernia repair. We sought to determine whether primary fascial closure and/or overlap of the mesh reduced recurrence and/or complications. We conducted a retrospective review on 57 LAVHR patients using polyester composite mesh between August 2010 and July 2013. They were divided into mesh-only (nonclosure) and primary fascial closure with mesh (closure) groups. Patient demographics, prior surgical history, mesh overlap, complications, and recurrence rates were compared. Thirty-nine (68%) of 57 patients were in the closure group and 18 (32%) in the nonclosure group. Mean defect sizes were 15.5 and 22.5 cm2, respectively. Participants were followed for a mean of 1.3 years [standard deviation (SD) = 0.7]. Recurrence rates were 2/39 (5.1%) in the closure group and 1/18 (5.6%) in the nonclosure group ( P = 0.947). There were no major postoperative complications in the nonclosure group. The closure group experienced four (10.3%) complications. This was not a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.159). The median mesh-to-hernia ratio for all repairs was 15.2 (surface area) and 3.9 (diameter). Median length of stay was 14.5 hours (1.7–99.3) for patients with nonclosure and 11.9 hours (6.9–90.3 hours) for patients with closure ( P = 0.625). In conclusion, this is one of the largest series of LAVHR exclusively using polyester dual-sided mesh. Our recurrence rate was about 5 per cent. Significant mesh overlap is needed to achieve such low recurrence rates. Primary closure of hernias seems less important than adequate mesh overlap in preventing recurrence after LAVHR.

Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected]

BACKGROUND

The Executive board of the Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) promoted an update of the first evidence-based Italian Consensus Conference Guidelines 2010 because a large amount of literature has been published in the last 4 years about the topics examined and new relevant issues.

METHODS

The scientific committee selected the topics to be addressed: indications to surgical treatment including special conditions (obesity, cirrhosis, diastasis recti abdominis, acute presentation); safety and outcome of intraperitoneal meshes (synthetic and biologic); fixing devices (absorbable/non-absorbable); abdominal border and parastomal hernia; intraoperative and perioperative complications; and recurrent ventral/incisional hernia. All the recommendations are the result of a careful and complete literature review examined with autonomous judgment by the entire panel. The process was supervised by experts in methodology and epidemiology from the most qualified Italian institution. Two external reviewers were designed by the EAES and EHS to guarantee the most objective, transparent, and reliable work. The Oxford hierarchy (OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. "The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence") was used by the panel to grade clinical outcomes according to levels of evidence. The recommendations were based on the grading system suggested by the GRADE working group.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The availability of recent level 1 evidence (a meta-analysis of 10 RCTs) allowed to recommend that not only laparoscopic repair is an acceptable alternative to the open repair, but also it is advantageous in terms of shorter hospital stay and wound infection rate. This conclusion appears to be extremely relevant in a clinical setting. Indications about specific conditions could also be issued: laparoscopy is recommended for the treatment of recurrent ventral hernias and obese patients, while it is a potential option for compensated cirrhotic and childbearing-age female patients. Many relevant and controversial topics were thoroughly examined by this consensus conference for the first time. Among them are the issue of safety of the intraperitoneal mesh placement, traditionally considered a major drawback of the laparoscopic technique, the role for the biologic meshes, and various aspects of the laparoscopic approach for particular locations of the defect such as the abdominal border or parastomal hernias.

Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair in a district general hospital

INTRODUCTION

The laparoscopic approach to repairing ventral and incisional hernias has gained increasing popularity worldwide. We reviewed the experience of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at a district general hospital in the UK with particular reference to patients with massive defects (diameter ≥15cm) and the morbidly obese.

METHODS

A total of 144 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral (incisional or umbilical/paraumbilical) hernia repair between April 2007 and September 2012.

RESULTS

The prevalence of conversion to open surgery was 2.8%. The prevalence of postoperative complications was 3.5%. Median postoperative follow-up was 30.2 months. A total of 5.6% cases suffered late complications and 2.8% developed recurrence. Thirty-four patients underwent repair of defects ≥10cm in diameter with a prevalence of recurrence of 5.6%. Sixteen patients underwent repair of 'massive' incisional hernia (diameter ≥15cm) with a prevalence of recurrence of 12.5%. Sixteen patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40kg/m(2) (range, 40-61kg/m(2)) underwent laparoscopic repair with a prevalence of recurrence of 6.3% (p>0.05 vs BMI <40kg/m(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair can be carried out safely with a low prevalence of recurrence. It may have advantages in morbidly obese patients in whom open repair would represent a significant undertaking. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair may be used in cases of large and massive hernias, in which the risk of recurrence increases but is comparable with open repair and associated with low morbidity.

Closure of small and medium size umbilical hernias with the Proceed Ventral Patch in obese patients: a single center experience

Obesity is a risk factor for the development of umbilical hernia. Open hernia closure could be challenging in obese patients leading to high rates of recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of hernia patches in the management of obese patients with umbilical hernias. All the patients included in this study were managed in the department of surgery of a primary care hospital in Germany. The data of patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair within a two-year period was retrospectively reviewed. Patients managed with the PVP were included for analysis. 24 obese patients were analyzed. Small and medium size patches were used in 15 and 9 patients respectively. The median duration of surgery was 40 min and the median length of hospital stay was 4d. The mean length of follow-up was 12 ± 9 months (range: 6–30 months). The rate of recurrence was 4.1% and the rate of complication was 8.3%. Obese patients presenting with small and medium size umbilical hernias could be safely and effectively managed with prosthetic patches like the Proceed Ventral Patch. However, the limited overlap zone following hernia closure with such a patch can be an issue.

Evaluation of absorbable mesh fixation devices at various deployment angles

BACKGROUND

Hernia repair failure may occur due to suboptimal mesh fixation by mechanical constructs before mesh integration. Construct design and acute penetration angle may alter mesh-tissue fixation strength. We compared acute fixation strengths of absorbable fixation devices at various deployment angles, directions of loading, and construct orientations.

METHODS

Porcine abdominal walls were sectioned. Constructs were deployed at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° angles to fix mesh to the tissue specimens. Lap-shear testing was performed in upward, downward, and lateral directions in relation to the abdominal wall cranial-caudal axis to evaluate fixation. Absorbatack™ (AT), SorbaFix™ (SF), and SecureStrap™ in vertical (SSV) and horizontal (SSH) orientations in relation to the abdominal wall cranial-caudal axis were tested. Ten tests were performed for each combination of device, angle, and loading direction. Failure types and strength data were recorded. ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer adjustments for multiple comparisons and χ (2) tests were performed as appropriate (p < 0.05 considered significant).

RESULTS

At 30°, SSH and SSV had greater fixation strengths (12.95, 12.98 N, respectively) than SF (5.70 N; p = 0.0057, p = 0.0053, respectively). At 45°, mean fixation strength of SSH was significantly greater than SF (18.14, 11.40 N; p = 0.0002). No differences in strength were identified at 60° or 90°. No differences in strength were noted between SSV and SSH with different directions of loading. No differences were noted between SS and AT at any angle. Immediate failure was associated with SF (p < 0.0001) and the 30° tacking angle (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh-tissue fixation was stronger at acute deployment angles with SS compared to SF constructs. The 30° angle and the SF device were associated with increased immediate failures. Varying construct and loading direction did not generate statistically significant differences in the fixation strength of absorbable fixation devices in this study.

Recurrence and Pseudorecurrence after Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: Predictors and Patient-focused Outcomes

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is gaining popularity as an option to repair abdominal wall hernias. Bulging after repair remains common after this technique. This study evaluates the incidence and factors associated with bulging after LVHR. Between 2000 and 2010, 201 patients underwent LVHR at two affiliated institutions. Patients who developed recurrence or pseudorecurrence (seroma or eventration) were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of these complications. Of the 201 patients who underwent LVHR, 40 (19.9%) patients developed a seroma, 63 (31.3%) patients had radiographically proven eventration, and 25 (12.4%) patients had a hernia recurrence. On multivariate analysis, seromas were associated with number of prior ventral hernia repairs, surgical site infections, and prostate disease. Mesh eventration was associated with hernia size and surgical technique. Tissue eventration was associated with primary hernias and surgical technique. Hernia recurrence was associated with incisional hernias and mesh type used. Recurrence and pseudorecurrence are important complications after LVHR. Large hernia size, infections, and surgical technique are important clinical factors that affect outcomes after LVHR.

Fascia lata allografts as biological mesh in abdominal wall repair: preliminary outcomes from a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

The use of biological meshes in management of infected abdominal hernias or in abdominal fields at high risk of infection (potentially contaminated or with relevant comorbidities) is well established. Available products include xenogenic patches or decellularized dermal allografts. Despite their biomechanical features, banked fascial allografts have not been investigated yet in this setting. The authors evaluated the safety and effectiveness of banked fascia lata allografts as biological meshes in abdominal wall repair.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients affected by abdominal wall defects and who were candidates for repair by means of a biological mesh and treated in the authors' institution with banked fascia lata allografts were reviewed retrospectively. Data from clinical and instrumental follow-up evaluations up to 48 months (average, 23 months) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (aged 1 to 86 years) with abdominal wall defects resulting from traumatic (n = 1), neoplastic (n = 6), or multiple previous laparotomies (n = 14) were treated from January of 2008 to October of 2012. Operations had no relevant postoperative complications. At clinical/instrumental follow-up examinations, no major signs of recurrence, laxity, infection of grafts, or other related pathologic symptoms were recorded. Three patients suffered from temporary minor complications (e.g., wound seroma, partial cutaneous dehiscence). At instrumental (computed tomographic scan or magnetic resonance imaging) evaluations, the neofascial tissue appeared stable until medium-term follow-up (3 to 6 months), later being gradually degraded and apparently replaced by host tissue.

CONCLUSION

According to limited preliminary outcomes, banked fascia lata allografts seem to provide a biocompatible, safe, and effective alternative to other biological meshes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has established itself as a well-accepted option in the treatment of hernias. Clear benefits have been established regarding the superiority of LVHR in terms of fewer wound infections compared with open repairs. Meticulous technique and appropriate patient selection are critical to obtain the reported results.

Trans-cutaneous Closure of Central Defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR)

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has been reported to have lower recurrence rates, fewer surgical site infections, and shorter hospital stays compared to open repair. Despite improved surgical outcomes with standard LVHR (sLVHR), seroma formation, eventration (or bulging of mesh or tissue), and hernia recurrence remain common complications. Our objective was to evaluate outcomes with trans-cutaneous closure of central defects in LVHR compared to sLVHR.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 176 patients who underwent elective LVHR between January 2007 and December 2010 was performed. Of the 176 patients, 36 (20.5 %) had the LVHR-TCCD (trans-cutaneous closure of central defects) procedure and 140 (79.5 %) had sLVHR. The LVHR-TCCD cases were compared to a 1:1 case-matched control (n = 36). The case control group was matched by hernia type (primary versus secondary), hernia size, Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grade, institution, and follow-up duration. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, hernia characteristics, operative details, imaging data, and complications were collected. Patient satisfaction (using a 10-point, Likert-type scale), late postoperative pain (using the visual analogue scale), and patient functional status (using the Activities Assessment Scale; AAS) were analyzed. Continuous data were analyzed with either the unpaired Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U-test, while Fischer's exact test was used to compare categorical data.

RESULTS

Patient demographics, co-morbidities, hernia size, hernia type, mesh type, and surgical histories were similar between the LVHR-TCCD group and the case control group. The LVHR-TCCD patients had significantly lower rates of seroma formation (5.6 % versus 27.8 %; p = 0.02), mesh eventration (0.0 % versus 41.4 %; p = 0.0002), tissue eventration (4.0 % versus 37.9 %; p = 0.003), clinical eventration (8.3 % versus 69.4 %; p = 0.0001), and hernia recurrence (0.0 % versus 16.7 %; p = 0.02) when compared to the sLVHR case control. Postoperative infectious complications and early complications classified by the Dindo-Clavien system were similar between the groups. Median follow-up was 24 months (range: 7-34 months) for both groups. Compared to the case control group, patients having undergone LVHR-TCCD had higher patient satisfaction scores (8.8 ± 0.4 versus 7.0 ± 0.5; p = 0.008), cosmetic satisfaction scores (8.8 ± 0.4 versus 7.0 ± 0.6; p = 0.01), and AAS functional status scores (79.1 ± 1.9 versus 71.3 ± 2.3; p = 0.002). There was no difference in worst pain scores or the prevalence of chronic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of seroma, mesh and tissue eventration, and hernia recurrence was significantly lower following LVHR-TCCD when compared to sLVHR. Subjective improvement in overall patient satisfaction, cosmetic satisfaction, and functional status was reported with closing the central defect. The LVHR-TCCD technique may be superior for treating ventral hernias due to lower complication rates and higher patient satisfaction and functional status.

Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference

PURPOSE

The laparoscopic treatment of ventral incisional hernias is the object of constant attention and is becoming increasingly widespread in the international scientific-surgical community; however, there is ample debate on its technical details and indications. In order to establish a common approach on laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair, the first Italian Consensus Conference was organized in Naples (Italy) on 14-15 January 2010.

METHODS

The format of the Consensus Conference was freely adapted from the standards of the National Institute of Health and the Italian Health Institute. The parties involved included the followings: a Promotional Committee, a Scientific Committee, a group of Experts, the Jury Panel and a Scientific Secretariat.

RESULTS

Eleven statements, regarding three large chapters on the indications, the technical details and the management of complications were drafted on the basis of literature references collected by the Scientific Committee, documents developed by the Experts, reports presented and discussed during the Consensus Conference, and discussion among the members of the Jury.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach is safe and effective for defects larger than 3 cm in diameter; old age, obesity, previous abdominal operations, recurrence and strangulation are not absolute contraindications. Ensuring an adequate overlap, careful adhesiolysis and correct fixing of the prosthesis are among the technical details recommended. Complications and recurrences are comparable to, and in some cases, less numerous than with the open approach.

Laparoscopic transcutaneous closure of central defects in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

PURPOSE

The aim of this technical report is to investigate the safety, efficacy, and outcome of transcutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR).

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with incisional hernias underwent a LIHR-TCCD repair. After clearance of the abdominal wall from adhesions, laparoscopic central closures were performed transcutaneously with 0-polypropelene sutures placed every 1 cm of the defect starting at the cranial-most edge of the hernia and ending at the caudal-most edge of the hernia. A standard LIHR was performed with coated polyester mesh placed with at least 6 cm of overlap with mesh on all borders. Transfascial sutures with 0-polypropelene sutures were placed every 4 cm circumferentially, and titanium tacks were used to secure the mesh to the peritoneum every 1 cm.

RESULTS

The mean age was 52 years and the mean body mass index was 35 kg/m. The mean hernia defect was 4.7 cm×7.2 cm with a mean area of 37 cm. There were no mortalities and no major perioperative morbidities. Minor complications included 2 (9%) cases of pneumonia/pneumonitis. There were no clinically significant seromas, no radiographic or clinical eventrations, and no hernia recurrences with a mean follow-up of 21 months.

CONCLUSIONS

LIHR-TCCD is safe and technically feasible in incisional hernias of width <10 cm. By closing the central defect, seromas and eventrations can be reduced.

[Biological implants in abdominal wall hernia surgery]

Permanent synthetic materials are currently of choice for abdominal wall hernia repair. However, they are not ideal as short- and long-term complications with these have been reported. Extracellular matrix-derived biological implants (EMDBI) have emerged as a result of research and development into new materials. Several types of EMDBI have appeared in the last few years, each with its own manufacture characteristics and different from the rest. The current panorama of the xenogeneic EMDBI available in Spain is analysed, their complications, the unknown factors arising in the long-term, and the clinical experience available on incisional and inguinal hernias.

Mesh shift following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is performed by placing the trocars on one side of the abdomen. Tacking the mesh on the operative side can be challenging. We hypothesized that mesh shift may occur as a result of this approach. We define mesh shift as any mesh off-center, where the center is the hernia defect. Our objectives were to evaluate whether mesh shift occurs after LVHR, and to develop a grading system to describe this phenomenon.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent LVHR from 2000 to 2010. We examined patient demographics, comorbidities, radiographic data, surgical data, and outcomes. Using analysis of variance, we analyzed continuous data; we used Chi squared to analyze categorical data. Of the 201 patients, we reviewed 78 postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Two surgeons measured mesh overlap of the fascia bilaterally at the level of the hernia defect. We compared a ratio of the two sides of overlap (least overlap/greatest overlap) and classified patients into four grades: grade I, no mesh shift (ratio of 0.5-1.00); grade II, mild mesh shift (ratio of 0.20-0.49); grade III, moderate mesh shift (>0-0.19); and grade IV, major mesh shift with recurrence (<0). Any recurrence was classified as a grade IV shift.

RESULTS

A total of 48% of patients had mesh shift (grade II = 23%; grade III = 10%; and grade IV = 17%). In 92% of the patients with mesh shift, the mesh migrated away from the port placement site, resulting in decreased mesh/fascial overlap. Patients in the four groups had similar demographics, comorbid conditions, hernia characteristics, operative technique, and outcomes (excluding recurrences, which were all grade IV by definition). Whereas differences in time to follow-up CT scan in the different grades were not statistically significant, there was a trend toward increasing shift with time (mean: grade I, 20 mo; grade II, 38 mo; grade III, 50 mo; and grade IV, 26 mo; P = 0.07). A total of 26 patients (33%) had multiple postoperative CT scans. With time, it appears that mesh tended to shift with time (grade I, 68%-46%; grade II, 12%-19%; grade III, 12%-8%, and grade 4, 8%-23%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh can shift from the ideal central placement after LVHR. Mesh tends to shift away from the operative side and recurrences tend to occur on the operative side. Mesh shift may be a precursor to hernia recurrence. Recurrence may be a two-step process, beginning first with intra-operative mesh shift followed by additional factors (such mesh contraction) that may accentuate the shift and lead to recurrence. Potential solutions include increasing mesh overlap (≥ 6 cm), performing transcutaneous closure of central defect, securing trans-fascial sutures before tacking, placing operative side tacks first, and consider placing contralateral ports to secure the mesh.

Investigation of abdomen surface deformation due to life excitation: implications for implant selection and orientation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia is a common medical problem. Statistically there are around 10% recurrences of the sickness. The authors' former investigation proved edges of the hernia orifice displacements to be one of the factors causing recurrence. Thus, experimental investigation of the abdomen surface deformation due to some normal activities of people is studied.

METHODS

Eight slim, healthy people were asked to extremely stretch their abdomens. Bending, stretching and expiration were considered. The deformations registration was made by two cameras located in front of the patient on both sides. Special calculation procedure was used in order to transform characteristic point displacements to strains of abdomen in different directions.

FINDINGS

The extreme strains, their localization and directions are identified. The study proves that the highest strains, bigger than 25% on average, appear in the upper part of the central vertical line of the abdomen and in lower sides in semi-vertical direction. The lowest strains, smaller than 7%, occur in a horizontal line situated low in the abdomen. For each patient similar zones of smaller or bigger strains are identified, however a wide discrepancy of the strain values obtained for different patients is stated. For example the strains in lower part in semi-vertical direction for one patient equals 9% and for another 134%!

INTERPRETATION

The acquired conclusions may be useful for surgeons in finding practical solutions to dilemmas concerning the choice of an implant (elastic or stiff) for a specific ventral hernia, its proper connection with fascia and orientation in the abdomen.

Is the outcome of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair affected by defect size? A prospective study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine if defect size after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is predictive of recurrence during the long-term follow-up evaluation.

METHODS

We performed a prospective clinical study on 310 patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional hernia repair to identify predictable risk factors for hernia recurrence. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used. The defect size was analyzed with curve receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The overall recurrence rate was 6% after an average follow-up period of 60 months. On univariate analysis of the defect size (categories: <10 cm, 10-12 cm, and >15 cm), obesity, previous repairs, hernia location, surgical time, hospital stay, morbidity, and recurrences were significantly different (P < .001). By multivariate analysis, only obesity and defect size were independent prognostic factors (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive value of defect size is shown. Patients with large defects have a higher risk of recurrence. Our study recommends reserving the laparoscopic technique for hernias not exceeding 10 cm in size, where it can be put to better use.

Long-Term Outcomes with Transfascial Sutures versus Tacks in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Review

Although most surgeons report using both transfascial sutures and laparoscopically placed tacks to secure prostheses in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, a significant minority have reported large series in which sutures were omitted. A systematic review of the available literature was conducted for large case series and controlled trials documenting long-term follow-up. Forty-three articles were identified, including 6015 patients whose prostheses were secured with transfascial sutures (with or without tacks), and 2450 patients receiving tacks or staples alone. The mean follow-up time reported was 30.1 months. No significant difference was found in rates of hernia recurrence, mesh removal, prolonged postoperative pain, patient body mass index, or hernia defect size between the two groups. The suture group did experience a significantly higher rate of surgical site infection. Although suture tensile strength is greater than that of tacks, and despite numerous anecdotal reports of hernia recurrence secondary to suture failure or omission, the existing literature does not show superiority of one mesh fixation technique over the other for recurrence, whereas infection rates increase when transfascial suture is used.

Predictors of recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is widely used to manage ventral hernias, but predictors of hernia recurrence have been poorly investigated. This retrospective study investigated the influence of common risk factors on hernia recurrence. Data from 146 consecutive, unselected patients who underwent LVHR between 2000 and 2006 were collected. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative parameters were analyzed to identify predictable risk factors for hernia recurrence. Both univariate and multivariate Cox's regression analysis were employed. The overall recurrence rate was 8% (12 patients) after an average follow-up of 45 months. On univariate analysis, smoking (P=0.01) and earlier repair (P<0.00) were significantly different in recurred patients. However, only earlier repair was an independent predictor of multivariate Cox's regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.085, 95% confidence interval: 0.020-0.355; P=0.001). LVHR is a safe technique to repair ventral hernias. However, smokers with earlier failed repair attempts have a higher risk of recurrence.

Functional cine MRI and transabdominal ultrasonography for the assessment of adhesions to implanted synthetic mesh 5-7 years after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has gained worldwide acceptance, due to its minimally invasive character, feasibility and low rate of complications. Animal experiments have shown marked adhesions to the intraperitoneal mesh (IPM), the clinical consequences being unclear. This study aimed to describe the extension of adhesions to the mesh, 5-7 years after LVHR, using two validated non-invasive radiologic methods.

METHODS

Real-time transabdominal ultrasonography (TAU) and cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was applied to 30 patients with prior LVHR and implantation of IPM (Intramesh W3, Cousin Biotech, France). The visceral slide was measured in nine predefined abdominal segments. Values <or=1 cm were defined as an area with adhesion.

RESULTS

The mean time between LVHR and TAU/cine MRI was 67 months (range, 58-80 months). We found adhesion to the mesh in 90% of the patients using TAU and 100% of the patients using cine MRI. In the latter, 65% were between the bowel and IPM.

CONCLUSIONS

LVHR is known to reduce recurrences and postoperative complications, while improving patient outcome. The intraperitoneal placement of the mesh has been shown to induce adhesions; the amount and extension in the clinical setting is unclear. The present study showed a marked proportion of adhesions to the mesh with an average surgery to scan time of 5.6 years, despite an anti-adhesive barrier on the visceral surface of the mesh. Together with existing data, this result increases the concern related to the long-term consequences of an IPM. As a consequence, a comprehensive and comparable test system for medical devices, i.e. IPM, is needed.

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model

PURPOSE

Current hernia literature shows that the use of mesh in ventral hernia repair reduces the risk of recurrence significantly. In laparoscopic repair, the mesh is placed intraperitoneally. Accordingly, the close contact between mesh and viscera involves a risk of adhesion formation. In this experimental study, we examined the degree of de novo adhesion formation over time to currently available meshes.

METHODS

Sixteen sheep each received laparoscopic placement of four (10 x 10 cm) meshes on intact peritoneum. Two different mesh materials (coated vs. non-coated) and two different fixation devices (absorbable/non-absorbable) were investigated. (Parietex Composite, DynaMesh IPOM, ProTack and AbsorbaTack). After 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, four animals, respectively, underwent a new laparoscopy to determine the extent of adhesions to the mesh.

RESULTS

Parietex Composite significantly reduced the formation of intraabdominal adhesions compared to DynaMesh IPOM. The mean extent of adhesions increases over time without reaching a steady state within the first 12 months after laparoscopic placement.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first long-term (18 months) experimental study on adhesion formation in sheep after laparoscopic placement of mesh and may serve as a template for future studies on meshes before marketing.

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias located on the abdominal borders: a retrospective critical review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and results of laparoscopic approach to repair incisional hernias of the abdominal borders, the weakest points of abdominal wall.

METHODS

Since 2002 through 2008 a total of 39 patients with fascial defects of the abdominal borders underwent laparoscopic repair. The defects were suprapubic (n=18), subxiphoidal (n=15), and lateral sided (n=6). The body mass index was >oe=30 Kg/m2 in 19 patients. The parietal defects was measured both externally and from within the peritoneal cavity and 56% of meshes were fixed only by tacks, especially in suprapubic site.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 161.8+/-25 minutes. There was 1 intraoperative complication, an intestinal injury repaired laparoscopically. Conversion was needed in 1 patient for massive adhesions. Postoperative early surgical complications were 7 (1 seroma). Morbidity in obese and nonobese patients showed no statistically relevant difference (P>0.05). There was no postoperative death. Mean hospital stay was 5.1+/-3 days. The mean follow-up was 37 months and recurrence was observed in 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The onlay laparoscopic approach for repair of incisional hernias of the abdominal borders can warrant good results. Obesity is not a contraindication to laparoscopic repair. Anyway, further experiences are necessary to confirm these results.

Long-term results of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the long-term complications and recurrences of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Very few studies evaluate objectively the long-term results of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

METHODS

Data for 200 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) in a university teaching hospital using a standardized procedure between January 1994 and December 2006 were collected prospectively. The median follow-up was 6 (range, 1-12) years.

RESULTS

The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open approach was 2.5% (205 initial patients). Mean operative time was 51 minutes; 63% of these patients were discharged the day of surgery. Mean hospital stay was 2.6 days. There was an overall postoperative complication rate of 15%. We had four small bowel injuries repaired laparoscopically, and one patient died as a result of a sepsis. Postoperative pain was limited, with a mean analgesics requirement of 6.8 (range, 0-30) days. During a mean follow-up of 60 (range, 12-144) months, the recurrence rate was 6.2%, which developed within 1 year of the operation and associated with body mass index >37, defect size >10 cm, and multiple Swiss-cheese defects (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

1) Intra-abdominal composite mesh is good tolerance. 2) The recurrence rate is low and within 1 year of the operation. 3) The long-term morbidity with LIHR is moderate. 4) The risk of intestinal injury is not predictable. 5) Reoperations can be performed with sufficient guarantee using laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair of incisional and ventral hernias

Incisional hernia is a relatively frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The use of mesh to repair incisional and ventral hernias results in lower recurrence rates compared with primary suture techniques. The laparoscopic approach may be associated with lower postoperative morbidity compared with open procedures. Long-term recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernias are not well defined. A prospective study of the initial experience of a standardized technique of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair carried out in a tertiary referral hospital was undertaken between January 2003 and February 2007. Laparoscopic hernia repair was attempted in 71 patients and was successful in 68 (conversion rate 4%). The mean age of the patients identified was 63.1 years (39 men and 31 women). Multiple hernial defects were identified in 38 patients (56%), and the mean overall size of the fascial defects was 166 cm(2). The mean mesh size used was 403 cm(2). The mean operative time was 121 minutes. There were six (9%) major complications in this series, but there were no deaths. Hernia recurrence was noted in four patients (6%) at a mean follow up of 20 months. Our preliminary experience indicates that laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair is technically feasible and has acceptable postoperative morbidity and low early recurrence rates.

Laparoscopic management of incisional hernias > or = 15 cm in diameter

BACKGROUND

Despite good results in terms of safety and minimal recurrence ensured by laparoscopy in the management of incisional hernias, the use of minimally invasive techniques for large incisional wall defects is still controversial.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2008 as many as 36 patients with abdominal wall defects > or = 15 cm were managed laparoscopically in our institution. The wall defects were > or = 20 cm in eight cases. The diameter of parietal defects was measured from within the peritoneal cavity. None had loss of domain. Body mass index (BMI) for 18 patients was > or = 30 kg/m(2).

RESULTS

The mean duration of operations was 195 +/- 28 min (range 75-540). One patient needed conversion for ileal injury and massive adhesions. Post-operative complications occurred in nine patients; there were six surgical complications. Morbidity in obese and non-obese patients was not statistically different (p > 0.05). There was no postoperative death. Mean hospital stay was 4.97 +/- 3.4 days (range 2-18). Mean follow up was 28 months (range 2-68) and only one hernia recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimum-access procedures can provide good results in the repair of giant incisional hernia. Obesity is not a contraindication to laparoscopic repair. Further studies are expected to confirm our promising results.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is an important complication of abdominal surgery. Its repair has progressed from a primary suture repair to various mesh repairs and laparoscopic repair. Laparoscopic mesh repair is a promising alternative, and in the absence of consensus, needs prospective randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and April 2005, 66 patients with incisional, primary ventral and recurrent hernias were randomized to receive either open retro-rectus mesh repair or laparoscopic mesh repair. These patients were followed up at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals thereafter for a mean of 12.17 months (open repair group) and 13.73 months (laparoscopic repair group).

RESULTS

Lower abdominal hernias after gynecologic operations constituted the majority of the hernias (approximately 50%) in both groups. There was no significant injury to viscera or vessel in either group and no conversions. The defect size was 42.12 cm in the open (group 1) and 65.66 cm2 in the laparoscopic group (group 2), and the prosthesis sizes were, respectively, 152.67 cm2 and 203.83 cm2. The hospital stay was 3.43 days in open group and 1.47 days in laparoscopic group (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the pain scores between the two groups. More wound-related infectious complications occurred in the open group (33%) than in the laparoscopic group (6%) (p = 0.013). There was one recurrence in the open repair group (3%) and two recurrences in laparoscopic group (6%) (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias is superior to open mesh repair in terms of significantly less blood loss, fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, and excellent cosmetic outcome.

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: Outcomes of 100 consecutive cases comprising 25 wall defects larger than 15 cm

BACKGROUND

Minimal access surgery for incisional hernia repair is still debated, especially for large and giant wall defects. This study was undertaken to analyze the results of the use of the laparoscopic technique in incisional hernias smaller and larger than 15 cm of diameter.

METHOD

From 2002 to 2007 a total of 100 patients with incisional hernia were operated on by laparoscopy and were included in this study. As much as 38 patients were obese, with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2). The mean follow-up span was 24 months (range = 2-58). The fascial defect was recurrent in 19 patients, in 13 after previous repair with mesh and in 6 after repair without mesh. The wall defect was larger than 15 cm in 25 patients and in 6 of them it was 20 cm or larger as measured from within the peritoneal cavity.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 152 +/- 25 min (range = 45-275), and for defects larger than 15 cm it was 205 +/- 101 min (range = 85-540). Two patients with massive adhesions needed conversion to open surgery, one after an intraoperative injury of an intestinal loop. Postoperative complications occurred in 23 patients; local complications were 10. Pulmonary embolism caused death in one obese patient. Morbidity and hospital stay were similar in obese and nonobese patients and the differences were not statistically relevant (p > 0.05). The outcomes in patients with wall defects larger than 15 cm showed no significant difference with outcomes of the remaining patients with smaller defects (p > 0.05). Recurrence occurred in three cases, and in one case local infection led to removal of the mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal access procedures can provide good results in the repair of incisional hernia, even when the diameter is larger than 15 cm. Obesity is not a contraindication to laparoscopic repair. Further studies are expected to confirm these promising results.

Minimally invasive ventral herniorrhaphy: an analysis of 6,266 published cases

BACKGROUND

Over 300,000 ventral abdominal wall hernias are repaired each year in the United States; many of these operations are done with a minimally invasive approach. Despite these numbers, there are few controlled data that evaluate the minimally invasive method of ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

A review of over 6,000 published cases of minimally invasive ventral herniorrhaphy was performed in order to determine major outcome statistics for this procedure.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 20 months. The operative mortality was 0.1%. The mean recurrence rate (weighted) was 2.7%, and the major complication rate (mostly bowel injury and infection) was 3%.

CONCLUSION

The results from published cases of minimally invasive ventral herniorrhaphy appear to be competitive with the historical results of open ventral herniorrhaphy. The major caveats of this review are that most of the data are (1) retrospective/uncontrolled and (2) obtained from specialized centers.

Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of ventral hernias has changed dramatically over the past decades by the introduction of laparoscopy and prosthetic biomaterials for reinforcement of the abdominal wall. There are many meshes available on the market for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), and new meshes are introduced regularly. Experimental and clinical documentation for safety and efficacy are, however, often not available for the clinician. The choice of mesh may therefore be difficult in clinical practice. We present a review of the current literature regarding safety measures such as adhesions, fistulas, and infections as well as the available data on pain, recurrence, mesh shrinkage, and seroma formation after LVHR.

METHODS

The literature was searched systematically using PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE for controlled studies, prospective descriptive series and retrospective case series.

RESULTS

The literature clearly points in the direction of very few mesh-related complications after LVHR. Experimental studies and theoretical considerations may argue for using a covered mesh, i.e., a composite mesh, or ePTFE for LVHR in humans, although it is important to stress that there are no human data at the moment to support this. Concerns about using pure polypropylene mesh in the intraperitoneal position may be re-evaluated with the experience of lightweight macropore meshes from open surgery in mind. There is a tendency towards greater shrinkage in ePTFE-based meshes but no differences seems to exist between different mesh materials in other relevant outcome parameters from clinical series.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature cannot give general recommendations for choice of mesh based on randomized controlled trials. The final choice of mesh for LVHR will therefore typically be based on surgeons' preference and cost while we await further data from randomized controlled clinical trials.

[Laparoscopic reconstruction of abdominal wall hernias]

The widespread use of tension free surgical techniques and the modern, tissue-friendly surgical meshes have led to the development of new surgical techniques. The increasing importance of minimal invasive surgery became apparent in abdominal wall reconstructions, too, and their use has been justified by literature data. This procedure combines the advantages of minimal invasive surgery with tension free technique. The authors discuss 102 patients operated with abdominal wall hernias using a laparoscopic technique. There were 978 abdominal wall hernia operations in our department between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2006, of which 102 cases were done laparoscopically. The average size of the abdominal wall defects was 62 square cm (minimum size: 12, maximum size: 160). The average size of the implanted surgical mesh was 300 square cm (min size: 150, max size: 750). Operating time was between 30 and 180 minutes. (The average time was exactly 70 minutes.) The hospital stay was between 1 to 7 days (4 days on average). Two recurrences were observed during the follow-up so far. The follow-up was from 2 to 96 months, with an average of 18 months. The laparoscopic technique significantly decreased the complication and recurrence rate, and shortened hospital stay compared to open surgery. Furthermore, laparoscopic technique improves aesthetic outcome, too. In addition, the authors found that small, hidden incisional hernia orifices could be explored and closed more easily with laparoscopic hernia repair.

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: are transfascial sutures necessary? A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias is rapidly becoming more commonplace in the armamentarium of general surgeons. Its utility and low recurrence rates make it a very attractive option. As with all newer procedures, controversies exist with this approach. One significant aspect is the method of fixation for the biomaterial. Most authors add the use of transfascial sutures. Others, in the minority, do not.

METHODS

A literature search using Medline and PubMed was used to evaluate the best practice for fixation in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair.

RESULTS

This review of the current literature (including comparative series) seems to show that the recurrence rate is approximately 4% with the use of sutures and 1.8% without their use. However, these data do not show that there is tremendous variation in the method and manner of placing transfascial sutures or that long-term follow-up evaluation is inadequate in most series. No firm conclusions can be drawn about whether it is detrimental to omit the use of transfascial sutures.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this review, a larger overlap of the prosthesis (5 vs 3 cm) is necessary if sutures are not used. If sutures are used, they should be placed no more than 5 cm apart. Prospective randomized trials with and without of transfascial sutures using a consistent biomaterial are necessary to settle this issue.

Assessment of usefulness exhibited by different tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is becoming a popular technique with good results and fast postoperative recovery. The mesh is placed directly under the peritoneum and anchored with transabdominal sutures and tacks. However, the ideal size of the mesh covering the hernia orifice is know, nor the ideal type or amount of tacks has to be described.

METHODS

To assess the forces acting on a single tack, a mathematical model of the ventral hernia was created. The force was described in reference to the surface of the hernia orifice and the pressure in the abdominal cavity. The following different types of mesh were examined in vitro: Proceed (knitted mesh), Dual Mesh (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [ePTFE] flat mesh), and Shelhigh (biologic flat mesh). The following different tacks also were examined: Protac, Anchor, and EMS. A pig model was used to measure the forces needed to destroy the connection between mesh and tissue and to describe the place of destruction (mesh, tissue, or tack) and the force needed.

RESULTS

The force acting on a single tack proportionally depends on the surface of the hernia orifice and the pressure in the abdominal cavity. The force needed to disconnect the tissue and mesh reached 8.97 +/- 0.11 N for ProTac, 2.67 +/- 0.22 N for Anchor, and 6.67 +/- 1.32 N for EMS. These values do not allow the mesh to be held in the right position when the orifice exceeds 10 cm for Protac and EMS. The disconnection of the EMS and Protac junction damages the tissue. Anchor tacks are insufficient to hold the mesh and stay in the tissue

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of small hernias (diameter<10 cm) EMS or ProTac used alone are not enough to hold the mesh. Anchor is not recommended alone in any hernia.

Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities

Surgeons often encounter the challenge of treating acquired abdominal wall defects following abdominal surgery. The current standard of practice is to repair most defects using permanent synthetic mesh material. Mesh augments the strength of the weakened abdominal wall fascia and enables the hernia repair to be performed in a tension-free manner. However, there is a risk of acute and/or chronic infection, fistula formation and chronic abdominal wall pain with the use of permanent mesh materials, which can lead to more complex operations. As a means to avoid such problems, surgeons are turning increasingly to the use of xenogenic and allogenic materials for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Their rapid evolution and introduction into the clinical operating room is leading to a new era in abdominal wall reconstruction. There are promising, albeit limited, clinical data with short-term follow-up for only a few of the many biological tissue grafts that are being promoted currently for the repair of abdominal hernias. Additional clinical studies are required to better understand the long-term efficacy and limitations of these materials.

Decision analysis model of incisional hernia after open abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

The incidence rate of incisional hernias after open surgery has been reported to be higher than that of port site hernias after laparoscopic surgery. No studies have compared the costs for the health care system in treating those two types of hernia.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to obtain the baseline data, and a decision analysis model was created to simulate the occurrence and recurrence of incisional and port site hernias.

RESULTS

The overall risk of having incisional hernias was eight-times higher than that of having port site hernias (7.4% vs 0.9%). A cost savings of 93 British Pound per patient can be generated for the health care system in the UK. Similar results were obtained for Germany, Italy and France.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional treatment costs for incisional hernia should be taken into account when the costs of a surgery performed by open approach are compared with by laparoscopy.

Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The incidence of trocar site hernia (TSH) after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is reported to be low. The present study investigates the associated risk factors, with a view to preventing this complication.

METHODS

A retrospective study was made of the incidence of TSH in a personal series of LVHR, recording anthropometric and clinical data on the patients. Risk factors were assessed by bivariate and multivariate analyses. The patients were subjected to clinical and telephone follow-up.

RESULTS

In a series of 27 LVHR, the incidence of TSH was 22% (6 patients). The use of meshes larger than 10 x 15 cm for LVHR was the only TSH risk factor to reach statistical significance. Female gender and diabetes showed a higher incidence in the TSH group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of large meshes may be a risk factor for TSH. We believe this to be due to dilatation of the trocar orifice during introduction of the mesh, and also to postoperative retraction of the mesh.

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a review of the literature

Incisional hernia is a common long-term complication of abdominal surgery. Historically the open repair with or without mesh was the mainstay of treatment. However, many recently published laparoscopic repair studies have challenged surgeons to re-evaluate which technique provides the best short and long-term outcomes. A Medline search of all English-language literature was performed using the keywords 'incisional', 'ventral', 'hernia', 'laparoscopic', and 'open'. Further references were obtained by cross-referencing the bibliography in each paper. Current evidence suggests that the laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is the optimal surgical treatment. A laparoscopic repair appears to shorten hospital stay, decrease perioperative complication rates, and decrease recurrence rates. However, there is no randomized trial utilizing a standardized complication grading system making it difficult to draw a definitive conclusion as to which repair is best.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with the Goretex Dualmesh: long-term results and review of the literature

Since 1993 laparoscopy has become a popular technique of repair of ventral hernias. The authors review the long-term results of a systematic laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias and discuss the current problems compared to open repair. Between 1997 and 2003, 146 patients had a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using an intraperitoneal Goretex Dualmesh with a 3-5-cm mesh overlap secured with a combination of nonabsorbable sutures and staples. A total of 155 attempts of laparoscopic repair was performed with four conversions. The 151 laparoscopic operations were completed in 105.8 min with a mesh implant being of 341 cm(2). There were two postoperative deaths and two patients had to be reoperated on. Mesh infection was diagnosed in two cases. Mean length of stay was 4.9 days. During a follow- up of 26.6 months eight patients (5.8%) developed a recurrence. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is a reproducible technique. Most of the comparative studies have shown an overall lower rate of complications after laparoscopic repair compared to open but with a 2-4% risk of bowel injury. The two other benefits of the laparoscopy are reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. The recurrence rate is usually between 2 and 7% but no difference has been found compared to open repair. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using the Goretex Dualmesh is a reliable operation with a low rate of conversion to open. Despite the risk of serious bowel injury, laparoscopy achieves as good results as the mesh open repair on the long term with the benefit of a decreased complication rate and a shorter hospital stay.