Herniography: analysis of its role and limitations

Imaging modalities for inguinal hernia diagnosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to determine which diagnostic modality [Computerized Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), or ultrasound (US)] is more precise in terms of sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing inguinal hernia and sub-type of inguinal hernia (direct or indirect).

METHODS

This systematic review was reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), and a search for relevant articles was undertaken in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were original studies that preoperatively diagnosed patients suspected of inguinal hernia by either CT, MRI, or US and compared diagnostic findings with operative findings or definitive follow-up. The main outcomes were the diagnostic certainty of inguinal hernia and type of hernia by sensitivity and specificity. All eligible studies were searched in the Retraction Watch database to ensure that all included studies were suitable for inclusion.

RESULTS

Bubble charts depicting the size of each patient cohort and percentual range for both sensitivity and specificity showed that US was better than CT and MRI in diagnosing inguinal hernia. Bubble charts for US and CT depicted high values within the studies that reported sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing type of hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that US had the highest sensitivity and specificity. However, it must be taken into consideration that performance is highly dependent on the operator's level of expertise. Based on this systematic review, ultrasound may be the preferred imaging modality when physical examination is inconclusive, given that local expertise in performing US examination for hernia disease is adequate.

Overuse of Previsit Ultrasound in Patients Referred for Treatment of Inguinal Hernias

Inguinal ultrasound (US) has a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of inguinal hernias but is often performed unnecessarily, adding cost and time to treatment. The aim of our study was to assess the rate and necessity of US before clinical examination by a hernia surgeon. Medical records of patients referred for an inguinal hernia from April through July 2017 were reviewed. These cases were analyzed for patient demographics, physical examination (PE) findings, previsit imaging, health-care system of surgeon, and case outcome. Twenty-nine per cent of patients had an inguinal US before visiting a surgeon. Sixty-three per cent of patients who underwent an US had a palpable hernia on PE, and 76 per cent had a positive PE by the surgeon. Patients without a hernia on referring provider's PE underwent US 59 per cent of the time. Inguinal USs are being ordered unnecessarily by referring providers. Physical examination by referring providers and surgeons should be the primary tool for diagnosis of an inguinal hernia.

Laparoscopic diagnosis and management of a novel inguino-pelvic hernia

Inguinal hernias can typically be diagnosed with a proper history and thorough physical exam. However, patients with chronic groin pain, normal physical exam and no radiologic findings present a diagnostic/therapeutic dilemma [1]. We present a case of a female patient with obscure chronic groin pain. Upon laparoscopic exploration, she was found to have a hernia in a previously non-described location. Reduction of a chronically incarcerated preperitoneal fat and subsequent repair using traditional transabdominal preperitoneal repair resulted in a complete resolution of her pain.

Herniography influences the management of patients with suspected occult herniae and patient factors can predict outcome

PURPOSE

Patients with groin pain and no palpable hernia are a diagnostic challenge for the surgeon. It is recognised that some patients will have an occult hernia and benefit from surgical repair. Herniography remains popular in some units, as it has a high diagnostic sensitivity.

METHODS

Presenting symptoms and signs were recorded, along with herniogram findings, management plan and outcome for all patients undergoing herniography between July 2004 and December 2009. Demographic factors and individual symptoms and signs were analysed for their ability to predict a positive herniogram.

RESULTS

There were a total of 72 positive and 132 negative herniograms. For positive herniograms, only 41 (59%) patients underwent surgery and six (16%) patients were found not to have a hernia. The most common reasons for not proceeding to surgery were herniogram findings thought to be insignificant and the herniogram being positive on the contralateral side. For negative herniograms, despite a negative herniogram, four (3%) patients underwent surgery and a hernia was confirmed in two patients. Regarding predictive symptoms and signs, history of a groin lump and greater patient age were significantly associated with a positive herniogram and a confirmed hernia at surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

After a positive herniogram, less than two-thirds of patients undergo surgery. The majority have improved symptoms on review and we, therefore, suggest a period of watchful waiting prior to herniography. Older patients and a history of a groin lump are associated with a positive herniogram and confirmed hernia at surgery, and could be used to select patients for laparoscopic exploration.