Inguinal hernia repair in women: is the laparoscopic approach superior?

Groin Hernia in Females Routinely Treated by Totally Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Approach

Background and Objectives:

There is a dearth of studies on laparoscopic treatment of female groin hernia. Our study assessed the outcome of groin hernia repair in females employing the totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic (TEP) access.

Methods:

Data of all females who were subjected to laparoscopic groin herniorrhaphy, from August 1998 to February 2020 were retrospectively obtained. Groin hernia repair was routinely started with TEP access.

Results:

A total of 2,399 patients who underwent laparoscopic groin herniorrhaphy, 254 (10.6%), were females. Most females (n = 191; 75.2%) had single hernia and the remaining (n = 63; 24.8%) had bilateral hernias, making a total of 317 hernias operated. Indirect inguinal hernia was the most common hernia type (72.5%), followed by femoral hernia (17.4%) and direct hernia (10.1%). Prior lower abdominal operations were recorded in 97 (38.2%) patients. Conversion to a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal procedure was performed due to technical difficulties to dissect the preperitoneal space in 17 patients (6.7%) and to open procedure in only one patient (0.4%) with incarcerated femoral hernia in whom an incidental perforation of the small bowel occurred. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 12 (4.7%) and 15 (5.9%) patients, respectively. There was no mortality. Most patients (n = 221; 87%) were discharged on the same day of the operation. Hernia recurrence was diagnosed in 6 patients (2.4%).

Conclusion:

It is concluded that females with groin hernia may be successfully treated with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic access, with low conversion and complication rates.

Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Groin Hernia Repair in Females: Comparison of Outcomes Between Preservation or Division of the Uterine Round Ligament

Background: Laparoscopic repair has been recommended as the method-of-choice of groin hernia repair among women. Whether the round ligament of uterus should be divided to facilitate mesh placement remains controversial. This study aims to review the outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) groin hernia repair in women and to evaluate the impact of division of round ligament. Methods: Consecutive female patients with inguinal or femoral hernias who underwent elective laparoscopic TEP repair at a single institution from 2006 to 2017 were included for retrospective analysis. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain, genital prolapse, and recurrence. Outcomes of patients who had the round ligament divided were further compared with those with round ligament preserved and multivariable adjusted analysis was performed. Results: Sixty-eight patients with a total of 77 TEP repairs were included in the 12-year study period. The mean age was 45 ± 16 years old. Incidental femoral hernia was identified in 4 patients (5.9%). There was 1 (1.3%) recurrence upon mean follow-up of 42.9 ± 37.3 months. The round ligament was divided in 67.5% of patients, and upon multivariable adjusted analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes in terms of chronic pain (odds ratio [OR] = 2.210, P = .357), paresthesia (OR = 0.241, P = .149), and genital prolapse (OR = 0.327, P = .415) when compared with patients with preserved round ligament. Conclusion: Laparoscopic groin hernia repair in women is associated with low recurrence. Division of round ligament intraoperatively facilitates mesh placement and has minimal impact on clinical outcomes.

Gender discrimination in endoscopic groin hernia repair. Minimal invasive groin hernia repair is offered less often to female patients compared to male patients

BACKGROUND

Groin hernia repair constitutes a very common procedure in general surgery. Minimal invasive closure of groin hernia has evolved to become the standard means of closure. However, there seems to be a gender-associated discrimination with regard to endoscopic groin hernia repair. We investigated the rate of endoscopic closure in female patients undergoing groin hernia closure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the data of patients undergoing elective groin hernia repair within a four-year period from 2013 to 2016 was performed. The rate of endoscopic hernia repair was calculated for both genders.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and forty-six patients including 94 females and 752 males were included for analysis. The female group was significantly older compared to the male group (68.0 vs. 61.0 yrs, P=0.02). The rate of endoscopic groin hernia repair was significantly lower in the female group compared to in the male cohort (30% vs. 60%, P=0.001). The overall duration of surgery was 74.0min in the female cohort and 93.0min in the male group, P=0.001. However, there was no statistically significant difference amongst both groups with regard to the duration of surgery for endoscopic repair: 78.0min in the female group and 89.0min in the male group, P=0.67.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this retrospective collective suggests that, there might be some degree of sex discrimination with regard to endoscopic groin hernia repair in favor of the male population.

Groin Hernias in Women-A Review of the Literature

Background: To date, there are few studies and no systematic reviews focusing specifically on groin hernia in women. Most of the existing knowledge comes from registry data. Objective: This present review now reports on such findings as are available on groin hernia in women. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the available literature was performed in September 2018 using Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. For the present analysis 80 publications were identified. Results: The lifetime risk of developing a groin hernia in women is 3-5.8%. The proportion of women in the overall collective of operated groin hernias is 8.0-11.5%. In women, the proportion of femoral hernias is 16.7-37%. Risk factors for development of a groin hernia in women of high age and with a positive family history. A groin hernia during pregnancy should not be operated on. The rate of emergency procedures in women, at 14.5-17.0%, is 3 to 4-fold higher than in men and at 40.6% is even higher for femoral hernia. Therefore, watchful waiting is not indicated in women. During surgical repair of groin hernia in females the presence of a femoral hernia should always be excluded and if detected should be repaired using a laparo-endoscopic or open preperitoneal mesh technique. A higher rate of chronic postoperative inguinal pain must be expected in females. Conclusion: Special characteristics must be taken into account for repair of groin hernia in women.

Recurrence Rates After Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Women: A Systematic Review

Importance

To our knowledge, a systematic review has not yet been performed that specifically addresses the management of inguinal hernia in women. Recurrence after repair of inguinal hernia is not unusual in women and may be a previously undiagnosed femoral hernia, which is rarely seen in men.

Objective

To investigate rates and types of recurrences in women who had undergone repair of primary inguinal hernia.

Evidence Review

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases were searched in September 2017 for studies reporting recurrences after repair of primary inguinal hernia in women. Crude rates of recurrence (number of recurrences/number of women) were calculated after open and laparoscopic repairs, and the type of recurrent hernia was registered, if noted in the studies. This review is reported according to the PRISMA guideline.

Findings

A total of 55 studies were included, comprising 43 870 women (mean age, 42-69 years; median age, 57 years). Five studies were randomized clinical trials, 14 were prospective cohort studies, 7 were prospective database studies, and 29 were retrospective cohort studies. Twenty studies reported recurrence after laparoscopic repair, with a crude recurrence rate of 1.2% (27 of 2257) (range, 0%-5%) and a median follow-up of 24 months. Thirty-seven studies reported open repair, with a crude recurrence rate of 2.4% (818 of 33 971) (range, 0%-12.5%) and a median follow-up of 36 months. The crude recurrence rate in randomized clinical trials and prospective studies was 1.2% (18 of 1525) after laparoscopic repair compared with 4.9% (490 of 10 058) after open repair. The recurrent inguinal hernia was a femoral hernia in 203 of 496 patients (40.9%) after open repair, compared with 0% of patients after laparoscopic repair. Recurrence rates were similar when open mesh vs nonmesh techniques were used.

Conclusions and Relevance

Recurrence rates after repair of primary inguinal hernia in women are lower after laparoscopic repair compared with open repair. Intraoperative findings during repair of recurrent inguinal hernia are often femoral hernias in women.

Predictors of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is among the most common general surgery procedures. Multiple studies have examined costs and benefits of laparoscopic approach versus open repair. This study aimed to identify patient, surgeon, and hospital demographic predictors of laparoscopic versus open IHR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 342,814 IHRs (241,669 open; 101,145 laparoscopic) performed in adults (age ≥ 18) from 2010 to 2015 using the Premier Hospital Database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio of an IHR being laparoscopic versus open with respect to several demographic variables.

RESULTS

The odds of an IHR being laparoscopic increased from 2010 to 2015. A laparoscopic procedure was more likely in patients who were < age 65 (OR 1.29, CI 1.24-1.31, p < 0.0001), male (OR 1.31, CI 1.27-1.34, p < 0.0001), privately insured (OR 1.36, CI 1.33-1.40, p < 0.0001), and neither white, black, nor Hispanic (OR 1.11, CI 1.09-1.14, p < 0.0001). The likelihood of a procedure being laparoscopic decreased 13% with each one-unit increase in Charlson comorbidity index value (OR 0.88, CI 0.87-0.89, p < 0.0001). Surgeons were more likely to perform a laparoscopic procedure if they had larger annual IHR caseloads (≥ 45/year; OR 1.57, CI 1.53-1.60, p < 0.0001), and operated at large hospitals (> 500 beds; OR 1.36, CI 1.33-1.39, p < 0.0001) in New England (OR 2.38, CI 2.29-2.47, p < 0.0001). Non-predictors of a laparoscopic procedure included urban/rural hospital location (OR 1.02, CI 0.10-1.05, p = 0.06) and hospital teaching status (OR 1.01, CI 0.99-1.03, p = 0.2084).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of laparoscopic IHR is increasing. Patient age, gender, race, and insurance type, as well as surgeon annual volume, hospital size, and hospital region were predictors of a laparoscopic procedure. Further studies are needed to explain and remedy underlying differences impacting these predictors.

Groin hernia repair in women - A nationwide register study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate reoperation for recurrence in men and women with respect to method of repair, hernia anatomy and year of operation.

METHOD

Since 1992, groin hernia repairs performed in Sweden are prospectively registered in the Swedish Hernia Register, (SHR). Reoperations are noted, regardless of where the reoperation is performed. Risk of reoperation for recurrence is calculated for men and women with respect of method of repair, hernia anatomy and year of operation.

RESULTS

Out of 221 108 eligible operations registered between 1992-2013, 17 545 (8%) were performed on women. The risk of being operated for recurrence after laparoscopic surgery was lowered in women, RR 0,4(95%CI 0.3-0.7) and increased in men, RR 2.3(95% CI 2.0-2.7), compared to the Lichtenstein technique.

DISCUSSION

The reoperation for recurrence rate differed significantly between men and women. As regards the technique used for primary repair, laparoscopic groin hernia repair lowered the risk of reoperation for recurrence in women whereas it doubled the risk in men.

Gender disparities in the utilization of laparoscopic groin hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Clinical treatment guidelines have suggested that laparoscopic hernia repair should be the preferred approach in both men and women with bilateral or recurrent elective groin hernias. Anecdotal evidence suggests, however, that women are less likely to undergo a laparoscopic repair than men, and therefore, we aimed to delineate if these disparities persisted after controlling for patient factors and comorbidities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data were abstracted for all elective groin hernia repairs between 2005 and 2014. Univariate analysis was used to compare rates of laparoscopic surgery between men and women. Multivariable analysis was performed, controlling for patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and year of surgery.

RESULTS

Over the 10-y period, 141,490 patients underwent elective groin hernia repair, of which 13,325 were women (9.4%). The rate of general anesthesia utilization was high in both men (81.3%) and women (77.2%) with 75.1% of open repairs being performed under general anesthesia. Overall, 20.2% of women underwent laparoscopic repair compared with 28.0% of men (P < 0.01). Women tended to be older, had a lesser body mass index, and slightly greater American Anesthesia Association (all P < 0.05). On multivariable regression, women had decreased odds of undergoing a laparoscopic approach compared with men (odds ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.73, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In the elective setting, women were less likely to undergo laparoscopic repair of groin hernias than men. Although we are unable to ascertain underlying causes for these gender disparities, these data suggest that there remains a disparity in the management of groin hernias in women.