Abdominal wall hernia and pregnancy: a systematic review

A Case of Painful Growing Abdominal Wall Mass during Pregnancy Requiring Resection in the Second Trimester

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a rare and locally aggressive neoplasm. We present a case of a 28-year-old previously healthy multigravida who noticed a lump in her abdomen near the umbilicus two months before becoming pregnant. It underwent rapid growth during pregnancy, causing pain and discomfort. Targeted ultrasound of the area showed an irregular mass measuring 0.9 × 1.7 × 1.4 cm. The origin of the mass was unclear, suggesting a connection with the intra-abdominal contents. An MRI done three weeks later revealed a subcutaneous ovoid mass measuring 3.0 × 2.3 × 3.0 cm, which was significantly larger. Due to pain and rapid growth, surgical resection was done at 25 weeks of pregnancy. Histopathological examination revealed a desmoid tumor. The patient had an uneventful recovery and term vaginal delivery without complications. Hence, our case serves as evidence that DF tumors can be surgically managed during pregnancy with minimal to no complications.

Successful management of strangulated incisional hernia in pregnancy - A case report

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal hernias, including incisional hernias, can occur due to weakness in the abdominal wall. Incisional hernias commonly occur following surgical incisions, and factors such as poor closure technique and patient-related factors can contribute to their development.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case, the patient was presented with a painful, irreducible lump over a previous laparotomy scar, along with bowel obstruction symptoms. The diagnosis was supported by ultrasound findings showing obstructed bowel loop in the hernial sac. Emergency open surgical reduction and mesh repair were performed to treat the strangulated hernia and ensure the mother and fetus's safety. The patient had an uneventful postoperative period and was discharged after three days.

DISCUSSION

Incisional hernias can be diagnosed through clinical evaluation, and imaging studies may be necessary in complex cases. However, imaging techniques such as X-rays and Computed Tomography scans are limited in pregnant women due to the radiation risks. Ultrasonography (USS) is preferred in pregnant women for its safety and non-invasiveness, although it may have reduced sensitivity in obese patients. Complicated hernias should be treated with emergency surgical repair, while elective surgery can be considered for asymptomatic or non-complicated hernias. Laparoscopic surgery offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays and fewer complications. Mesh repair reduces the recurrence risk in subsequent pregnancies (relate the discussion with the case).

CONCLUSION

Overall, surgical management of hernias in pregnancy requires careful consideration of individual circumstances and the use of appropriate techniques to ensure the safety of both the mother and fetus.

Ventral hernia repair and mesh use in females of childbearing age

BACKGROUND

A substantial knowledge gap exists in understanding sex as a biological variable for abdominal wall hernia repair, which also extends to hernia repair practices in females of childbearing age. We sought to determine the incidence of mesh repairs in females of childbearing age and to characterize factors associated with mesh use.

METHODS

Using a statewide hernia-specific data registry, we conducted a retrospective study identifying females of childbearing age, defined as 18-44 per CDC guidelines, who underwent clean ventral hernia repair between January 2020 and Dec 2021. The primary outcome was mesh use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with mesh use. To further delineate whether childbearing status may affect decision to use mesh, we also examined mesh practice stratified by age, comparing women 18 to 44 to those 45 and older.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and thirty-six females of childbearing age underwent ventral hernia repair with a mean age of 34.8 (6.2) years. Mesh was used in 547 (65.4%) patients. Mesh use was significantly associated with minimally invasive approach [aOR 29.46 (95% CI 16.30-53.25)], greater hernia width [aOR 1.50 (95% CI 1.20-1.88)], and greater BMI [aOR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.08)]. Age was not significantly associated with mesh use [aOR 1.02 (95% CI 0.99-1.05)]. Compared to 1,461 female patients older than 44 years old, there was no significant association between childbearing age and mesh use [aOR 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.04)].

CONCLUSIONS

Most females of childbearing age had mesh placed during ventral and incisional hernia repair, which was largely associated with hernia size, BMI, and a minimally invasive surgical approach. Neither chronologic patient age nor being of childbearing age were associated with mesh use. Insofar as existing evidence suggests that childbearing status is an important factor in deciding whether to use mesh, these findings suggest that real-world practice may not reflect that evidence.

Mechanical properties of warp-knitted hernia repair mesh with various boundary conditions

In this paper, two most representative hernia repair meshes were prepared with 0.15 mm polypropylene monofilaments via warp knitting technology, and their mechanical properties were tested in various aspects. Meanwhile, a focused investigation of the boundary conditions between the sutures and the mesh was simulated in several directions innovatively. The results revealed that the hernia repair mesh with different structures has different mechanical properties, and the mechanical properties of standard hernia repair mesh were superior to that of lightweight hernia repair mesh. In order to reduce foreign body sensation and postoperative adverse reactions significantly, the lightweight hernia repair mesh may be preferred. At the same time, the mesh should be placed in the proper direction to comply with the anisotropy of abdominal wall during operation. The area where the hernia mesh is in contact with the sutures was vulnerable to damage. The curved or wrinkled area of the hernia repair mesh increases with the increase of load, which may lead to poor tissue growth, a strong inflammatory response, and even the recurrence of the hernia. Therefore, the hernia repair meshes with different structures may require unique suture techniques. And they also should be further treated prior to implantation. This study provides a theoretical basis for development, utilization and improvement of meshes. Further research will focus on the biomechanical properties of the mesh after implantation in vivo studies.

How to Treat Hernias in Pregnant Women?

A hernia is a common surgical problem. Although hernias during pregnancy are uncommon, they can be challenging for both the surgeon and the patient if present. To date, there is no consensus in the medical community regarding the elective repair of hernias in pregnant women. The debate mainly concerns three areas: the timing, the approach, and the surgical technique. This study aims to offer a clear pathway in this field based on the best available data. In this study, we collected reviews written in English and published in PubMed from 2010 to 2020 (the exception being three articles that were published before 2010, which we retained since they contained relevant information). We used regular and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords. Two of the authors screened the collected studies to select the best articles that would fit our inclusion criteria for the review. The articles considered for this review can be classified into retrospective studies, case reports, and reviews. No randomized controlled trials were found. The lack of an agreement about the treatment of ventral hernias in fertile women makes the decision to treat and the process challenging. The treatment significantly depends on two factors: the symptoms and the pregnancy status at diagnosis. If the hernia is incarcerated or strangulated at presentation, an emergency repair is obligatory. If the hernia is symptomatic, but not complicated, elective surgery should be offered. The timing of repair will depend on whether the patient is already pregnant or non-pregnant. In pregnant patients, if the hernia is small and asymptomatic, it may be better to delay the surgery until after delivery or after the last pregnancy. If the hernia is symptomatic and seems to affect the patient's quality of life, it may be better to postpone the repair until the second trimester or after delivery if complications do not occur. Internal herniation (IH) should be suspected as a cause of the abdominal pain in pregnant women who have undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). In pre-pregnancy patients, if the hernia is large and symptomatic, it may be better to do an elective repair and then wait for one or two years before the next pregnancy. However, if the hernia is small or minimally symptomatic, it may be better to hold the repair until after delivery or after the last pregnancy. Pregnancy may be considered a significant risk factor for hernia recurrence. The laparoscopic mesh repair should be offered whenever possible, whereas the open approach may be preferred in complicated cases. The suture repair may be suitable for both small hernias and in cases of gross contamination.

EHS and AHS guidelines for treatment of primary ventral hernias in rare locations or special circumstances

Background

Rare locations of hernias, as well as primary ventral hernias under certain circumstances (cirrhosis, dialysis, rectus diastasis, subsequent pregnancy), might be technically challenging. The aim was to identify situations where the treatment strategy might deviate from routine management.

Methods

The guideline group consisted of surgeons from the European and Americas Hernia Societies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used in formulating the recommendations. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) critical appraisal checklists were used to evaluate the quality of full‐text papers. A systematic literature search was performed on 1 May 2018 and updated 1 February 2019. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was followed.

Results

Literature was limited in quantity and quality. A majority of the recommendations were graded as weak, based on low quality of evidence. In patients with cirrhosis or on dialysis, a preperitoneal mesh repair is suggested. Subsequent pregnancy is a risk factor for recurrence. Repair should be postponed until after the last pregnancy. For patients with a concomitant rectus diastasis or those with a Spigelian or lumbar hernia, no recommendation could be made for treatment strategy owing to lack of evidence.

Conclusion

This is the first European and American guideline on the treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias in patients with special conditions, including Spigelian and lumbar hernias. All recommendations were weak owing to a lack of evidence. Further studies are needed on patients with rectus diastasis, Spigelian and lumbar hernias.

Risk factors for repeat hernia repair in women of childbearing age

PURPOSE

Herniorrhaphy is a source of substantial cost and morbidity. Although women are a substantial proportion of patients seeking repair, gender-specific data, including the influence of childbirth on hernia recurrence, are lacking. Our objective was to estimate the rate and identify risk factors for repeat herniorrhaphy in reproductive-aged women.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of women who underwent herniorrhaphy during June 2000-December 2014 in the United States. Women aged 18-50 who underwent umbilical, incisional/ventral, or inguinal/femoral herniorrhaphy in the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan^® Commercial Claims and Encounters database were included. Women without a hernia diagnosis or multiple/concurrent index herniorrhaphy types were excluded. Primary outcome of interest was second herniorrhaphy.

RESULTS

Of 123,674 women, 13% had a second herniorrhaphy within 10 years; increasing age, comorbidities, childbirth, smoking, obesity, and inpatient procedure were independently associated with increased risk. Cesarean delivery before umbilical herniorrhaphy (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.34, 1.92) and both vaginal (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.98, 3.34) and cesarean delivery (HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.25, 3.87) after umbilical herniorrhaphy were associated with increased risk of second herniorrhaphy. Both vaginal (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13, 2.43) and cesarean delivery (HR 2.72, 95% CI 2.09, 3.53) after incisional/ventral herniorrhaphy and vaginal delivery after inguinal/femoral herniorrhaphy (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22, 2.51) were associated with increased risk of second herniorrhaphy.

CONCLUSIONS

Among reproductive-aged women, childbirth, increasing age, comorbidities, smoking, and obesity increase risk of subsequent herniorrhaphy. Risk of second herniorrhaphy is higher with cesarean delivery compared to vaginal delivery, and higher for delivery occurring after initial hernia repair compared to before.

Incisional hernia repair in women of childbearing age: A nationwide propensity-score matched study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although incisional hernia repair in women of childbearing age is not rare, hernia disease in this group of patients is sparsely documented. The aim of this study was to examine long-term clinical results after incisional hernia repair in women of childbearing age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This nationwide cohort study examined incisional hernia repair from 2007 to 2013 in women of childbearing age, registered prospectively in the Danish Ventral Hernia Database. All women with a subsequent pregnancy were included, and a 1:3 propensity-score matched group of women with an incisional hernia repair without a subsequent pregnancy. A prospective follow-up was conducted, including a validated questionnaire. The primary outcome was recurrence, and the secondary outcome was chronic pain from the operated site.

RESULTS

In total, 124 (70.5%) women responded, 47 and 77 women with and without a subsequent pregnancy, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 41.0% (95% confidence interval 32.0%-49.9%). After adjustment for potential confounders, subsequent pregnancy was independently associated with recurrence (hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.29, p = 0.044). Twenty-six (21.0%) women reported chronic pain (moderate, n = 21; severe, n = 5) with no difference between women with and without a subsequent pregnancy. Hernia recurrence, higher body mass index, and smoking were associated with chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy following incisional hernia repair was associated with an increased risk of recurrence, but not with chronic pain.

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology.

METHODS

Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS

All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.

Ventral hernia recurrence in women of childbearing age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus agreement on the optimal management strategy for ventral hernia in women of childbearing age. The theoretical increased risk of ventral hernia recurrence can impact management strategies. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to report the ventral hernia recurrence rate in women of childbearing age who underwent hernia repair prior to their pregnancy and propose a management algorithm.

METHODS

We systematically searched multiple databases including MEDLNE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library sources from inception to August, 2017. Two reviewers independently identified 314 primary studies, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data. Quality of included studies was assessed by employing the Newcastle Ottawa quality assessment tool for cohort studies. A separate tool was utilized for assessing the methodological quality of case series. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted of studies reporting incidence of recurrence using STATA, employing a random effects model, to calculate a pooled weighted incidence rate (with 95% confidence interval). Descriptive statistics were employed to report the findings of studies which did not report any ventral hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies were included in our review, enrolling a total of 14,638 female participants. Upon stratifying patients according to pregnancy status after primary hernia repair, 13,494 were found to be in the non-pregnant cohort whereas 1,144 were included in the pregnant cohort. Overall, 9% (95% CI 8-9%) of the non-pregnant patients experienced a recurrence whereas 12% (95% CI 10-15%) of patients that became pregnant subsequent to a ventral hernia repair experienced a recurrence. No major adverse events were recorded throughout the course of pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventral hernias in women of childbearing age have a pooled recurrence rate of 12%. Pregnancy may be considered a risk factor for ventral hernia recurrence. Female patients of childbearing age with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic ventral hernias that do not pose a significant strain on the patients' quality of life could be provided with the option of watchful waiting, with appropriate education of risks while discussing management.

Traumatic abdominal wall hernia secondary to seatbelt injury: a case successfully managed by delayed surgical mesh repair and complicated by intervening pregnancy

Traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH) is a rare type of hernia occurring secondary to blunt trauma. We report a case of seatbelt-associated TAWH in a 20-year-old woman who was presented to hospital via ambulance following a road traffic collision with a distended abdomen, peritonitis and free gas, with an associated TAWH identified on CT imaging. The patient underwent delayed surgical repair of her hernia using biological mesh, without recurrence, with a clinical course complicated by pregnancy. We use this report to demonstrate late repair as a safe and effective option for management of TAWH in pregnancy, with active surveillance and a multidisciplinary approach by the obstetric, plastic surgery and trauma teams.

Successful Pregnancy and Delivery after Autologous Abdominal Wall Reconstruction using Anterolateral-Thigh and Iliotibial-Tract Flap

The surgical management of abdominal wall tumor in women with childbearing potential is a thorny issue. A synthetic mesh is widely used for abdominal wall reconstruction but not necessarily applicable in case of women of childbearing potential because it has been reported to cause severe pain during pregnancy. Autologous reconstruction is usually considered a feasible option for such cases; however, there is no consensus on this approach and almost no evidence to support it. In the present 2 cases, 2 female patients (age, 17 years and 35 years) with abdominal wall desmoid tumor underwent primary radical resection and autologous reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect in the lateral oblique muscle area (defect size, 13 × 5 cm and 8 × 6 cm) using an anterolateral thigh and iliotibial tract flap. The postoperative course was uneventful. Both patients achieved pregnancy and a full-term delivery without complications with the exception of a feeling of mild stretching in the area of the operation. Magnetic resonance imaging and a clinical examination after the delivery revealed no signs of abdominal wall hernia or bulging. Normal pregnancy and full-term delivery could be obtained after abdominal wall resection and autologous reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh + iliotibial tract flap. This reconstructive method is considered to be a versatile option for the management of abdominal wall tumor in women with childbearing potential; however, further evidence should be accumulated on the reconstruction of wider and central abdominal wall defects.

Umbilical Hernia Repair and Pregnancy: Before, during, after…

Umbilical hernias are most common in women than men. Pregnancy may cause herniation or render a preexisting one apparent, because of progressively raised intra-abdominal pressure. The incidence of umbilical hernia among pregnancies is 0.08%. Surgical algorithm for a pregnant woman with a hernia is not thoroughly clear. There is no consensus about the timing of surgery for an umbilical hernia in a woman either who is already pregnant or planning a pregnancy. If the hernia is incarcerated or strangulated at the time of diagnosis, an emergency repair is inevitable. If the hernia is not complicated, but symptomatic an elective repair should be proposed. When the patient has a small and asymptomatic hernia it may be better to postpone the repair until she gives birth. If the hernia is repaired by suture alone, a high risk of recurrence exists during pregnancy. Umbilical hernia repair during pregnancy can be performed with minimal morbidity to the mother and baby. Second trimester is a proper timing for surgery. Asymptomatic hernias can be repaired, following childbirth or at the time of cesarean section (C-section). Elective repair after childbirth is possible as early as postpartum of eighth week. A 1-year interval can give the patient a very smooth convalescence, including hormonal stabilization and return to normal body weight. Moreover, surgery can be postponed for a longer time even after another pregnancy, if the patients would like to have more children. Diastasis recti are very frequent in pregnancy. It may persist in postpartum period. A high recurrence risk is expected in patients with rectus diastasis. This risk is especially high after suture repairs. Mesh repairs should be considered in this situation.

Surgical complications of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a retrospective study

The single-port approach has been associated with an unacceptably high rate of umbilical port hernias in large series of patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy and colectomy and with additional surgical risks thought secondary to technical and ergonomic limitations. A retrospective review of 378 consecutive laparoendoscopic single-site(LESS) donor nephrectomies performed between 04/15/2009 and 04/09/2014 was conducted. Twelve patients (3%) developed an umbilical hernia. Eleven (92%) were female and eight (73%) of these patients had a prior pregnancy. Hernias were reported 13.5 ± 6.9 months after donation, and the mean size was 5.1 ± 3.7 cm. Seven additional cases (1.9%) required a return to the operating room for internal hernia (2), evisceration (1), bleeding (1), enterotomy (1), and wound infection (2). The original incision was utilized for reexploration. One patient required emergent conversion to an open procedure for bleeding during the initial donation. There were no mortalities. Recipient patient and graft survival were 99% and 99% at 1 year, respectively. Although reports associated with earlier experiences with single-site procedures suggested an unacceptably high rate of hernias at the surgical site, this does not seem to be the case at our center. This technique is a reliable surgical technique for left donor nephrectomy at this institution.

Primary ventral or groin hernia in pregnancy: a cohort study of 20,714 women

BACKGROUND

Prevalence, management, and risk of emergency operation for primary ventral or groin hernia in pregnancy are unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalences of primary ventral or groin hernia in pregnancy and the potential risks for elective and emergency repair.

METHODS

This single-institutional retrospective study included all pregnant women attending one or more prenatal consultations at Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark, during a 3-year period. Patients' medical records were electronically retrieved. A free-text search algorithm and subsequent manual review was conducted to identify patients registered with a primary ventral or groin hernia in pregnancy. Follow-up was conducted by review of medical record notes within the Capital Region of Denmark supplemented with structured telephone interviews on indication.

RESULTS

In total, 20,714 pregnant women were included in the study cohort. Seventeen (0.08%) and 25 (0.12%) women were registered with a primary ventral and groin hernia, respectively. None underwent elective or emergency repair in pregnancy, and all had uncomplicated childbirth. In 10 women, the groin bulge disappeared spontaneously after delivery. During postpartum follow-up of median 4.4 years (range 0.2-6.0 years), five (0.02%) and four (0.02%) underwent elective primary ventral and groin hernia repair, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Primary ventral or groin hernia seems rare in pregnancy, and the incidence of emergency repair is extremely low. Watchful waiting strategy is recommended during pregnancy in women suspected for a primary ventral or groin hernia.

Does pregnancy increase the risk of abdominal hernia recurrence after prepregnancy surgical repair?

BACKGROUND

By increasing intraabdominal pressure, pregnancy may increase the risk of abdominal hernia recurrence. Current data are limited to studies with small sample size and thus the impact of pregnancy on recurrence is unclear.

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the impact of pregnancy on clinically significant abdominal hernia recurrence in a large multicenter cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

A multiinstitution deidentified electronic health record database, EPM: Explore (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH) was utilized to perform a retrospective cohort study of women aged 18-45 years with a history of an abdominal hernia repair from 1999 through 2013. Abdominal hernia was defined to include ventral and incisional hernias, and other types were excluded. The presence or absence of a pregnancy following primary hernia repair was elucidated from the database. Subjects were excluded if a hernia repair occurred during pregnancy. The rate of hernia recurrence, defined as reoperation, was calculated. The association between pregnancy and hernia recurrence was evaluated with logistic regression, both unadjusted and adjusted for diabetes, obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m(2)), tobacco abuse, and wound complication at the time of initial hernia repair.

RESULTS

A total of 11,020 women with a history of hernia repair were identified, of whom 840 had a subsequent pregnancy. Overall, 915 women in the cohort had a hernia recurrence (8.3%). Women with a history of pregnancy following primary hernia repair were more likely to have a body mass index >30 kg/m(2), a history of tobacco abuse, and a wound complication at the time of primary repair. In an unadjusted analysis, pregnancy was associated with an increase in the risk of hernia recurrence (13.1% vs 7.1%, odds ratio, 1.96, 95% confidence interval, 1.60-2.42). The association between pregnancy and hernia recurrence was attenuated but persisted after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73, 95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.14).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of abdominal hernia recurrence after adjusting for confounding factors. The magnitude of this association is likely underestimated, given that the risk of recurrence was defined as reoperation, which captures only the most clinically significant group of recurrences. This information will facilitate counseling for reproductive-aged women planning elective ventral or incisional hernia repair. The risk of recurrence and subsequent reoperation should be balanced against the risk of incarceration and emergent surgery during pregnancy. As such, the desire for future pregnancy and/or contraception should be considered when planning asymptomatic hernia repair for women of reproductive age.

Recurrent umbilical or epigastric hernia during and after pregnancy: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Umbilical and epigastric (umb/epi) hernia repairs are performed commonly in fertile female patients. Recent studies suggest mesh repair to be superior to suture repair; however, evidence is lacking concerning the optimal treatment of umb/epi hernias in female patients who might wish future pregnancies. The aim of this study was to compare the cumulative recurrence rate after mesh versus suture repair of umb/epi hernia in female patients subsequently becoming pregnant.

METHODS

This retrospective nationwide cohort study included female patients who underwent primary umb/epi hernia repair and subsequently became pregnant between 2007 and 2013. The follow-up began at first day of pregnancy and ended May 2015. Data were obtained from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database, Medical Birth Registry, and National Patient Registry. Patients with recurrence before pregnancy were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 224 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 3.8 years (range 0.1-8.1). The cumulative recurrence rate was 16.3% after mesh repair and 10.9% after suture repair, P = .299. Univariate Cox regression analysis (mesh repair hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 0.71-3.72, P = .249) and multivariate analysis adjusted for body mass index and hernia defect size (mesh repair hazard ratio 2.77, confidence interval 0.98-7.85, P = .055) likewise showed no significant difference in the risk of recurrence when we compared mesh and suture repair.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to findings in the general operative patient, mesh repair was not associated with a lesser risk of recurrence compared with suture repair for treatment of umb/epi hernia in female patients with subsequent pregnancy.