1
|
Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:551-561. [PMID: 32602079 PMCID: PMC7449947 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01911-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Within the last years, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) emerged as an alternative to multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC). SLC has advantages in cosmetic results, and postoperative pain seems lower. Overall complications are comparable between SLC and MLC. However, long-term results of randomized trials are lacking, notably to answer questions about incisional hernia rates, long-term cosmetic impact and chronic pain. Methods A randomized trial of SLC versus MLC with a total of 193 patients between December 2009 and June 2011 was performed. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain on the first day after surgery. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative morbidity, technical feasibility and hospital stay. A long-term follow-up after surgery was added. Results Ninety-eight patients (50.8%) underwent SLC, and 95 patients (49.2%) had MLC. Pain on the first postoperative day showed no difference between the operative procedures (SLC vs. MLC, 3.4 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.9, respectively; p = 0.317). No significant differences were observed in operating time or the overall rate of postoperative complications (4.1% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.731). SLC exhibited better cosmetic results in the short term. In the long term, after a mean of 70.4 months, there were no differences in incisional hernia rate, cosmetic results or pain at the incision between the two groups. Conclusions Taking into account a follow-up rate of 68%, the early postoperative advantages of SLC in relation to cosmetic appearance and pain did not persist in the long term. In the present trial, there was no difference in incisional hernia rates between SLC and MLC, but the sample size is too small for a final conclusion regarding hernia rates. Trial registration German Registry of Clinical Trials DRKS00012447
Collapse
|
2
|
Barutcu AG, Klein D, Kilian M, Biebl M, Raakow R, Pratschke J, Raakow J. Long-term follow-up after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:126-132. [PMID: 30863926 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06739-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is growing in popularity. The increased diameter of the umbilical incision might raise questions about the possibility of a greater risk of postoperative incisional hernia in comparison to conventional laparoscopy. This study aims to disclose the frequency of incisional hernia after SILS in long-term follow-up as well as to reveal the factors predisposing patients to this feared complication. METHODS The patient collective consists of cholecystectomy and appendectomy patients, who were operated on using SILS technique. Follow-up was achieved through letter correspondence, telephone interview, and clinical examination. Effects of demographic variables and operative parameters including age, sex, BMI, ASA score, duration of surgery, pre-existing hernia as well as postoperative incidence of incisional hernia were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 286 cases with complete follow-up were included in the analyses. Mean follow-up duration was 58.4 months. 192 patients (67.1%) underwent cholecystectomy; 94 (32.9%) had an appendectomy. The study collective consisted of 218 women (76.2%) and 68 men (23.8%). Mean age at the date of the operation was 38.5 (median 36, range 13-74). In 5 cases (1.7%), the surgical approach was converted into conventional laparoscopy. Intraoperative complication rate was 0.3% and postoperative complication rate was 5.9%. 7 patients (2.4%) developed an incisional hernia. Obese patients had an incisional hernia incidence of 10.9%. 3 out of 19 patients (15.8%) with a pre-existing umbilical hernia developed an incisional hernia during follow-up. Obesity and pre-existing umbilical hernia proved to have a significant association with incisional hernia incidence in univariate and multivariate analyses. Sex, age, procedure (appendectomy vs cholecystectomy), presence of acute inflammation, and duration of surgery did not show a statistically significant association with incisional hernia. CONCLUSION Detection of incisional hernia necessitates a long follow-up duration. Obesity and pre-existing umbilical hernia are associated with a higher incidence of this complication. Following a careful patient selection, SILS offers a safe approach for cholecystectomy and appendectomy procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atakan Görkem Barutcu
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Denis Klein
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maik Kilian
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelische Elisabeth Klinik, Lützowstraße 26, 10785, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roland Raakow
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Dieffenbachstrasse 1, 10967, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jonas Raakow
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|