Assessing the safety of outpatient ventral hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis of 7666 patients

Incidence of wound dehiscence in patients undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is a serious complication-with a 40% estimated mortality rate-that occurs after surgical intervention. Since the implementation of advanced recovery protocols, the current global incidence of SWD is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the worldwide incidence of SWD and explored its associated factors in general surgical patients. Eligible full-text cross-sectional, cohort and observational studies in English, between 1 January 2010 to 23 April 2021, were retrieved from MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Data extraction and quality appraisal were undertaken independently by three reviewers. Random effects meta-analytic models were used in the presence of substantial inconsistency. Subgroup, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were used to explore inconsistency. Publication bias was assessed using Hunter's plots and Egger's regression test. Of 2862 publications retrieved, 27 studies were included in the final analyses. Pooled data from 741,118 patients across 24 studies were meta-analysed. The 30-day cumulative incidence of SWD was 1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1-1%). SWD incidence was highest in hepatobiliary surgery, at 3% (95% CI: 0-8%). Multivariable meta-regression showed SWD was significantly associated with duration of operation and reoperation (F=7.93 (2-10); p=0.009), explaining 58.2% of the variance. Most studies were retrospective, predated the agreed global definition for SWD and measured as a secondary outcome; thus, our results likely underestimate the scope of the problem. Wider uptake of the global definition will inform the SWD surveillance and improve the accuracy of reporting.

Surgical site occurrences, not body mass index, increase the long-term risk of ventral hernia recurrence

BACKGROUND

Recurrence rates after ventral hernia repair vary widely and evidence about risk factors for recurrence are conflicting. There is little evidence for risk factors for long-term recurrence.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ventral hernia repair at our institution and were captured in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2002 and 2015 were included. We reviewed all demographic, procedural, and hernia-specific data.

RESULTS

Six hundred and thirty patients were included for analysis with a median follow-up of 4.9 years (inter-quartile range, 2-7.3 years). By univariate analysis, index hernia repairs were more likely to recur if defect size was ≥4 cm (P = .019), no mesh was used (P = .026), or if the repair was for a recurrent hernia (P = .001). Five-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and reoperation was 24.3% and 16.0%, respectively. Patients with a perioperative surgical site occurrence, which included superficial, deep-incisional, and organ space surgical site infections as well as wound disruption, had a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence of 54.9% compared with 22.6% for those without surgical site occurrence. By multivariable analysis, non-primary hernia repair (hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.4, P = .005) and any postoperative surgical site occurrence (hazard ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.6, P = .02) were the only risk factors predictive of recurrence. Patient body mass index had no independent effect on recurrence.

CONCLUSION

1 in 4 patients undergoing an open ventral hernia repair will have a recurrence after 5 years, and this risk is doubled among patients who experience any perioperative surgical site occurrence. After controlling for patient comorbidities, including body mass index, hernia size, and mesh position, the most significant risk factor for recurrence after ventral hernia repair was a non-primary hernia and surgical site occurrence.

Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics Reduce Surgical Site Infection Rates after Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review

SSIs after ventral hernia repair (VHR) represent a significant complication. The impact of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics on the SSI rates after VHRs is unclear. A systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception through March 2016 investigating the effect of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics after VHRs was performed. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented, and the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. After systematic independent assessment of 216 citations, four studies, involving 344 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Among the included studies, 164 patients received >24 hours of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics, whereas 180 patients were controls. The overall incidence of SSI among patients receiving postoperative antibiotics was 14.6 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.9 to 20.9) which compares favorably with the control group: 35.5 per cent (95% CI, 28.9 to 42.7) (odds ratio: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5, P < 0.01). Among patient's receiving postoperative antibiotics, the pooled average duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment was 6.2 ± 0.4 days. Based on the available evidence, the use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics seems to be associated with lower SSI rates after VHRs. Future prospective randomized controlled trials should be conducted to further confirm the efficacy of this prophylactic intervention.

Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Tissue Reinforcement Patch: A Case Series Experience

Diaphragmatic hernias are commonly encountered by general surgeons. However, repair is often fraught with complications and recurrence. The use of extracellular matrix scaffolds for repair of damaged tissues through constructive remodeling is an effective surgical adjunct. Herein, we describe the repair of diaphragmatic hernias using GORE® BIO-A® Tissue Reinforcement patch in a series of patients.

Factors of selection and failure of ambulatory incisional hernia repair: A cohort study of 1429 patients

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory surgery for incisional hernia repair (IHR) is not a widespread practice and is mainly performed for small incisional hernias.

AIM

To assess outpatient IHR practice in France and to identify predictive factors of selection and failure of ambulatory procedures.

METHOD

Surgeons of the French "Club Hernie" prospectively gathered data concerning IHR over a period of almost 5years within a nationwide database.

RESULTS

A number of patients (1429) were operated on during the period of the study. The mean age was 63.3 (22-97) years old. An ambulatory procedure was planned in 305 (21%) patients. Among these, 272 (89%) IHR were effectively performed as one-day procedures. Upon multivariate analysis, predictive factors influencing practitioners for not propose an ambulatory care were increasing age (OR 0.97, P<0.001), body mass index (OR 0.95, P<0.001), ASA grade≥III (OR 0.23, P<0.001), hernia width≥4cm (OR 0.44, P<0.001), recurrent hernia (OR 0.55, P=0.01) and a laparoscopic IHR (OR 0.54, P<0.001). A number of patients (1157) were not selected preoperatively for outpatient IHR mainly because of organizational issues or an ASA grade≥III. Medical or social reasons were the main causes of failure of initially planned ambulatory settings.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory IHR is a safe and feasible practice subject to a good preoperative selection of the patients. Increasing age, body mass index, ASA grade≥III, hernia width≥4cm, recurrent hernia and a laparoscopic IHR were identified to be preoperative factors for not proposing an ambulatory care. One-day surgery for IHR could be systematically proposed for IHR of small incisional hernias (<4cm) in young patients with few comorbidities.

Discrepancies in the Definition of "Outpatient" Surgeries and Their Effect on Study Outcomes Related to ACDF and Lumbar Discectomy Procedures: A Retrospective Analysis of 45,204 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in definition of "inpatient" and "outpatient" [stated status vs. actual length of stay (LOS)], and the effect of defining populations based on the different definitions, for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and lumbar discectomy procedures in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There has been an overall trend toward performing ACDF and lumbar discectomy in the outpatient setting. However, with the possibility of patients who underwent outpatient surgery staying overnight or longer at the hospital under "observation" status, the distinction of "inpatient" and "outpatient" is not clear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF or lumbar discectomy in the 2005-2014 ACS-NSQIP database were identified. Outpatient procedures were defined in 1 of 2 ways: either as being termed "outpatient" or hospital LOS=0. Differences in definitions were studied. Further, to evaluate the effect of the different definitions, 30-day outcomes were compared between "inpatient" and "outpatient" and between LOS>0 and LOS=0 for ACDF patients.

RESULTS

Of the 4123 "outpatient" ACDF patients, 919 had LOS=0, whereas 3204 had LOS>0. Of the 13,210 "inpatient" ACDF patients, 337 had LOS=0, whereas 12,873 had LOS>0. Of the 15,166 "outpatient" lumbar discectomy patients, 8968 had LOS=0, whereas 6198 had LOS>0. Of the 12,705 "inpatient" lumbar discectomy patients, 814 had LOS=0, whereas 11,891 had LOS>0. On multivariate analysis of ACDF patients, when comparing "inpatient" with "outpatient" and "LOS>0" with "LOS=0" there were differences in risks for adverse outcomes based on the definition of outpatient status.

CONCLUSIONS

When evaluating the ACS-NSQIP population, ACDF and lumbar discectomy procedures recorded as "outpatient" can be misleading and often did not correlate with same day discharge. These findings have significant impact on the interpretation of existing studies and define an area that needs clarification for future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Delineating the burden of chronic post-operative pain in patients undergoing open repair of complex ventral hernias

BACKGROUND

After open complex ventral hernia repair (cVHR), chronic pain has a significant impact on quality of life and processes of care.

METHODS

Records of 177 patients undergoing cVHR were reviewed in order to characterize the burden of managing postoperative pain in the first post-operative year following open cVHR.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 91 patients initiated at least one unsolicited complaint of pain, though phone call (37), unscheduled clinic visit (45) or evaluation in the emergency room (9); among these an actionable diagnosis was found in 38 (41.8%). Among 41 patients who initiated additional unsolicited complaints of pain, an actionable diagnosis was found in only 3 patients. Risk factors for such complaints included pre-operative pain and the use of synthetic mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the absence of an actionable diagnosis, significant resources are utilized in evaluation and management of unsolicited complaints of pain in the first year after cVHR.

Proposal for a national triage system for the management of ventral hernias

Ventral hernia disease is becoming increasingly prevalent and complex. Subspecialisation for patients with challenging conditions requiring surgery has been shown to improve postoperative outcomes. Worldwide, there is an emergence of specialist hernia centres using new and innovative techniques to repair large and complicated ventral hernias. After a national meeting of hernia experts, we present an algorithm to be used as a national triage system for patients with ventral hernias, with the aim of ensuring that patients are operated on by the most appropriate surgeon. Evidence-based clinical risk factors and ventral hernia parameters are used for risk stratification and patient triage. We hope that this algorithm will guide future ventral hernia management in the UK.

Definitional Differences of 'Outpatient' Versus 'Inpatient' THA and TKA Can Affect Study Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There has been great interest in performing outpatient THA and TKA. Studies have compared such procedures done as outpatients versus inpatients. However, stated "outpatient" status as defined by large national databases such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) may not be a consistent entity, and the actual lengths of stay of those patients categorized as outpatients in NSQIP have not been specifically ascertained and may in fact include some patients who are "observed" for one or more nights. Current regulations in the United States allow these "observed" patients to stay more than one night at the hospital under observation status despite being coded as outpatients. Determining the degree to which this is the case, and what, exactly, "outpatient" means in the NSQIP, may influence the way clinicians read studies from that source and the way hospital systems and policymakers use those data.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were (1) to utilize the NSQIP database to characterize the differences in definition of "inpatient" and "outpatient" (stated status versus actual length of stay [LOS], measured in days) for THA and TKA; and (2) to study the effect of defining populations using different definitions.

METHODS

Patients who underwent THA and TKA in the 2005 to 2014 NSQIP database were identified. Outpatient procedures were defined as either hospital LOS = 0 days in NSQIP or being termed "outpatient" by the hospital. The actual hospital LOS of "outpatients" was characterized. "Outpatients" were considered to have stayed overnight if they had a LOS of 1 day or longer. The effects of the different definitions on 30-day outcomes were evaluated using multivariate analysis while controlling for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of 72,651 patients undergoing THA, 529 were identified as "outpatients" but only 63 of these (12%) had a LOS = 0. Of 117,454 patients undergoing TKA, 890 were identified as "outpatients" but only 95 of these (11%) had a LOS = 0. After controlling for potential confounding factors such as gender, body mass index, functional status before surgery, comorbidities, and smoking status, we found "inpatient" THA to be associated with increased risk of any adverse event (relative risk, 2.643, p = 0.002), serious adverse event (relative risk, 2.455, p = 0.011), and readmission (relative risk, 2.775, p = 0.010) compared with "outpatient" THA. However, for the same procedure and controlling for the same factors, patients who had LOS > 0 were not associated with any increased risk compared with patients who had LOS = 0. A similar trend was also found in the TKA cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Future THA, TKA, or other investigations on this topic should consistently quantify the term "outpatient" because different definitions, stated status or actual LOS, may lead to different assignments of risk factors for postoperative complications. Accurate data regarding risk factors for complications after total joint arthroplasty are crucial for efforts to reduce length of hospital stay and minimize complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

The Impact of Body Mass Index on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Obesity and higher body mass index may be associated with higher rates of wound healing complications and hernia recurrence rates following complex abdominal wall reconstruction. The authors hypothesized that higher body mass indexes result in higher rates of postoperative wound healing complications but similar rates of hernia recurrence in abdominal wall reconstruction patients.

METHODS

The authors included 511 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with underlay mesh. Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of preoperative body mass index: less than 30 kg/m (nonobese), 30 to 34.9 kg/m (class I obesity), and 35 kg/m or greater (class II/III obesity). The authors compared postoperative outcomes among these groups.

RESULTS

Class I and class II/III obesity patients had higher surgical-site occurrence rates than nonobese patients (26.4 percent versus 14.9 percent, p = 0.006; and 36.8 percent versus 14.9 percent, p < 0.001, respectively) and higher overall complication rates (37.9 percent versus 24.7 percent, p = 0.007; and 43.4 percent versus 24.7 percent, p < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, obese patients had significantly higher skin dehiscence (19.3 percent versus 7.2 percent, p < 0.001; and 26.5 percent versus 7.2 percent, p < 0.001, respectively) and fat necrosis rates (10.0 percent versus 2.1 percent, p = 0.001; and 11.8 percent versus 2.1 percent, p < 0.001, respectively) than nonobese patients. Obesity class II/III patients had higher infection and seroma rates than nonobese patients (9.6 percent versus 4.3 percent, p = 0.041; and 8.1 percent versus 2.1 percent, p = 0.006, respectively). However, class I and class II/III obesity patients experienced hernia recurrence rates (11.4 percent versus 7.7 percent, p = 0.204; and 10.3 percent versus 7.7 percent, p = 0.381, respectively) and freedom from hernia recurrence (overall log-rank, p = 0.41) similar to those of nonobese patients.

CONCLUSION

Hernia recurrence rates do not appear to be affected by obesity on long-term follow-up in abdominal wall reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Is old age a contraindication to elective ventral hernia repair?

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is a frequent problem in the expanding aging population. However, advanced age is often viewed as a contraindication to elective hernia surgery. We aimed to analyze outcomes of VHR in a large cohort of elderly patients. We hypothesized that elective VHR is safe and effective even in patients over 70 years old.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients over the age of 70 who underwent VHR at a at a tertiary care hospital. Main outcome measures included postoperative complications and recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2015, 263 elderly patients who underwent elective VHR were included. Major comorbidities included diabetes, COPD, and smoking history. The majority of the patients underwent open repairs. Surgical site events occurred in 54 patients (21%). Postoperative complications included 17 venous thromboembolism occurrences, 2 myocardial infarctions, 41 patients who required postoperative critical care, and 1 mortality. Readmission within 90 days postoperatively occurred in 34 patients (13%). At a mean follow-up of 25.6 months, 17 patients in the open group and 6 patients in the laparoscopic group had a recurrence.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that VHR can be performed reasonably safely and effectively even in this potentially risky cohort. The use of laparoscopy might be associated with further reduction in morbidity. Overall, age should not be a contraindication to elective VHR, even in patients over 70 years old.