Ventral hernia recurrence in women of childbearing age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Successful management of strangulated incisional hernia in pregnancy - A case report

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal hernias, including incisional hernias, can occur due to weakness in the abdominal wall. Incisional hernias commonly occur following surgical incisions, and factors such as poor closure technique and patient-related factors can contribute to their development.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case, the patient was presented with a painful, irreducible lump over a previous laparotomy scar, along with bowel obstruction symptoms. The diagnosis was supported by ultrasound findings showing obstructed bowel loop in the hernial sac. Emergency open surgical reduction and mesh repair were performed to treat the strangulated hernia and ensure the mother and fetus's safety. The patient had an uneventful postoperative period and was discharged after three days.

DISCUSSION

Incisional hernias can be diagnosed through clinical evaluation, and imaging studies may be necessary in complex cases. However, imaging techniques such as X-rays and Computed Tomography scans are limited in pregnant women due to the radiation risks. Ultrasonography (USS) is preferred in pregnant women for its safety and non-invasiveness, although it may have reduced sensitivity in obese patients. Complicated hernias should be treated with emergency surgical repair, while elective surgery can be considered for asymptomatic or non-complicated hernias. Laparoscopic surgery offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays and fewer complications. Mesh repair reduces the recurrence risk in subsequent pregnancies (relate the discussion with the case).

CONCLUSION

Overall, surgical management of hernias in pregnancy requires careful consideration of individual circumstances and the use of appropriate techniques to ensure the safety of both the mother and fetus.

Impact of sex on ventral hernia repair outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the variability in abdominal physiology and hernia presentation between sexes, better comprehension of sex-related differences in outcomes would tailor surgical approach and counseling regarding postoperative outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to appraise the effect of sex on the outcomes of ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane selected studies comparing outcomes of ventral hernia repair between sexes. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by pooled and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

We screened 3128 studies, reviewed 133, and included 18 observational studies, which encompassed 220,799 patients following ventral hernia repair. Postoperative chronic pain was significantly higher in female (OR 1,9; 95% CI 1,64-2,2; p ​< ​0,001). There were no significant differences in complications, readmission, or recurrence rates between females and males.

CONCLUSION

Female sex is associated with a higher risk of postoperative chronic pain following ventral hernia repair.

Evaluation of Treatment Differences Between Men and Women Undergoing Ventral Hernia Repair: An Analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative

BACKGROUND

Sex is emerging as an important clinical variable associated with surgical outcomes and decision making. However, its relevance in regard to baseline and treatment differences in primary and incisional ventral hernia repair remains unclear.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database to identify elective umbilical, epigastric, or incisional hernia repairs. Propensity matching was performed to investigate confounder-adjusted treatment differences between men and women. Treatments of interest included surgical approach (minimally invasive or open), mesh use, mesh type, mesh position, anesthesia type, myofascial release, fascial closure, and fixation use.

RESULTS

A total of 8,489 umbilical, 1,801 epigastric, and 16,626 incisional hernia repairs were identified. Women undergoing primary ventral hernia repair were younger (umbilical 46.4 vs 54 years, epigastric 48.7 vs 52.7 years), with lower BMI (umbilical 30.4 vs 31.5, epigastric 29.2 vs 31.1), and less likely diabetic (umbilical 9.9% vs 11.4%, epigastric 6.8% vs 8.8%). Women undergoing incisional hernia repair were also younger (mean 57.5 vs 59.1 years), but with higher BMI (33.1 vs 31.5), and more likely diabetic (21.4% vs 19.1%). Propensity-matched analysis included 3,644 umbilical, 1,232 epigastric, and 12,480 incisional hernias. Women with incisional hernia were less likely to undergo an open repair (60.2% vs 63.4%, p < 0.001) and have mesh used (93.8% vs 94.8%, p = 0.02). In umbilical and incisional hernia repairs, women had higher rates of intraperitoneal mesh placement and men had higher rates of preperitoneal and retro-muscular mesh placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Small but statistically significant treatment differences in operative approach, mesh use, and mesh position exist between men and women undergoing ventral hernia repair. It remains unknown whether these treatment differences result in differing clinical outcomes.

Ventral hernia repair and mesh use in females of childbearing age

BACKGROUND

A substantial knowledge gap exists in understanding sex as a biological variable for abdominal wall hernia repair, which also extends to hernia repair practices in females of childbearing age. We sought to determine the incidence of mesh repairs in females of childbearing age and to characterize factors associated with mesh use.

METHODS

Using a statewide hernia-specific data registry, we conducted a retrospective study identifying females of childbearing age, defined as 18-44 per CDC guidelines, who underwent clean ventral hernia repair between January 2020 and Dec 2021. The primary outcome was mesh use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with mesh use. To further delineate whether childbearing status may affect decision to use mesh, we also examined mesh practice stratified by age, comparing women 18 to 44 to those 45 and older.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and thirty-six females of childbearing age underwent ventral hernia repair with a mean age of 34.8 (6.2) years. Mesh was used in 547 (65.4%) patients. Mesh use was significantly associated with minimally invasive approach [aOR 29.46 (95% CI 16.30-53.25)], greater hernia width [aOR 1.50 (95% CI 1.20-1.88)], and greater BMI [aOR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.08)]. Age was not significantly associated with mesh use [aOR 1.02 (95% CI 0.99-1.05)]. Compared to 1,461 female patients older than 44 years old, there was no significant association between childbearing age and mesh use [aOR 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.04)].

CONCLUSIONS

Most females of childbearing age had mesh placed during ventral and incisional hernia repair, which was largely associated with hernia size, BMI, and a minimally invasive surgical approach. Neither chronologic patient age nor being of childbearing age were associated with mesh use. Insofar as existing evidence suggests that childbearing status is an important factor in deciding whether to use mesh, these findings suggest that real-world practice may not reflect that evidence.

Sex disparities in the treatment and outcomes of ventral and incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Despite females accounting for nearly half of ventral and incisional hernia repairs performed each year in the United States, shockingly little attention has been paid to sex disparities in hernia treatment and outcomes. We explored sex-based differences in operative approach and outcomes using a population-level hernia registry.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Hernia Registry (MSQC-HR) to identify patients undergoing clean ventral or incisional hernia repair between January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The primary outcomes were risk-adjusted rates of laparoscopic/robotic approach, mesh use, and composite 30-day adverse events stratified by sex. Risk adjustment between sex was performed using all patient, clinical, and hernia characteristics.

RESULTS

5269 patients underwent ventral and incisional hernia repair of whom 2295 (43.6%) patients were female. Mean age was 53.9 (14.5) years. Females had slightly larger hernias (3.5 cm vs. 3.0 cm, P < 0.001), fewer umbilical hernias (50.9% vs. 73.0%, P < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of prior hernia repair (17.9% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression adjusting for differences between males and females, female sex was associated with lower odds of mesh use [aOR 0.62 (95% CI 0.52-0.74)] and higher odds of laparoscopic/robotic repair [aOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.10-1.44)]. In a similar multivariable model, female sex was also associated with significantly higher odds of composite 30-day adverse events [aOR 1.64 (95% CI 1.32-2.02)]. This equates to predicted probabilities of 11.7% (95% CI 10.3-13.0%) vs. 7.6% (95% CI 6.6-8.6%) for adverse events in females compared to males.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being younger and having fewer comorbidities, women were more likely to experience adverse events after surgery. Moreover, women were less likely to have mesh placed. Additional work is needed to understand the factors that drive these gender disparities in ventral hernia treatment and outcomes.

Long-term reoperation rate following primary ventral hernia repair: a register-based study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyse the risk for reoperation following primary ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

The study was based on umbilical hernia and epigastric hernia repairs registered in the population-based Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) 2010-2019. Reoperation was defined as repeat repair after primary repair.

RESULTS

Altogether 29,360 umbilical hernia repairs and 6514 epigastric hernia repairs were identified. There were 624 reoperations registered following primary umbilical repair and 137 following primary epigastric repairs. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for reoperation was 0.292 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.109-0.782) after open onlay mesh repair, 0.484 (CI 0.366-0.641) after open interstitial mesh repair, 0.382 (CI 0.238-0.613) after open sublay mesh repair, 0.453 (CI 0.169-1.212) after open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair, 1.004 (CI 0.688-1.464) after laparoscopic repair, and 0.940 (CI 0.502-1.759) after other techniques, when compared to open suture repair as reference method. Following umbilical hernia repair, the risk for reoperation was also significantly higher for patients aged < 50 years (HR 1.669, CI 1.389-2.005), for women (HR 1.401, CI 1.186-1.655), and for patients with liver cirrhosis (HR 2.544, CI 1.049-6.170). For patients undergoing epigastric hernia repair, the only significant risk factor for reoperation was age < 50 years (HR 2.046, CI 1.337-3.130).

CONCLUSIONS

All types of open mesh repair were associated with lower reoperation rates than open suture repair and laparoscopic repair. Female sex, young age and liver cirrhosis were risk factors for reoperation due to hernia recurrence, regardless of method.

Strangled gravidic uterus, an exceptional complication of umbilical hernia during pregnancy, a case report

Introduction

Strangulated pregnancy is a very rare presentation in which the intra umbilical strangulated form is exceptional. To our knowledge, we report the first Moroccan case and one of less than 10 cases published in the literature of a strangulated gravid uterus; in a woman admitted for treatment of umbilical pain.

Case presentation

Through this presentation, we report a sporadic case of hernial strangulation during pregnancy containing an evolving pregnancy in the umbilical harness bag. The suspicion of this diagnosis was clinical and the confirmation made by ultrasound and abdominal MRI for confirmation. The objectives of this publication are threefold: i), to report this new exceptional case ii), to highlight the place of imaging in the management of hernial pathology iii), and to recommend surgical treatment of umbilical hernias in women of childbearing age in order to avoid surgical complications and maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

Conclusion

Our case report shows that we should consider this very rare presentation of strangulated pregnancy. Our work also reports another new case to the poor published literature on this subject and emphasizes the importance of surgical management of parietal pathology by focusing on the parietal impact of physiological change during pregnancy.

•

Atypical presentation of the strangled uterus.

•

A strangled umbilical hernia containing a pregnant uterus being one of less than 10 cases reported in the literature.

•

Take into consideration the possibility of complication of parietal pathology during pregnancy.

How to Treat Hernias in Pregnant Women?

A hernia is a common surgical problem. Although hernias during pregnancy are uncommon, they can be challenging for both the surgeon and the patient if present. To date, there is no consensus in the medical community regarding the elective repair of hernias in pregnant women. The debate mainly concerns three areas: the timing, the approach, and the surgical technique. This study aims to offer a clear pathway in this field based on the best available data. In this study, we collected reviews written in English and published in PubMed from 2010 to 2020 (the exception being three articles that were published before 2010, which we retained since they contained relevant information). We used regular and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords. Two of the authors screened the collected studies to select the best articles that would fit our inclusion criteria for the review. The articles considered for this review can be classified into retrospective studies, case reports, and reviews. No randomized controlled trials were found. The lack of an agreement about the treatment of ventral hernias in fertile women makes the decision to treat and the process challenging. The treatment significantly depends on two factors: the symptoms and the pregnancy status at diagnosis. If the hernia is incarcerated or strangulated at presentation, an emergency repair is obligatory. If the hernia is symptomatic, but not complicated, elective surgery should be offered. The timing of repair will depend on whether the patient is already pregnant or non-pregnant. In pregnant patients, if the hernia is small and asymptomatic, it may be better to delay the surgery until after delivery or after the last pregnancy. If the hernia is symptomatic and seems to affect the patient's quality of life, it may be better to postpone the repair until the second trimester or after delivery if complications do not occur. Internal herniation (IH) should be suspected as a cause of the abdominal pain in pregnant women who have undergone laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). In pre-pregnancy patients, if the hernia is large and symptomatic, it may be better to do an elective repair and then wait for one or two years before the next pregnancy. However, if the hernia is small or minimally symptomatic, it may be better to hold the repair until after delivery or after the last pregnancy. Pregnancy may be considered a significant risk factor for hernia recurrence. The laparoscopic mesh repair should be offered whenever possible, whereas the open approach may be preferred in complicated cases. The suture repair may be suitable for both small hernias and in cases of gross contamination.