Initial report of bridge to recovery in a patient with DuraHeart LVAD

Complex HeartWare left ventricular assist device infection treated with pump exchange: clinical alert for the driveline location

Infection is a major complication in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Once a driveline exit-site infection (DLI) reaches the LVAD component, LVAD exchange may become necessary for radical treatment, although clinical results are not satisfactory. In this report, we describe two cases of LVAD infection successfully treated with pump exchange. During LVAD support, the DLI extended into the pump pocket and the outflow graft despite aggressive surgical debridement and negative pressure wound therapy. These two patients required LVAD exchange for radical treatment, because the estimated waiting period for heart transplantation was at least more than 1 year. The LVAD exchange was performed through median re-sternotomy, and the infected HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) was completely removed under cardiopulmonary bypass. Then, a new LVAD covered with the omentum flap was implanted. These two patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation after 10 months and 2 years of support without recurrence of infection. These two cases may suggest that the driveline of the HVAD needs to be kept away from the outflow graft to prevent refractory outflow graft infection.

A case of cardiogenic shock due to acute coronary syndrome successfully recovered by percutaneous and paracorporeal left ventricular assist device

We recently experienced a 70-year-old woman with left main trunk-acute coronary syndrome who was initially supported by Impella 5.0 which converted to paracorporeal left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to recovery. Optimized guideline-directed medical therapy with cardiac rehabilitation resulted in successful explantation of LVAD and she discharged on foot.

The Rehabilitation of Patients With Advanced Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement: A Narrative Review

Because more patients with advanced heart failure are receiving a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy or a bridge to transplantation, there is increasing attention on functional outcomes and quality of life after LVAD implantation. Rehabilitation providers in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting increasingly will treat patients with an LVAD and should understand the exercise physiology, medical management, rehabilitation considerations, and outcomes after rehabilitation for patients with an LVAD. The purpose of this article is to provide the physiatrist with a comprehensive understanding of the rehabilitation of patients with advanced heart failure and LVAD implantation. Changes in relevant organ system physiology and exercise physiology after LVAD are summarized. Safety of rehabilitation and program considerations for acute inpatient rehabilitation are reviewed. Recommendations for medical management and prevention of secondary complications seen in patients with an LVAD are outlined. A discussion of outcomes after acute inpatient rehabilitation, the dual diagnosis of stroke and LVAD placement, and long-term cognitive, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes after LVAD placement is presented.

Prevalence of Cerebral Microbleeds in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in gradient echo T2*-weighted brain MRI has a positive correlation with hemorrhagic stroke incidence. However, the prevalence of CMBs in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has not been evaluated. We evaluated the prevalence of CMBs and the relationship with hemorrhagic stroke incidence in patients with LVADs.

METHOD AND RESULTS

We analyzed results from brain MRI in prospective examinations of 35 consecutive patients who had undergone LVAD explantation for heart transplantation or recovery since 2011. The number and distribution of CMBs were counted, then the relationship between baseline characteristics and adverse events during LVAD support were analyzed. The mean age was 37.7±12.4 years and the mean LVAD duration was 2.43±1.08 years. Thirty-four (97%) patients had at least one CMB. Nine (26%) developed hemorrhagic stroke during LVAD support, and patients with hemorrhagic stroke had a significantly greater number of CMBs compared with patients without hemorrhagic stroke (5 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-7] versus 9 [IQR, 5-23]; odds ratio 1.14 [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.02-1.32], P=0.05). There was no significant relationship between age, LVAD support duration, or systolic blood pressure during LVAD. However, patients who had at least one episode of bacteremia (9 [IQR, 4-16] versus 5 [IQR, 3-7], P=0.06) and pump pocket infection (14 [IQR, 4-27] versus 5 [IQR, 3-7], P=0.08) showed a trend toward a greater number of CMBs than patients without bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-four (97%) patients with continuous-flow LVAD had at least one CMB, and the number of CMBs were more prevalent in patients with hemorrhagic stroke and in patients with LVAD-related infection.

Initial experience of EVAHEART explantation after continuous-flow LVAD off test with percutaneous occlusion balloon

In contrast to a pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD), an LVAD off test for evaluation of cardiac recovery with a continuous-flow device is difficult because of intra-circuit backflow from the outflow graft when a device is stopped. We report a case of reliable evaluation of cardiac recovery using balloon occlusion of the outflow graft, followed by successful removal of a continuous-flow EVAHEART LVAD using a minimally invasive approach.