Immunoadsorption plasmapheresis treatment for the recurrent exacerbation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with a fluctuating anti-aquaporin-4 antibody level

Protein-A immunoadsorption combined with immunosuppressive treatment in refractory primary Sjögren's syndrome coexisting with NMOSD: a case report and literature review

The treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) coexisting with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) using protein-A immunoadsorption combined with immunosuppressive therapy has rarely been reported. Herein, we present the case of a 35-year-old female diagnosed with pSS concomitant with NMOSD (pSS-NMOSD) who demonstrated a positive response to protein-A immunoadsorption after failing to respond to therapy comprising high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Within one week of receiving three sessions of immunoadsorption combined with immunosuppressive treatment, the patient's clinical symptoms (blurred vision, paraparesis, and dysfunctional proprioception) significantly improved. Additionally, a rapid decrease in the circulating levels of Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG), immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG, IgM, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and rheumatoid factor (RF) were observed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) further revealed a significant reduction in the lesions associated with longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis. During the follow-up period, prednisolone was gradually tapered to a maintenance dose of 5-10 mg/day, whereas mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was maintained at 1.0-1.5 g/day. The patient's condition has remained stable for four years, with no signs of recurrence or progression observed on imaging examination. Therefore, this case suggests that protein A immunoadsorption may represent a potentially effective therapeutic option for patients with pSS-NMOSD who are refractory to conventional treatments.

Immunoadsorption as maintenance therapy for refractory neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Background

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare relapsing autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, affecting mainly optic nerves and spinal cord. NMOSD pathophysiology is associated with anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies. Rapid extracorporeal elimination of autoantibodies with apheresis techniques, such as immunoadsorption (IA), was proven to be an effective treatment of NMOSD attacks. Data on the long-term use of IA to prevent attacks or progression of NMOSD are lacking.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of maintenance IA for preventing recurrence of NMOSD attacks in patients refractory to other immunotherapies.

Design

Case study.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of two female patients with severe NMOSD refractory to conventional immunotherapies was performed. Both patients had responded to tryptophan IA (Tr-IA) as attack therapy and subsequently were treated with biweekly maintenance Tr-IA.

Results

Patient 1 (AQP4-IgG seropositive, age 42 years) had 1.38 attacks of optic neuritis per year within 10.1 years before commencing regular Tr-IA. With maintenance Tr-IA for 3.1 years, one mild attack occurred, which was responsive to steroid pulse therapy. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was stable at 5.0. Visual function score of the last eye improved from 3 to 1. Patient 2 (AQP4-IgG seronegative, age 43 years) experienced 1.7 attacks per year, mainly acute myelitis and optic neuritis, during the period of 10.0 years before the start of Tr-IA. During regular Tr-IA treatment, no further NMOSD attack occurred. The patient was clinically stable without any additional immunosuppressive treatment for 5.3 years. EDSS improved from 6.0 to 5.0, and the ambulation score from 7 to 1. Tolerability of Tr-IA was good in both patients. No serious adverse events occurred during long-term clinical trajectories.

Conclusion

Tr-IA was well tolerated as maintenance treatment and resulted in clinical stabilization of two patients with highly active NMOSD, who were refractory to standard drug therapy.

Plasmapheresis as a viable treatment option for scleritis

Purpose

We describe a case and our experience with using plasmapheresis as a treatment for scleritis.

Observations

Treating relapsing autoimmune scleritis can be challenging when it inadequately responds to traditional therapy. Our patient could not receive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy for her scleritis due to recent gastrointestinal surgery and previously failed multiple steroid sparing treatments due to intolerance. There was good initial control with high dose oral prednisone, however, the steroid could not be tapered to a safe dosage (<10 mg per day) without relapse. Therefore, we opted to treat our patient with plasmapheresis.

Conclusions and Importance

After undergoing plasmapheresis, our patient experienced total resolution of symptoms with corresponding clinical resolution of scleritis. Plasmapheresis derives great benefit by filtering circulating immune complexes. Although rarely used, plasmapheresis can be effective in treating non-infectious scleritis.

Dynamic Changes in AQP4-IgG Level and Immunological Markers During Protein-A Immunoadsorption Therapy for NMOSD: A Case Report and Literature Review

The changes in the serum levels of aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG), immunoglobulins, and inflammatory mediators in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) cases treated with immunoadsorption have been rarely described in detail. Here we report a 29-year-old steroid-resistant NMOSD female with a severe disability (bilateral blindness and paraplegia) who received protein-A immunoadsorption as a rescue treatment. During the total 5 sessions, the circulating level of AQP4-IgG, immunoglobulins, and complement proteins (C3 and C4) showed a rapid and sawtooth-like decrease, and the serum AQP4-IgG titer declined from 1:320 to below the detectable limit at the end of the 3rd procedure. Of all the antibodies, IgG had the biggest removal rate (>96.1%), followed by IgM (>66.7%) and IgA (53%), while complement C3 and C4 also dropped by 73% and 65%, respectively. The reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α) and marked increased lymphocyte (T and B cell) counts were also observed. The improvement of symptoms initiated after the last session, with a low AQP4-IgG titer (1:32) persisting thereafter. Accordingly, protein-A immunoadsorption treatment could be one of the potential rescue therapies for steroid-resistant NMOSD patients with a severe disability.

Rescue immunoadsorption treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attacks unresponsive to intravenous methylprednisolone

We aimed to evaluate the value of immunoadsorption (IA) treatment after the failure of intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Sixty-one NMOSD attacks unresponsive to IVMP were included: 22 patients received rescue IA (IVMP+IA), 24 underwent rescue plasma exchange (PE) (IVMP+PE), and 21 received no further rescue therapy (IVMP alone). The improvement frequencies were higher in the IVMP+IA and IVMP+PE groups than in the IVMP-alone group (P = 0.024). The effective period for IA treatment may be longer than previously thought. IA treatment for IVMP-resistant NMOSD attacks was effective and comparable to PE treatment.

PLEX: the best first-line treatment in nmosd attacks experience at a single center in Colombia

Objective

Primary outcome was to evaluate complete improvement at six months after acute treatment in NMOSD relapses.

Methods

Retrospective observational cohort study of patients with diagnosis of NMOSD admitted for acute attacks. We performed an explanatory analysis using the univariate, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression approach. We compared survival curves using the Kaplan Meier analysis and estimated the median time for the main outcome.

Results

In the univariate analysis, basal EDSS score, AQP4-IgG positivity, PLEX as a first-line treatment (IVMP + PLEX), less systemic complications related to acute treatment and total attack history were independently associated with complete improvement at six months. After adjusting for confounding variables and using multivariate analysis by Cox Regression, positive AQ4-IgG (HR 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02–0.66) and IVMP + PLEX (HR 5.1, 95% CI: 3.9–66.4), were kept as independent factors associated to time to complete improvement. Time from admission to PLEX initiation and complete improvement at six months had a median of seven days (95% CI: 5.2–8.8). In secondary effects, there were no statistical differences between the groups.

Conclusions

PLEX + IVMP is the treatment of choice for NMOSD relapses and should be initiated as early as possible.

Plasma Exchange or Immunoadsorption in Demyelinating Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease mainly affecting the central nervous system. In MS, abnormal immune mechanisms induce acute inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss, and the formation of central nervous system plaques. The long-term treatment involves options to modify the disease progression, whereas the treatment for the acute relapse has its focus in the administration of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (up to 1000 mg daily) over a period of three to five days as a first step. If symptoms of the acute relapse persist, it is defined as glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive, and immunomodulation by apheresis is recommended. However, several national and international guidelines have no uniform recommendations on using plasma exchange (PE) nor immunoadsorption (IA) in this case. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including observational studies or randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of PE or IA on different courses of MS and neuromyelitis optica (NMO). One thousand, three hundred and eighty-three patients were included in the evaluation. Therapy response in relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome was 76.6% (95%CI 63.7–89.8%) in PE- and 80.6% (95%CI 69.3–91.8%) in IA-treated patients. Based on the recent literature, PE and IA may be considered as equal treatment possibilities in patients suffering from acute, glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive MS relapses.

Metabolic and Non-Metabolic Peripheral Neuropathy: Is there a Place for Therapeutic Apheresis?

As the rate of obesity and the incidence of diabetes mellitus have been increasing, diabetic neuropathy has become the most common cause of peripheral neuropathy in developed countries. In addition, a variety of pathogenetically heterogeneous disorders can lead to impairment of the peripheral nervous system including amyloidosis, vitamin deficiencies, uremia and lipid disorders, alcohol abuse, autoimmune and infectious diseases as well as exposure to environmental toxins. We have noted that a combination of these disorders may aggravate the manifestations of peripheral diabetic neuropathy, an effect, which is most pronounced when metabolic and non-metabolic pathologies lead to cumulative damage. Current treatment options are limited and generally have unsatisfactory results in most patients. Therapeutic apheresis (INUSpherese®) allows the removal of metabolic, inflammatory, immunologic and environmental contributors to the disease process and may be an effective treatment option. We reviewed the developments in therapeutic apheresis for metabolic and non-metabolic peripheral neuropathy, including the current literature as well as data from our university diabetes center.