Weaning from prolonged veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after transfer to a specialized center: a retrospective study

The Ventilatory Ratio as a Predictor of Successful Weaning from a Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator

Background: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a critical intervention for patients with severe lung failure, especially acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The weaning process from ECMO relies largely on expert opinion due to a lack of evidence-based guidelines. The ventilatory ratio (VR), which correlates with dead space and mortality in ARDS, is calculated as [minute ventilation (mL/min) x arterial pCO2 (mmHg)]/[predicted body weight × 100 × 37.5]. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the VR alone can serve as a reliable predictor of safe or unsafe liberation from VV-ECMO in critically ill patients. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted, involving ARDS patients undergoing VV-ECMO weaning at Massachusetts General Hospital (January 2016 - December 2020) and at the University Hospital Aachen (January 2012-December 2021). Safe liberation was defined as no need for ECMO recannulation within 48 h after decannulation. Clinical parameters were obtained for both centers at the same time point: 30 min after the start of the SGOT (sweep gas off trial). Results: Of the patients studied, 83.3% (70/84) were successfully weaned from VV-ECMO. The VR emerged as a significant predictor of unsafe liberation (OR per unit increase: 0.38; CI: 0.17-0.81; p = 0.01). Patients who could not be safely liberated had longer ICU and hospital stays, with a trend towards higher mortality (38% vs. 13%; p = 0.05). Conclusions: The VR may be a valuable predictor for safe liberation from VV-ECMO in ARDS patients, with higher VR values associated with an elevated risk of unsuccessful weaning and adverse clinical outcomes.

Liberation From Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Safe and timely liberation from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) would be expected to reduce the duration of ECMO, the risk of complications, and costs. However, how to liberate patients from venovenous ECMO effectively remains understudied.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the current state of the evidence on liberation from venovenous ECMO?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We systematically searched for relevant publications on liberation from venovenous ECMO in Medline and EMBASE. Citations were included if the manuscripts provided any of the following: criteria for readiness for liberation, a liberation protocol, or a definition of successful decannulation or decannulation failure. We included randomized trials, observational trials, narrative reviews, guidelines, editorials, and commentaries. We excluded single case reports and citations where the full text was unavailable.

RESULTS

We screened 1,467 citations to identify 39 key publications on liberation from venovenous ECMO. We then summarized the data into five main topics: current strategies used for liberation, criteria used to define readiness for liberation, conducting liberation trials, criteria used to proceed with decannulation, and parameters used to predict decannulation outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Practices on liberation from venovenous ECMO are heterogeneous and are influenced strongly by clinician preference. Additional research on liberation thresholds is needed to define optimal liberation strategies and to close existing knowledge gaps in essential topics on liberation from venovenous ECMO.

Fundamentals of weaning veno-arterial and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Recent advances in veno-arterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) technology and management have enabled us to support patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary failure, who may have previously been considered untreatable. VA ECMO and VV ECMO are by definition transient therapies and serve as a bridge to recovery, bridge to decision, bridge to transplant, or bridge to no recovery. Weaning ECMO should be considered for all patients once native cardiac and pulmonary function show signs of recovery. Currently, there are no universally accepted protocols for weaning VA and VV ECMO, and consequently, each individual center follows their own weaning protocols. The aim of this review article is to describe different approaches to safely wean from VA and VV ECMO.

Physiological adaptations during weaning from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) has an established evidence base in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has seen exponential growth in its use over the past decades. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the approach to weaning, with variation of practice and outcomes between centres. Preconditions for weaning, management of patients' sedation and mechanical ventilation during this phase, criteria defining success or failure, and the optimal duration of a trial prior to decannulation are all debated subjects. Moreover, there is no prospective evidence demonstrating the superiority of weaning the sweep gas flow (SGF), the extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF) or the fraction of oxygen of the SGF (FdO2), thereby a broad inter-centre variability exists in this regard. Accordingly, the aim of this review is to discuss the required physiological basis to interpret different weaning approaches: first, we will outline the physiological changes in blood gases which should be expected from manipulations of ECBF, SGF and FdO2. Subsequently, we will describe the resulting adaptation of patients' control of breathing, with special reference to the effects of weaning on respiratory effort. Finally, we will discuss pertinent elements of the monitoring and mechanical ventilation of passive and spontaneously breathing patients during a weaning trial. Indeed, to avoid lung injury, invasive monitoring is often required in patients making spontaneous effort, as pressures measured at the airway may not reflect the degree of lung strain. In the absence of evidence, our approach to weaning is driven largely by an understanding of physiology.

A Retrospective Analysis for Risk Factors and Early Prognosis of Delayed Withdrawal Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is widely used for cardiopulmonary assistance during lung transplantation (LTx). However, the optimal timing for ECMO removal remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and early prognosis of delayed withdrawal ECMO after LTx.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-seven patients who underwent LTx supported by ECMO were included in this study. Based on whether or not ECMO was completely stopped in the operating room, patients were divided into early ECMO withdrawal group (group E, 107 cases) and delayed withdrawal group (group D, 160 cases). Perioperative data of the donors and recipients, including the suspected risk factors for delayed removal of ECMO, postoperative complications, and hospital survival rate, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Preoperative New York Heart Association cardiac function for recipients and mechanical ventilation time for donors were independent risk factors for delayed weaning of ECMO in veno-arterial ECMO patients. Compared with group E, the odds of postoperative pulmonary infection, primary graft dysfunction, renal dysfunction, blood transfusion volume, and mechanical ventilation time were significantly higher in group D (all P < 0.05). Delayed withdrawal ECMO was decisive factor for early postoperative death, as the risk of early postoperative death in group D was 1.99 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.54) times as that in the group E.

CONCLUSIONS

During the period of LTx, New York Heart Association grade III/IV for recipients and mechanical ventilation time ≥5 days for donors are suggestive of delayed veno-arterial ECMO removal, and clinicians should minimize the postoperative bypass time of ECMO when conditions permit.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Introduction: The global number of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has been growing after several studies highlighted the favorable results attained in cases of severe respiratory failure. However, evidence-based guidelines for optimal use of ECMO are lacking.Areas covered: This review covers optimal candidates, timing of initiation, strategies for patient management including mechanical ventilation, and decision-making regarding discontinuation of ECMO based on its potential role in treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Expert opinion: Early initiation of ECMO should be considered if hypoxemia and uncompensated hypercapnia do not respond to optimal conventional treatment. Use of a comprehensive management approach for preventing additional lung injury and extrapulmonary organ failure is critical during ECMO support to ensure the best outcome. The possibility of weaning from ECMO should be fully assessed by a multidisciplinary team during ECMO support. Futility should not be determined solely by duration of ECMO, and use of prolonged ECMO for lung recovery may be worthwhile.