Analgesie bei Traumapatienten in der Notfallmedizin

Patient-reported side effects and satisfaction of pre-hospital analgesia with low-dose esketamine: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Analgesia is a core intervention in emergency medicine. Pain is subjective, so patient-reported experience with pain and analgesia is essential for healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported side effects and satisfaction associated with pre-hospital analgesia with low-dose esketamine.

METHODS

This is an observational cross-sectional study conducted as part of quality assurance measures of the German Red Cross Emergency Medical Service, Reutlingen, Germany. The survey was administered to all patients who received prehospital esketamine analgesia from paramedics. Addresses were obtained from medical records and mailed 10 days after the event. Patient feedback was anonymous and could not be linked to operational documentation.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were contacted, and 119 responses were received via the online questionnaire and postal mail (response rate 59%). The mean age of the patients was 68±13 years, with 64.7% (n=77) being female. The main diagnosis reported was fractures of the extremities in 69.7%. Patients reported initial median pain intensity on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 10 [8-10]. Pain was unbearable for 96.3% of patients. After administration of analgesia, 95.3% were satisfied or very satisfied. Patients reported no side effects in 78.5%, minor side effects in 10.0%, significant but well tolerable side effects in 11.3%, borderline tolerable side effects in 0.2%, and no unbearable side effects. Borderline tolerable nausea was reported in 2% of patients along with dreams in 0.8%. No nightmares were reported. Further analysis showed that patients older than 80 years reported significantly more side effects (p < 0.001) and were thus less satisfied with the analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Both patient perception and analgesia with few side effects were important for both safety and satisfaction. In the present study, low-dose esketamine analgesia was associated with low side effects and high patient satisfaction.

[Best practice-example of a paramedic competence system in the context of user and patient safety: the Reutlinger Weg]

The discussion about the competencies and responsibilities of paramedics has been going on for decades and is the subject of controversial legal debates and currently the focus of political attention due to the heterogeneous country-specific design. However, there are only a few published examples of a so-called competency system for the safe and effective use of prehospital emergency medicine interventions. The practical experience of a competence system is presented. Adequate education and training are crucial for development of competence. A physician-supported quality assurance system creates the opportunity to confirm the competencies of paramedics within the framework of competence checks, monitor the system by means of indicators, and detect weak points at an early stage. Safety culture must be exemplified. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are the guideline for implementation. In a competence system, certified paramedics can be granted authorization and thus contribute to rapid and efficient patient care, while keeping emergency physicians available for indications requiring their competencies.

Training Effectiveness and Impact on Safety, Treatment Quality, and Communication in Prehospital Emergency Care: The Prospective Longitudinal Mixed-Methods EPPTC Trial

BACKGROUND

Emergency training is designed to improve medical care teams' knowledge, practical skills, and treatment procedures in patient care to increase patient safety. This requires effective training, but the multifactorial effects of training are difficult to measure.

METHODS

We assessed the impact of emergency team training on treatment procedures and quality, processes, technical skills, and nontechnical skills in simulated trauma emergencies in a longitudinal analysis, using videos that were recorded before (t0), immediately after (t1), and 1 year after the training (t2). The training was evaluated with the validated PERFECT checklist, which includes 7 scales: primary assessment, secondary assessment, procedures, technical skills, trauma communication, nontechnical skills, and a global performance scale.The primary end point was the change from before a training intervention (t0) to 1 year after training (t2), measured by a metric point score. The second end point was the impact of the intervention from before training to after and from immediately after training to 1 year later.

RESULTS

A total of 146 trainings were evaluated. In simulated traumatological emergencies, training participants showed significantly better treatment capacity after 1 year (t0: 28.8 ± 5.6 points versus t2: 59.6 ± 6.6 points, P < 0.001), with greater improvement from t0 to t1 (28.8 ± 5.6 points versus 65.1 ± 7.9 points, P < 0.001). The most significant change from t0 to t2 was seen in the primary assessment, with a mean change of 11.1 ± 5.1, followed by the scale of the procedure (6.1 ± 3.0) and nontechnical skills (6.0 ± 3.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Team trainings with intensive scenario training and short theoretical inputs lead to a significant improvement in simulated care of severely injured patients, especially in identifying and intervening in life-threatening symptoms, processes, and nontechnical skills, even 1 year after the course. Positive, longitudinally positive effects were also in communication and subjective safety of prehospital health care personnel.