Relationship between historical height loss and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women

Zoledronate Reduces Height Loss Independently of Vertebral Fracture Occurrence in a Randomized Trial in Osteopenic Older Women

Vertebral fractures are associated with height loss, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality and are an important endpoint for osteoporosis trials. However, height loss is associated with quality of life and mortality independent of associations with fracture. We have used data from a recent 6-year trial of zoledronate in 2000 osteopenic women aged >65 years to assess the impact of the semiquantitative and quantitative components of the definition of vertebral fracture on the outcome of that trial, to determine what factors impacted on height loss and to test whether height loss can be used as a surrogate for vertebral fracture incidence. In the trial protocol, an incident vertebral fracture was defined as a change in Genant grade plus both a 20% and 4 mm decrease in a vertebral height. The addition of the quantitative criteria reduced the number of fractures detected but did not change the size of the anti-fracture effect (odds ratios of 0.49 versus 0.45) nor the width of the confidence intervals for the odds ratios. Multivariate analysis of baseline predictors of height change showed that age accelerated height loss (p < 0.0001) and zoledronate reduced it (p = 0.0001). Incident vertebral fracture increased height loss (p = 0.0005) but accounted for only 0.7% of the variance in height change, so fracture could not be reliably inferred from height loss. In women without incident vertebral fractures, height loss was still reduced by zoledronate (height change: zoledronate, -1.23; placebo -1.51 mm/yr, p < 0.0001). This likely indicates that zoledronate prevents a subtle but widespread loss of vertebral body heights not detected by vertebral morphometry. Because height loss is associated with quality of life and mortality independent of associations with fracture, it is possible that zoledronate impacts on these endpoints via its effects on vertebral body integrity. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Osteoporosis in Africa-where are we now

Africa is experiencing an exponential increase in the number of older persons. The number of persons surviving with human immunodeficiency virus is simultaneously increasing due to improved availability of anti-retroviral therapy. The burden of non-communicable diseases, in particular, osteoporosis and its consequent fragility fractures, is also predicted to increase. Osteoporosis, however, remains a neglected disease and there are no age-standardized reference data available to accurately screen and diagnose individuals with osteoporosis. Epidemiological studies reporting the incidence of hip fracture or vertebral fractures are limited from Africa, especially Sub-Saharan Africa. The studies are usually limited as they are based on a retrospective data and small study numbers and often from a single study site. However, compared with early initial studies, the more recent studies show that osteoporosis and fractures are increasing across the continent. The overall incidence rates for osteoporosis and fractures still vary greatly between different regions in Africa and ethnic groups. Predisposing factors are similar with those in developed countries, but awareness of osteoporosis is sorely lacking. There is a lack of awareness among the population as well as health authorities, making it extremely difficult to quantify the burden of disease. There is great potential for research into the need and availability of preventive strategies. The FRAX® tool needs to be developed for African populations and may circumvent the shortage of bone densitometry.

ADDING VFA TO DXA IDENTIFIES FRACTURE RISK IN A WAY NOT DUPLICATED BY OTHER MEASURES

OBJECTIVE

Published studies have demonstrated that adding vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) identifies more patients with increased fracture risk than DXA alone. But who needs VFA? This study attempts to determine if some test other than VFA could duplicate the additional information obtained by performing VFA on all first-time patients. This study looked at the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), height loss, age, documented back pain, and nonvertebral fragility fractures.

METHODS

VFA was performed on 1,259 (all) DXA patients at their first visit from March 2010 through September 2013. All DXA and VFA results were read by the same International Society for Clinical Densitometry-certified clinician.

RESULTS

By DXA alone, 44% were osteoporosis. Adding VFA increased clinical osteoporosis by 36% of the original total patients. Eighty-three "normal bone mineral density" patients were changed to clinical osteoporosis. FRAX identified 53% of the patients with diagnosis changes. Historical height loss was not reliable. Increasing age correlated only weakly with clinical osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

These are modest numbers from a nonacademic referral practice and may not be typical of other populations. Thirty-six percent of our patients were misclassified by DXA alone, with fragility fractures already taken into account for T-scores of -1.5 and lower. FRAX, height loss, age, back pain, and fragility fractures all failed to identify many of the patients identified by VFA. Seeing the lateral spine images obtained by VFA influenced patients and families. VFA on all first-time patients should be reconsidered.

ABBREVIATIONS

BMD = bone mineral density DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry FRAX = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool HL = height loss ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry VF = vertebral fracture VFA = vertebral fracture assessment.

The filling proportion of bone cement affects recollapse of vertebrae after percutaneous vertebral augmentation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between filling proportion of bone cement in the vertical direction and incidence of recollapse in the augmented vertebrae after vertebral augmentation.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients (51 vertebrae) who had operations between January 2014 and July 2016 with a mean age of 78.10 years were included. All patients in our department of spine surgery were advised to have follow-up care every 6 months. Patients characteristics, radiographic outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The recollapse of augmented vertebral body occurred in 10 of 51 vertebrae (20%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a high proportion rate of bone cement in the middle vertical direction have a low incidence of experiencing recollapse.

Plasma level of homocysteine associated with severe vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women

The aim of this cross-sectional cohort study was to clarify risk factors for severe vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Japanese women. Subjects were ambulatory volunteers age over 50 years who were recruited from a population of outpatients at a primary care institute. At registration, age, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), and present illness were investigated. Biochemical parameters including urinary levels of type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTXs), and pentosidine and plasma levels of homocysteine were measured. Values were compared with different fracture grades (grade 0-3). A total of 1,475 postmenopausal women (66.6 ± 9.0 years) were included in the present study. Distributions of vertebral fracture grades were grade 1, 137 cases (9.3 %); grade 2, 124 cases (8.4 %); and grade 3, 162 cases (11.0 %). Age, BMI, BMD, NTX, pentosidine, and homocysteine were significantly associated with vertebral fracture in unadjusted analysis. In addition, a higher prevalence of hypertension was observed in patients with severe fracture. When comparing vertebral fracture grade 0 versus grade 2-3 by multiple regression analysis, pentosidine and homocysteine levels were a significant risk for moderate/severe vertebral fracture (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.38, p = 0.049; OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.03-1.46, p = 0.013). Homocysteine levels were also a significant risk when comparing vertebral fracture grade 0 versus grade 3 (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.04-1.58, p = 0.021). Plasma level of homocysteine was an independent risk for severe vertebral fractures.

Effect of including historical height and radius BMD measurement on sarco-osteoporosis prevalence

BACKGROUND

A clinical need exists to improve identification of those who will sustain fragility fractures. Individuals with both osteoporosis (OP) and sarcopenia (SP), so-called "sarco-osteoporosis" (SOP), might be at higher fracture risk than those with OP or SP alone. Approaches to facilitate SOP identification, e.g., use of tallest historical rather than current height and inclusion of radius bone mineral density (BMD) measurement, may be of benefit. This study examined the effect of advancing age on SOP prevalence with and without use of historical tallest height and radius BMD measurement.

METHODS

Adults age 60+ underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) BMD and total body composition measurement. OP and SP were defined using standard criteria: T-score ≤-2.5 at the lumbar spine or hip and appendicular lean mass (ALM)/current height(2) <5.45 kg/m(2) (female) and <7.26 kg/m(2) (male). Proposed "sensitive" SP criteria used historical tallest height instead of current height, while "sensitive" OP criteria added the 1/3(rd) radius T-score. The primary outcome was SOP prevalence by decade (60-69, 70-79, 80+).

RESULTS

A total of 304 individuals (146 M/158 F) participated. OP, SP and SOP prevalence were higher in older adults and increased (p < 0.05) with the "sensitive" criteria. SOP prevalence was lower than that of OP or SP and increased (standard/sensitive) criteria from 1.1 % / 4.5 % in the 60-69 years age group to 10.4 % / 21.9 % in the 80+ years age group.

CONCLUSIONS

SOP prevalence is higher in older adults. Use of historical tallest height and 1/3(rd) radius BMD increases SOP prevalence. Future studies need to assess whether having SOP increases fracture risk and whether use of tallest height and/or one-third radius BMD improves fracture risk prediction.