1
|
Kampen WU, Boddenberg-Pätzold B, Fischer M, Gabriel M, Klett R, Konijnenberg M, Kresnik E, Lellouche H, Paycha F, Terslev L, Turkmen C, van der Zant F, Antunovic L, Panagiotidis E, Gnanasegaran G, Kuwert T, Van den Wyngaert T. The EANM guideline for radiosynoviorthesis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:681-708. [PMID: 34671820 PMCID: PMC8803784 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05541-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) using the intraarticular application of beta-particle emitting radiocolloids has for decades been used for the local treatment of inflammatory joint diseases. The injected radiopharmaceuticals are phagocytized by the superficial macrophages of the synovial membrane, resulting in sclerosis and fibrosis of the formerly inflamed tissue, finally leading to reduced joint effusion and alleviation of joint pain. METHODS The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) has written and approved these guidelines in tight collaboration with an international team of clinical experts, including rheumatologists. Besides clinical and procedural aspects, different national legislative issues, dosimetric considerations, possible complications, and side effects are addressed. CONCLUSION These guidelines will assist nuclear medicine physicians in performing radiosynoviorthesis. Since there are differences regarding the radiopharmaceuticals approved for RSO and the official indications between several European countries, this guideline can only give a framework that must be adopted individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W U Kampen
- Nuklearmedizin Spitalerhof, Radiologische Allianz, Spitalerstraße 8, 20095, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - M Fischer
- Praxis Für Radiologie Und Nuklearmedizin, Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 50, 34117, Kassel, Germany
| | - M Gabriel
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, Kepler University Hospital Linz GmbH, Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Strasse 69, 4040 Linz and Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria
| | - R Klett
- ÜBAG Für Nuklearmedizin, Hanau-Frankfurt-Offenbach-Gießen, Standort Gießen, Paul-Zipp-Str. 171-173, 35398, Gießen, Germany
| | - M Konijnenberg
- Erasmus MC, Nucleaire geneeskunde, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - E Kresnik
- Privatklinik Villach, Institut Für Nuklearmedizin, Dr.-Walter-Hochsteinerstrasse 4, 9504, Warmbad Villach, Austria
| | - H Lellouche
- Unité Rhumatologique de Affections de La Main, Centre Viggo Petersen, Hôpital Lariboisiere, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France
- Institut de Rhumatologie Interventionnelle, 13 rue Thouin, 75005, Paris, France
| | - F Paycha
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France
| | - L Terslev
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 17, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - C Turkmen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey
| | - F van der Zant
- Nucleaire Geneeskunde, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Postbus 501, 1800 AM, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | - L Antunovic
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Milan, 20089, Rozzano, Italy
| | - E Panagiotidis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology Center 'Theageneio', Al Symeonidis 2 str, P.C 54007, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - G Gnanasegaran
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Kuwert
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - T Van den Wyngaert
- Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium
- Molecular Imaging Center Antwerp (MICA - IPPON), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The association between synovial fluid serine proteinase activity and response to intra-articular corticosteroid injection in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2355-2361. [PMID: 32100195 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05003-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES Intra-articular corticosteroid (IAS) injections are often used for the immediate relief of pain and inflammation in the joint of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. However, studies identifying factors that predict response to the IAS injections are lacking. We aimed to assess the usefulness of serine proteinase activity measurements in PsA synovial fluid (SF) samples obtained at the time of injection in predicting clinical response. METHODS The PsA patients with available SF samples from the knee joint were identified from the University of Toronto PsA cohort. Clinical response was defined as an absence of tenderness or swelling in the injected joint at the first post-injection visit, at either 3 or 6 months. SF proteinase activity was determined by measuring cleavage of fluorogenic tri-peptide substrates for trypsin-like (VPR-AMC and VLK-AMC) and chymotrypsin-like (AAPF-AMC) serine proteinases. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to investigate factors associated with response. RESULTS A total of 32 patients with 60 injected joints and data available for follow-up at 3 or 6 months were included in the analysis, with 25 (41.7%) injected joints resulting in clinical response. Age, sex, active joint count, systemic medications and SF serine proteinase activity at the time of injection were included as covariates. Only treatment with biologics was significantly associated with response at 3 or 6 months in the multivariate reduced model (OR 3.02, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS We could not demonstrate an association between SF serine proteinase activity and response to IAS injection. Biologic agents significantly improve the likelihood of achieving clinical response.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang S, Wang X, Liu Y, Sun X, Tang Y. Ultrasound-guided intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide injection for treating refractory small joints arthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16714. [PMID: 31415364 PMCID: PMC6831351 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the efficiency and clinical safety of intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection under the guide of ultrasonography combined with standard treatment for treating refractory small joints arthritis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.TA was injected upon confirmation of the needle inserting into the articular cavity. The dose was 40 mg for the wrist, 20 mg for the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint and 20 mg for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, respectively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for joint pain, swelling, tenderness, synovial hyperplasia and power Doppler signal scores were evaluated at pretreatment, and post-treatment 24 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks as well as 12 weeks.The VAS for pain and tenderness scores showed gradual improvement at 24 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment compared with the baseline levels (P' < .005). The swelling showed no changes at 24 hours after treatment compared with the baseline, and showed gradual improvement at 1 week, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment (P' < .005). Significant decrease was noticed in the synovial hyperplasia score at 4 weeks and 12 weeks compared with the baseline level. Power Doppler signal score showed significant decrease at post-treatment 24 hours, which showed further decrease at 1 week and 4 weeks.Ultrasound-guided intra-articular TA injection is effective for treating RA patients with refractory small joints arthritis without changing the original treatment plan.
Collapse
|