Drug compliance in patients with systemic scleroderma

Therapy satisfaction and health literacy are key factors to improve medication adherence in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Although medication adherence (MA) contributes to therapeutic outcome in systemic sclerosis (SSc), research data are scarce. Factors influencing MA in SSc are hardly known.

METHOD

We conducted a monocentric, cross-sectional study on 85 patients with SSc at the University of Lübeck, Germany, using the Compliance Questionnaire of Rheumatology as the main measurement tool of MA. We also used the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, Illness Perception Questionnaire - Revised, Health Literacy Questionnaire, Lübeck Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (a novel instrument created for this study), and patients' demographic and clinical data, to find factors contributing to MA.

RESULTS

Good MA was seen in 51.8% of patients. MA was positively associated with therapy satisfaction (p < 0.001), modified Rodnan Skin Score (p = 0.032), age (p = 0.025), intake of micronutrients (p = 0.033), number of prescribed drugs (p = 0.014), and some dimensions of health literacy. Negative associations were found for patients with weight loss attributed to SSc (p = 0.009) and the perception that the disease is caused by the patient's personality (p = 0.011) or emotional state (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Although most SSc patients display good MA, non-adherence remains a major problem. Patients should be assessed for non-adherence. The factors affecting MA identified herein could help to improve therapeutic outcomes.

A systematic literature review of existing tools used to assess medication adherence in connective tissue diseases: the state of the art for the future development of co-designed measurement tools

Lack of medication adherence is frequent in chronic connective tissue diseases and is associated with poorer health outcomes, low quality of life and economic loss. This research is based on a systematic literature search and aims to identify the surveys and tools used for the assessment of medication adherence in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and in particular the tools co-designed with patients. A systematic literature review was performed in PubMed and Embase databases searching for studies concerning the application of surveys or tools designed for medication adherence assessment. A specific analysis was also performed to identify which of these existing tools were developed in co-design with patients affected by CTDs. 1958 references were identified, and 31 studies were finally included. Systemic lupus erythematosus was the most investigated disease, followed by the Behçet's disease. The tools used to assess adherence in CTDs were, in most cases, valid and useful. However, the results showed a certain degree of heterogeneity among the studies and the medication adherence assessment and measurement tools adopted, which were mostly based on selfreported questionnaire. No co-designed tools with patients were found. Low- and non-adherence were explored in some CTDs with valid and useful tools, while other CTDs still need to be assessed. Therefore, more efforts should be made to better understand the specific reasons for the low- and non-adherence in CTDs patients.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

Some studies have shown that the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in patients with chronic painful conditions, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This study aimed to determine the prevalence and types of CAM usage in patients with AS and to evaluate the impact of treatment adherence and beliefs about medicines on CAM usage.

METHODS

This study has a descriptive design. A total of 140 patients with AS were included. The treatment adherence of the patients was evaluated using the Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ-T) was used to assess patients' beliefs about medicines.

RESULTS

Previous or current CAM usage was stated by 40% of the patients. It has been found that CAM usage was significantly high (p<0.05) in patients who were married, older, and diagnosed at older ages. The difference between patients' beliefs about medicines and CAM usage was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The BMQ-T scores were significantly different in terms of the patients' treatment adherence (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that approximately half of the patients with AS were using 1 CAM method. Furthermore, medication adherence and patients' beliefs about medicines did not have any impact on CAM usage, but the patients' beliefs about medicines affected treatment adherence.

[Monocentric study on pharmaceuticals taken by patients to treat systemic sclerosis]

INTRODUCTION

Pharmaceutical prescription in systemic sclerosis is guided by national and international recommendations. This study's primary objective was to describe and analyze these prescriptions among patients of our cohort. We also aimed to assess drug compliance among our patients.

METHODS

This is a monocentric observational study on two cohorts of patients with systemic sclerosis; a primary cohort comprising ambulatory patients, who were prospectively included, with exhaustive prescription's data collection; and a secondary cohort included patients asked to fill in a self-questionnaire on treatment compliance.

RESULTS

The main cohort included 157 patients, including 31 cases of diffuse systemic sclerosis. A vasodilator drug for Raynaud's phenomenon was prescribed in 75 patients (47.9%) and a specific treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension in 10 patients (6.4%). Immuno-modulators/immunosuppressants was prescribed in 62 patients (39.5%), who received prednisone (n=37, 23.6%), mycophenolate mofetil (n=14, 8.9%), hydroxychloroquine (n=12, 7.6%) and colchicine (n=22, 14%). Treatment for "gastro-intestinal tract involvement" was prescribed for 106 patients (67.5%) and treatment of a scleroderma renal crisis with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for 6 patients (3.8%). Among the 42 patients in the secondary cohort, 21.4% reported a good compliance, mostly older patients (P=0.045) or those who had not experienced adverse events (P=0.009).

CONCLUSION

This study provides original real-life data illustrating the heterogeneity of prescription habits in systemic sclerosis. As previously reported, treatment compliance was insufficient.

Treatment adherence in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Treatment adherence is an important medical and pharmaco-economical phenomenon, influenced by multiple variables. Treatment adherence in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been poorly studied.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess treatment adherence in SSc patients and to identify factors associated with good and poor adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a monocentric, cross-sectional, observational study. Treatment adherence was evaluated by the Compliance Questionnaire of Rheumatology (CQR). The necessity of treatment and concerns about treatment were investigated using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire-Specific (BMQ-S). The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R) assessed illness perceptions. Disease-related characteristics were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 47 (71.2%) had a weighted CQR score of ≤80% ("poor adherence") and 19 (28.8%) had a weighted CQR score of >80% ("good adherence"). No significant relationship between demographic, clinical or psychological factors and overall adherence could be found, except with the IPQ subscale "timeline acute/chronic" (p = 0.042). Our patient population estimated the necessity of their medication high (mean necessity score 20.5), with moderate concern beliefs (mean concern score 15.1). Subjective adherence, as self-reported by patients, was high.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated low treatment adherence rates in SSc patients. We could not identify demographic, clinical or psychological factors associated with treatment adherence, except with the IPQ subscale "timeline acute/chronic". This suggests a correlation between poor adherence and the belief that the disease will be chronic without improvement over time. Symptom relief was an important motivating factor for taking medication. The treatment necessity was scored higher than treatment concerns, but the necessity beliefs were not associated with adherence.

Treatment adherence and disease burden of individuals with rheumatic diseases admitted as outpatients to a large rheumatology center in Shanghai, China

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine treatment adherence and disease burden, analyze detailed medication problems experienced by patients, and identify factors associated with adherence in patients with rheumatic diseases in China.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with confirmed diagnoses of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were recruited, regardless of demographics, disease severity, and treatment characteristics. Adherence was assessed using the Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology and interview-based self-reports. A backwards-stepwise multivariate regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with adherence.

RESULTS

We collected data on 252 patients who had a rheumatic disease and visited our outpatient clinic in January or February of 2017. There were 121 patients with SLE, 70 with RA, and 61 with AS. The overall adherence rate was 41.7%, with 48.7% for SLE patients, 38.6% for RA patients, and 31.1% for AS patients. The overall EuroQol (EQ)-index was 0.761; AS patients had the best EQ-index (0.792), followed by those with SLE (0.780) and RA (0.700). SLE patients also had greater annual direct costs (US$5,103.58) than RA or AS patients.

CONCLUSION

Overall, 41.7% of our rheumatic disease patients were adherent to treatment, lower than in many other parts of the world. This indicates that it is important to identify methods that improve adherence in this population. It is particularly important to improve the health status and reduce the disease burden of patients with SLE, the most common of the three rheumatic diseases we analyzed. Our results suggest that reminder tools may improve adherence. Further prospective research is needed to confirm whether reminder tools and other measures can improve patient compliance.

Quality of life and drug compliance: their interrelationship in rheumatic patients

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

In rheumatic disorders, one of the treatment objectives is to improve the patient's quality of life (QoL). Similar to other chronic conditions, drug compliance is poor, but necessary for successful treatment. The relationship between drug compliance and QoL has never been tested. The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship between drug compliance and QoL in patients with different rheumatic disorders.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted and patients ≥18 years of age with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and systemic scleroderma (SSc) were recruited. Data were collected by questionnaires including the Short Form 36 version 2, Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology (CQR), Health Assessment Questionnaire and by a general questionnaire that focused on demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

The questionnaires were completed by 289 patients. Of the respondents, 61.6% (178) were treated for RA, 16.3% (47) for SA, 14.2% (41) for SSc and 8% (23) for JIA. The median of CQR score ranged from 66.7 (JIA) to 82.5 (RA), with 51.6% of patients reaching a score <80. QoL was decreased mainly in the physical component, with the lowest rate for patients with SSc. Higher compliance was observed in patients with decreased QoL (physical component), nevertheless, statistical significance of the relationship was reached only in JIA and SA patients.

CONCLUSION

Doctors caring for rheumatic patients should focus their efforts on strengthening drug compliance in patients with higher QoL where it seems that lower compliance is more likely.