Anaphylaxis to anakinra in a pediatric patient with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis successfully treated with canakinumab: a case-based review

Hypersensitivity to Biological Treatments in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: How Should It Be Managed?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most frequent diseases in the practice of pediatric rheumatology. JIA treatments have been modified and improved with the use of biological drugs along with technological innovations. However, different types of hypersensitivity reactions to biological drugs have also been reported. Anaphylaxis and infusion reactions occurring during the intravenous infusion require a critical approach in the acute period. On the other hand, the detection of drug-related late-type reactions and the development of antibodies to the agent highlight the need for an understanding of the drug-induced etiology to prevent the patient from continuing the treatment with the culprit drug. The chronic disease process, concomitant immune dysregulation, and multiple drug use may result in these hypersensitivity reactions. In this review, the hypersensitivity reactions to the biological treatments used in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and the management of these conditions are discussed.

Biologics and anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of biologicals as therapeutic agents in oncology and other inflammatory diseases has dramatically increased during the last years. Due to their biological nature and inherent immunological activity, they are able to induce important adverse events, such as cytokine release reactions (rapid release of proinflammatory cytokines), serum sickness disease, and immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. The aim of the current article is to review the state of the art of anaphylaxis because of biological agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different phenotypes, and potential underlying endotypes, have been described in anaphylactic reactions to biologicals. There seems to be a spectrum from type 1 reactions (IgE or non-IgE-mediated) to cytokine release reactions, with some reactions falling in between both. Management should be directed according to such phenotypes.

SUMMARY

There is ongoing research to further define immediate adverse reactions to biologicals and to find relevant biomarkers to aid in their diagnosis. Such information will serve in defining their immediate and long term management.

Expedited Desensitization to Canakinumab

Introduction

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) antagonists have been successful in the management of monogenic auto-inflammatory diseases, notably classic hereditary fever syndromes, such as Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF). Anakinra (Kineret®), a human recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), has been clinically effective in the management of persistent auto-inflammation, such as FMF. Few studies report anaphylaxis in response to anakinra, which were resolved with an anakinra desensitization or the anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody canakinumab (ILARIS®). We describe the first reported desensitization protocol to canakinumab.

Case Report

A 51-year-old man with a prior history of FMF presented with history of failed colchicine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and anakinra trials. Anakinra desensitization and canakinumab intradermal testing (IDT) resulted in anaphylactic and allergic symptoms, respectively. Expedited desensitization to canakinumab was successfully performed with 15-minute intervals between 13 doses of incremental increase to 150 mg.

Discussion

Biological agents are immune modulators that may evoke unanticipated hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. These anaphylactic reactions to biologics have been infrequently reported, but the expanding market may increase the risk of IgE-mediated hypersensitivities and subsequent need for desensitization protocols. The current, expedited desensitization evaluated several published protocols involving anakinra desensitization to determine appropriate dosing for canakinumab.

Conclusion

We report the gastrointestinal intolerance and continued FMF flares on colchicine, followed by anaphylactic responses to anakinra and allergic reaction to IDT of canakinumab, in the present case of FMF. Our novel, expedited canakinumab desensitization protocol serves as an effective and alternative therapy in cases when other appropriate biologic agents are not tolerated.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies in Children

Biologic drugs are widely used in pediatric medicine. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in particular are a therapeutic option for rheumatic, autoinflammatory and oncologic diseases. Adverse drug reactions and hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to mAbs may occur in children. Clinical presentation of HSRs to mAbs can be classified according to phenotypes in infusion-related reactions, cytokine release syndrome, both alpha type reactions and type I (IgE/non-IgE), type III, and type IV reactions, all beta-type reactions. The aim of this review is to focus on HSRs associated with the most frequent mAbs in childhood, with particular attention to beta-type reactions. When a reaction to mAbs is suspected a diagnostic work-up including in-vivo and in-vitro testing should be performed. A drug provocation test is recommended only when no alternative drugs are available. In selected patients with immediate IgE-mediated drug allergy a desensitization protocol is indicated. Despite the heavy use of mAbs in childhood, studies evaluating the reliability of diagnostic test are lacking. Although desensitization may be effective in reducing the risk of reactions in children, standardized pediatric protocols are still not available.

Hypersensitivity reactions to biologics (part I): allergy as an important differential diagnosis in complex immune-derived adverse events

Purpose

Biotechnological substances (BSs) are strongly relied upon to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, and to treat oncological, allergological, and other inflammatory diseases. Allergic reactions to partly foreign biologics can occur due to their potential immunogenicity. The severity of an immune response to a biological drug may range from no clinical significance to a severe, life-threatening anaphylactic reaction.

Methods

Detailed searches were performed on Pubmed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to include all available publications. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and British Columbia Cancer Agency Drug Manual databases were screened for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR), infusion reaction, injection site reaction, urticaria, and anaphylaxis for individual BSs.

Results

Treatment with BSs can cause various types of HSR. These are mentioned in the literature with definitions such as allergic reactions, anaphylactoid reactions, anaphylaxis, HSR, infusion reactions, injection site reactions, cytokine release syndrome, and urticaria. Due to the overlap in signs and symptoms in the reported descriptions, it is not always possible to differentiate these reactions properly according to their pathomechanism. Similarly, many data reported as anaphylaxis actually describe severe anaphylactic reactions (grades III or IV).

Conclusion

There is an urgent need for a simpler symptom- or system-based classification and scoring system to create an awareness for HSRs to BSs. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of HSRs and increased clinical experience in the treatment of side effects will provide timely control of unexpected reactions. As a result, immunotherapy with BSs will become safer in the future.