Women who had appendectomy have increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide cohort study

Colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of appendiceal disease

In this editorial, we comment on the article published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. We focused on the understanding of appendiceal disease, and the various options for diagnosis and treatment via endoscopy. Some factors affecting the diagnosis and management of appendiceal diseases are also discussed. The existence of any organ has its natural rationality, and the appendix is such a magical organ. A growing number of experts and scholars have gradually come to a consensus that the appendix is not a useless evolutionary relic. There are many lymphocytes and lymph nodes in the appendix wall, which has a strong immune function, and this function is particularly important for children and adolescents. Many intestinal probiotics in the appendix are very helpful for maintaining the balance of the intestinal flora. With the continuous progress of endoscopic technology, endoscopic treatment involving preservation of the appendix has shown great advantages over surgery. In the diagnosis of appendiceal inflammation and neoplasms, colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde appendicography and choledochoscopy help assess conditions of the appendix. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy, abscess drainage under colonoscopy, fenestration of abscess under colonoscopy, and endoscopic or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery resection of appendiceal neoplasms are safe and effective endoscopic treatments for appendiceal disease. New breakthroughs in the application of endoscopy in the appendix are expected to occur in the near future.

Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment for acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment (ERAT) for acute appendicitis (AA) by conducting a meta-analysis of clinical randomized trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Eight electronic databases were searched. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RevMan5.3 and STATA14 software were used to for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six RCTs with 2236 subjects were analyzed. First, operative time, length of hospital stay and duration of bed rest were shorter in the ERAT groups than in the control groups, with the pooled MD and 95 % CI being -13.22(-20.09, -6.35)(p = 0.0002), -2.13 (-2.47, -1.80)(p < 0.00001) and -3.15 (-3.76, -2.53)(p < 0.00001), respectively. Second, patients in the ERAT groups had a lower incidence of complications than the control groups, with a pooled RR and 95 % CI of 0.25(0.18, 0.35)(p < 0.00001). Third, patients who received ERAT returned to normal temperature faster than the control groups, the pooled MD and 95 % CI was -3.39(-4.36, -2.42)(p<0.00001). Finally, the result showed that the recurrence rate in the ERAT groups was approximately twice that of control groups, with the pooled RR and 95 % CI being 2.10(1.02, 4.32)(p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAT results in fewer complications and shorter recovery time. And compared to appendectomy, ERAT reduces operative time and intraoperative bleeding. However, the recurrence of acute appendicitis after ERAT remains a concern. And more multicenter and large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the benefits of ERAT.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

We have registered on the PROSPERO [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], and the registration number is CRD42023420171.

Sarcoidosis and its relation to other immune-mediated diseases: Epidemiological insights

Several epidemiological studies show a co-occurrence of sarcoidosis with other immune-mediated diseases (IMD). There are many similarities between sarcoidosis and IMDs in their geographical distribution and risk factors. Understanding these similarities and identifying the differences can help us to better understand sarcoidosis and put it into context with other IMDs. In this review, we present the current knowledge about the overlap between sarcoidosis and other IMDs derived from epidemiological studies. Epidemiologic methods utilize study design and statistical analysis to describe the patterns in data and, ideally, identify causal relationships between an exposure and a health outcome. We discuss how study design and analysis may affect the interpretation of epidemiological studies on this topic and highlight some theories that attempt to explain the relation between sarcoidosis and other IMDs.

Appendectomy Mitigates Coxsackievirus B3-Induced Viral Myocarditis

Appendix has a distinct abundance of lymphatic cells and serves as a reservoir of microbiota which helps to replenish the large intestine with healthy flora. And it is the primary site of IgA induction, which shapes the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Recent population-based cohort studies report that appendectomy is associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease. Here, whether appendectomy has an effect on the occurrence and development of coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3)-induced viral myocarditis is studied. 103 TCID50 CVB3 was inoculated i.p. into appendectomized and sham-operated mice. RNA levels of viral load and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the hearts and the intestine were detected by RT-PCR. Compared to sham-operated mice, appendectomized mice exhibited attenuated cardiac inflammation and improved cardiac function, which is associated with a systemic reduced viral load. Appendectomized mice also displayed a reduction in cardiac neutrophil and macrophage infiltration and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Mechanistically, we found that CVB3 induced an early and potent IL-10 production in the cecal patch at 2 days post infection. Appendectomy significantly decreased intestinal IL-10 and IL-10+ CD4+ Treg frequency which led to a marked increase in intestinal (primary entry site for CVB3) anti-viral IFN-γ+ CD4+ T and IFN-γ+ CD8+ T response and viral restriction, eventually resulting in improved myocarditis. Our results suggest that appendix modulates cardiac infection and inflammation through regulating intestinal IL-10+ Treg response.

Appendicitis is associated with an increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide, population-based, case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between appendicitis and the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Using claims data from the 2003-2013 Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database, we selected 6054 patients with newly diagnosed SLE from 2007 to 2012 and 36,324 age-, sex- and year of SLE diagnosis date-matched (1:6) non-SLE controls. After controlling for potential confounders, a multivariable conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association of appendicitis history with SLE. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using various definitions of appendicitis. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine possible modification effects by age, gender, level of urbanization, income and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

RESULTS

The average age of patients was 38 years old in both groups. The proportion of females was 86.5%. 75 (1.2%) of SLE cases and 205 (0.6%) of non-SLE controls had appendicitis history before the index date. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, appendicitis was associated with a higher risk of SLE (aOR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.34-2.52), and such association remained robust after variation of appendicitis definition. No significant modification effects were found for the association between appendicitis and SLE by age, gender, urbanization level, income and CCI.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide, population-based case-control study demonstrates an association between appendicitis and incident SLE. Lack of individual smoking status is a major limitation. Key Points • Appendicitis was significantly associated with an increased risk of SLE. • Such association remained robust using various definitions of appendicitis.

Incidence and risk of sepsis following appendectomy: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Appendectomy is a frequently performed surgical procedure; however, long-term consequences have not been fully explored. We used a nationwide population-based cohort to determine whether patients undergoing appendectomy are at an increased risk of sepsis. Overall, 252,688 patients undergoing appendectomy and 252,472 matched controls were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A propensity score analysis was used for matching age, sex, index year and comorbidities at a ratio of 1:1. Multiple Cox regression and stratified analyses were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of developing sepsis. Patients undergoing appendectomy had a 1.29 times (aHR: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.33) higher risk of developing sepsis than those not undergoing. Patients aged 20-49 years had a 1.58-fold higher risk of sepsis in the appendectomy cohort (aHR; 95% CI, 1.50-1.68). Also, having undergone appendectomy, patients had a higher likelihood of sepsis, regardless of sex and with or without comorbidities. Patients with <1 year follow-up showed a 1.98-fold risk of sepsis in the appendectomy cohort. Patients with 1-4 and ≥5 years follow-up showed a 1.29 and 1.11-fold risk of sepsis, respectively. Future research is required to elucidate the possible immuno-pathological mechanisms of these associations.

Risk of irritable bowel syndrome in patients who underwent appendectomy: A nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures; however, the possible long-term consequences have not been fully explored. The appendix has been associated with microflora of the gut and immune functions. However, literature examining the relationship between prior appendectomy and the risk of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of irritable bowel syndrome for patients who underwent appendectomy by using a nationwide longitudinal population-based cohort.

METHODS

Data from this study was collected from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), a population-based database. We identified 12,760 patients who underwent appendectomy between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2012. A total of 9236 patients who had appendectomy (case group) were randomly matched with 9236 patients who had not undergone appendectomy (control group) in a ratio of 1:1 by means of propensity scores. The hazard ratio (HR) of IBS was calculated by multiple Cox regression. Furthermore, sensitivity test and stratified analysis were performed.

FINDINGS

The incidence rate of IBS was 51.30 per 10,000 person-years in patients having appendectomy, more than the 35.28 per 10,000 person-years in patients not having appendectomy. Patients who underwent appendectomy had 1.46-fold risk of IBS compared to patients not having appendectomy (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24-1.72). Stratified analysis revealed that the higher HR of 1.55 (95% CI, 1.18-2.04) in patients <40 years old, and particularly within the first 5 years follow-up period of undergoing appendectomy. In addition, patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia had a greater risk of suffering IBS after appendectomy (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.92).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with appendectomy have a higher incidental risk of IBS than the control population. The risk is higher for patients under 40 years old and those who received appendectomy within 5 years. Physicians could take this into consideration for treatment plans of patients who have underwent this surgery. Further research on the pathogenesis of this association is required.

FUNDING

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (MOHW108-TDU-B-212-133004), China Medical University Hospital, Academia Sinica Stroke Biosignature Project (BM10701010021), MOST Clinical Trial Consortium for Stroke (MOST 108-2321-B-039-003-), Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan, and Katsuzo and Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan.