1
|
Nikfar M, Malek Mahdavi A, Khabbazi A, Hajialilo M. Long-term remission in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e13909. [PMID: 33277751 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remission has been introduced as a desirable outcome and the primary target of treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The purpose of this study was to identify the number of patients in remission and the long-term outcome of the disease and their predictors. METHOD Of the 379 patients in our SLE Database, a total of 193 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Remission was definition according to the definitions of remission in SLE. Three levels of remission were defined, including remission on-treatment, remission off-treatment and complete remission. In addition, we have defined a sustained remission for each level of remission in which the remission should last at least 5 years. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 96 months, remission on-treatment and off-treatment, and complete remission were obtained in 49.2%, 38.9% and 19.2% of patients, respectively. Predictors of remission on-treatment in multivariate regression analysis were adherence to therapy and remission induction during 6 months after treatment. Predictors of remission off-treatment were age ≥40 at the time of analysis and remission induction during 6 months after treatment. Poor outcome (SLE Damage Index ≥1) was observed in 28% of the patients. Age at disease onset <30, kidney and nervous system involvement and SLEDAI-2K ≥ 11 at the cohort entry were the risk factors of poor outcome in multivariate analysis. However, sustained remission on-treatment had a negative association with poor outcome. CONCLUSION Treatment with glucocorticoids, antimalarials, immunosuppressants and biologics in sequential or in combination may cause durable remission. Patients with durable remission have significantly lower organ damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mozhdeh Nikfar
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Aida Malek Mahdavi
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Alireza Khabbazi
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mehrzad Hajialilo
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Z, Cheng C, Wang Z, Wang Y, Zhao J, Wang Q, Tian X, Hsieh E, Li M, Zeng X. Prevalence, predictors and prognostic benefits of remission achievement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 74:208-218. [PMID: 32986933 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review and evaluate the prevalence, potential predictors and prognostic benefits of remission achievement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Studies reporting prevalence, predictors and prognostic benefits of remission in adult SLE patients were searched and selected from Pubmed and EMBASE databases. Studies were reviewed for relevance and quality. Two reviewers independently assessed studies and extracted data. RESULTS Data from forty-one studies including 17270 patients were included and analyzed. Although no consensus has been achieved on the definition of remission, clinical disease activity, serological activity, duration and treatment are agreed to be critical components of defining remission status. In most studies published in the recent 5 years, 42.4% to 88% patients achieved and maintained the remission status for one year, and 21.1% to 70% for at least 5 years. Factors associated with remission included older age at diagnosis, lower baseline disease activity and absence of major organ involvement, while positive serological results were shown to be negatively associated with remission. Remission-especially prolonged remission-when achieved, demonstrated an association with lower accrual of damage and better quality of life among patients with SLE. CONCLUSIONS Remission is an achievable and desirable target for SLE patients, proven to be associated with prognostic benefits. Further development and assessment of a clear remission definition, a risk stratification model as well as a full algorithm with frequency of monitoring, timepoints for treatment adjustment and drug withdrawal are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyi Yang
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Cheng
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ziqian Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Yanhong Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine Peking, Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiuliang Zhao
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Xinping Tian
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Evelyn Hsieh
- Section of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mengtao Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zeng
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|