Study of clinical utility of antibodies to phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex in Asian-Indian patients with suspected APS

Antibody profiles in the mosaic of 'seronegative' APS syndrome

Clinical manifestations, as distinct from thrombotic and obstetric morbidity, were recently included in the update of classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, the existence of several patients with clinical manifestations suggestive of APS, but negative for criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) [anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2-GPI), and lupus anticoagulant] may suggest an update of diagnostic criteria. In this study, we analysed the prevalence of six non-criteria aPLs in a large monocentric cohort of patients with seronegative APS (SN-APS), to investigate their possible diagnostic role. aCL IgA, aβ2-GPI IgA, and aβ2-GPI Domain 1 antibodies were detected by chemiluminescence, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgG, anti-vimentin/cardiolipin (aVim/CL) IgG, and anti-carbamylated-β2-glycoprotein I (aCarb-β2-GPI) IgG by ELISA in sera from 144 SN-APS patients. In SN-APS patients, aCL IgA was detected in 4/144 (2.77%), aβ2-GPI IgA in 2/144 (1.39%), aβ2-GPI-Domain 1 in 1/144 (0.69%), aPS/PT in 16/144 (11.11%), aVim/CL in 37/144 (25.69%), and aCarb-β2-GPI in 43/144 patients (29.86%). Patients negative for all non-criteria aPL assays were 77/144 (53.47%). Notably, the Venn diagram showed that aCarb-β2-GPI together with aVim/CL represented the prevalent combination of positive antibodies. In SN-APS patients, aCL IgA were associated with recurrent thrombosis (OR 11.48; P = 0.03); in obstetric SN-APS patients, aPS/PT were significantly associated with foetal deaths (OR 4.84; P = 0.01), aVim/CL with spontaneous abortions (OR 2.71; P = 0.016). This study indicates that aPS/PT, aVim/CL and aCarb-β2-GPI antibodies may represent useful tools to identify 'seronegative' APS patients, who are negative for criteria aPLs, supporting the need to make testing for non-criteria aPLs more accessible in patients with SN-APS.

Beyond the classics: The emerging value of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which can lead to thrombosis and pregnancy complications. Within the diverse range of aPLs, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) have gained significance in clinical practice. The detection of aPS/PT has proven valuable in identifying APS patients and stratifying their risk, especially when combined with other aPL tests like lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI). Multivariate analyses have confirmed aPS/PT as an independent risk factor for vascular thrombosis and obstetric complications, with its inclusion in the aPL score and the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) aiding in risk evaluation. However, challenges remain in the laboratory testing of aPS/PT, including the need for assay standardization and its lower sensitivity in certain patient populations. Further research is necessary to validate the clinical utility of aPS/PT antibodies in APS diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.

Added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in the workup of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies

BACKGROUND

The added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) in the diagnostic workup of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is unclear. Currently, diagnosis of thrombotic APS (TAPS) and obstetric APS (OAPS) requires persistent presence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin (Ig) G/IgM, or anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of aPS/PT IgG and IgM in OAPS.

METHODS

aPS/PT IgG/IgM, aCL IgG/IgM, aβ2GPI IgG/IgM, and LAC were determined in 653 patients (OAPS, TAPS, and controls). In-house aPS/PT cut-off values were calculated, titers and prevalence were compared between OAPS, TAPS, and controls and type of pregnancy morbidity. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated.

RESULTS

In OAPS, aPS/PT IgG and IgM showed an OR of 4.32 (95% CI, 2.54-7.36) and 3.37 (95% CI, 1.93-5.89), respectively, but the association was not independent of LAC. Prevalence and titers of aPS/PT IgG and IgM were lower in OAPS than in patients with TAPS. aPS/PT were more prevalent and showed higher titers in patients with late pregnancy loss than in patients with early pregnancy loss with a positivity of 86.4% and 39.3%, respectively. Higher aPS/PT titers did not increase the likelihood of having OAPS.

CONCLUSION

The added value of aPS/PT testing in the current diagnostic workup of OAPS seems limited compared with LAC, aCL, and aβ2GPI. aPS/PT might be useful in specific subsets of patients with OAPS. However, future multicentric studies are needed to elucidate the risk of less frequent and most severe obstetrical manifestations.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the presence of a clinical criterion (thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity), combined with persistently circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, laboratory criteria aPL consist of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgG/IgM, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM. Diagnosis and risk stratification of APS are complex and efforts to standardize and optimize laboratory tests have been ongoing since the initial description of the syndrome. LAC detection is based on functional coagulation assays, while aCL and aβ2GPI are measured with immunological solid-phase assays. LAC assays are especially prone to interference by anticoagulation therapy, but strategies to circumvent this interference are promising. Alternative techniques such as thrombin generation for LAC detection and to estimate LAC pathogenicity have been suggested, but are not applicable yet in routine setting. For aCL and aβ2GPI, a lot of different assays and detection techniques such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent and chemiluminescent assays are available. Furthermore, a lack of universal calibrators or standards results in high variability between the different solid-phase assays. Other non-criteria aPL such as anti-domain I β2 glycoprotein I and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies have been suggested for risk stratification purposes in APS, while their added value to diagnostic criteria seems limited. In this review, we will describe laboratory assays for diagnostic and risk evaluation in APS, integrating applicable guidelines and classification criteria. Current insights and hindrances are addressed with respect to both laboratory and clinical implications.

"Non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies": bridging the gap between seropositive and seronegative Antiphospholipid Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the prevalence of non-criteria anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies and their role in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in a cohort of patients with clinical features consistent with a diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but persistently negative for criteria aPL-anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2-GPI), and lupus anticoagulant (LA) - named seronegative APS (SN-APS).

METHODS

Sera from SN-APS patients were tested for aCL by TLC-immunostaining, anti-vimentin/cardiolipin (aVim/CL) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) by ELISA. Control groups of our study were APS patients and healthy controls.

RESULTS

We enrolled 114 consecutive SN-APS patients, 69 (60.5%) resulted positive for at least one non-criteria test in two occasions 12 weeks apart. Among the persistently positive patients to these tests, 97% resulted positive for aCL by TLC-immunostaining, 52.3% for aVim/CL and 17.4% for aPS/PT. SN-APS patients with double positivity (aCL by TLC-immunostaining and aVim/CL) showed a likelihood positive ratio of 8 to present mixed thrombotic and obstetrical features. Among SN-APS patients tested positive, after the therapeutic changes, 3 cases of recurrent thrombosis were observed [median follow-up 41 months (IQR 39.5)]. Twenty pregnancies were recorded in 17 SN-APS patients after the detection of unconventional aPL and 12 of them (60%) experienced a good outcome under conventional treatment for APS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest monocentric study demonstrating that aCL tested by TLC-immunostaining and aVim/CL can detect aPL positivity in SN-APS. It may encourage clinicians to monitoring and providing adequate targeted therapy, which improve SN-APS prognosis.

Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: refining the value of "non-criteria" antibodies for diagnosis and clinical management

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial and venous thrombotic manifestations and/or pregnancy-related complications in patients with persistently high antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), the most common being represented by anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-beta 2 glycoprotein-I (aβ2GPI), and lupus anticoagulant (LAC). A growing number of studies have showed that, in some cases, patients may present with clinical features of APS but with temporary positive or persistently negative titers of aPL. For these patients, the definition of seronegative APS (SN-APS) has been proposed. Nevertheless, the negativity to classic aPL criteria does not imply that other antibodies may be present or involved in the onset of thrombosis. The diagnosis of SN-APS is usually made by exclusion, but its recognition is important to adopt the most appropriate anti-thrombotic strategy to reduce the rate of recurrences. This research is in continuous development as the clinical relevance of these antibodies is far from being completely clarified. The most studied antibodies are those against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, vimentin/cardiolipin complex, and annexin A5. Moreover, the assays to measure the levels of these antibodies have not yet been standardized. In this review, we will summarize the evidence on the most studied non-criteria aPL, their potential clinical relevance, and the antithrombotic therapeutic strategies available in the setting of APS and SN-APS.

Does seronegative obstetric APS exist? "pro" and "cons"

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is the commonest treatable cause of recurrent miscarriage and pharmacological treatment of pregnant patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) should aim at preventing obstetric complications and maternal thrombotic events. Conventional treatment for patients with an established diagnosis of obstetric APS (OAPS), generally resulting in over 70-80% successful pregnancies. Since seropositive (SP)-APS and seronegative (SN)-APS patients had shown similar clinical profiles, patients with SN- OAPS, as well as SP-OAPS, should receive combined treatment in order to improve the pregnancy prognosis; indeed, current standard of care increased good pregnancy outcome in SN-APS, with similar effect to confirmed APS. The above data suggest that there are patients with the clinical manifestations of OAPS but persistently negative to conventional aPL that need to be identified to ensure adequate therapy and therefore a better prognosis. The clinical utility of non-criteria aPL in the diagnosis of SN-APS is still a matter of debate. In the last decade more and more studies have reported the presence of patients suffering from SN-APS in which non-conventional ("non-criteria") aPL might be present or antibodies may be detected using methodological approaches different from the traditional assays. To improve test standardization large prospective, multicenter, and multinational studies are needed. Therefore, when assessing a patient with clinical manifestations consistent with OAPS but aPL negative using the conventional available assays, the clinician should consider the possibility that the patient is affected with SN-APS.

Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex antibodies as a determinant of prothrombotic plasma fibrin clot properties in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) antibodies are recognized as a marker for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Dense and poorly lysable fibrin clots occur in thrombotic APS. Compact clots predict thromboembolism, but determinants of the unfavorable clot phenotype remain unknown in APS. We hypothesized that elevated aPS/PT antibodies determine unfavorable clot features.

METHODS

In a cohort study involving 124 consecutive patients with thrombotic APS, we measured at baseline plasma fibrin clot permeability (Ks ), efficiency of fibrinolysis (clot lysis time, CLT), and turbidity (off anticoagulation) along with immunoglobulin (Ig)G/IgM aPS/PT. During follow-up, symptomatic thromboembolic events were recorded.

RESULTS

Elevated IgG and IgM aPS/PT antibodies >30 international enzyme units (UI) were detected in 54.8% and 42.7% of APS patients, including 76.2% and 54% of lupus anticoagulant- (LA, n = 63) positive patients, respectively. Elevated IgG and IgM aPS/PT antibodies predicted low Ks (lower quartile, <6 × 10-9  cm2 ; odds ratio [OR] = 5.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09-16.82 and OR = 11.79, 95% CI 4.10-33.92) and prolonged CLT (top quartile, ≥116 min; OR = 4.85, 95% CI 2.42-25.07 and OR = 6.04, 95% CI 2.42-15.07). No such associations were observed for anticardiolipin or β2-glycoprotein I antibodies or LA presence. During follow-up (median 72.5, range 66-83 months), thromboembolic events observed in 32 (26.7%, 4.6%/year) patients were independently predicted by IgG aPS/PT antibodies >30 UI (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.04, 95% CI 1.20-8.88) and low Ks (HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.41-6.50).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified aPS/PT antibodies as a determinant of denser and poorly lysable plasma fibrin clot formation in APS patients. The association of elevated aPS/PT antibodies with thromboembolism in APS could be at least in part mediated by prothrombotic clot properties.