Investigation of anti-DFS70 antibody in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Clinical Significance of Antibodies to DFS70 in Immunoinflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

The relevance of the problem of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD) for modern medicine is determined by their high prevalence in the population, the difficulty of early diagnosis, the rapid development of disability and poor life prognosis. Recent data on the significance of anti-DFS70 have opened up new possibilities for optimizing the step-by-step diagnosis of IIRD. The detection of these antibodies can help in the interpretation of a positive result for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (IIFA-HEp-2) in the absence of autoantibodies specific for IIRD. Detection of anti-DFS70 in antinuclear factor (ANF) seropositive patients without clinical and/or serological markers characteristic of a certain disease from the IIRD group can be considered as a potential marker that excludes this group of diseases.

Dense fine speckled nuclear immunofluorescence: A mildly reassuring antinuclear antibody pattern meriting consideration

INTRODUCTION

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are regarded as a hallmark of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and play a key role in their diagnosis, but the value of some particular antibodies in management of patients and the disease prognosis is controversial. The mechanism underlying the production of ANAs in CTDs, other chronic inflammatory conditions and even in healthy people, is not completely elucidated. Anti-DFS70 antibodies connected with the dense fine speckled autoantigen of 70 kD, known as the lens epithelium-derived growth factor p75, are a subgroup of ANAs. Their presence and coexistence with other antibodies and their clinical significance are the matter of debate.

METHODS

Based on literature data, the authors focused on current knowledge explaining the role of anti-DFS70 antibodies in selected CTDs.

RESULTS

However, the literature data is ambiguous and does not fully support the validity of the anti-DFS70 assay for a specific CTD diagnosis. Most researchers claim that the presence of anti-DFS70 as the only one usually exclude the diagnosis of CTD. Nevertheless, its coexistence with other ANAs is not an excluding factor but has predictive value due to more favorable course of CTD. Such situations may also suggest an enhanced risk of the development of a CTD in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more studies are needed in this field, it seems reasonable to ascertain the presence of anti-DFS70 in routine clinical practice.

Anti-DFS70 Antibodies Are Associated With Proliferative Lupus Nephritis and Renal Pathological Activity

Objective

The significance of anti-dense fine speckles 70 (DFS70) antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still unclear, especially in lupus nephritis (LN) patients. We investigated the prevalence, clinical and pathological relevance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in LN patients.

Methods

Anti-DFS70 antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in 377 biopsy-proven LN patients, 268 non-LN SLE patients, 232 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and 78 healthy individuals (HI). Demographic, clinical, and pathological parameters were compared between LN patients with and without anti-DFS70 antibodies. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify covariates associated with anti-DFS70 antibodies.

Results

The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in LN (19.6%) was comparable to non-LN SLE patients (19.8%, P=0.9630), but was significantly higher than CKD patients (13.4%, P=0.0468) and HI (9.0%, P=0.0252). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, the titer of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies (adjusted odds ratio=1.002, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.003, P=0.004) was associated with positive anti-DFS70 antibodies in LN patients. In addition, anti-DFS70 antibodies were more prevalent in proliferative LN (22.0%, 68/309) compared to membrane LN patients (10.2%, 6/59, P=0.0376). Furthermore, LN patients with positive anti-DFS70 antibodies had significantly higher activity index (AI) compared to patients who were negative (8.0 vs 6.0, P=0.0131). However, the chronicity index was similar between the groups (3.0 vs 3.0, P=0.8412).

Conclusion

Anti-DFS70 antibodies were not associated with LN development in SLE patients but were associated with anti-dsDNA antibodies, proliferative LN, and renal AI. This suggests their potential to serve as a non-histological biomarker for LN subclass and activity status.

Autoantibodies to dense-fine-speckled 70 (DFS70) do not necessarily rule out connective tissue diseases

OBJECTIVES

In some patients with antinuclear antibodies (ANA), a pattern called anti-dense-fine-speckled-70 antibody (anti-DFS70) can be detected. Presence of anti-DFS70 is less frequently observed in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) and is therefore used as an exclusion criterion by some rheumatologists. To date, however, it is unclear as to what extent the presence of an anti-DFS70 can reliably rule out CTDs.

METHODS

Data of 460 patients who were tested for the presence of anti-DFS70 at University Hospital Bonn, Germany, were analyzed. Patients were examined with regard to clinical symptoms and signs, type of disease, type of CTD, fulfillment of the classification criteria, presence of anti-DFS70, other systemic autoantibodies and ANA titers by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assays and line immunoassays. Differences in DFS70 antibody status between patients with CTD were examined. In addition, specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive values for different ANA titers were calculated.

RESULTS

In 182 of the 460 patients (of whom 79.8% were female), CTD was diagnosed. 354 patients (77.0%) tested negative, 81 (17.6%) positive and 25 (5.4%) borderline for anti-DFS70. Twenty-one patients (25.9%) with a positive result had CTD. No significant differences were observed between anti-DFS70 positive and anti-DFS70 negative patients with CTD concerning age, gender, symptoms, clinical signs, and other disease-specific antibodies. However, of these 21 patients, only one patient showed the monospecific appearance of anti-DFS70. Anti-DFS70 had a sensitivity and a specificity of 26.9% and 86.8%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 68.2% at an ANA titer of ≥1:160 with respect to the absence of CTD.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoantibodies to DFS70 seem to be prevalent in CTD patients and are thus not a good exclusion criterion. The monospecific occurrence of anti-DFS70 can, however, be helpful in ambiguous situations.

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method in acute COVID-19 infection; future roadmap for laboratory diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

As in other viral infections, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) are observed in SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated the presence of autoantibodies in acute COVID-19 and the association with early laboratory findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 50 sera (>18 years, 25 Female) from patients with acute COVID-19. ANAs (HEp-20-10 liver biochip), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA, Europlus Granulocyte Mosaic 32) and anti-double stranded DNA were investigated with product of Euroimmune AG (Luebeck, Germany) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method. Also, antibody against cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) was examined by a chemiluminisens assay (Euroimmun AG, Luebeck, Germany). Samples from 50 blood bank donors collected before the COVID-19 pandemic were used as controls.

RESULTS

The IIF-ANA test was positive in 18% (N = 9/50) of the patients. The median time of sample collection was 7 days (range: 1-28 days) after diagnosis. ANA was positive in only one (2%) control sample. Five (55.5%) patients were ANA positive with a strong titer (3+). There was no relationship between antibody titration and time of sample collection (p = 0,55). Anti-CCP was detected in a nucleolar (3+) positive patient (2%). ANA was detected in 14.28% (N = 1/7, rods-rings (±), p = 0,78) of patients in the intensive care unit(ICU). Patients treated in the clinic have more and higher titers of ANA, mostly in nucleolar patterns, than ICU patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The variety of antibodies detected in acute COVID-19 and the uncertainty of how long they persist can lead to confusion, especially in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases for IIF-ANA testing in immunology laboratories. Improvements in cell lines and methods will facilitate the diagnostic process.

Antinuclear Autoantibodies in Health: Autoimmunity Is Not a Synonym of Autoimmune Disease

The incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing is a critical tool for their diagnosis. However, ANA prevalence in healthy persons has increased over the last decades, especially among young people. ANA in health occurs in low concentrations, with a prevalence up to 50% in some populations, which demands a cutoff revision. This review deals with the origin and probable physiological or compensatory function of ANA in health, according to the concept of immunological clearance, theory of autoimmune regulation of cell functions, and the concept of functional autoantibodies. Considering ANA titers ≤1:320 as a serological marker of autoimmune diseases seems inappropriate. The role of anti-DFS70/LEDGFp75 autoantibodies is highlighted as a possible anti-risk biomarker for autoimmune rheumatic disorders. ANA prevalence in health is different in various regions due to several underlying causes discussed in the review, all influencing additive combinations according to the concept of the mosaic of autoimmunity. Not only are titers, but also HEp-2 IFA) staining patterns, such as AC-2, important. Accepting autoantibodies as a kind of bioregulator, not only the upper, but also the lower borders of their normal range should be determined; not only their excess, but also a lack of them or "autoimmunodeficiency" could be the reason for disorders.

Twenty years of research on the DFS70/LEDGF autoantibody-autoantigen system: many lessons learned but still many questions

The discovery and initial characterization 20 years ago of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) presenting a dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear pattern with strong staining of mitotic chromosomes, detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay in HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IIFA test), has transformed our view on ANAs. Traditionally, ANAs have been considered as reporters of abnormal immunological events associated with the onset and progression of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), also called ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD), as well as clinical biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of these diseases. However, based on our current knowledge, it is not apparent that autoantibodies presenting the DFS IIF pattern fall into these categories. These antibodies invariably target a chromatin-associated protein designated as dense fine speckled protein of 70 kD (DFS70), also known as lens epithelium-derived growth factor protein of 75 kD (LEDGF/p75) and PC4 and SFRS1 Interacting protein 1 (PSIP1). This multi-functional protein, hereafter referred to as DFS70/LEDGF, plays important roles in the formation of transcription complexes in active chromatin, transcriptional activation of specific genes, regulation of mRNA splicing, DNA repair, and cellular survival against stress. Due to its multiple functions, it has emerged as a key protein contributing to several human pathologies, including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), leukemia, cancer, ocular diseases, and Rett syndrome. Unlike other ANAs, "monospecific" anti-DFS70/LEDGF autoantibodies (only detectable ANA in serum) are not associated with SARD and have been detected in healthy individuals and some patients with non-SARD inflammatory conditions. These observations have led to the hypotheses that these antibodies could be considered as negative biomarkers of SARD and might even play a protective or beneficial role. In spite of 20 years of research on this autoantibody-autoantigen system, its biological and clinical significance still remains enigmatic. Here we review the current state of knowledge of this system, focusing on the lessons learned and posing emerging questions that await further scrutiny as we continue our quest to unravel its significance and potential clinical and therapeutic utility.