A quality improvement intervention failed to significantly increase pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates in immunosuppressed inflammatory arthritis patients

Do Not Leave Your Patients in the Dark-Using American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Recommendations for Vaccination in Polish Adult Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

(1) Introduction: Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) face a higher infectious risk compared to the general population. As per the ACR and EULAR recommendations, vaccinations against influenza, COVID-19, pneumococci, and tetanus are recommended for most patients with AIIRD. (2) Objectives: This study aimed to assess vaccination coverage among Polish AIIRD patients and identify factors influencing it. (3) Patients and Methods: This study was conducted at the reference rheumatological center in Poland between May 2023 and October 2023. The study participants completed a questionnaire covering their knowledge of vaccination recommendations, actual vaccination status, factors affecting their decision to vaccinate, and their perspectives on immunization. (4) Results: This study involved 300 AIIRD patients and 60 controls. Both groups exhibited comparably low vaccination rates for all diseases (the highest for COVID-19-52% in both groups and the lowest for pneumococci-7.7% and 10%, respectively). Knowledge about recommended vaccinations was limited among patients in both groups. AIIRD patients were also not aware that they should avoid live vaccines. The primary motivators for vaccination among AIIRD patients were fear of infection (up to 75%) and medical advice (up to 74.6%). Conversely, the predominant reasons for non-vaccination were a lack of knowledge that vaccination is recommended (up to 74.7%) and concerns about potential adverse effects (up to 48.6%). Many patients reported not receiving vaccination recommendations from either primary care physicians or rheumatologists. (5) Conclusions: To enhance vaccination coverage among AIIRD patients in Poland, it is essential to educate them about vaccinations during routine medical consultations, emphasizing the increased risk of infection, informing them about recommended vaccinations, and clarifying doubts about adverse effects.

Interventions Increase Vaccination Rates in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with immune-mediated conditions such as IBD and RA are at risk for vaccine-preventable infections. Despite guideline recommendations, prior studies have shown suboptimal vaccination rates.

AIM

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the different interventions intended to increase vaccination rates.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library up to 2020 for studies with interventions intended to increase vaccination rates. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to generate pooled odds ratios (ORs) to assess all interventions against no interventions. Our primary outcome was pneumococcal vaccination (PCV) rate.

RESULTS

Our review found 8580 articles, for which 15 IBD and 8 RA articles met the inclusion criteria; 21 articles were included in the analysis. PCV was the predominant vaccination (91%). In our analysis of patients with IBD, almost all interventions (patient-oriented, physician-oriented, or barrier-oriented) increased PCV uptake [OR, 4.74; 95% CI, 2.44-6.56, I2 = 90%] compared to no intervention. The greatest effect was seen in barrier-oriented studies [OR, 12.68; 95% CI, 2.21-72.62, I2 = 92%]. For RA data, all interventions had increased PCV uptake compared to no interventions (OR 2.74; 95% CI, 1.80-4.17, I2 = 95%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that many different interventions can increase PCV rates. It appears that barrier-oriented interventions may have the greatest positive effect on increasing PCV uptake. However, clinicians should be encouraged to implement measures best suited to their practice. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the best approach to optimize vaccination rates.

Technology targeting immunocompromised patients for COVID-19 vaccine in community pharmacies

BACKGROUND

Medication targeting by community pharmacists may assess medical history of patients for recommendation of clinical services through review of their prescription history. Previous studies have implemented medication targeting to identify patients eligible for vaccine recommendations. Targeting of immunosuppressing medications may impact the rate of third primary doses of COVID-19 vaccine administered to immunocompromised patients.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the impact of medication targeting on the rate of third primary doses of COVID-19 vaccine given to immunocompromised patients.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective cohort study occurred within one division of a large community pharmacy chain. Included patients were greater than 18 years of age with record of at least one immunosuppressing medication dispensed one year prior to study enrollment and 2 primary COVID-19 vaccine doses in the pharmacy dispensing software. An intervention for pharmacist recommendation of a third primary dose of COVID-19 vaccine was automatically loaded into their prescription profiles. The proportion of patients with completed interventions and confirmation of third dose administration was collected with demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

The pharmacy dispensing software identified 1670 interventions through medication targeting, though 69 interventions met criteria for study inclusion. Baseline characteristics of the included population were a mean age of 51.8 years of primarily female sex (69.6%) and Caucasian race (78.3%). Third primary COVID-19 vaccine dose administration and completed pharmacist recommendation was recorded for 2 (2.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Medication targeting identified immunocompromised patients for the recommendation of a third primary dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Improved specification for targeting of dosing regimen and route of administration may result in greater accuracy of appropriate recommendations identified.

Facilitators and barriers of vaccine uptake in patients with autoimune inflammatory rheumatic disease: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) often have lower vaccination coverage rates compared with the general population, despite being disproportionately affected by infectious complications. We aim to systematically review the literature regarding vaccination willingness and hesitancy in AIRD.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library in June 2021. Study selection was performed by two independent reviewers and data were extracted using a standardised form. Risk of bias was assessed using instruments from McMaster University. Identified barriers were categorised into the WHO's measuring behavioural and social drivers (BeSD) of vaccination conceptual model.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1644 hits of which 30 publications were included (cross-sectional studies based on interviews (n=27) and intervention studies (n=3)). The majority of studies reported barriers to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination only (n=9) or in combination with another vaccination (n=8) from the patients' perspective. Only one study assessed the view of rheumatologists. Coverage of domains matched to the BeSD model suggests a lack of awareness of infection risk by both patients and physicians. Patients mainly mentioned behavioural and social factors that negatively influenced their willingness to be vaccinated while physicians mentioned organisational deficits as major barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The view on vaccination in patients with AIRD diverges between patients and rheumatologists. Our results show that in-depth counselling on vaccines is important for patients, whereas physicians need support in implementing specific immunisation recommendations. The themes identified provide a starting point for future interventions to improve vaccine rates in patients with AIRD.

WITHDRAWN: Technology targeting immunocompromised patients for COVID-19 vaccine in community pharmacies

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause.

The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

Assessing influenza vaccination coverage and predictors in persons living with HIV/AIDS in Louisiana, June 2002-June 2013

BACKGROUND

Despite the burden of disease and increased risk of influenza-associated morbidity and mortality among PLWHA, influenza vaccination has been understudied in this population.

METHODS

We built an 11-year cohort of HIV-infected adults from medical records of PLWHA seeking care within the Louisiana State University medical system from June 2002-June 2013. Influenza vaccination uptake among PLWHA was calculated overall and for each medical facility for each influenza season. Linear regression was used to assess influenza vaccination uptake over time, both overall and by facility. Data were restricted to the final influenza season (2012-13) to assess predictors of PLWHA vaccination. Individuals were nested within medical facilities in order to assess the amount of variability in influenza vaccination rates across medical facilities.

RESULTS

Influenza vaccination uptake among PLWHA increased over the study period (p < 0.01). The overall proportion of PLWHA vaccinated during the 2012-13 influenza season was 33.7%. 37.9% of the variability in the model occurred at the facility-level.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was an increase in influenza vaccination within the PLWHA cohort over the course of the study, vaccination rates remained low overall. Special efforts must be made to increase vaccination uptake among PLWHA, with particular focus on those within the population who are likely to be at highest risk. The substantial variability at the facility-level indicates that there are unmeasured facility-level factors that contribute significantly to PLWHA vaccination.

Predictors of Influenza Vaccination in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis 2017-2021: Results From the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort

Objective

Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a higher risk for infections, including influenza and related complications. We identified influenza vaccination coverage in adults newly diagnosed with RA and examined sociodemographic RA characteristics and attitudes associated with vaccination.

Methods

We used data from patients enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort between September 2017 and February 2021. At enrollment, participants reported their vaccination status in the previous year and completed the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Clinical data were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of vaccination in the year after RA diagnosis.

Results

The baseline analytic sample of 431 patients were mostly White (80%) women (67%) with a mean age of 56 (SD 14) years. Prediagnosis, influenza vaccine coverage was 38%, increasing to 46% post diagnosis in the longitudinal sample (n = 229). Participants with previous influenza vaccination (odds ratio [OR] 15.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.37‐36.90), on biologics or JAKs (OR 5.42; 95% CI 1.72‐17.03), and with a higher change in BMQ Necessity‐Concerns Differential scores (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.02‐1.15) had greater odds, whereas women (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.14‐0.71), participants with a non‐White racial background (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04‐0.51), and participants currently smoking (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02‐0.37) had lower odds of influenza vaccine coverage.

Conclusion

Influenza vaccination coverage in patients with early RA remains below national targets in adults living with a chronic condition. Discussing vaccine history and medication attitudes at initial clinic visits with new patients with RA may enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake.

Reporting standards, outcomes and costs of quality improvement studies in Ireland: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To profile the aims and characteristics of quality improvement (QI) initiatives conducted in Ireland, to review the quality of their reporting and to assess outcomes and costs.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Lenus and rian.ie. Two researchers independently screened abstracts (n=379) and separately reviewed 43 studies identified for inclusion using a 70-item critique tool. The tool was based on the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS), an appraisal instrument for QI intervention publications, and health economics reporting criteria. After reaching consensus, the final dataset was analysed using descriptive statistics. To support interpretations, findings were presented at a national stakeholder workshop.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

QI studies implemented and evaluated in Ireland and published between January 2015 and April 2020.

RESULTS

The 43 studies represented various QI interventions. Most studies were peer-reviewed publications (n=37), conducted in hospitals (n=38). Studies mainly aimed to improve the 'effectiveness' (65%), 'efficiency' (53%), 'timeliness' (47%) and 'safety' (44%) of care. Fewer aimed to improve 'patient-centredness' (30%), 'value for money' (23%) or 'staff well-being' (9%). No study aimed to increase 'equity'. Seventy per cent of studies described 14 of 16 QI-MQCS dimensions. Least often studies reported the 'penetration/reach' of an initiative and only 35% reported health outcomes. While 53% of studies expressed awareness of costs, only eight provided at least one quantifiable figure for costs or savings. No studies assessed the cost-effectiveness of the QI.

CONCLUSION

Irish QI studies included in our review demonstrate varied aims and high reporting standards. Strategies are needed to support greater stimulation and dissemination of QI beyond the hospital sector and awareness of equity issues as QI work. Systematic measurement and reporting of costs and outcomes can be facilitated by integrating principles of health economics in QI education and guidelines.

Increased influenza vaccination rates in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

To assess non-compliance and potential changes in seasonal flu vaccination coverage before and during the Covid-19 pandemic in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Consecutive patients with ARDs followed-up in 2 tertiary hospitals were telephone-interviewed (December 12–30, 2020) regarding seasonal flu vaccination during the 2019/20 and 2020/21 time periods. Self-reported disease flares that occurred after flu vaccination, as well as reasons for non-vaccination were recorded. One thousand fifteen patients were included. The rate of flu vaccination increased from 76% before to 83% during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.0001). The rate of self-reported disease flares was < 1% among vaccinated patients. Reasons for not vaccination in both periods, respectively, included: ‘was not recommended by their rheumatologists’ (35.0vs.12.2%, p < 0.0001), ‘did not feel that they would have any benefit’ (36.9 vs. 32.6%), felt unsafe to do so (27.5 vs. 30.2%), or other reasons (18.9 vs. 23.8%). By multivariate analysis, age [OR = 1.03 (95% CI 1.02–1.04)] vs. [1.04 (95% CI 1.02–1.05)] and treatment with biologics [OR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.22–2.24) vs. [1.68 (95% CI 1.19–2.38)] were independent factors associated with vaccination in both periods. These findings, although are temporally encouraging, emphasize the need for continuous campaigns aiming at increasing patients’ and physicians’ awareness about the benefits of vaccination.

Improving Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates in Rheumatology Patients by Using Best Practice Alerts in the Electronic Health Records

Objective

To improve pneumococcal vaccination (PV) rates among rheumatology clinic patients on immunosuppressive therapy in the outpatient settings.

Methods

This quality improvement project was based on the pre–post intervention design. Phase I of the project targeted patients with rheumatoid arthritis from 13 rheumatology clinics (January 2013–July 2015) on immunosuppressive therapy to receive the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). In the Phase II study (January 2016–October 2017), all patients on immunosuppressive medications regardless of diagnosis were targeted to receive PPSV23 and the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). The best practice alerts (BPAs) for both PVs were developed based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, which appeared on electronic medical records for eligible patients at the time of assessment by the medical assistant. The BPA was designed to inform the vaccination status and enable the physician to order the PV, or to document refusal or deferral reasons. Education regarding vaccine guidelines, BPAs, vaccination process, and regular feedback of results were important project interventions. The vaccination rates during pre–post intervention for each study phase were compared using chi-square test.

Results

During phase I, PPSV23 vaccination rates improved from a 28% preintervention rate to 61.5% (P < 0.0001). During phase II, 77.4% of patients had received either PPSV23, PCV13, or both, compared to 49.6% of patients in the preintervention period (P < 0.0001). The documentation rates (vaccine received, ordered, patient refusal and deferral reasons) increased significantly in both phases.

Conclusion

Electronic identification of vaccine eligibility and implementation of BPAs with capabilities to order and document resulted in significantly improved PV rates. The process has potential for self-sustainability and generalizability.

Infections in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Era of Targeted Synthetic Therapies

The third decade of the 21st century marks the beginning of a new era in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, after the introduction in clinical practice of different biologics in the first decade, three different oral synthetic targeted agents (JAK inhibitors) have been licensed for the treatment of RA, in patients who had failed or are intolerant to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Despite the significant progress that these agents bring to the care of RA patients, the risk of infections is still present and clear, given that their risk for serious infections is at least comparable with that of biologic DMARDs, whereas the incidence of herpes zoster is higher than that of bDMARDs. Here, we review the most recent data regarding the risk for serious and opportunistic infections in RA patients treated with biologics or JAK inhibitors, as well the up-to-date approach for managing and preventing such infections in RA patients.