1
|
Dahiya B, Mehta N, Soni A, Mehta PK. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2023; 23:561-582. [PMID: 37318829 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2223980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is an arduous task owing to different anatomical locations, unusual clinical presentations, and sparse bacillary load in clinical specimens. Although GeneXpert® MTB/RIF is a windfall in TB diagnostics including EPTB, it yields low sensitivities but high specificities in many EPTB specimens. To further improve the sensitivity of GeneXpert®, GeneXpert® Ultra, a fully nested real-time PCR targeting IS6110, IS1081 and rpoB (Rv0664) has been endorsed by the WHO (2017), wherein melt curve analysis is utilized to detect rifampicin-resistance (RIF-R). AREA COVERED We described the assay chemistry/work design of Xpert Ultra and evaluated its performance in several EPTB types, that is, TB lymphadenitis, TB pleuritis, TB meningitis, and so on, against the microbiological reference standard or composite reference standard. Notably, Xpert Ultra exhibited better sensitivities than Xpert, but mostly at the compensation of specificity values. Moreover, Xpert Ultra exhibited low false-negative and false-positive RIF-R results, compared with Xpert. We also detailed other molecular tests, that is, Truenat MTBTM/TruPlus, commercial real-time PCR, line probe assay, and so on, for EPTB diagnosis. EXPERT OPINION A combination of clinical features, imaging, histopathological findings, and Xpert Ultra are adequate for definite EPTB diagnosis so as to initiate an early anti-tubercular therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhawna Dahiya
- Centre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
| | - Neeru Mehta
- Department of Medical Electronics, Ambedkar Delhi Skill & Entrepreneurship University, Shakarpur, New Delhi, India
| | - Aishwarya Soni
- Centre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
- Department of Biotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal, Sonipat, India
| | - Promod K Mehta
- Centre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
- Microbiology Department, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, SGT University, Budhera, Gurgaon, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharma V, Singh A, Gaur M, Rawat D, Yadav A, Rajan, Kumar C, Varma-Basil M, Lohiya S, Khanna V, Khanna A, Chaudhry A, Singh Y, Misra R. Evaluating the efficacy of stool sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and its comparison with other sample types by meta-analysis for TB diagnostics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 41:893-906. [PMID: 35508741 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-022-04449-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Precise and timely detection of tuberculosis (TB) is crucial to reduce transmission. This study aims to assess the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on stool samples and systematically review the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with different sample types by meta-analysis. Stool samples of smear-negative pulmonary TB (PTB), cervical lymph node TB, and abdominal TB patients were tested on the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra system. Meta-analysis was performed on a set of 44 studies. Data were grouped by sample type, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra were calculated. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with stool samples was 100% for smear-negative PTB, 27.27% for cervical lymph node TB, and 50% for abdominal TB patients, with 100% specificity for all included TB groups. The summary estimate for all PTB samples showed 84.2% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity, and EPTB samples showed 88.6% sensitivity and 96.4% specificity. Among all sample types included in our meta-analysis, urine showed the best performance for EPTB diagnosis. This pilot study supports the use of stool as an alternative non-invasive sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for rapid testing, suitable for both PTB and EPTB diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishal Sharma
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Anoop Singh
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Mohita Gaur
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Deepti Rawat
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Anjali Yadav
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Rajan
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Chanchal Kumar
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Mandira Varma-Basil
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India
| | - Sheelu Lohiya
- Chest Clinic, Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, 110002, India
| | - Vishal Khanna
- Chest Clinic, Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, 110002, India
| | - Ashwani Khanna
- State TB Officer & In-Charge, Chest Clinic, Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, 110002, India
| | - Anil Chaudhry
- Rajan Babu Institute of Pulmonary Medicine and Tuberculosis, Kingsway Camp, Delhi, 110009, India
| | - Yogendra Singh
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
| | - Richa Misra
- Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India. .,Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
| |
Collapse
|