Assessment of fore-, mid-, and rear-foot alignment and their association with knee symptoms and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Determinants of Achilles tendon thickness and their influence on knee function and foot alignment in knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) significantly impacts the quality of life of individuals globally. However, the interconnections between Achilles tendon thickness, knee symptoms/functions, and foot alignment remain understudied in knee OA patients. This study determines the relationships between Achilles tendon thickness (ATT), knee symptoms/functions, and foot alignment in knee OA patients, considering their interconnected biomechanical nature. In a cross-sectional analysis involving 122 knee OA patients, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) assessed knee function and symptoms. Forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot alignment were measured using hallux valgus angle, navicular/foot ratio, and rearfoot angle. The navicular/foot ratio represented the ratio of navicular height to total foot length. ATT was measured using a digital calliper. Pearson correlations and stepwise multiple linear regression models were employed to explore relationships and determinants. Out of 122 participants, 88 (72.1%) were females. ATT correlated significantly with ankle range of motion, forefoot alignment, and midfoot alignment. In stepwise multivariable regression, ankle range of motion, navicular/foot ratio, and age were significantly associated with ATT (adjusted R2 = 0.44). Similarly, KOOS-Symptoms scores were linked to the OA severity, navicular/foot ratio, ankle range of motion, gastrocnemius strength, and age (adjusted R2 = 0.22). KOOS-Function scores were significantly associated with knee OA severity, gastrocnemius strength, ankle range of motion, and age (adjusted R2 = 0.19). Midfoot alignment was significantly associated with ATT and knee symptoms in patients with Knee OA. This suggests potential benefits of interventions targeting both Achilles tendon properties and foot alignment for improved knee OA outcomes.

Modifying loading during gait leads to biochemical changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein concentrations in a subgroup of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Strong observational evidence has linked changes in limb loading during walking following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). It remains unknown if manipulating peak loading influences joint tissue biochemistry. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine whether manipulating peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during gait influences changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP) concentrations in ACLR participants.

METHODS

Forty ACLR individuals participated in this randomized crossover study (48% female, age = 21.0 ± 4.4 years, BMI = 24.6 ± 3.1). Participants attended four sessions, wherein they completed one of four biofeedback conditions (habitual loading (no biofeedback), high loading (5% increase in vGRF), low loading (5% decrease in vGRF), and symmetrical loading (between-limb symmetry in vGRF)) while walking on a treadmill for 3000 steps. Serum was collected before (baseline), immediately (acute post), 1 h (1 h post), and 3.5 h (3.5 h post) following each condition. A comprehensive general linear mixed model was constructed to address the differences in sCOMP across all conditions and timepoints in all participants and a subgroup of sCOMP Increasers.

RESULTS

No sCOMP differences were found across the entire cohort. In the sCOMP Increasers, a significant time × condition interaction was found (F9,206 = 2.6, p = 0.009). sCOMP was lower during high loading than low loading (p = 0.009) acutely (acute post). At 3.5 h post, sCOMP was higher during habitual loading than symmetrical loading (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that manipulating lower limb loading in ACLR patients who habitually exhibit an acute increase in sCOMP following walking results in improved biochemical changes linked to cartilage health. Key Points • This study assesses the mechanistic link between lower limb load modification and joint tissue biochemistry at acute and delayed timepoints. • Real-time biofeedback provides a paradigm to experimentally assess the mechanistic link between loading and serum biomarkers. • Manipulating peak loading during gait resulted in a metabolic effect of lower sCOMP concentrations in a subgroup of ACLR individuals. • Peak loading modifications may provide an intervention strategy to mitigate the development of PTOA following ACLR.

Effect of Hind- and Fore-Foot Eversion on Positional and Rotational Displacement of the Knee in Standing Posture

We investigated the effects of hindfoot and forefoot eversion on the knee's positional and rotational displacement, plantar pressure, and foot discomfort in a standing posture, beyond the traditional focus on external knee adduction moments (EKAM) in lateral wedge insoles. Twenty-six healthy participants underwent hindfoot eversion from 0 to 10 degrees in 2-degree increments, and forefoot eversion from 0 degrees to the hindfoot eversion angle in 2-degree increments in a standing posture. At each eversion angle, the knee's medial displacement, EKAM's moment arm decrease, plantar pressure changes, and foot discomfort were obtained and compared across varying angles. Both hindfoot-only and entire-foot eversion led to significant medial knee displacement and the EKAM's moment arm decrease, with more pronounced effects in entire-foot eversion. At each hindfoot eversion angle, increasing forefoot eversion resulted in significant medial knee displacement and EKAM's moment arm decrease. Lower leg rotations were not significantly affected in hindfoot-only eversion but displayed significant medial tilting and internal rotation in entire-foot eversion at specific combinations. Varying eversion angles significantly influenced the forefoot pressure, with heel pressure remaining unaffected. Notably, the lateral forefoot pressure increased significantly as the forefoot eversion angle increased, particularly at higher hindfoot eversion angles. Foot discomfort increased significantly with higher eversion angles, particularly in entire-foot eversion, and also increased significantly as the forefoot eversion angle increased at higher hindfoot eversion angles. Insole configurations incorporating 6-10 degrees of hindfoot eversion and 40-60% forefoot eversion of the hindfoot angle may offer optimized biomechanical support for knee osteoarthritis patients.