The antimicrobial effect of thiamine dilauryl sulfate in tofu inoculated with Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus cereus

Sustainable bio-based antimicrobials derived from fatty acids: Synthesis, safety, and efficacy

Some conventional sanitizers and antibiotics used in food industry may be of concerns due to generation of toxic byproducts, impact on the environment, and the emergence of antibiotic resistance bacteria. Bio-based antimicrobials can be an alternative to conventional sanitizers since they are produced from renewable resources, and the bacterial resistance to these compounds is of less concern than those of currently used antibiotics. Among the bio-based antimicrobial compounds, those produced via either fermentation or chemical synthesis by covalently or electrovalently attaching specific moieties to the fatty acid have drawn attention in recent years. Disaccharide, arginine, vitamin B1, and phenolics are linked to fatty acids resulting in the production of sophorolipid, lauric arginate ethyl ester, thiamin dilauryl sulfate, and phenolic branched-chain fatty acid, respectively, all of which are reported to exhibit antimicrobial activity by targeting the cell membrane of the bacteria. Also, studies that applied these compounds as food preservatives by combining them with other compounds or treatments have been reviewed regarding extending the shelf life and inactivating foodborne pathogens of foods and food products. In addition, the phenolic branched-chain fatty acids, which are relatively new compounds compared to the others, are highlighted in this review.

Thiamine Demonstrates Bio-Preservative and Anti-Microbial Effects in Minced Beef Meat Storage and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Stimulated RAW 264.7 Macrophages

This study assessed the anti-inflammatory effect of thiamine (TA) in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 cells and also assessed the preservative properties of TA in minced beef. TA demonstrated a concentration-dependent antimicrobial effect on microbial contaminants. Inhibition zones and MIC from the effect of TA on the tested bacterial strains were respectively within the ranges 15−20 mm and 62.5−700 µg/mL. TA significantly (p < 0.05) decreased all the pro-inflammatory factors [(nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)] monitored relative to LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. TA inhibited the expression of both iNOS and COX-2. In minced beef flesh, the growth of Listeria monocytogenes was inhibited by TA. TA improved physicochemical and microbiological parameters of stored minced beef meat compared to control. Principal component analyses and heat maps elucidate the quality of the tested meats.

Inhibitory effect of ethanol and thiamine dilaurylsulfate against loosely, intermediately, and tightly attached mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium in chicken skin

The effects of 3 ethanol levels (30, 50, and 70%) with and without thiamine dilaurylsulfate (TDS; 1,000 ppm) were evaluated for the reduction of natural mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB), coliforms, and inoculated Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) in chicken skin. The chicken skin was inoculated with a 7 log cfu/mL suspension of S. Typhimurium. Loosely, intermediately, and tightly attached cells were recovered from chicken skin through shaking at 200 rpm for 5 min, stomaching for 1 min, and blending for 1 min, respectively. Increasing the ethanol concentration reduced the number of MAB, coliforms, and S. Typhimurium on the chicken skin, whereas TDS treatment without ethanol was not effective. Intermediately and tightly attached microorganisms (total MAB, coliforms, and S. Typhimurium) were more resistant to chemical disinfectants than loosely attached microorganisms. The combination of 70% ethanol with TDS was most effective than the combination of TDS with lower concentrations of ethanol in reducing populations of loosely, intermediately, and tightly attached MAB (by 1.88 log cfu/g, 1.21 log cfu/g, and 0.84 log cfu/g, respectively), coliforms (by 1.14 log cfu/g, 1.04 log cfu/g, and 0.67 log cfu/g, respectively), and S. Typhimurium (by 1.62 log cfu/g, 1.72 log cfu/g, and 1.27 log cfu/g, respectively). However, the chicken skin treated with higher concentrations of ethanol was tougher (P < 0.05) and more yellow and less red (P < 0.05) than that treated with lower concentrations of ethanol or with water (control). On the other hand, a combination of 30% ethanol and TDS yielded the best results, showing the reduction greater than 0.5 log cfu/g in S. Typhimurium, with no negative effect on chicken skin color or texture. Thus, a combination of 30% ethanol and TDS appears to be the optimal treatment for reducing microbial contamination of skin-on chicken products to enhance poultry safety without decreasing food quality, and this treatment could be applied in the poultry industry.